Consoles "Stealing" Hardcore PC Gamers?

  • 174 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for goddamn_
goddamn_

884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 goddamn_
Member since 2008 • 884 Posts

I would never classify any game on a console, or any console only gamer as hardcore.Subcritical

Go to play Forza 2 and Ninja Gaiden instead all this stupid RTS

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]]:roll: Ofcourse ofcourse...forgot it's always by YOUR rules. -.-' The PC has way more casual games than consoles,the PC has a ton of casual players. Thats what the arguements about,which is home to more casual games...consoles or pc. Obviously,the PC.Vandalvideo
Why one earth would we be talking about flash games anyway? There are thousands upon thousands of Indie games out there, and theres nothing of the sort on consoles. I'm trying to have a fair comparison here. Mainstream market PC games are generally more hardcore than console games. Thats that, end of story.

When you say mainstream do you mean retail?Because it's a ton more of those on PC too.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#153 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]]:roll: Ofcourse ofcourse...forgot it's always by YOUR rules. -.-' The PC has way more casual games than consoles,the PC has a ton of casual players. Thats what the arguements about,which is home to more casual games...consoles or pc. Obviously,the PC.killab2oo5
Why one earth would we be talking about flash games anyway? There are thousands upon thousands of Indie games out there, and theres nothing of the sort on consoles. I'm trying to have a fair comparison here. Mainstream market PC games are generally more hardcore than console games. Thats that, end of story.

When you say mainstream do you mean retail?Because it's a ton more of those on PC too.

Theres are ton more games on PCs in general, and in general, the vast majority of retail games on the PC generally require much more dedication than console games.
Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#154 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts

Mark Rein thinks so. Discuss

While the heated (and pointless) console vs. PC argument rages on in Internet forums, even big PC advocates at Epic are picking the couch over the desktop.

"I'm a real fan of the PC, but yes, consoles are definitely stealing a lot of hardcore gamers from the PC," Rein told Guardian Unlimited's Keith Stuart

"When [Activision's] Call of Duty 4 came out, I heard some of our guys sitting around talking about the great game they'd had last night and I'm like, 'Hey guys, what server are you playing on? I'd love to come and join you,' and they said, 'Just send us a friends request.' It was at that point I realized they were all playing it on console. Plus, the sales of the console versions are something like ten times the sales of the PC versions.

Link

Deihmos

Why do you think Crytek is bringing their CryEngine 2 and Far Cry 2 to game consoles? Hermits think that just because some consoles don't have keyboard & mouse controls, that FPS can't be fun and exciting on game consoles. It can and the huge number of COD4 sales on the PS3 and XBox 360 proves this to be true.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]]:roll: Ofcourse ofcourse...forgot it's always by YOUR rules. -.-' The PC has way more casual games than consoles,the PC has a ton of casual players. Thats what the arguements about,which is home to more casual games...consoles or pc. Obviously,the PC.Vandalvideo
Why one earth would we be talking about flash games anyway? There are thousands upon thousands of Indie games out there, and theres nothing of the sort on consoles. I'm trying to have a fair comparison here. Mainstream market PC games are generally more hardcore than console games. Thats that, end of story.

When you say mainstream do you mean retail?Because it's a ton more of those on PC too.

Theres are ton more games on PCs in general, and in general, the vast majority of retail games on the PC generally require much more dedication than console games.

xD K,if you say so.
Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#156 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Yes, consoles, home of the casual games, is stealing hardcore PC gamers, used to the most hadrcore games known to man.....suuure.anshul89
What makes the PC so much more hard core? Genuinely curious.

customisation, better hardware, better online, better graphics, excellent library of games. Basically if someone had unlimited money, puts lots of hours into gaming and had to choose only one system, it has to be the pc.

That really depends on the person. There are a lot of rich celebraties that would rather play Madden on a game console, then on a PC. I don't remember seeing too many Madden tournaments hosted on the PC. As I've said in the past, having the best hardware, graphics or even library of games doesn't necessarily mean it's the best platform to play your games on.

