Every thing in SLi's system is Sli.
the ram, the cpu, the gpu, the sound card, the mother board, the monitor.
Sli is infact its own company and not just a gpu linking tech by nvidia.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Every thing in SLi's system is Sli.
the ram, the cpu, the gpu, the sound card, the mother board, the monitor.
Sli is infact its own company and not just a gpu linking tech by nvidia.
Better than halo yes, better than killzone 2 i doubt, crysis has very weak fps gameplay.dakan45maybe if all you want is to be told what to do and have heaps of enemies on screen at once, but crysis is far more fun if you like to play stealth and take them by surprise. killzone lacks all the features that made farcry the best fps since the original half life and crysis has built on it. killzone is just your average run and gun fps. plus killzone lacks the weapon customization of crysis. plus if you want lots of action warhead has it all for you.
[QUOTE="badtaker"][QUOTE="dakan45"] I find it worse, far cry was so much more fun for me....But in PC forums you said Crysis has best graphics.Oh i forgot you are PS3 fanboy. but yes far cry was awesome. What? I said crysis has the best graphics so far but i liked far cry more in gameplay and levels Nowhere i said that killzone 2 has better graphics than crysis, just to make clear that. I just like "pure fps" like far cry or cod 4 or killzone 2 rather crysis or timeshift. Why? I dont know i have more fun with em. you can play crysis like a normal fps if you want. sure farcry did have better levels but crysis is still miles better than any console shooter this gen in level design. gs doesn't give out 9.5s to games with poor gameplay "Crysis is visually stunning, packed with intelligent, thrilling gameplay, and easily one of the greatest shooters ever made."dakan45
Its like saying i dont like cod4 or killzone because i cant sneak up on my enemies and throw a chicken on the head or i cant drive vehicles.. Duh:shock: but fps games are not about that, they are about shooting stuff.dakan45you should go and play quake1 that has everything a modern "pure shooter" has. sure cod4 and killzone are great, but they are just the same old game I played 5 years ago with a new coat of paint. cod4 and killzone will have been forgotten in 3 years time, but game that are different stand the test of time. who still plays doom3? but hl2 and farcry are still played because they are more than the same old with flash graphics at the time.
IMO... Halo 3 > Crysis > Killzone 2 But I prefer the fun factor over the graphics. BTW, Halo3 had great graphics :| And this is coming from a PC gamer btw...-GeordiLaForge-Agreed. And all the games now have great graphics when you get right down to it. Two Worlds had good graphics as well as Oblivion for the consoles. On the PC you could take those two games and crank up the graphics even further and you know what? Didnt make those games any different story and play wise. None of the games on these consoles could ever be mistaken for real life but none of them are pixolated messes either. So we play then for the fun factor not the graphics.
Crysis has better gameplay, i still play every day one round in the SP, Killzone and Halo are more like CoD4. Shotguns are too weak you have to camp their. In Crysis i could the complete Game finishing with shotgun thx to my cloak ability.
its fun
Played Crysis, play Halo 3 and halo is a far superior game too crysis. Crysis is just a game to flash your computers specs. Proof is an average of 91 scores for Crysis to a superior 94 for Halo 3.
Better luck next time kids.
Umm, did you really try and use aggregate scores to prove one game is better than the other? The variables in that are insane. For example, GameSpot gave both games the same score, but gave Crysis Shooter of the Year in 2007 (GameSpot scores, according to them, are not meant to be compared directly across platforms). In addition, Crysis does not have the luxury of a whole entourage of Official Xbox Magazines giving it perfect scores like Halo 3 did. In fact, PC only magazines (none of which are official or have any sort of direct manufacturer sponsorship, unlike 360 publications) are renowned for being notoriously harsh.Played Crysis, play Halo 3 and halo is a far superior game too crysis. Crysis is just a game to flash your computers specs. Proof is an average of 91 scores for Crysis to a superior 94 for Halo 3.
Better luck next time kids.
Immortal_Evil
[QUOTE="SamGv"][QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]
i just finished playing crysis demo on high settings, it doesnt look as good as those screenshots people post on this forum (yes i tried the game on very high settings as well with full 1080p resolutions, still doesnt look that good). overall i think its a good game but i wouldnt say its better then kz2
Silenthps
Most of a screenshots are modded, like a modded config file or the natural mod to bring out the best in crysis.
They're not modded, they are just custom configs which anyone can adjust using the console control thing. btw how can you(poster above you) say that its not better than KZ2 when all you did is play the demo?crysis graphics are not real unleashed like on the dx10vs9 techdemo, im using a confick which takes alot performance but gives me even better graphics than this video
crysis warhead has enthusiast settings which gives you related graphics.
sure thing.I did a Video on Youtube to proofing that Crysis is better than Killzone 2, Killzone 2 looks not bad but common Crysis owns the Game in every category. Where is Halo?, well for me is the game not even worth to put it on my Video and do comparisons and to mention it in my Video.
Thats all my opnion how you see you the things?`????
SLIisaownsystem
[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]Im sorry. But thta absolutely makes no sense whatever to me at least. Also Thank you for stating something we all knew I thought I was the only one...i think all shooters have bad gameplay in general,
Hexen and the old Dooms are still the best out there
thats why i prefer to have better graphics
Animal-Mother
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment