This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yes because a better TV (although they were the same models) will magiclly add Ambient and High Dynamic lighting to the PS3 version. :roll:[QUOTE="Shattered007"][QUOTE="PSdual_wielder"]
How about someone post some non-offscreen shots before declaring anything?
The screens on page 7 of this thread even had the TV blurred out on the PS3 pic, that must be REALLY fair competition isn't it?
PSdual_wielder
if you're saying the ps3 version lacks those you could just be a bit more direct. The thing is with the current amount of materials both side has there is no fair competition. I could say the PS3 version has better textures and give you no supporting evidence other than the offscreens currently available, and you can't refute my claim despite how hard you try. I could even say cryengine 3 at this state looks even worse than killzone 2 because there's HD videos of one game and none of the other.
So yeah I'd wait for some real screenshots and videos to show up before saying anything.
So now you want irrefutable proof and my screen shots arn't admissible as such... :roll: You have eye's...if they tell you the PS3 version looks better then go with it. I made an observation and to me it's pretty clear...if you can't see that then no matter what I show you, it won't matter.The only difference is lighting. 360 can do Full HDR while the PS3 does Low HDR, although Cevat did say that the PS3 is the superior version. Nonstop-MadnessHow can it be a superior version if it's missing fretures?
EDIT: Features are lowerd on one console?
/thread. Yup, PS3 is just harder to develop for.Every demo that I have seen has show Cry Engine 2 to look slightly better on the PS3, and John Carmack (programing and hardware god) has said several times that the PS3 is the slightly more powerful console, albeit harder to develop for, and has also stated that Blu-Ray is a large advantage when using his new texturing methods.
evilross
How can it be a superior version if it's missing fretures?[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]The only difference is lighting. 360 can do Full HDR while the PS3 does Low HDR, although Cevat did say that the PS3 is the superior version. Shattered007
EDIT: Features are lowerd on one console?
idk, maybe textures or draw distance or physics etc.How can it be a superior version if it's missing fretures?[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]The only difference is lighting. 360 can do Full HDR while the PS3 does Low HDR, although Cevat did say that the PS3 is the superior version. Shattered007
EDIT: Features are lowerd on one console?
I think the dev. meant that PS3 has more potential. Oh and lighting thing isn't exactly true, RSX should be capable to do full hdr but without using AA (The architecture doesn't let the usage of both; the old Nvidia cards). The lighting is still strange though,in my opinion, being very unnatural in both (most likely because of it being off-screen). As mentioned(or not lol)before I will rather wait for a better comparison.
The only difference is lighting. 360 can do Full HDR while the PS3 does Low HDR, although Cevat did say that the PS3 is the superior version. Nonstop-Madnessyap like GHOSTBASTERS devs say that the PS3 is the superior version lol dev say that becuse the PS3 ver of multiplat games dont sell good as the 360 ver
The only difference is lighting. 360 can do Full HDR while the PS3 does Low HDR, although Cevat did say that the PS3 is the superior version. Nonstop-MadnessWhere is this link?
ROFL you little kids are really stupid, the ps3 has 512 mb of memory, same as the xbox 360, cevat yerli, the head at crytek SAID THE PS3 WAS MORE POWERFUL i mean after that its basically done arguing lol PS3 winsClassic24If only CEVAT hasn't said that "the PS3 is the lowest denominator" in between PS3 / 360 / PC you could have been right...
ROFL you little kids are really stupid, the ps3 has 512 mb of memory, same as the xbox 360, cevat yerli, the head at crytek SAID THE PS3 WAS MORE POWERFUL i mean after that its basically done arguing lol PS3 winsClassic24no ps3 has 256 mb ram dedicated for the gpu and 256 mb dedicated for the cpu xbox360 has 512 mb and the cpu/gpu share it each uses any amount that's needed
[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]The only difference is lighting. 360 can do Full HDR while the PS3 does Low HDR, although Cevat did say that the PS3 is the superior version. doubleblahzors2Where is this link? http://pc.ign.com/articles/966/966403p2.html, top of the second page.
How about someone post some non-offscreen shots before declaring anything?
The screens on page 7 of this thread even had the TV blurred out on the PS3 pic, that must be REALLY fair competition isn't it?
PSdual_wielder
yeah thats what i was thinking? kinda skews the point in the comparassin.
Not too bothered both look pretty similar to me ifi was to imagine myself playing it but thats the way i think.
[QUOTE="doubleblahzors2"][QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]The only difference is lighting. 360 can do Full HDR while the PS3 does Low HDR, although Cevat did say that the PS3 is the superior version. Nonstop-MadnessWhere is this link? http://pc.ign.com/articles/966/966403p2.html, top of the second page. it's the samething yeri said before ps3 will run better in some situations and xbox360 will run better in others. except ign cut off the 360 part to spin it lol.