Avatar image for DarxPhil
DarxPhil

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#157 DarxPhil
Member since 2007 • 1135 Posts

[QUOTE="anshul89"][QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Yes, consoles, home of the casual games, is stealing hardcore PC gamers, used to the most hadrcore games known to man.....suuure.XanderZane

What makes the PC so much more hard core? Genuinely curious.

customisation, better hardware, better online, better graphics, excellent library of games. Basically if someone had unlimited money, puts lots of hours into gaming and had to choose only one system, it has to be the pc.

That really depends on the person. There are a lot of rich celebraties that would rather play Madden on a game console, then on a PC. I don't remember seeing too many Madden tournaments hosted on the PC. As I've said in the past, having the best hardware, graphics or even library of games doesn't necessarily mean it's the best platform to play your games on.

1#. I hate Madden.

2#. Thats because a game like Madden can't be play well on a PC unless you have some kind of controller attachment, and whats the point of wasting cash when you have a console sitting right there. But thats because its a sports game.

Avatar image for Makemap
Makemap

3755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#158 Makemap
Member since 2007 • 3755 Posts

I find console gamers sometimes sad because there is no mods for them.:cry:

So when they get bored they buy a new game. PC Gamers actually takes forever to buy new games unless their is a really cool game coming out. With mods it makes online fun :D So they won't get bored.

Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#159 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts

Why do you think Crytek is bringing their CryEngine 2 and Far Cry 2 to game consoles? Hermits think that just because some consoles don't have keyboard & mouse controls, that FPS can't be fun and exciting on game consoles. It can and the huge number of COD4 sales on the PS3 and XBox 360 proves this to be true.

XanderZane

Correction: Ubisoft Montreal is developing Far Cry 2, not Crytek, who developed the original Far Cry and Crysis.
I agree with your statement that FPS games can be done well on consoles (I played a ton of TimeSplitters and Red Faction); however, I personally find them a little annoying to play at times because of the analog sticks, but that may be due to me coming from a PC gaming background where fast reactions and pin-point accuracy are essential.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts
[QUOTE="Deihmos"]

Mark Rein thinks so. Discuss

While the heated (and pointless) console vs. PC argument rages on in Internet forums, even big PC advocates at Epic are picking the couch over the desktop.

"I'm a real fan of the PC, but yes, consoles are definitely stealing a lot of hardcore gamers from the PC," Rein told Guardian Unlimited's Keith Stuart

"When [Activision's] Call of Duty 4 came out, I heard some of our guys sitting around talking about the great game they'd had last night and I'm like, 'Hey guys, what server are you playing on? I'd love to come and join you,' and they said, 'Just send us a friends request.' It was at that point I realized they were all playing it on console. Plus, the sales of the console versions are something like ten times the sales of the PC versions.

Link

XanderZane

Why do you think Crytek is bringing their CryEngine 2 and Far Cry 2 to game consoles? Hermits think that just because some consoles don't have keyboard & mouse controls, that FPS can't be fun and exciting on game consoles. It can and the huge number of COD4 sales on the PS3 and XBox 360 proves this to be true.

We never said it can't be fun on consoles. We just said that it's more fun on PC, but that's preference. :P

And Crytek is not making Far Cry 2, nice try though.

Avatar image for DarxPhil
DarxPhil

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#161 DarxPhil
Member since 2007 • 1135 Posts
[QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="Deihmos"]

Mark Rein thinks so. Discuss

While the heated (and pointless) console vs. PC argument rages on in Internet forums, even big PC advocates at Epic are picking the couch over the desktop.

"I'm a real fan of the PC, but yes, consoles are definitely stealing a lot of hardcore gamers from the PC," Rein told Guardian Unlimited's Keith Stuart

"When [Activision's] Call of Duty 4 came out, I heard some of our guys sitting around talking about the great game they'd had last night and I'm like, 'Hey guys, what server are you playing on? I'd love to come and join you,' and they said, 'Just send us a friends request.' It was at that point I realized they were all playing it on console. Plus, the sales of the console versions are something like ten times the sales of the PC versions.

