Crytek: Cryengine 3 runs better on the PS3 compared to the 360

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#151 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

He actually says that nobody else is using the PS3 as well as they are, not that the PS3 runs the engine better. Sounds more like he's saying that they've brought the PS3 up to par. We'll probably see a game using this engine on both consoles soon and see which console truly runs it better anyways.

Avatar image for BlackTragedy
BlackTragedy

1830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 BlackTragedy
Member since 2009 • 1830 Posts

[QUOTE="BlackTragedy"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]dude, you are a well known cow, deny it all you want, your posting history speaks for itself navyguy21

you must have that line saved cus thats the same thing you said to me yesterday :|....... when i posted an article to patchers prediction that the live would raise in price and asked sw to comment on such speculation .

STOP CALLING PPL COWS

lol, it stings?? You know you are a cow, he knows he is a cow, and system wars knows BOTH of your posting histories, so you cant hide from it, its not just me that KNOWS, the rest of system wars see the threads you both create. You think people forget stuff like that?? As i said in that thread you referred to, its not based on that one thread you created, but based on YOUR ENTIRE POSTING HISTORY, why do you insist on limiting it to that post??

show me this tainted posting history then. Yesterday you avoided the same question.

Avatar image for eNT1TY
eNT1TY

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 eNT1TY
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts
You are a lemming and YOUR posting history shows that :) anyways, 2 cows and 1 lemming in a thread isnt so bad, there could be 15 cows and 8 lemmings... before you get your panties in a twirl about the accusation i did refer to your recent posting history and not once have you accused a lemming or what you thought might be a lemming of being a lemming yet you only accuse cows... not only that, when said potential lemmings exhibit fanboyism and/or spout outlandish claims or statements you do not point it out or make an accusation like you do for cows... and lastly you defend the 360 in any thread against 'cows' but when anyone defends the ps3 they are fanboy and a cow. You my friend ARE a lemming through and through regardless of what systems you own by your own standard...
Avatar image for dethroned3
dethroned3

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 dethroned3
Member since 2007 • 1104 Posts

[QUOTE="BlackTragedy"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]dude, you are a well known cow, deny it all you want, your posting history speaks for itself navyguy21

you must have that line saved cus thats the same thing you said to me yesterday :|....... when i posted an article to patchers prediction that the live would raise in price and asked sw to comment on such speculation .

STOP CALLING PPL COWS

lol, it stings?? You know you are a cow, he knows he is a cow, and system wars knows BOTH of your posting histories, so you cant hide from it, its not just me that KNOWS, the rest of system wars see the threads you both create. You think people forget stuff like that?? As i said in that thread you referred to, its not based on that one thread you created, but based on YOUR ENTIRE POSTING HISTORY, why do you insist on limiting it to that post??

whats up with the name calling? lemming/fanboy?

you see what i did just then?

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#155 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

Wow, that graphic destroys KZ2, when you think you seen what Ps3 can do you see something like this, wow :o

Avatar image for themerlin
themerlin

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 themerlin
Member since 2006 • 481 Posts

Don`t forget it`s only a Tech demo not an actual game.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

This entire thread fails. Declaring the PS3 version won by basing it off of tech demos.

Why not wait for the real thing?

Avatar image for Cheesehead9099
Cheesehead9099

2849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#158 Cheesehead9099
Member since 2008 • 2849 Posts
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] Cause you guys like to ***** about such small and meaningless differences. It's pointless for you to argue like the differences matter.AAllxxjjnn
dont put you guys like im part of this.....i buy all multis on pc but you dont have to come into every thread screaming PC OWNS Both or showing shots ffrom crysis every graphics thread

Ok, sorry, i was using 'you guys' to refer to PS3 or 360 owners. It's just silly to me to bother comparing when the differences are so insignificant. Like when DMC4 came out and GT put up a comparison vid, the most noticeable difference was the saturation, and even that was small.

