[QUOTE="Sollet"][QUOTE="ocstew"]I'd hate to drag this even longer but we are talking about which one is graphically better, not which one is optimized for whatever console. Crytek is the king of graphics, and this game being in development for 3 years plus their new tech could always thrash KZ3. KZ2 is one of the best looking games so far on consoles but we'll have to see and compare when they do come out. Bus-A-Bus
yeah it's too early to decide x is better than y. need final products to compare properly.I agree...but there is no denying it,Crysis 2 on consoles looks spectacular.After those first GDC videos and screens were very bashed by how it looks,then scans came and people said its from PC,now it turns out its on consoles and somehow people say its not that good.
Anyway...there is still things to be fixed IMO.Particles,smoke and overall polish as well,but it looks great,and more importantly runs great. :)
Yeah the smoke looks real good, also the glass looks particularlly impressvie. However there is bad screen tearing, videos dont' make the screen tear like that, maybe they will be able to fix that before it releases but who knows.
Gun modles aren't as good as Killzone 2's but it dose seem to have bigger spaces, Crysis 2 seems to have a faster pace but KZ2 still has better animations.
The "destruction" in C2 (at least what they've shown on the console version) is limited just like with KZ2, also they both have simularlly impressive physics, post-processing, and particle effects so i'd sayright now it's up and down between the two which could be considered more impressive. At this point I would at least say they are on the same level which is something I can't say for other other on the 360 at this time.
Log in to comment