Link

DragonfireXZ95

Why do you think Crytek is bringing their CryEngine 2 and Far Cry 2 to game consoles? Hermits think that just because some consoles don't have keyboard & mouse controls, that FPS can't be fun and exciting on game consoles. It can and the huge number of COD4 sales on the PS3 and XBox 360 proves this to be true.

We never said it can't be fun on consoles. We just said that it's more fun on PC, but that's preference. :P

And Crytek is not making Far Cry 2, nice try though.

Its your opinion( and mines) that Far Cry is better on PC. So it doesn't matter.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="Deihmos"]

Mark Rein thinks so. Discuss

While the heated (and pointless) console vs. PC argument rages on in Internet forums, even big PC advocates at Epic are picking the couch over the desktop.

"I'm a real fan of the PC, but yes, consoles are definitely stealing a lot of hardcore gamers from the PC," Rein told Guardian Unlimited's Keith Stuart

"When [Activision's] Call of Duty 4 came out, I heard some of our guys sitting around talking about the great game they'd had last night and I'm like, 'Hey guys, what server are you playing on? I'd love to come and join you,' and they said, 'Just send us a friends request.' It was at that point I realized they were all playing it on console. Plus, the sales of the console versions are something like ten times the sales of the PC versions.

Link

DarxPhil

Why do you think Crytek is bringing their CryEngine 2 and Far Cry 2 to game consoles? Hermits think that just because some consoles don't have keyboard & mouse controls, that FPS can't be fun and exciting on game consoles. It can and the huge number of COD4 sales on the PS3 and XBox 360 proves this to be true.

We never said it can't be fun on consoles. We just said that it's more fun on PC, but that's preference. :P

And Crytek is not making Far Cry 2, nice try though.

Its your opinion( and mines) that Far Cry is better on PC. So it doesn't matter.

Are you replying to the person above me? Because I agree with you.. lol

Avatar image for RKfromDownunder
RKfromDownunder

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 RKfromDownunder
Member since 2007 • 1463 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Yes, consoles, home of the casual games, is stealing hardcore PC gamers, used to the most hadrcore games known to man.....suuure.killab2oo5

You sure about that claim?PC has an unbelievable amount of online Flash games that people play,and large casual website like Yahoo games,Pogo,Zoogdisney...etc. Not to much all the casual games released for very little money like Roller Coaster Tycoon,Zoo Tycoon...etc.,unlimited amount of casual games are released on PC. I would even say that its more casualized than console gaming.

Yes, flash games, of course, why didn't I think of that! We're talking about mainstream market releases. The vast majority of major PC games require much more dedication.

:roll: Ofcourse ofcourse...forgot it's always by YOUR rules. -.-' The PC has way more casual games than consoles,the PC has a ton of casual players. Thats what the arguements about,which is home to more casual games...consoles or pc. Obviously,the PC.

Comparing flash games to comercial releases? Um, what the hell?

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#164 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]The PC can NOT provide the experience for the same amount of money, which I specifically addressed in my post. NOWHERE did I say the PC can't replicate the experience at all. I also never tried to say MY opinion was universal, and I believe used the phrase "to me" more than once. The PC can not provide the same experience at the same pricepoint for ME. I PREFER THE CONSOLE EXPERIENCE, that is not spewing crap, that is my opinion. Sure if I spend more money I can replicate things, but like I said IN MY OPINION the benefits are not worth the extra money or hassle. Is it that hard to understand? Steppy_76

The PC can provide the same experience for a relatively equal ammount of money. You don't need high end graphics to match consoles. "Consoles are equivalent to low end PCs" -Epic. You could buy a 640 dollar rig right now that would outperform consoles, and continue to do so the entire generation. Thanks to cheaper games, it will invariably end up being cheaper. The PC can provide the same experience. you can sit on the couch, use a gamepad, and play games for roughly a little extra, which is negated over the span of a generation. Sorry, but your antiquated knowledge is no longer applicable.

