Conker vs Sonic SR (56k)

  • 116 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts






Can we all agree that Wii > xbox?


Avatar image for advertise_this
advertise_this

1208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 advertise_this
Member since 2006 • 1208 Posts
no ...
Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts
Conker has better textures.... dunno about the rest.
Avatar image for nintendogamer6
nintendogamer6

1772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 nintendogamer6
Member since 2006 • 1772 Posts

Whoever hasn't already agreed to that is just a complete moron

EDIT: Also SOnic has better lighting

Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
I do think Wii is superior than the Xbox in terms of graphical power but Conker looks excellent and the screens posted don't do it justice.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
Conker has better textures.... dunno about the rest.m_machine024
You mean Sonic isn't a fury mess and the textures aren't as blury? :)
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts
Conker was an N64 port (Of Bad Fur Day), not a "designed for Xbox" game. So yes....Wii>N64 (ports) But really, who buys a Wii for graphics? (and yes, I agree that Wii has more GFX potential than Xbox1)
Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts
I'm not sure that this comparison actually proves it,but we all should know that the Wii is more capable than the Xbox.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
Why Why Why...why does the Sonic pic look better than the Conker pic...give me three reasons
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
I do think Wii is superior than the Xbox in terms of graphical power but Conker looks excellent and the screens posted don't do it justice.the-very-best
And Sonic SR looks way better in motion that those screens. Is a very fast paced game designed to give speed sense.
Avatar image for HeedleGlavin
HeedleGlavin

15373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#11 HeedleGlavin
Member since 2005 • 15373 Posts
I do think Wii is superior than the Xbox in terms of graphical power but Conker looks excellent and the screens posted don't do it justice.the-very-best
Agreed, though I could say the same thing about Secret Rings. Those screens don't do it justice either.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts



Another comparison

Avatar image for HappyInvader101
HappyInvader101

3791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#14 HappyInvader101
Member since 2005 • 3791 Posts
Conker looks better than Sonic, Conker is very good looking game though.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
Conker looks better than Sonic, Conker is very good looking game though.HappyInvader101
No it don't.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
[QUOTE="HappyInvader101"]Conker looks better than Sonic, Conker is very good looking game though.loco145
No it don't.

Has better charecter models..lighting...enviorments...
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts



Another comparison

poopinloop32
That isn't a fair one. If you think mine are unfair then tell me why.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
[QUOTE="poopinloop32"]



Another comparison

loco145
That isn't a fair one. If you think mine are unfair then tell me why.

Yours are fair but why arent these?
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="HappyInvader101"]Conker looks better than Sonic, Conker is very good looking game though.poopinloop32
No it don't.

Has better charecter models..lighting...enviorments...

Ligthing? And enviroments? You have never played SOnic, you don't know anything about it.
Avatar image for vegnadragon
vegnadragon

346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 vegnadragon
Member since 2004 • 346 Posts

The point is, the wii still looks like previous gen, period. Whatever happen to gameplay>graphics?

Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
[QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="HappyInvader101"]Conker looks better than Sonic, Conker is very good looking game though.loco145
No it don't.

Has better charecter models..lighting...enviorments...

Ligthing? And enviroments? You have never played SOnic, you don't know anything about it.

yup Ive never played a Sonic before:roll:...and obvisouly you havent played Conker...what was the first leval
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"]



Another comparison

poopinloop32
That isn't a fair one. If you think mine are unfair then tell me why.

Yours are fair but why arent these?

Sonic is just runnig in and empty path without enemies on the screen.
Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts
No, Conker looks far better.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="HappyInvader101"]Conker looks better than Sonic, Conker is very good looking game though.poopinloop32
No it don't.

Has better charecter models..lighting...enviorments...

Ligthing? And enviroments? You have never played SOnic, you don't know anything about it.

yup Ive never played a Sonic before:roll:...and obvisouly you havent played Conker...what was the first leval

You are drunk and encounter a drunk scarecrow.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
[QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"]



Another comparison

loco145
That isn't a fair one. If you think mine are unfair then tell me why.

Yours are fair but why arent these?

Sonic is just runnig in and empty path without enemies on the screen.


here
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
[QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="HappyInvader101"]Conker looks better than Sonic, Conker is very good looking game though.loco145
No it don't.

Has better charecter models..lighting...enviorments...

Ligthing? And enviroments? You have never played SOnic, you don't know anything about it.

yup Ive never played a Sonic before:roll:...and obvisouly you havent played Conker...what was the first leval

You are drunk and encounter a drunk scarecrow.

Live and Reloded I meant
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"]



Another comparison

poopinloop32
That isn't a fair one. If you think mine are unfair then tell me why.

Yours are fair but why arent these?

Sonic is just runnig in and empty path without enemies on the screen.


here

You like the lava effect abscent here, don't you?
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
[QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"]



Another comparison

loco145
That isn't a fair one. If you think mine are unfair then tell me why.

Yours are fair but why arent these?

Sonic is just runnig in and empty path without enemies on the screen.


here

You like the lava effect abscent here, don't you?

