[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"] [QUOTE="raualex"]The only time I see Killzone + hype these days is when Lems ask cows to stop hyping the game. Kinda getting the feeling that the lems actually think this game is hyped more than what it is ;)a_ratchet_fan
..Exactly, its being hyped WAY MORE than it should be. Any hype, is to much hype, for Killzone.
Â
LOL, I don't think you understood his point. He's saying that lems, like YOU, are blowing Killzone's hype more out of proportion than cows are.
Â
And again, if you're going to compare a Halo game released in 2007 that got updated quite a bit, you should compare it to a Killzone game that was released in 2006 to much more acclaim (8.3)Â
I understand his point perfectly, my point is that the hype behind Killzone(or lack thereof) is to much, plain and simple, easy as pie, peice of cake!
[QUOTE="jessesalinas"][QUOTE="a_ratchet_fan"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"] Why do cows hype Killzone? Is'nt that like hyping a flop? What basis and foundation does your hype come from...? Killzone PS2 or the E3 trailer cause if its being hyped from the 2 mintues trailer rather than the game, that should tell you how sucky the game itself was.
Whats even worse is that in November of 2004 cows hyped Killzone to be "teh Halo killa" Even Adam Sessler mentioned its purpose in which it failed at. Halo 2 destroyed Killzone and owned every cow that hyped it, now in 2007, in the brink Halo 2 PC, history has repeat itself. Halo 2 managed to own Killzone again despite being a substandard, 2.7 year old port.
Halo 2 2004:
Halo 2 2007:
Killzone 2004:
Cows where parading around with their 'lemming ownage' threads when reality is that they have been owned....for a SECOND TIME..by the SAME GAME:lol:, now thats ownage. Cows should be ashamed to hype this game, this game should'nt even be released because of the embarresment you cows suffered. Does Sony not care for their fanatics, why lead cows to the slaughter house for a 3rd time?
Just to be fair though, they should port Killzone to PC. I wonder how it will fair on the king platform of FPS'. A god of the console FPS' got made into a peasant, I wonder what the peasant of console FPS' would get made into?
a_ratchet_fan
Â
First off, Killzone was NOT a bad game. It was only hyped too much. Second, if you're going to compare a Halo game that was released in 2007 to a killzone game, you should be comparing it to the latest killzone release, Killzone: Liberation, which got an 8.3. 8.3>7
Â
Edit: In KZ: L, they already fixed the flaws from the first game. Now it's just a matter of building its solid base into something special.
Please tell me you're not Comparing a PSP game to a PC game..Â
Â
Â
LOL... Did you read the (Halo 2) PC review at all?! It got such a s*** score because it SUCKED compared to all the PC FPS games! In other words, you have a PSP game that was recognized for it's awesome cover system and fun gunplay while you have a fullblown updated PC game that was written off as terrible. Under no circumstances can you inflate Halo 2 PC's 7.0 above KZ: L's 8.3. Not happening.
You answered yourself perfectly really "It sucked compared to all the PC FPS games" So why would you compare it to a PSP game that is not a FPS? Under no circumstance can you compare two games on two different platforms with much greater standards.
Log in to comment