Crysis Just Can't Stop Looking Better (Screenshots) - 56k

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]

Was this thread really necessary?

dgsag

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="Silverbond"]

Was this thread really necessary?

AdobeArtist

And how many people can afford the PC that could run the game at those graphical settings you just displayed? Now I am not going to perpetrate the myth, "PC gaming costs $4000", but do NOT tell me that a $400 (console equivelant) PC could run that game, again, specifically Crysis, which is known to be a system hog. And I also specified going by those samples which show the game running at very high settings. I'm pretty sure a $1000 PC could run the game, but could it do so at those visual settings, and run it smoothly? I'm guessing the $1000 PC would not display Crysis at that quality your samples showed. How much would it cost to play Crysis looking like what you showed with a smooth frame rate of at least 30fps?

Looks good but so did Haze bullshots.

Where is the HUD?

Looks good but so did Haze bullshots.

Where is the HUD?

-Reggaeton-

[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]

Wow. I seriously doubt even games on the PS4/Xbox720/Wii 2 will even look this good. Cows am cry.

Jade_Monkey

They think they will but they are wrong. Best case they look a little close to that, worst case they go the way of the Wii and don't improve graphics or gameplay.

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="Silverbond"]

Was this thread really necessary?

SpruceCaboose

Take this to the PC Board, stop flooding SW with picture topics.

[QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"]

[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]

Wow. I seriously doubt even games on the PS4/Xbox720/Wii 2 will even look this good. Cows am cry.

munu9

They think they will but they are wrong. Best case they look a little close to that, worst case they go the way of the Wii and don't improve graphics or gameplay.

Very true, console hardware has always been better than what you can get for PC at launch.

PC graphics are better now, but it took awhile for the parts to become affordable.

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="Silverbond"]

Was this thread really necessary?

And how many people can afford the PC that could run the game at those graphical settings you just displayed? Now I am not going to perpetrate the myth, "PC gaming costs $4000", but do NOT tell me that a $400 (console equivelant) PC could run that game, again, specifically Crysis, which is known to be a system hog. And I also specified going by those samples which show the game running at very high settings. I'm pretty sure a $1000 PC could run the game, but could it do so at those visual settings, and run it smoothly? I'm guessing the $1000 PC would not display Crysis at that quality your samples showed. How much would it cost to play Crysis looking like what you showed with a smooth frame rate of at least 30fps?

Threads like this do bring out insecure feelings out of some people like: "2000$ PC", "no gameplay", "who cares about graphics", "no need of this thread"..etc

I think this setting should be achievable with a below $1000PC , with 30fps, better resolution than the consoles and no AA, easily.

Threads like this do bring out insecure feelings out of some people like: "2000$ PC", "no gameplay", "who cares about graphics", "no need of this thread"..etc

I think this setting should be achievable with a below $1000PC , with 30fps, better resolution than the consoles and no AA, easily.

dk_2007

looks good. impressive. too bad its all graphics though. :P

___gamemaster__

So you're trying to tell us that crysis has good graphics??? I had no idea. I can't believe it took so long for someone to make a thread like this. Good job. :roll:

So you're trying to tell us that crysis has good graphics??? I had no idea. I can't believe it took so long for someone to make a thread like this. Good job. :roll:

Huff

Not good enough for me to drop thousands on building a PC that could run that.

[QUOTE="dk_2007"]

Threads like this do bring out insecure feelings out of some people like: "2000$ PC", "no gameplay", "who cares about graphics", "no need of this thread"..etc

I think this setting should be achievable with a below $1000PC , with 30fps, better resolution than the consoles and no AA, easily.

dgsag

Not good enough for me to drop thousands on building a PC that could run that.

W1NGMAN-

[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

Not good enough for me to drop thousands on building a PC that could run that.

dgsag

Between 1000-1999 = Not good enough

Amazing. Although I did see some jaggies in the garage area.SMR-Venom

Is it possible to get your config file as even when using max DX10 settings my game does not look like that?mark_c_128

Not good enough for me to drop thousands on building a PC that could run that.

W1NGMAN-

Sorry but that isn't Crysis..... I can take a Camaro, and pull parts out and putdifferent parts in, give it an overhaul, etc. but guess what, it's no longer a Camaro.

Now that that's out of the way, yes, those are pretty screens.... too bad Crysis is boring as ****, and only worth loading up to look at the pretty scenery. I'd take Halo, L4D, Fallout 3, Super Mario Galaxy almost any game over Crysis any day of the week.