I saw the PS3 demonstration, and the frame rate was pretty unstable. The short clips of the side by side comparison looked like 360 version ran a bit smoother, this is my honest opinion. Of course this wouldn't mean 360 is more powerful than PS3 though, but I am impressed of how developers can simultaneously create very similar games, very easily.Next-Gen-Tecthis is a direct feed off the ps3 and is a 9 min long video from ign
LINK http://ps3.ign.com/dor/articles/1014415/gc-2009-cry-engine-3-demo/videos/gcom09act_crytek_demo2_081709.html;jsessionid=4cslj2gqapmgk
this is a direct feed off the ps3 and is a 9 min long video from ign[QUOTE="Next-Gen-Tec"]I saw the PS3 demonstration, and the frame rate was pretty unstable. The short clips of the side by side comparison looked like 360 version ran a bit smoother, this is my honest opinion. Of course this wouldn't mean 360 is more powerful than PS3 though, but I am impressed of how developers can simultaneously create very similar games, very easily.Bladex2k
LINK http://ps3.ign.com/dor/articles/1014415/gc-2009-cry-engine-3-demo/videos/gcom09act_crytek_demo2_081709.html;jsessionid=4cslj2gqapmgk
Yeah it's in this IGN video that Cevat says at the end the ps3 is the lowest denominator in between the 360/PC/PS3.[QUOTE="Bladex2k"]this is a direct feed off the ps3 and is a 9 min long video from ign[QUOTE="Next-Gen-Tec"]I saw the PS3 demonstration, and the frame rate was pretty unstable. The short clips of the side by side comparison looked like 360 version ran a bit smoother, this is my honest opinion. Of course this wouldn't mean 360 is more powerful than PS3 though, but I am impressed of how developers can simultaneously create very similar games, very easily.usule
LINK http://ps3.ign.com/dor/articles/1014415/gc-2009-cry-engine-3-demo/videos/gcom09act_crytek_demo2_081709.html;jsessionid=4cslj2gqapmgk
Yeah it's in this IGN video that Cevat says at the end the ps3 is the lowest denominator in between the 360/PC/PS3. not really, he just says the PS3 has the weaker GPU but they have found ways to make the versions the same. (of course excluding the PC)this is a direct feed off the ps3 and is a 9 min long video from ign[QUOTE="Next-Gen-Tec"]I saw the PS3 demonstration, and the frame rate was pretty unstable. The short clips of the side by side comparison looked like 360 version ran a bit smoother, this is my honest opinion. Of course this wouldn't mean 360 is more powerful than PS3 though, but I am impressed of how developers can simultaneously create very similar games, very easily.Bladex2k
LINK http://ps3.ign.com/dor/articles/1014415/gc-2009-cry-engine-3-demo/videos/gcom09act_crytek_demo2_081709.html;jsessionid=4cslj2gqapmgk
Yep, that's the one I was talking about. Thanks for the link.I saw the PS3 demonstration, and the frame rate was pretty unstable. The short clips of the side by side comparison looked like 360 version ran a bit smoother, this is my honest opinion. Of course this wouldn't mean 360 is more powerful than PS3 though, but I am impressed of how developers can simultaneously create very similar games, very easily.Next-Gen-TecThe framerate was stable except for when the character was inside the tunnel portions that was there for loading purposes only(every environment change started with a walk through the same tunnel. That tunnel is there to mask the loading of the level).
*facepalm*, they don't have full RGB and superwhite enabled on ps3. they look identicle if you enable those, the 360 just doesn't have the option to turn them off. ign does this on purpose, and the 360 will always look better on IGN, because they take the screenshots with bad settings...
In my opinion the ps3 images are better, the 360 has loads of lens flare and little detail, the ps3 pics have more colour and the lighting isn't overboard.
I'm a hermit btw.
thats what i thought aswell.The detail between the two is basically the same, because they use practically the same assets. The 360 version has more HDR(there is no lens flare effect) and the monitor is set to a higher contrast level.In my opinion the ps3 images are better, the 360 has loads of lens flare and little detail, the ps3 pics have more colour and the lighting isn't overboard.
I'm a hermit btw.
tenaka2
I think outdoors it obviously looks better on the 360 version.
Come on are you seriously telling me you don't see a difference there? 360 seems to benefit from much better HDR and the colours seem much richer (PS3 has a washed out look). Also check out the difference between the shaders on the gun and arm. PS3 doesn't have that shadowing. This is coming from a PS3 only owner, too.
There's not that much difference, but it definitely is there.
crysis 2 >>>>>>>>> U2 and KZ2 and crysis 2 is best on the 360 (after the PC ) so yes 360 > PS3\[QUOTE="Nisim19"][QUOTE="sethman410"]A port from a PC version... This doesn't prove anything. But ps3 is more powerful than the 360. *looks at Uncharted 2 and Kz2.*zacroxs
Dude are you a moron the person WHO DEVELOPED THE GAME said the PS3 was stronger than the 360
okay are you ready YOUR A PERSON WHO HASNT EVEN PLAYED CRYSIS 2 YET AND THIS GUY IS THE PERSON WHO IS DEVELOPING IT
You do the math :D
you dont even saw the videos hu? the dev already said that the 360 GPU is much better then the PS3 GPU and also the best looking game looks and works better on the 360, i have facts you have just words...Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment