Crysis 2 will OWN Halo Reach

Crysis 2 is a real sequel unlike Halo Reach which Kevin P. called it a Halo 3 mod with new abilities and perks :lol:

Crysis 2 will blow you away and make you realize how brainwashed people were to the generic FPSHalo.

Instashot

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

Crysis 2 is a real sequel unlike Halo Reach which Kevin P. called it a Halo 3 mod with new abilities and perks :lol:

Crysis 2 will blow you away and make you realize how brainwashed people were to the generic FPSHalo.

Arbiterisl33t69

[QUOTE="Funconsole"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] you still dont have the ability to edit the world geometry.ferret-gamer

[QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"][QUOTE="Instashot"]

Crysis 2 is a real sequel unlike Halo Reach which Kevin P. called it a Halo 3 mod with new abilities and perks :lol:

Crysis 2 will blow you away and make you realize how brainwashed people were to the generic FPSHalo.

ferret-gamer

[QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"][QUOTE="Instashot"]

Crysis 2 is a real sequel unlike Halo Reach which Kevin P. called it a Halo 3 mod with new abilities and perks :lol:

Crysis 2 will blow you away and make you realize how brainwashed people were to the generic FPSHalo.

ferret-gamer

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

Spend 80% of development time on textures and level design. Drop random N. Koreans all around the game and have them say "Die Die!" + a few aliens creatures. You have Crysis.

Oh man TC why did you have to make this thread? Remember what happened when you said APB would be the GTA/WoW? I want Crysis 2 to be good. Please stop jynxing it :cry:

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

erglesmergle

LOL?

People would mention Crysis's gameplay more if people here stopped making GRAPHIC KING Threads.

Crysis/Warhead are the BEST Single Player FPS I have ever played.

Halo 3 got a 9.5 due to hype and MS paying companies for high reviews.

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"] Reach is more different from Halo 3 than Crysis 2 is from Crysis 1. Exactly what is a "real" sequel, anyway? Bungie did not left a single aspect untouched or unchanged in the making of Reach, everything is practically different. I guess that's a real sequel, then.. I'll be buying Crysis 2 probably, but I will have way more fun with Reach, and for me it'll be the better game.Arbiterisl33t69

Crysis 2:

1. Suit Power system is revamped

2. A completely different setting, Jungle to New York City and new playing style will need to go with this change

3. A totally different set of enemies, none of the enemies you have seen from the crysis 2 videos were encountered in Crysis 1

4. A new writer for the story who is an actual acclaimed sci-fi writer instead of some drunk dude who got thrown in jail

5. Multiplayer is being done by a different studio before.

What does reach have that is new that is comparable to that?

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

erglesmergle

What?! When I think of Crysis, I think of its gameplay first. I thought it was quite a progressive FPS. Not as progressive as, say, STALKER, but still an advancement of the FPS genre. Some might find it boring, and I can understand that since the levels are so large and the camps of enemies are spaced out.

But I thought because of it's size, the pacing was perfect. If you wanted action, you'd speed through, grabbing any vehicle you can find. But if you wanted to take a slow approach and stalk your enemies, you could. I thought it was great. The only issue I had with the gameplay were the guns. They felt lame. And the whole "fully customizable guns" thing was a load of ****, too. But seriously, those were minor issues.

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

erglesmergle

Crysis 2:

1. Suit Power system is revamped

2. A completely different setting, Jungle to New York City and new playing style will need to go with this change

3. A totally different set of enemies, none of the enemies you have seen from the crysis 2 videos were encountered in Crysis 1

4. A new writer for the story who is an actual acclaimed sci-fi writer instead of some drunk dude who got thrown in jail

5. Multiplayer is being done by a different studio before.

What does reach have that is new that is comparable to that?ferret-gamer

It has new abilities and perks all for $60 :lol: and one probably short level of space combat, roooofl.

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

Spend 80% of development time on textures and level design. Drop random N. Koreans all around the game and have them say "Die Die!" + a few aliens creatures. You have Crysis.

erglesmergle

A lot of people mention Crysis for its gameplay. The gameplay in Crysis is leagues above most FPS out there (including Halo 3). The only people who only mention Crysis for its graphics are those who either haven't played it or like to hate on it.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

Instashot

1.uh what?

2.can you prove micrsoft pay companies to get higher reviews

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

Instashot

LOL?

