Crysis 2 and RAGE are proof that the 360 is more powerful then the PS3 (no 56K)

Crysis 2 and RAGE are the next console graphics kings (and IMO we will not see a better looking games this gen)

and last IGN videos show that the 360 ver looks and run much better then the PS3 ver

and also RAGE run at 60FPS on the 360 and only 30-20FPS on the PS3.

cows say that the PS3 is more powerful becusegame like U2 andKZ2, so we havehere 2 game that looks much much better then U2 and KZ2

and thay run better on the 360, thisis proof that the PS3 is not more powerful then the 360.

proof that the 360 ver looks better:

They're the same.

Crysis 2 and RAGE are the next console graphics kings (and IMO we will not see a better looking games this gen)

and last IGN videos show that the 360 ver looks and run much better then the PS3 ver

and also RAGErunat 60FPS on the 360 and only 30-20FPS on the PS3.

cows say that the PS3 is more powerful becusegame like U2 andKZ2, so we havehere 2 game that looks much much better then U2 and KZ2

and thay run better on the 360, thisis proof that the PS3 is notmore powerful then the 360.

They're the same.

EndorphinMaster

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

They're the same.

Brownesque

Well they did update that RAGE is 60 FPS on the PS3 also.

What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?Brownesque

What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?Brownesque

Exactly and that Crytek developer has even said nobody has pushed the ps3 to it's peak yet. Also like you said only exclusives are a good way to tell the difference.

Crysis 2 and RAGE are the next console graphics kings (and IMO we will not see a better looking games this gen)

and last IGN videos show that the 360 ver looks and run much better then the PS3 ver

and also RAGE run at 60FPS on the 360 and only 30-20FPS on the PS3.

cows say that the PS3 is more powerful becusegame like U2 andKZ2, so we havehere 2 game that looks much much better then U2 and KZ2

and thay run better on the 360, thisis proof that the PS3 is notmore powerful then the 360.

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

They're the same.

Brownesque

What? :? Both versions of Rage will be running at 60fps, and the Crysis 2 comparison shows no difference between the 2 versions.

[QUOTE="Brownesque"]What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?Shattered007

Every demo that I have seen has show Cry Engine 2 to look slightly better on the PS3, and John Carmack (programing and hardware god) has said several times that the PS3 is the slightly more powerful console, albeit harder to develop for, and has also stated that Blu-Ray is a large advantage when using his new texturing methods.

[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

They're the same.

Yandere

Well they did update that RAGE is 60 FPS on the PS3 also.

What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?Brownesque

Every demo that I have seen has show Cry Engine 2 to look slightly better on the PS3, and John Carmack (programing and hardware god) has said several times that the PS3 is the slightly more powerful console, albeit harder to develop for, and has also stated that Blu-Ray is a large advantage when using his new texturing methods.

evilross

[QUOTE="Brownesque"]What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?Nisim19

Every demo that I have seen has show Cry Engine 2 to look slightly better on the PS3, and John Carmack (programing and hardware god) has said several times that the PS3 is the slightly more powerful console, albeit harder to develop for, and has also stated that Blu-Ray is a large advantage when using his new texturing methods.

Uncharted 2/Killzone 2 = Crysis 2 >>>> RAGE

Also, RAGE is going to be 60 FPS across both platforms.

.....funny because cevat himself said that the ps3 is THE superior system for them.dakan45

[QUOTE="dakan45"].....funny because cevat himself said that the ps3 is THE superior system for them.Nisim19

According to whom??

Uncharted 2/Killzone 2 = Crysis 2 >>>> RAGE

Also, RAGE is going to be 60 FPS across both platforms.

urdead18

ps3 bashers are out in a full force since ps3 got a price drop..

They are also proof of how much more capable the PC is.

[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

They're the same.

EndorphinMaster

What? :? Both versions of Rage will be running at 60fps, and the Crysis 2 comparison shows no difference between the 2 versions.

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

They're the same.

Brownesque

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Uncharted 2/Killzone 2 = Crysis 2 >>>> RAGE

Also, RAGE is going to be 60 FPS across both platforms.

Nisim19

[QUOTE="Nisim19"][QUOTE="dakan45"].....funny because cevat himself said that the ps3 is THE superior system for them.EndorphinMaster

According to whom??