So, 640 bucks is now equal to 350? All games run off of the disc and you don't have to install them anymore? All games automatically will patch for you? You really think a 640 dollar PC is going to be keeping up with games a year or more from now? Let me see this 640 dollar PC too. How is the cost "negated" over a generation? You also seem to have problems reading. I'll try to say it again so you can understand.

To ME, the slight edge in visuals and the like is NOT worth the extra money, and hassle it takes to replicate the same experience I can already get simply by buying a console in the first place. Back in the days of SDTV, PC gaming's advantages TO ME were worth the extra money and effort...now TO ME it is not. The "edge" you speak of to me isn't worth 300 dollars...plain and simple.

Well..to me and most PC gamers consoles can't offer the same experience for smaller money. Sure...they are cheaper, but so what? I don't intend to have them just sit and gather dust, I intend to play on them. And with console games costing 30$ more than PC ones here in Europe consoles at very best are as expensive, in msot cases much more expesive than PCgaming. THe only way console gaming woullld be less expensive is if I hardly played at all, which kind of defeats the purpose

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#165 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Yes, consoles, home of the casual games, is stealing hardcore PC gamers, used to the most hadrcore games known to man.....suuure.killab2oo5
You sure about that claim?PC has an unbelievable amount of online Flash games that people play,and large casual website like Yahoo games,Pogo,Zoogdisney...etc. Not to much all the casual games released for very little money like Roller Coaster Tycoon,Zoo Tycoon...etc.,unlimited amount of casual games are released on PC. I would even say that its more casualized than console gaming.

PCgaming is preety diffrent. It has both gamez/gamers that are more casual than anything on consoles as well as games/gamers more hardcore than anything from console market

Avatar image for wok7
wok7

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 wok7
Member since 2003 • 2034 Posts
[QUOTE="Steppy_76"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]The PC can NOT provide the experience for the same amount of money, which I specifically addressed in my post. NOWHERE did I say the PC can't replicate the experience at all. I also never tried to say MY opinion was universal, and I believe used the phrase "to me" more than once. The PC can not provide the same experience at the same pricepoint for ME. I PREFER THE CONSOLE EXPERIENCE, that is not spewing crap, that is my opinion. Sure if I spend more money I can replicate things, but like I said IN MY OPINION the benefits are not worth the extra money or hassle. Is it that hard to understand? AdrianWerner

The PC can provide the same experience for a relatively equal ammount of money. You don't need high end graphics to match consoles. "Consoles are equivalent to low end PCs" -Epic. You could buy a 640 dollar rig right now that would outperform consoles, and continue to do so the entire generation. Thanks to cheaper games, it will invariably end up being cheaper. The PC can provide the same experience. you can sit on the couch, use a gamepad, and play games for roughly a little extra, which is negated over the span of a generation. Sorry, but your antiquated knowledge is no longer applicable.

So, 640 bucks is now equal to 350? All games run off of the disc and you don't have to install them anymore? All games automatically will patch for you? You really think a 640 dollar PC is going to be keeping up with games a year or more from now? Let me see this 640 dollar PC too. How is the cost "negated" over a generation? You also seem to have problems reading. I'll try to say it again so you can understand.

To ME, the slight edge in visuals and the like is NOT worth the extra money, and hassle it takes to replicate the same experience I can already get simply by buying a console in the first place. Back in the days of SDTV, PC gaming's advantages TO ME were worth the extra money and effort...now TO ME it is not. The "edge" you speak of to me isn't worth 300 dollars...plain and simple.

