Crysis To be 16GBs; Run on 9800PRO - Minimum Reqs.?

  • 150 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for _Pedro_
_Pedro_

6829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 _Pedro_
Member since 2004 • 6829 Posts
[QUOTE="0bscurity"]

[QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
Pro_wrestler

What hermit doesn't have a 200gb+ hard drive?

The same hermits that say you don't need cutting edge/alot to be a hermit.

wrong! Even those that don't have cutting edge have atleast 200gb. Hell I don't know a single person complaining about lack of storage space on the pc. Because hard drives are cheap as hell.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

[QUOTE="baddog121390"][QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
Pro_wrestler

Halo 3 also looks like a last-gen game.

You just stooped to his level of fanboyism...

Read his other post,

"compared to PC standerds"

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="0bscurity"]

[QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
_Pedro_

What hermit doesn't have a 200gb+ hard drive?

The same hermits that say you don't need cutting edge/alot to be a hermit.

wrong! Even those that don't have cutting edge have atleast 200gb. Hell I don't know a single person complaining about lack of storage space on the pc. Because hard drives are cheap as hell.

Thats not entirely true, I just bought a 250GB HDD 2 monts ago, before I was using a 40GB HDD. And HDD are expensive here

Avatar image for diablo_human
diablo_human

754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 diablo_human
Member since 2007 • 754 Posts
It's not that bad, I wish it was 756 RAM minimum though but I guess it'll do.
Avatar image for J_Swayze
J_Swayze

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 J_Swayze
Member since 2007 • 493 Posts

*Rubs Tower Case*

Sorry Dell Dimension 2400, you won't be able to run this game

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]

[QUOTE="-voodoo_child-"]Well, I guess this is the end of 360 fans hiding behind the "well Crysis fits on a DVD, Blu Ray isn't needed" crap...-voodoo_child-

Now if only Crysis was possible in its current form on consoles, Blu-Ray supporters would have an argument.

But it isn't a pro Blu-ray argument, that's the point, it's just that in every "is BR needed" thread there is always the "Crysis fits on one DVD so a DVD is enough" and now that is proven wrong. That's all. I'm not saying Crysis could be ported to a console it is just that we are seeing a lot more games that need more room.

This is not a Pro Blu-Ray argument this is a PRO HDD arguement. Again I will ask. Why do we need to absorb the costs of Sony's Blu-Ray drive when the PS3 like a PC has a standard HDD equipped in every console?

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#57 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

My 8800gts should beable to tear that game apart then

Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts
min should be a 7 series card.
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
[QUOTE="0bscurity"]

[QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
Pro_wrestler

What hermit doesn't have a 200gb+ hard drive?

The same hermits that say you don't need cutting edge/alot to be a hermit.

because 200gb doesn't costs a lot, on pc i mean and not on 360

Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts

My 8800gts should beable to tear that game apart then

Wasdie

you will be in for a suprise then. NO card will tear that game apart.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="Supafly1"][QUOTE="baddog121390"]

It's just been released at the EA store that the minimum requirements are:

[QUOTE="EA Store"]MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Intel Pentium 4 @ 2.8 GHz or AMD equivalent 1GB RAM nVidia GeForce 6800GT/256 or ATI Radeon 9800 Pro/256 Microsoft Windows DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card HD free space 16GB-R3Volation

Don't jump around yet...there's been no official confirmation from EA or Crytek. But, a little while ago, the CEO of Crytek, Cevat Yerli, said that they would be released in the middle of September.

Link

This is 3/4 year old hardware, people.

Erm, that's pretty fake. Since when did 9800Pro became almost as powerful as 6800GT. Isn't 6800GT like 1.5x more powerful than 9800pro?

Eh, not really, maybe the 6800 Ultra. Considering the x700 is equivalent to the 6600GT and the 9800Pro is between x700 and x800 (which is equivalent to the Ultra).

There just isn't really anything else in between. And yes the 6800GT is faster than the 9800 Pro but not by a lot.

INcrediably false.. a 6800 GT is WAY faster then a 9800 pro.. The 6800 GT has 16 pixel pipelines, twice the amount of the 9800 pro..

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]

[QUOTE="-voodoo_child-"]Well, I guess this is the end of 360 fans hiding behind the "well Crysis fits on a DVD, Blu Ray isn't needed" crap...threegodhalo

Now if only Crysis was possible in its current form on consoles, Blu-Ray supporters would have an argument.

Ram



What does ramming something have to do with not being able to come to 360? Halo 3 only takes up less than 6 gigs and is a much bigger game. What would you need to ram the 360 with to make it run? 360 can already do DX10 with it's video card, 3 core CPU, and runs Gears and Halo 3 like a hot knife into butter.