Yes I agree with you, the two consoles have such similar graphics that its pretty sad that people spend their whole day wasting their time fighting about it when there's barely a difference at all. You may see a difference between 360 n PS3 on screenshots if you look close, but when you're playing the game I doubt you'll inspect the differences so no one notices them. But with PC, its obviously superior, you'd have to be blind not to see that almost every multiplat is better on PC. its a given. BTW, I AM NOT A HERMIT. I DO NOT OWN A GAMING PC, JUST A 360 AND PS3. I AM JUST TIRED OF ALL MY FELLOW CONSOLE OWNERS ARGUING ABOUT PETTY INSIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES. FROM THE PC VIDEOS AND SCREENSHOTS I HAVE SEEN OF MANY POPULAR GAMES SUCH AS ASSASSINS CREED, COD4, BATMAN: AA and MORE, I CAN SEE THAT PC HAS A HUGE GFX ADVANTAGE OVER THE CONSOLES BUT THE CONSOLES BARELY DIFFER FROM EACH OTHER. kthxbye
Avatar image for kunal1092000
kunal1092000

920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 kunal1092000
Member since 2003 • 920 Posts

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. stereointegrity
yes we kno pc destroys both but that has nothing to do with this.....why do hermits always enter every thread screaming PC owns Both!!!!.....WE KNO

We do it just to remind you and annoy you. lol we get a kick out of watching this forum.

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts
[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"] when he was showing off the post processing effects, physics. He clearly never mentions the 360 version, only the pc and ps3.

You must know that he did not mention the 360 because it has more than just post processing and physics. He clearly did not want to embarrass the PS3 and PC, hence the reason for not mentioning the 360.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#161 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="themerlin"]

This engine is optomized for consoles and PC. Why would they cut out Physics and post processing for the 360. I bet every multiplatform game that uses this engine will be near identical. Nowhere in the video did he say that the 360 can`t run Cryengine 3 aswell as the PS3.

And i think they are showing the PS3 version to show how well they have it running on there because most multiplatform games run worse on the PS3.

ZoomZoom2490

the multiplat games that run worse on ps3 are straight ports of the code, it meansnooptimization at all.this game from Crytek is build from ground up for both consoles. learn the differences.

really? ghostbusters says hi,the ps3 was the lead platform but it still looked noticably worse than the 360 version, TC has selective hearing, nowhere did anybody say the ps3 version would run better, the TC and the whol thread are complete failure, and i would suggest the TC seriously considers purchasing a hearing aid
Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts
This thread is about PS3 vs 360 not pc vs ps3 vs 360 :| Let cows have some joy gezz
Avatar image for Sniper-PIG
Sniper-PIG

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Sniper-PIG
Member since 2009 • 115 Posts
Actually this is wrong at 8:32 - Crytek's Cevat Yerli says: "Now... there are a lot of engines that run - or two major engines that run beside us on consoles. PS3/360, but I would argue nobody is running on PS3 as good as we do. I can put my hand on fire on this... nobody. I mean nobody. I have seen what people are running on PS3, and we are running PS3/360/PC this quality bar and, I mean PS3 would be the lowest nominated for a lot of people, but in our case actually PS3 is running at a top level. It's very difficult, I mean the PS3 as a engine.. as a technology platform is very challenging. But all the SPUs the Cell architecture itself, the low-end GPU compared to the rest of the family, the 360 and PC, it adds a complexity to it, but we have managed to abstract this complexity from a developer and write intelligent compute systems that actually take care of the problems, and, and... that's it." At 01:37 of the video - Cevat Yerli says: "Everything that you see, from all lights and shadows are real-time so there's nothing pre-computed whatsoever. This is the only engine that does everything real-time. There's no one other engine that performs every step in real-time. So every frame loop that goes through all the data that you see on the screen... all the shading all the lights, the softshadows, the wind and the cloth. Again we just wanted to show how close range details could look on a console. I mean, again the idea was that PS3/360/PC look the same, identical. So for us to achieve that, with this kind of crisp detail was a major challenge." "Now... there are a lot of engines that run - or two major engines that run beside us on consoles. PS3/360, but I would argue nobody is running on PS3 as good as we do. I can put my hand on fire on this... nobody. I mean nobody." "Everything that you see, from all lights and shadows are real-time so there's nothing pre-computed whatsoever. This is the only engine that does everything real-time. There's no one other engine that performs every step in real-time."
Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#164 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

That multiscreen presentation tells a different story. LINK

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#165 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. AAllxxjjnn
lol so random! lol, funny thing is I just finished rewatching braveheart last night :P
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. AAllxxjjnn