They are also proof of how much more capable the PC is.

Wasdie

[QUOTE="Shattered007"][QUOTE="Brownesque"]What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?darthogre

They're the same.

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Uncharted 2/Killzone 2 = Crysis 2 >>>> RAGE

Also, RAGE is going to be 60 FPS across both platforms.

[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

They're the same.

2mrw

ya like all multiplat games

lol from what i seen they look equal this topics nothing more than typical petty mud slinging especially since TC has been seen frequently bashing the PS3 oh they joy...its showing your credibility

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

[QUOTE="Nisim19"] funny still the game looks and run better on the 360Nisim19

According to whom??

They are both equally inferior to the PC version.anolecrabcf

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Nisim19"] U2 and KZ2 looks like a last gen games comper to CRYSIS 2 and RAGE

Nisim19

I think Uncharted 2 is equal.

[QUOTE="Brownesque"]What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?Nisim19

I just watched the video again pausing a million times and the only difference is the lighting. The 360 version seems darker... They both also ran the same, but they ran weird because there was lag between what he was doing on the pc and what was displaying on the consoles.

How can we even judge? All we have of Crysis 2 are some off screen vids of the engine, not the actual game...and the one vid that is direct feed shows them to be nearly identical. AAllxxjjnn

[QUOTE="Nisim19"][QUOTE="Brownesque"]What IGN videos show that the 360 version looks better? I've been watching the Cryengine 3 comparison videos since they came out and every one of them looked better on the PS3 side. You're going to have to link them. Not to mention the fact that Carmack said that the PS3 version would get up to nearly the same framerate. Not to mention that those games are not even remotely close to the graphics things from the looks of things.....I'd say that Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, or Gran Turismo 5 have it by a very, very large margin. Crysis 2 looks like butt on consoles, roughly equal to medium settings Crysis 1. That and multiplatform titles aren't the truest indicators of a consoles peak performance, particularly in the case of the Playstation 3, which requires a bit more optimized coding to get the greatest degree of efficiency out of the processors. Exactly how many of the PS3's 6 parallel processors are being utilized in either Crysis 2 or Rage at any given time?bigblunt537

I just watched the video again pausing a million times and the only difference is the lighting. The 360 version seems darker... They both also ran the same, but they ran weird because there was lag between what he was doing on the pc and what was displaying on the consoles.

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]How can we even judge? All we have of Crysis 2 are some off screen vids of the engine, not the actual game...and the one vid that is direct feed shows them to be nearly identical. Nisim19

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]How can we even judge? All we have of Crysis 2 are some off screen vids of the engine, not the actual game...and the one vid that is direct feed shows them to be nearly identical. Nisim19

eh both look the same i watched both.......and how can your eyes differentiate the FPS as its impossible for the human eye to differentiate in Frames per second unless at low levels.or there is a drastic change like 30 to 60......seriously doesnt give you a good case besides both arent actually seen running BY yourself and naturally both are flash based media videos not till i see at least an SD high quality feed i wont really change my case.

And the part bout the foam on the beach who in green hell is gonna notice it unless your some 13 year old kid defending a console with a hardon the size of blackpool tower for chrissakes.

[QUOTE="bigblunt537"]

[QUOTE="Nisim19"] links: part 1: http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/dor/articles/1014410/gc-2009-cry-engine-3-demo/videos/gcom09act_crytekdemo_p1_081709.html part 2: http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/dor/articles/1014410/gc-2009-cry-engine-3-demo/videos/gcom09act_crytekdemo_p2_081709.html the 360 ver looks and run much better and its looks better then any game on consoles and i dont think that we will see a better looking games then crysis 2 or rage crysis 2 is realy mex out the 360 and the PS3.Nisim19

I just watched the video again pausing a million times and the only difference is the lighting. The 360 version seems darker... They both also ran the same, but they ran weird because there was lag between what he was doing on the pc and what was displaying on the consoles.

They look identical. The only thing the 360 is doing better is the lighting... Quit being a fanboy both will look great on both consoles although i will be buying mine on pc.

the 360 version does look better i mean its more noticeable when your in the corridor the lighting is better on the 360... but the PC version just blows them both away :O