Sorry not Lava pic is found on Gamespot
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
I do think Wii is superior than the Xbox in terms of graphical power but Conker looks excellent and the screens posted don't do it justice.the-very-best
agreed.Conker has better textures and nice fur effects......but those sonic screens look way better in motion.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
Sorry not Lava pic is found on Gamespotpoopinloop32
Tha'ts why i didn't included that Conker pic. :)  Sadly most Conker pics are from cutscenes.
Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"]Conker was an N64 port (Of Bad Fur Day), not a "designed for Xbox" game. So yes....Wii>N64 (ports) But really, who buys a Wii for graphics? (and yes, I agree that Wii has more GFX potential than Xbox1)

Wait, stop, hold up... Did you just say that Conker on Xbox was a port of the N64 game?
Avatar image for Tony_aaaa
Tony_aaaa

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Tony_aaaa
Member since 2007 • 475 Posts

[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"]Conker was an N64 port (Of Bad Fur Day), not a "designed for Xbox" game. So yes....Wii>N64 (ports) But really, who buys a Wii for graphics? (and yes, I agree that Wii has more GFX potential than Xbox1)General_X
Wait, stop, hold up... Did you just say that Conker on Xbox was a port of the N64 game?

Yes, the single player game IS N64's Conker's Bad Fur Day.

The multiplayer is (basically) new.

http://www.gamespot.com/n64/action/conkersbadfurday/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary

Avatar image for juanfraino
juanfraino

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 juanfraino
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts
Can we all agree that Wii > xbox?loco145
since day 1.
Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

Conker

http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/490/490304/vids_1.html

vs.

Sonic

http://media.wii.ign.com/media/800/800277/vids_2.html

Conker in motion looks better than Sonic. 

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

Conker

http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/490/490304/vids_1.html

vs.

Sonic

http://media.wii.ign.com/media/800/800277/vids_2.html

Conker in motion looks better than Sonic.

nnavidson
im not IGN insider.
Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"]Conker was an N64 port (Of Bad Fur Day), not a "designed for Xbox" game. So yes....Wii>N64 (ports) But really, who buys a Wii for graphics? (and yes, I agree that Wii has more GFX potential than Xbox1)

Actually, The Xbox Conker WAS designed for the Xbox. Do you think it would have taken as long as it did to release if it was simply a port? The entire game engine was redesigned to take advantage of the Xbox.
Avatar image for Optusnet
Optusnet

11065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#38 Optusnet
Member since 2003 • 11065 Posts

Sonic was in development for 1 year. Conker was in development for about 2-3 years. Sonic was released early in a console's life, whereas Conker was released quite late in Xbox's life.

Avatar image for Huxley_01
Huxley_01

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Huxley_01
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
the multiplayer portion of conker looks far greater actually.. show some conker mulitplayer pictures and it's not even fair.. actually most sites agreed that sonic is on the level of RE4.. Conker looked better than RE4.. so there..
Avatar image for Optusnet
Optusnet

11065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#40 Optusnet
Member since 2003 • 11065 Posts

[QUOTE="General_X"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"]Conker was an N64 port (Of Bad Fur Day), not a "designed for Xbox" game. So yes....Wii>N64 (ports) But really, who buys a Wii for graphics? (and yes, I agree that Wii has more GFX potential than Xbox1)Tony_aaaa

Wait, stop, hold up... Did you just say that Conker on Xbox was a port of the N64 game?

Yes, the single player game IS N64's Conker's Bad Fur Day.

The multiplayer is (basically) new.

http://www.gamespot.com/n64/action/conkersbadfurday/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary

You've got it all ballsed up. There's a difference between 'port' and 'remake'. Conker Live and Reloaded was a 'remake'.

Avatar image for akatsuki0wn3d
akatsuki0wn3d

1151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 akatsuki0wn3d
Member since 2006 • 1151 Posts
use better conker pictures conker >>> sonic
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
[QUOTE="Huxley_01"]the multiplayer portion of conker looks far greater actually.. show some conker mulitplayer pictures and it's not even fair.. actually most sites agreed that sonic is on the level of RE4.. Conker looked better than RE4.. so there..

!up said on Re4 level, Ign said better than anything on the GC. GS only said that  "The graphics are great in Sonic and the Secret Rings".
Avatar image for Krazy_duck
Krazy_duck

2301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 Krazy_duck
Member since 2006 • 2301 Posts
sonic isnt a game you can use pictures to descirbe.... the pees of the game makes it a lot easier to appreciate
Avatar image for general_KDI
general_KDI

1068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 general_KDI
Member since 2003 • 1068 Posts
So, you say it is normal that "late Xbox games" looks better than early Wii games? Sorry, but something I call "Next-Gen" must be better from the start. As I don't really care about the new controls, Wii isn't next-gen IMO. 
Avatar image for TheCrimsonKoopa
TheCrimsonKoopa

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 TheCrimsonKoopa
Member since 2006 • 2031 Posts

Conker

http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/490/490304/vids_1.html

vs.

Sonic

http://media.wii.ign.com/media/800/800277/vids_2.html

Conker in motion looks better than Sonic.

nnavidson


Agreed, Conker looks much better.
Avatar image for Syaoran
Syaoran

283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Syaoran
Member since 2004 • 283 Posts
[QUOTE="poopinloop32"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"]



Another comparison

loco145
That isn't a fair one. If you think mine are unfair then tell me why.

Yours are fair but why arent these?

Sonic is just runnig in and empty path without enemies on the screen.









Can we all agree that Wii > xbox?


poopinloop32


You did the same thing, talk about fair, i see no enemies but i do see better lightning so....

Avatar image for apolloluke
apolloluke

1273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 apolloluke
Member since 2006 • 1273 Posts
lol xbox pwned wii in this thread
Avatar image for console_fanboy
console_fanboy

595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 console_fanboy
Member since 2006 • 595 Posts
look, of course the Wii is more powerful than the xbox1. But Sonic SR looks like garbage, and doesnt defeat conker in the graphix department.
Avatar image for apolloluke
apolloluke

1273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 apolloluke
Member since 2006 • 1273 Posts
console fanboy: you need to update your sig. at one stage it was "dual 1080p 120fps".