Well..to me and most PC gamers consoles can't offer the same experience for smaller money. Sure...they are cheaper, but so what? I don't intend to have them just sit and gather dust, I intend to play on them. And with console games costing 30$ more than PC ones here in Europe consoles at very best are as expensive, in msot cases much more expesive than PCgaming. THe only way console gaming woullld be less expensive is if I hardly played at all, which kind of defeats the purpose

Not to mention that the Europeans get shafted for consoles by much later release dates than the US and Japan.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#167 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]They don't need money, they just want more. goddamn_

Looking Glass, Sirtech, UFO creators and many others did need money. That's why they closed the doors and nobody will play new Thief, UFO, Jagged Alience, Wizardry and so on

Actualy LGS, Microprose and SirTech were all closed down due to failed investments and canceled games, not their actual released games selling badly. Jagged Alliance2 and Thief 1 and 2 were big financial suceseses and were the only reason why LGS and SirTech didn't go bancrupt years before. Oh...and there is Jagged Alliance 3 in development right now and some SirTech guys are acting as advisors on it.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#168 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]Sometimes, Mark Rein says smart things, but other times, its like he is talking out of his a$$. I have been a harcore pc gamer now for almost 11 years and never once have I considered becoming a console gamer. I certainly tried, but I cannot stand playing on a controller. I make exceptions to playing with friends on consoles but I don't see myself owning one any time soon.Steppy_76
I was a hardcore PC gamer from the days of the genesis until the later stages of the PS2/Xbox gen. At some point I realized I was spending more money on hardware, and not gaming all that much...optimizing and benchmarking yes, actually PLAYING games no. It did take a while to get used to FPS's on a gamepad, but once this gen came with HD all the time...it was over. Sitting on my couch, controller in hand, 56" HD display, 7 channel surround sound on my home theater OWNS sitting in my PC chair with my PC monitor. Once consoles got in HD, the mundane differences between the platforms wasn't worth the WAY more comfortable environment of console gaming.

I doubt you were hardcore pcgamer. If the only thing you'veplayed are casual FPSes on PC.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#169 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts
[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]The PC can NOT provide the experience for the same amount of money, which I specifically addressed in my post. NOWHERE did I say the PC can't replicate the experience at all. I also never tried to say MY opinion was universal, and I believe used the phrase "to me" more than once. The PC can not provide the same experience at the same pricepoint for ME. I PREFER THE CONSOLE EXPERIENCE, that is not spewing crap, that is my opinion. Sure if I spend more money I can replicate things, but like I said IN MY OPINION the benefits are not worth the extra money or hassle. Is it that hard to understand? wok7

The PC can provide the same experience for a relatively equal ammount of money. You don't need high end graphics to match consoles. "Consoles are equivalent to low end PCs" -Epic. You could buy a 640 dollar rig right now that would outperform consoles, and continue to do so the entire generation. Thanks to cheaper games, it will invariably end up being cheaper. The PC can provide the same experience. you can sit on the couch, use a gamepad, and play games for roughly a little extra, which is negated over the span of a generation. Sorry, but your antiquated knowledge is no longer applicable.

So, 640 bucks is now equal to 350? All games run off of the disc and you don't have to install them anymore? All games automatically will patch for you? You really think a 640 dollar PC is going to be keeping up with games a year or more from now? Let me see this 640 dollar PC too. How is the cost "negated" over a generation? You also seem to have problems reading. I'll try to say it again so you can understand.

To ME, the slight edge in visuals and the like is NOT worth the extra money, and hassle it takes to replicate the same experience I can already get simply by buying a console in the first place. Back in the days of SDTV, PC gaming's advantages TO ME were worth the extra money and effort...now TO ME it is not. The "edge" you speak of to me isn't worth 300 dollars...plain and simple.

Well..to me and most PC gamers consoles can't offer the same experience for smaller money. Sure...they are cheaper, but so what? I don't intend to have them just sit and gather dust, I intend to play on them. And with console games costing 30$ more than PC ones here in Europe consoles at very best are as expensive, in msot cases much more expesive than PCgaming. THe only way console gaming woullld be less expensive is if I hardly played at all, which kind of defeats the purpose

Not to mention that the Europeans get shafted for consoles by much later release dates than the US and Japan.