:lol:

Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#63 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts



Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
threegodhalo

how do you know how much memory halo 3 will take on the pc? its not out yet, and the PC version always has content the xbox version dosent

Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts


Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
threegodhalo
And hermits only have 500 gb harddrives..
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

Who the hell wants to play this game on low settings and with a stuttering framerate.

I would NEVER play a game on anything less than medium settings, there's always something lost in the process. Atleast you could be bumping medium specs.

Avatar image for turaaggeli
turaaggeli

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 turaaggeli
Member since 2007 • 785 Posts

[QUOTE="baddog121390"][QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
Pro_wrestler

Halo 3 also looks like a last-gen game.

You just stooped to his level of fanboyism...

Indeed. Making comments like those make you just as ignorant as threegodhalo....

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
Its not like PC harddrives costs $100 for 20 gigs(which is really around 13).
Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#68 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts

[QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
omgimba
And hermits only have 500 gb harddrives..

only 500? i have 800GB of disk space, 16 gigs is nothing

also, threegodhalo, you do realise crysis has 2x the graphics, vastly larger area to explore, and far better physics do you not?

that is not to say halo3 looks/plays bad, it dosent, its just not close to the scale crysis is at

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]

[QUOTE="-voodoo_child-"]Well, I guess this is the end of 360 fans hiding behind the "well Crysis fits on a DVD, Blu Ray isn't needed" crap...threegodhalo

Now if only Crysis was possible in its current form on consoles, Blu-Ray supporters would have an argument.

Ram



What does ramming something have to do with not being able to come to 360? Halo 3 only takes up less than 6 gigs and is a much bigger game. What would you need to ram the 360 with to make it run?360 can already do DX10 with it's video card,3 core CPU, and runs Gears and Halo 3 like a hot knife into butter.

Oooh a great post! :D

1. Obviously Halo 3 is a smaller game... It only takes up 6 gigs. You even stated that yourself.

2. The 360 has 512mb shared ram. Puny. Minimum for PC is 256mb video, and 1024mb system. 360 cant handle the game.

3. No it cannot run DX10. The 360s GPU can be compared to a X1950PC video card... Which is now budget priced.

4. The 360s 3 Core is actually less efficient than a standard Core 2 Duo.

5. No it descent run Gears " like a hot knife through* butter". The game is @ 30fps in a small environment, and even dips into the low 20s. I cant speak for Halo 3 until Monday.

Sheesh when will fanboys learn to use logic.

Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#70 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts
[QUOTE="threegodhalo"][QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]

[QUOTE="-voodoo_child-"]Well, I guess this is the end of 360 fans hiding behind the "well Crysis fits on a DVD, Blu Ray isn't needed" crap...skrat_01

Now if only Crysis was possible in its current form on consoles, Blu-Ray supporters would have an argument.

Ram



What does ramming something have to do with not being able to come to 360? Halo 3 only takes up less than 6 gigs and is a much bigger game. What would you need to ram the 360 with to make it run?360 can already do DX10 with it's video card,3 core CPU, and runs Gears and Halo 3 like a hot knife into butter.

Oooh a great post! :D

1. Obviously Halo 3 is a smaller game... It only takes up 6 gigs. You even stated that yourself.

2. The 360 has 512mb shared ram. Puny. Minimum for PC is 256mb video, and 1024mb system. 360 cant handle the game.

3. No it cannot run DX10. The 360s GPU can be compared to a X1950PC video card... Which is now budget priced.

4. The 360s 3 Core is actually less efficient than a standard Core 2 Duo.

5. No it descent run Gears " like a hot knife through* butter". The game is @ 30fps in a small environment, and even dips into the low 20s. I cant speak for Halo 3 until Monday.

Sheesh when will fanboys learn to use logic.

this is threegodhalo your talkng about, aside from wok7 and treebranch, he is one of the worst, most ignorant fanboys out there

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="0bscurity"]

[QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
Pro_wrestler

What hermit doesn't have a 200gb+ hard drive?

The same hermits that say you don't need cutting edge/alot to be a hermit.

200gb is alot of space? :|

No wonder, your 20gb 360 HDD must be having some sort of effect on you.

Shesssh 320gb drives have been the norm for years, and costs virtually next to nothing in GB per $ ratio.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

My 8800gts should beable to tear that game apart then

lespaul1919

you will be in for a suprise then. NO card will tear that game apart.

8800 GTX begs to differ.

And who knows how the 2900XT may run it.

