[QUOTE="pimperjones"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]ermm..you clearly wrote Crytek lost 14mln. It's right there in your quote. You also wrote Crytek must have gotten sponsorship dollars. Both claims are dead wrong.Sorry kid, you got owned badly. Live with it
AdrianWerner
Point proven. I never said Cryptek has to pay EA 14 million, so STOP LYING. Losing 14 million dollars in potential profits has nothing to do with writing out a check for 14 mil. Get your facts straight. For as long as the Crysis ip makes money EA will continue to cash in on that minus 14 million dollar balance that Crytek has lost. And I continue to say LOST, because the money is coming out of their own IP royaltees. And yes Cryptek did recieve money from GPU companies. I still stick with that, cause that's what my friend told me, and I trust my friend more than some guy with an Go Dexter avatar. Thanks.
Since I've proven my point again, I'm going to sleep.
Ciao.
nice damage control. You wrote they lost 14mlns and would be crying if it wasn't for sponsorship money. Now you're trying to add stuff like "potential profits" that wasn't there in the first place. Stop your damage control, it's getting sad. Just admit you were wrong and be done with it.And you also lost any credibility you had with your "friend" comment
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5719&Itemid=39
"Sources very close to the company have said that the company spent some 4 to 5 million dollars in marketing. They didn't give the money, they simply spent it for marketing,."
No wonder you write nonsense, if you believe lies your friend (if he even exist in the first place) tells you.
When you are in minuses you LOSE MONEY.When you make a game that recieves no royaltees you cry.
When you take GPU kickbacks you act the way Cryptek does now.
End of story.
I can't stand a sore loser.
P.S When you grow up you will understand what kick backs mean. If a kick back is out in the open so any kid can find out about it, it ain't a kick back.
Log in to comment