[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"][QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"] In his defense he just getting bashed for no reason, people aren't even taking a second look nor want to.
There are just so many things done well in God of War III that it deserves recognition. As far as what i can see the games are on the same level, and its really just the approach thats different. I get confused when people complain that God of War III isn't open ended, have you seen the bloody game? What more will it take for people just to accept that its brilliant and stop nit picking.
Adrian_Cloud
Yeah GoWIII does deserve reconition, I don't really see anyone saying that it is a bad looking game, People are just not saying that it is at the level of Crysis, and a reason he is getting bashed is he is making fanboy claims without good proof to back it up.
I know you PS3 fanboys have to stick together, for this even some of the other PS3 fanboys are disagreeing.
I've played Crysis on a high end PC 2-3 years ago and i'm not sure what makes it look better than the gow III trailer that i saw today. Is it the character models, because Kratos looks far more detailed with twice the animations and blood being splattered on him. There isn't a definitive answer to why Crysis looks better, so i'm not sure if his claims are wrong. I'd imagine it's because one game employs the most detail game word ever seen, with some fo the most realistic lighting, character models, vegetation, snow, ai, post processing effects, all on a huge scale, at 60fps.
Whilst the other has a shockingly detailed lead character running around fairly drab, smallenviromentws, mutilating stupid creatures. All at a relativly low resolution, AA, AF, and FPS
Log in to comment