And exactly at what resolutions on the highest settings to 'tear apart' the game?

this is threegodhalo your talkng about, aside from wok7 and treebranch, he is one of the worst, most ignorant fanboys out there

shadow_hosi
Indeed. Tree Branch got served by the ban hammer didnt he?

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts



Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
threegodhalo

most hermits have over 250 gigs of hardrive space, unlike your 12 gig xbox

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

8800 GTX begs to differ.

And who knows how the 2900XT may run it.

And exactly at what resolutions on the highest settings to 'tear apart' the game?

skrat_01

Well, I have a 8800GTS, and it seems enough, but I am planning to get another one for SLI. It should tear it apart, no?

this is threegodhalo your talkng about, aside from wok7 and treebranch, he is one of the worst, most ignorant fanboys out there

shadow_hosi

consoles are not the only thing threegodhalo is ignorant on, you should go see his "Help! Muslims have moved into my neighborhoo!" thread. It's pretty much the reason why I decided to completely ignore his posts, and you should too.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#76 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
*facepalm*

Oh Crytek, why must you be one of the only developers who spends tons of time optimising? This pretty much means I could have run Crysis on my older, pre-X1650Pro setup... :|

Why does PC gaming only seem to get better?
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

*facepalm*

Oh Crytek, why must you be one of the only developers who spends tons of time optimising? This pretty much means I could have run Crysis on my older, pre-X1650Pro setup... :|

Why does PC gaming only seem to get better?
foxhound_fox

well, to be fair, this is only their second franchise, we really didn't know if they were going to optimise or not

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]*facepalm*

Oh Crytek, why must you be one of the only developers who spends tons of time optimising? This pretty much means I could have run Crysis on my older, pre-X1650Pro setup... :|

Why does PC gaming only seem to get better?
The_Ish

well, to be fair, this is only their second franchise, we really didn't know if they were going to optimise or not

I reckon they will - and do fine job of it.

I beat Far Cry on a P3 400mhz, 256mb of RAM, and a GeForce 2MX 32mb.

That alone is a testiment to Cryteks wonderful technical work.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Well, I have a 8800GTS, and it seems enough, but I am planning to get another one for SLI. It should tear it apart, no?

The_Ish
Your 8800 should be fine, on lower resolutions (1600X1200 and under) - depending on how much memory the card has. And SLI setup would be fantastic, but honestly at this stage its overkill :P Wait until mid-late next year for SLI - then a 8800 GTS is noice and cheap.
Avatar image for ps3rulezzggdff
ps3rulezzggdff

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 ps3rulezzggdff
Member since 2007 • 946 Posts
[QUOTE="-R3Volation"][QUOTE="Supafly1"][QUOTE="baddog121390"]

It's just been released at the EA store that the minimum requirements are:

[QUOTE="EA Store"]MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Intel Pentium 4 @ 2.8 GHz or AMD equivalent 1GB RAM nVidia GeForce 6800GT/256 or ATI Radeon 9800 Pro/256 Microsoft Windows DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card HD free space 16GBSupafly1

Don't jump around yet...there's been no official confirmation from EA or Crytek. But, a little while ago, the CEO of Crytek, Cevat Yerli, said that they would be released in the middle of September.

Link

This is 3/4 year old hardware, people.

Erm, that's pretty fake. Since when did 9800Pro became almost as powerful as 6800GT. Isn't 6800GT like 1.5x more powerful than 9800pro?

Eh, not really, maybe the 6800 Ultra. Considering the x700 is equivalent to the 6600GT and the 9800Pro is between x700 and x800 (which is equivalent to the Ultra)

How is that possible? I thought x800 was competing with 6800, 6600 with x700 or x600. Isn't 9800pro like a generation behind 6800gt? It doesn't have SM 3.0 and other stuff. I dunno about the clock speeds but if 9800pro is able to run Crysis at the same settings as 6800GT then that's pretty screwed up.

the x600/x700 are pixel shader 2.0b cards just like the 9800 pro, the x700 is almost equal in power to 9800 pro, the x700 is weaker.

6800 gt has 16 pixel pipelines it has ps 3.0 the 9800 pro has 8, the x700 has 8 the x600 has like 4 .

Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts
my friend in the beta with 2 8800GTX's getting 20-30 FPS begs to differ.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

my friend in the beta with 2 8800GTX's getting 20-30 FPS begs to differ.lespaul1919
And this is where the lines of normal user - to fanboy are drawn.

edit* if it is a SLI problem, as stated a few comments down, then you raise a decemt point. It is a beta...