People would mention Crysis's gameplay more if people here stopped making GRAPHIC KING Threads.

Crysis/Warhead are the BEST Single Player FPS I have ever made.

Halo3 got a 9.5 due to hype and MS paying companies for high reviews.

You made Crysis and warhead?

Also, I'm sure millions of people play Halo because of the hype and because MS paid them to play as well.... :(

[QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"][QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] How is reach more different from halo 3 than crysis 2 is more different than crysis 1?ferret-gamer

Crysis 2:

1. Suit Power system is revamped

2. A completely different setting, Jungle to New York City and new playing style will need to go with this change

3. A totally different set of enemies, none of the enemies you have seen from the crysis 2 videos were encountered in Crysis 1

4. A new writer for the story who is an actual acclaimed sci-fi writer instead of some drunk dude who got thrown in jail

5. Multiplayer is being done by a different studio before.

What does reach have that is new that is comparable to that?

The I made Crysis part was a typo, was supposed to be played.

The I made Crysis part was a typo.

Instashot

Sure it was, Mr. Yerli. :P

jk

[QUOTE="Funconsole"] LOL nice excuse buddy. Instashot

Really?

Name me a big of FPS on 360 aside from CoD.

None, when compared to Halo 3 & CoD. There isn't any shooter on the PC I enjoy more than Halo 3 though.

and yet halo reach will be the better game and more people will buy it

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

The I made Crysis part was a typo.

organic_machine

Sure it was, Mr. Yerli. :P

jk

and yet halo reach will be the better game and more people will buy it

konzen29

[QUOTE="Funconsole"][QUOTE="Instashot"] Yeah, the Sandbox 3 engine will make Forge look like a little kids toy. When you can make missions, maps, you name it from scratch on forge, tell me.Ravensmash

Have you used Cryengine Sandbox 2? If not, stop typing.

Sandbox 2 is incredibly dynamic in which people have created whole games out of.

There is a point and click RPG game someone made for Sandbox 2. Can't find the link right now, but it's somewhere on Crymod.com.

Someone made a Mirror's Edge type game.

http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=44694

Talking about the gameplay of both games.

Original Crysis had lean, pron, sprint, suit powers that you could change on the fly, destructible environments, AI that had to adapt to an open world+destructibility, and just all around better gameplay.

If Crysis 2 has good multiplayer, you can call Halo owned, simply because Halo Reach is pretty much more of the same as before.

The I made Crysis part was a typo, was supposed to be played.

Instashot

you still havent prove microsoft pay companies for halo 3 to get higher scores.

[QUOTE="konzen29"]

and yet halo reach will be the better game and more people will buy it

Instashot

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

1) Addition of Armour Abilities for MP (which seem to be balanced, although Bungie are tweaking them from Beta response) Ok.

2)A completely different setting. Larger SP maps similar to CE. No.... it looks pretty much the same as the past halo games like 2 and CE, sure it is alittle different but nowhere near the change from a tropical jungle to New york city

3) New weapons, vehicles, modes, gametypes. ok But you are still fighting basically the same enemies as before, whereas in crysis 2 you have an entirely different set from teh first game

4) A change in plot from previous games. Less focus on one individual now, will change the dynamics of the gameplay And as i mentioned before crysis 2 also has altered gameplay from the first

5) Addition of Forge World, better community features, Firefight vs. etc. etc. Well that was easy. You now have a big map and the abiliy to enable no collide on models and snap to grid....

Ravensmash

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

The I made Crysis part was a typo, was supposed to be played.

TheShadowLord07

you still havent prove microsoft pay companies for halo 3 to get higher scores.

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]Crysis 2:

1. Suit Power system is revamped

2. A completely different setting, Jungle to New York City and new playing style will need to go with this change

3. A totally different set of enemies, none of the enemies you have seen from the crysis 2 videos were encountered in Crysis 1

4. A new writer for the story who is an actual acclaimed sci-fi writer instead of some drunk dude who got thrown in jail

5. Multiplayer is being done by a different studio before.

What does reach have that is new that is comparable to that?Instashot

It has new abilities and perks all for $60 :lol: and one probably short level of space combat, roooofl.

[QUOTE="konzen29"]

and yet halo reach will be the better game and more people will buy it

Instashot

I read somewhere that 98% of Halo sales come from it's amazing gameplay. I can do it to.