So the existence of something better means we can't enjoy the console titles? Why does PC need to be brought into every graphics thread between consoles? It's ridiculous.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
I'll be getting it on PC anyways.
Avatar image for buwiset
buwiset

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 buwiset
Member since 2006 • 293 Posts

That multiscreen presentation tells a different story. LINK

Epak_

Looks like the 360 has better fps, and colors are more vivid, the PS3 version is a bit choppy and colors are not as vivid as the 360

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#169 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
he says its the loweest common denominator for a lot of people but for us its right up there with the best considering its lesser gpu in the family.. you fanboys should listen harder to what he says instead of wanting to hear what he says and turning it into something in your favour..
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. hakanakumono

So the existence of something better means we can't enjoy the console titles? Why does PC need to be brought into every graphics thread between consoles? It's ridiculous.

Umm, deal with it. If the console crowd is gonna argue over such small differences in multiplat titles, PC gamers can come in and bring up that their version is best.
Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#171 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

[QUOTE="Epak_"]

That multiscreen presentation tells a different story. LINK

buwiset

Looks like the 360 has better fps, and colors are more vivid, the PS3 version is a bit choppy and colors are not as vivid as the 360

Exactly.

Avatar image for ToScA-
ToScA-

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 ToScA-
Member since 2006 • 5783 Posts
Hm..would be interesting if the 360 version outperforms Uncharted 2. Will be interesting to see what our bovine friends will fall back on considering "it cannot be done on 360".
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. stereointegrity
yes we kno pc destroys both but that has nothing to do with this.....why do hermits always enter every thread screaming PC owns Both!!!!.....WE KNO

why argue about differences you can only see if you put them side by side?
Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts

[QUOTE="Martin_G_N"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] We have seen both games in motion, and they look the same. Just because they have the PS3's SPUs processing physics, and some effects doesn't mean they can't do the same with the 360's 3 processing cores. Keeping in mind the 360 has the superior GPU. I mean, if you had watched the video, you'd hear about how many problems they had even getting the engine to run on the PS3. They had no problems with the 360, or PC version. :)navyguy21

There is not one game that uses the X360's CPU in the same way as the PS3 uses it's CPU. Uncharted 2 and other exclusives uses the Cell for sound processing, physics, animation, post processing effects and other graphics processing to help out the GPU. It does all that while doing other CPU processes. There is not a single game out on the X360 where the CPU does all that, specially helping out the GPU, I doubt the X360's CPU can help out the GPU at all.

You just showed that you have no idea about how game development works, or how the hardware inside the systems work. You are just saying what you heard on the internet..........which is dangerous

Are you saying that I am wrong? Both the PS2 and the PS3 was made to use the CPU more than both the Xboxes. And if you watch the making of Uncharted 2, they will explain how much they are using the Cell. According to them, the Cell is doing a lot of the work and is the main reason they can have such a high polygon count and some of the post pocessing effects. I have never heard one word about the X360's CPU handling GPU work, and I doubt we ever will.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#175 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
hehe.. ps3 fans trying to spin "runs up to par with x360" to "runs better than x360" :P
Avatar image for dolph1073
dolph1073

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 dolph1073
Member since 2004 • 204 Posts

The way its meant to be played:

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#177 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]

[QUOTE="Martin_G_N"]There is not one game that uses the X360's CPU in the same way as the PS3 uses it's CPU. Uncharted 2 and other exclusives uses the Cell for sound processing, physics, animation, post processing effects and other graphics processing to help out the GPU. It does all that while doing other CPU processes. There is not a single game out on the X360 where the CPU does all that, specially helping out the GPU, I doubt the X360's CPU can help out the GPU at all.Martin_G_N

You just showed that you have no idea about how game development works, or how the hardware inside the systems work. You are just saying what you heard on the internet..........which is dangerous

Are you saying that I am wrong? Both the PS2 and the PS3 was made to use the CPU more than both the Xboxes. And if you watch the making of Uncharted 2, they will explain how much they are using the Cell. According to them, the Cell is doing a lot of the work and is the main reason they can have such a high polygon count and some of the post pocessing effects. I have never heard one word about the X360's CPU handling GPU work, and I doubt we ever will.