It's the same with PCgaming, US gamers are getting more and more shafted each year by much later release dates than Europe. It's getting quite common to see PCgame being released in Europe 6-12 months before US debut

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

I doubt you were hardcore pcgamer. If the only thing you'veplayed are casual FPSes on PC.

AdrianWerner
Is this the only argument you guys have anymore? "You must be pretending to have been a PC gamer." This is the second time someone's used it in this thread. Hell, the last guy even accused me of lying about my job.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#171 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts
[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

I doubt you were hardcore pcgamer. If the only thing you'veplayed are casual FPSes on PC.

lowe0

Is this the only argument you guys have anymore? "You must be pretending to have been a PC gamer." This is the second time someone's used it in this thread. Hell, the last guy even accused me of lying about my job.

it's true. Either that or he completely changed his gaming taste when moving to consoles. As the hardcore pcgames generaly aren't avaible on consoles. I'm not saying he wasn't a pcgamer, I'm saying he wasn't really a hardcore one.

Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#172 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts

[QUOTE="Steppy_76"][QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]Sometimes, Mark Rein says smart things, but other times, its like he is talking out of his a$$. I have been a harcore pc gamer now for almost 11 years and never once have I considered becoming a console gamer. I certainly tried, but I cannot stand playing on a controller. I make exceptions to playing with friends on consoles but I don't see myself owning one any time soon.AdrianWerner

I was a hardcore PC gamer from the days of the genesis until the later stages of the PS2/Xbox gen. At some point I realized I was spending more money on hardware, and not gaming all that much...optimizing and benchmarking yes, actually PLAYING games no. It did take a while to get used to FPS's on a gamepad, but once this gen came with HD all the time...it was over. Sitting on my couch, controller in hand, 56" HD display, 7 channel surround sound on my home theater OWNS sitting in my PC chair with my PC monitor. Once consoles got in HD, the mundane differences between the platforms wasn't worth the WAY more comfortable environment of console gaming.

I doubt you were hardcore pcgamer. If the only thing you'veplayed are casual FPSes on PC.

Yeah, I guess I don't remember hooking up a couple of 486's(Do you even know what a 486 was?) and using a serial cable to get multiplayer Doom matches. I never played Rise of the Triad, or Shadow Warrior, or Blood, or Duke Nukem 3D, or the Quake series, or Half Life, or Wolfenstein, or Deus Ex...nope never played undying either. Hmm, I must not have been the one to blow 300 bucks on a Rendition Verite 3d Accelerator, or getting my Voodoo 2, or my TNT2 Ultra, nor any of those Radeons I got over the years. The majority of games I played were FPS's, TPS's, flight sims, racers, sports games, action games, RPG's, adventure games(King's Quests, Space Quests, Quest for Glory, Loom, etc)with a few RTS's sprinkled in. Lo and behold there are games on the console to fill most of those needs(with the exception of the adventure games, but those aren't coming out much anymore on the PC either). I started gaming on an Atari 2600, had a commodore 64, then got a nintendo and real PC. I got a Genesis, and after that I was ONLY a PC gamer until I got an Xbox in 2003. I still gamed mostly on the PC, and got an HDTV in early 2004 in anticipation of the new consoles coming. Once I saw HD consoles in action my gaming very quickly switched over to consoles rather than dumping more money into my PC for what TO ME is a marginal improvement over what the console could give me, and I wouldn't be dumping money into the console on a yearly basis like I would and HAD been with my PC.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#173 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