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

The I made Crysis part was a typo, was supposed to be played.

you still havent prove microsoft pay companies for halo 3 to get higher scores.

and yet halo reach will be the better game konzen29

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"]

[QUOTE="Funconsole"] Here you go (Scroll down a bit to find the questions answered) The only thing Crysis 2 beats Halo in is graphics but everything else, the stuff that matters, Halo OWNS CrysisDragonfireXZ95

Have you used Cryengine Sandbox 2? If not, stop typing.

Sandbox 2 is incredibly dynamic in which people have created whole games out of.

There is a point and click RPG game someone made for Sandbox 2. Can't find the link right now, but it's somewhere on Crymod.com.

Someone made a Mirror's Edge type game.

http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=44694

Talking about the gameplay of both games.

Original Crysis had lean, pron, sprint, suit powers that you could change on the fly, destructible environments, AI that had to adapt to an open world+destructibility, and just all around better gameplay.

If Crysis 2 has good multiplayer, you can call Halo owned, simply because Halo Reach is pretty much more of the same as before.

[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

The I made Crysis part was a typo, was supposed to be played.

Instashot

you still havent prove microsoft pay companies for halo 3 to get higher scores.

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

The I made Crysis part was a typo, was supposed to be played.

you still havent prove microsoft pay companies for halo 3 to get higher scores.

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Ya... lol.... I don't know about the rest but sandbox 3 DESTROYS forge world 2. It's not even debatable.

It won't matter if the MP sucks though, and we have yet to see that.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Crysis 1 and Warhead are some of THE MOST boring games I have ever played. I have a strong feeling their scores were due to the tech, not gameplay.

No one EVER mentions Crysis when it comes to gameplay. I wonder why. But people love to defend it when its attacked, always using the 9.5 GS score. Im guessing hermits doing their thing?

Instashot

LOL?

People would mention Crysis's gameplay more if people here stopped making GRAPHIC KING Threads.

Crysis/Warhead are the BEST Single Player FPS I have ever played.

Halo 3 got a 9.5 due to hype and MS paying companies for high reviews.

[QUOTE="konzen29"]

and yet halo reach will be the better game and more people will buy it

Instashot

How credible!

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

[QUOTE="Funconsole"] Here you go (Scroll down a bit to find the questions answered) The only thing Crysis 2 beats Halo in is graphics but everything else, the stuff that matters, Halo OWNS CrysisFunconsole

Yet Crysis beat out Halo in 2007 for best FPS, hmmm. Crysis>>Halo

Crysis is on another level in terms of gameplay.

But hey, according to you and Instashot, that makes for a REAL sequel when all the changes Reach has just makes it a rehash, because its Halo..Arbiterisl33t69

Please dont lump me with him, i am making no claim that halo reach isnt a true sequel, im just pointing out that crysis 2 has more of a change from its predecessor than reach does.

You do know the use of that "haters" pic is very hypocritical right?SpiritOfFire117

[QUOTE="Instashot"][QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]

you still havent prove microsoft pay companies for halo 3 to get higher scores.

lawlessx

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"]You do know the use of that "haters" pic is very hypocritical right?Arbiterisl33t69

[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

The I made Crysis part was a typo, was supposed to be played.

Instashot

you still havent prove microsoft pay companies for halo 3 to get higher scores.

why should I take you seriously for something like this statement? your the same guy said apb would be wow killer. Those reviews looks it didnt help APB to be the wow killer. you also think is reach is just another "halo reskin". last time I check reach had more things the what halo 3 had back in 07. and there could also be things bungie hasnt said about halo reach. \

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"] Some of the maps Bungie have created using forge are being implemented in MP. Shows you how confident they are of this :)

Ravensmash

Have you used Cryengine Sandbox 2? If not, stop typing.

Sandbox 2 is incredibly dynamic in which people have created whole games out of.

There is a point and click RPG game someone made for Sandbox 2. Can't find the link right now, but it's somewhere on Crymod.com.

Someone made a Mirror's Edge type game.

http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=44694

Talking about the gameplay of both games.

Original Crysis had lean, pron, sprint, suit powers that you could change on the fly, destructible environments, AI that had to adapt to an open world+destructibility, and just all around better gameplay.

If Crysis 2 has good multiplayer, you can call Halo owned, simply because Halo Reach is pretty much more of the same as before.

I doubt it. Crysis 2 will have the graphical edge, but other than that, I'm thinking Reach will win it.