firstly if you do your research the 360 is capable of pushing twice as many polygons as the ps3, secondly, what do you think the 3 core CPU in the 360 actually does? because by your logic, the GPU does everything and the CPU does absolutely nothing except run the OS, which would be a waste of a triple core processor if you ask me, here read this, then you will know what the 360 cpu does http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2005/06/xbox360-2.ars if you go to page 4 you will clearly see that the VMX unit in the xenon helps with 3d rendering, so therefore the xenon DOES help the GPU to render graphics, thus proving your point completely wrong
Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts
[QUOTE="Martin_G_N"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"] You just showed that you have no idea about how game development works, or how the hardware inside the systems work. You are just saying what you heard on the internet..........which is dangerous

delta3074

Are you saying that I am wrong? Both the PS2 and the PS3 was made to use the CPU more than both the Xboxes. And if you watch the making of Uncharted 2, they will explain how much they are using the Cell. According to them, the Cell is doing a lot of the work and is the main reason they can have such a high polygon count and some of the post pocessing effects. I have never heard one word about the X360's CPU handling GPU work, and I doubt we ever will.

firstly if you do your research the 360 is capable of pushing twice as many polygons as the ps3, secondly, what do you think the 3 core CPU in the 360 actually does? because by your logic, the GPU does everything and the CPU does absolutely nothing except run the OS, which would be a waste of a triple core processor if you ask me, here read this, then you will know what the 360 cpu does http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2005/06/xbox360-2.ars

I know that, but for all we know that number could be without the optimizations of the Cell. And there is nothing saying what polygon count the PS3 and X360 can do with textures and lighting. The CPU in the X360 is powerfull, but it does'nt beat the Cell in terms of handling more tasks at once.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Honestly no matter what sources are thrown out there; whenever I see any video the 360 version looks like it is running better.

Quite frankly I saw nothing in that old video saying PS3 > 360, only that they as a developer utilize it the best.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#180 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="Martin_G_N"]Are you saying that I am wrong? Both the PS2 and the PS3 was made to use the CPU more than both the Xboxes. And if you watch the making of Uncharted 2, they will explain how much they are using the Cell. According to them, the Cell is doing a lot of the work and is the main reason they can have such a high polygon count and some of the post pocessing effects. I have never heard one word about the X360's CPU handling GPU work, and I doubt we ever will.Martin_G_N
firstly if you do your research the 360 is capable of pushing twice as many polygons as the ps3, secondly, what do you think the 3 core CPU in the 360 actually does? because by your logic, the GPU does everything and the CPU does absolutely nothing except run the OS, which would be a waste of a triple core processor if you ask me, here read this, then you will know what the 360 cpu does http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2005/06/xbox360-2.ars

I know that, but for all we know that number could be without the optimizations of the Cell. And there is nothing saying what polygon count the PS3 and X360 can do with textures and lighting. The CPU in the X360 is powerfull, but it does'nt beat the Cell in terms of handling more tasks at once.

it clearly states on page 4 that the vmx unit in the xenon helps with 3d rendering, therefore it does help the GPU with it's graphics, it plain and simple really, you said the CPU didn't help the GPU, that clearly proves otherwise, simple as ,don't try to confuse the issue
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#181 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. hakanakumono

So the existence of something better means we can't enjoy the console titles? Why does PC need to be brought into every graphics thread between consoles? It's ridiculous.

I love it when you admit that the PC is better... And the pc must be mentioned always,as it serves as benchmark for graphics.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#182 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. AAllxxjjnn
How does that apply to this thread?
Avatar image for Sniper-PIG
Sniper-PIG

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 Sniper-PIG
Member since 2009 • 115 Posts
Just to let people know, he NEVER said the PS3 version is better. Read my last post..PEOPLE!
Avatar image for cb_au
cb_au

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 cb_au
Member since 2009 • 219 Posts
Those GOD RAYS appear at very high settings on PC !!Its a shame to see that quality(which is easily equilant to high-very high Crysis PC),run on a 300$ machine. Without any frame rate issues,without any heating issue...You can sit back and plug it in your 50"+ HDTV and enjoy it !
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#185 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
Just to let people know, he NEVER said the PS3 version is better. Read my last post..PEOPLE! Sniper-PIG

Actually, towards the end it says the PS3 would be the lowest "nominator" for most developers, and he then goes on to say that it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC. He also says the cell architecture is very challenging, and says they've taken this difficult platform and found ways to "take care of the problems".