Crysis = pretty graphics w/ good physics, nothing more.

whatisazerg

Not good enough for me to drop thousands on building a PC that could run that.

[QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"]

[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]

Wow. I seriously doubt even games on the PS4/Xbox720/Wii 2 will even look this good. Cows am cry.

munu9

They think they will but they are wrong. Best case they look a little close to that, worst case they go the way of the Wii and don't improve graphics or gameplay.

If you saw my other post, you would have read me saying that i believe next gen will be the first where PCs out perform consoles from the start. I guess you havent noticed the revolution in gaming this gen. I dont think Sony/MS will release cutting edge tech next gen because of the Wii's success.

OT: I always found in funny when people mention things such as 33% cow 26% sheep etc. I've always wanted to know how people know these things.

[QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"]

They think they will but they are wrong. Best case they look a little close to that, worst case they go the way of the Wii and don't improve graphics or gameplay.

RedFactionFan

Very true, console hardware has always been better than what you can get for PC at launch.

PC graphics are better now, but it took awhile for the parts to become affordable.

[QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"]

They think they will but they are wrong. Best case they look a little close to that, worst case they go the way of the Wii and don't improve graphics or gameplay.

shutdown_202

If you saw my other post, you would have read me saying that i believe next gen will be the first where PCs out perform consoles from the start. I guess you havent noticed the revolution in gaming this gen. I dont think Sony/MS will release cutting edge tech next gen because of the Wii's success.

OT: I always found in funny when people mention things such as 33% cow 26% sheep etc. I've always wanted to know how people know these things.

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

Not good enough for me to drop thousands on building a PC that could run that.

W1NGMAN-

Between 1000-1999 = Not good enough

He meant 1000 or less.

Unreal Engine 4 will be better.

Neither of the two are king though, Nvidia are the graphic kings, only they have made the most realistic graphics to date. hell without Nvidia these devs like Epic & Crytek wouldnt be able to produce the things that they do, characters movements would seem unrealistic etc.

Very true, console hardware has always been better than what you can get for PC at launch.

PC graphics are better now, but it took awhile for the parts to become affordable.

muscleserge

It really depends on when you consider this generation started, when 360 launched or when all consoles were out.

If you go by the latter then at the time you could get hardware that would easily surpass consoles and would still do so today, the Nvidia 8 series launched a couple of days before the PS3 and we already had Conroe and DDR2 at that time.

It's mostly a matter of the hardware eventually becoming more affordable, not available.

Unreal Engine 4 will be better.

Neither of the two are king though, Nvidia are the graphic kings, only they have made the most realistic graphics to date.

Euroshinobi

[QUOTE="Euroshinobi"]

Unreal Engine 4 will be better.

Neither of the two are king though, Nvidia are the graphic kings, only they have made the most realistic graphics to date.

GTR2addict

[QUOTE="muscleserge"]

Very true, console hardware has always been better than what you can get for PC at launch.

PC graphics are better now, but it took awhile for the parts to become affordable.

AnnoyedDragon

It really depends on when you consider this generation started, when 360 launched or when all consoles were out.

If you go by the latter then at the time you could get hardware that would easily surpass consoles and would still do so today, the Nvidia 8 series launched a couple of days before the PS3 and we already had Conroe and DDR2 at that time.

It's mostly a matter of the hardware eventually becoming more affordable, not available.

I think you quoted wrong.muscleserge

Yeah my bad, the person it is directed at should recognise the contents.

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"][QUOTE="Euroshinobi"]

Unreal Engine 4 will be better.

Neither of the two are king though, Nvidia are the graphic kings, only they have made the most realistic graphics to date.

Euroshinobi

[QUOTE="Euroshinobi"]

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"] wow fanboy much?GTR2addict

This is a formidable place for PS3 fanboys to mention Killzone.

I am amazed.

I thought the asian soldier was real at fist glance :p

Anyways, some people are saying that when console dudes are comparing their games graphicly they need a slap in the face with PC graphics...well I think everyone knows/should know that the better graphics are on the PC. But, not many really care, they should just rename this board to X360 v. PS3 IMO.

[QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"]

They think they will but they are wrong. Best case they look a little close to that, worst case they go the way of the Wii and don't improve graphics or gameplay.

RedFactionFan

Very true, console hardware has always been better than what you can get for PC at launch.

PC graphics are better now, but it took awhile for the parts to become affordable.