Avatar image for dracolich666
dracolich666

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 dracolich666
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts
I bet thats all the DX10, DX10.1 textures, and codes. Tho thats alot of space!
Avatar image for dracolich666
dracolich666

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 dracolich666
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts
my friend in the beta with 2 8800GTX's getting 20-30 FPS begs to differ.lespaul1919
He needs to disable SLI, ive heard it doesnt use multicore or GPU in the beta. The demo will be ALOT newer build. Quote me.
Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts
we shall see. i hope so, im tired of getting TERRIBLE performance.
Avatar image for zsc4
zsc4

5233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 zsc4
Member since 2005 • 5233 Posts
I wont be able to play it, though I'm not that interested in that game anyways.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#87 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
my friend in the beta with 2 8800GTX's getting 20-30 FPS begs to differ.lespaul1919


"Beta"

Its not the final release and has forced graphical options. Of course its not going to run as well as it should.
Avatar image for froidnite
froidnite

2294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 froidnite
Member since 2006 • 2294 Posts

Here's a more legit looking source which also states minimum requirements

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

Well, I have a 8800GTS, and it seems enough, but I am planning to get another one for SLI. It should tear it apart, no?

skrat_01

Your 8800 should be fine, on lower resolutions (1600X1200 and under) - depending on how much memory the card has. And SLI setup would be fantastic, but honestly at this stage its overkill :P Wait until mid-late next year for SLI - then a 8800 GTS is noice and cheap.

I have 640 video RAm on the card, I hope that is good.

and yeah, I was actually planning almost a year ahead :P

Avatar image for _Pedro_
_Pedro_

6829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 _Pedro_
Member since 2004 • 6829 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

Well, I have a 8800GTS, and it seems enough, but I am planning to get another one for SLI. It should tear it apart, no?

skrat_01

Your 8800 should be fine, on lower resolutions (1600X1200 and under) - depending on how much memory the card has. And SLI setup would be fantastic, but honestly at this stage its overkill :P Wait until mid-late next year for SLI - then a 8800 GTS is noice and cheap.

sli actually has very little use. It's only to get the best performance at it's current time. If a newer card is released lets say the 9800GTs, it will most likely run better than two 8800gts at roughly the same price.

Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts

we shall see. i hope so, im tired of getting TERRIBLE performance.lespaul1919

According to some users ingame, Core 2 Duo and Quads are not even working properly with the game, the performance over single core is barely shown.... wait fora few patchs ... PC Beta's are typically like this ... look at World in conflict ... it was also a mess at the time of beta (Performance wise)

Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts

It's just been released at the EA store that the minimum requirements are:

[QUOTE="EA Store"]MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Intel Pentium 4 @ 2.8 GHz or AMD equivalent 1GB RAM nVidia GeForce 6800GT/256 or ATI Radeon 9800 Pro/256 Microsoft Windows DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card HD free space 16GBbaddog121390

Don't jump around yet...there's been no official confirmation from EA or Crytek. But, a little while ago, the CEO of Crytek, Cevat Yerli, said that they would be released in the middle of September.

Link

This is 3/4 year old hardware, people.

It's not official yet as said by Alex from Crytek. That's why EA took it down from their site.

Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts
16GB is just too much.
Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts

16GB is just too much.Deihmos

Why? The more the better......

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

16 GB's is pretty large....though not really a problem for anyone.....I really cant think of any game thats this size.

it will probably come on several DVD's.

Avatar image for SuperVegeta518
SuperVegeta518

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 SuperVegeta518
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts
This is going to take 2 hours to install and half an hour to load.
Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts

This is going to take 2 hours to install and half an hour to load.SuperVegeta518

Lol no :S

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

This is going to take 2 hours to install and half an hour to load.SuperVegeta518

size doest dictate loading times.

it will take a while to install....but that doesnt matter to me all that much.

Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts

[QUOTE="Deihmos"]16GB is just too much.trix5817

Why? The more the better......

The more the better? I don't see where people get this idea from. PC games don't use losless audio or whatever you call it. Hell most games use MP3 sound so I don't see why this game would be a whopping 16GB on my hard drive. Imaging how long it will take to load and install. Is this official because I highly doubt it requires 16GB.

Avatar image for Pro_wrestler
Pro_wrestler

7880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#100 Pro_wrestler
Member since 2002 • 7880 Posts
[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="0bscurity"]

[QUOTE="threegodhalo"]

Haha, hermits have to give up 16gigs of space. Halo 3 is less than 6. Wow.
naval

What hermit doesn't have a 200gb+ hard drive?

The same hermits that say you don't need cutting edge/alot to be a hermit.

because 200gb doesn't costs a lot, on pc i mean and not on 360

Oh so Gigabytes dictates your status as a hermit?

Can we all stop replaying to 'theegodhalo' he's clearly a diluted fanboy whos bringing out the fanboy in all of you.