Yeah, I guess I don't remember hooking up a couple of 486's(Do you even know what a 486 was?) and using a serial cable to get multiplayer Doom matches. I never played Rise of the Triad, or Shadow Warrior, or Blood, or Duke Nukem 3D, or the Quake series, or Half Life, or Wolfenstein, or Deus Ex...nope never played undying either. Hmm, I must not have been the one to blow 300 bucks on a Rendition Verite 3d Accelerator, or getting my Voodoo 2, or my TNT2 Ultra, nor any of those Radeons I got over the years. The majority of games I played were FPS's, TPS's, flight sims, racers, sports games, action games, RPG's, adventure games(King's Quests, Space Quests, Quest for Glory, Loom, etc)with a few RTS's sprinkled in. Lo and behold there are games on the console to fill most of those needs(with the exception of the adventure games, but those aren't coming out much anymore on the PC either). I started gaming on an Atari 2600, had a commodore 64, then got a nintendo and real PC. I got a Genesis, and after that I was ONLY a PC gamer until I got an Xbox in 2003. I still gamed mostly on the PC, and got an HDTV in early 2004 in anticipation of the new consoles coming. Once I saw HD consoles in action my gaming very quickly switched over to consoles rather than dumping more money into my PC for what TO ME is a marginal improvement over what the console could give me, and I wouldn't be dumping money into the console on a yearly basis like I would and HAD been with my PC. Steppy_76

See..you've lost all those hardcore games and you're still happy, you don't miss them at all.. So as you can see you were not hardcore pcgamer. And no console don't offer equivalent of hardcore games from any of the genre you've named.

There's nothing wrong with that. I don;t know why you're getting so worked up. Just because you weren't hardcore pcgamer doesn't mean you're casual or something.

Avatar image for DarxPhil
DarxPhil

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#174 DarxPhil
Member since 2007 • 1135 Posts
[QUOTE="DarxPhil"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="Deihmos"]

Mark Rein thinks so. Discuss

While the heated (and pointless) console vs. PC argument rages on in Internet forums, even big PC advocates at Epic are picking the couch over the desktop.

"I'm a real fan of the PC, but yes, consoles are definitely stealing a lot of hardcore gamers from the PC," Rein told Guardian Unlimited's Keith Stuart

"When [Activision's] Call of Duty 4 came out, I heard some of our guys sitting around talking about the great game they'd had last night and I'm like, 'Hey guys, what server are you playing on? I'd love to come and join you,' and they said, 'Just send us a friends request.' It was at that point I realized they were all playing it on console. Plus, the sales of the console versions are something like ten times the sales of the PC versions.

Link

DragonfireXZ95

Why do you think Crytek is bringing their CryEngine 2 and Far Cry 2 to game consoles? Hermits think that just because some consoles don't have keyboard & mouse controls, that FPS can't be fun and exciting on game consoles. It can and the huge number of COD4 sales on the PS3 and XBox 360 proves this to be true.

We never said it can't be fun on consoles. We just said that it's more fun on PC, but that's preference. :P

And Crytek is not making Far Cry 2, nice try though.

Its your opinion( and mines) that Far Cry is better on PC. So it doesn't matter.

Are you replying to the person above me? Because I agree with you.. lol

Yep.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Yes, consoles, home of the casual games, is stealing hardcore PC gamers, used to the most hadrcore games known to man.....suuure.RKfromDownunder

You sure about that claim?PC has an unbelievable amount of online Flash games that people play,and large casual website like Yahoo games,Pogo,Zoogdisney...etc. Not to much all the casual games released for very little money like Roller Coaster Tycoon,Zoo Tycoon...etc.,unlimited amount of casual games are released on PC. I would even say that its more casualized than console gaming.

Yes, flash games, of course, why didn't I think of that! We're talking about mainstream market releases. The vast majority of major PC games require much more dedication.

:roll: Ofcourse ofcourse...forgot it's always by YOUR rules. -.-' The PC has way more casual games than consoles,the PC has a ton of casual players. Thats what the arguements about,which is home to more casual games...consoles or pc. Obviously,the PC.

Comparing flash games to comercial releases? Um, what the hell?

:roll: Do you think I read minds? He never specified whether he was talking about commercial games only...he only said games.