Interesting stuff.

Avatar image for cb_au
cb_au

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 cb_au
Member since 2009 • 219 Posts
[QUOTE="Sniper-PIG"]Just to let people know, he NEVER said the PS3 version is better. Read my last post..PEOPLE! musicalmac

Actually, towards the end it says the PS3 would be the lowest "nominator" for most developers, and he then goes on to say that it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC. He also says the cell architecture is very challenging, and says they've taken this difficult platform and found ways to "take care of the problems".

Interesting stuff.

Yup certainly interesting, after watching Uncharted II i dont think we need an explanation to that.
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#187 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17930 Posts
[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Sniper-PIG"]Just to let people know, he NEVER said the PS3 version is better. Read my last post..PEOPLE! cb_au

Actually, towards the end it says the PS3 would be the lowest "nominator" for most developers, and he then goes on to say that it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC. He also says the cell architecture is very challenging, and says they've taken this difficult platform and found ways to "take care of the problems".

Interesting stuff.

Yup certainly interesting, after watching Uncharted II i dont think we need an explanation to that.

lol, cryengine 3 still looks better :P
Avatar image for cb_au
cb_au

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 cb_au
Member since 2009 • 219 Posts
[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="cb_au"][QUOTE="musicalmac"]

Actually, towards the end it says the PS3 would be the lowest "nominator" for most developers, and he then goes on to say that it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC. He also says the cell architecture is very challenging, and says they've taken this difficult platform and found ways to "take care of the problems".

Interesting stuff.

Yup certainly interesting, after watching Uncharted II i dont think we need an explanation to that.

lol, cryengine 3 still looks better :P

d I hope it does, i dont want gaming consoles to stuck at a place :P ...
Avatar image for Communistsheep
Communistsheep

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#189 Communistsheep
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. gamewhat

You must only have an inferior 360. Must be the reason why all the sudden so called hermits come to these threads and say such nonsensical things. Besides when some site does a comparison the pc version will be touted as superior, but when watched on video will look just the the PS3 version. Get over it, the console versions will look as good as the pc version, might have other bells and whistles but you would never know unless it was ran by digital foundry.

BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!
Avatar image for Next-Gen-Tec
Next-Gen-Tec

4623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#190 Next-Gen-Tec
Member since 2009 • 4623 Posts
Sounds like he was comparing it to other PS3 games.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#191 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="Sniper-PIG"]Just to let people know, he NEVER said the PS3 version is better. Read my last post..PEOPLE! musicalmac

Actually, towards the end it says the PS3 would be the lowest "nominator" for most developers, and he then goes on to say that it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC. He also says the cell architecture is very challenging, and says they've taken this difficult platform and found ways to "take care of the problems".

Interesting stuff.

Sony fanboys wont like that "it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC" claim :P

Avatar image for cb_au
cb_au

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 cb_au
Member since 2009 • 219 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Sniper-PIG"]Just to let people know, he NEVER said the PS3 version is better. Read my last post..PEOPLE! PAL360

Actually, towards the end it says the PS3 would be the lowest "nominator" for most developers, and he then goes on to say that it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC. He also says the cell architecture is very challenging, and says they've taken this difficult platform and found ways to "take care of the problems".

Interesting stuff.

Sony fanboys wont like that "it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC" claim :P

Actually Sony fanboys can thrash that theory since they have the best looking GAMES (not even a single game) on consoles. :P. So yeah, for me it is just a theory. Hard work outputting killer graphics NOT equals to "lowest end hardware".
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#193 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]

Actually, towards the end it says the PS3 would be the lowest "nominator" for most developers, and he then goes on to say that it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC. He also says the cell architecture is very challenging, and says they've taken this difficult platform and found ways to "take care of the problems".

Interesting stuff.

cb_au

Sony fanboys wont like that "it has the lowest end GPU when compared to the 360 and PC" claim :P

Actually Sony fanboys can thrash that theory since they have the best looking GAMES (not even a single game) on consoles. :P. So yeah, for me it is just a theory. Hard work outputting killer graphics NOT equals to "lowest end hardware".

2 better looking exclusives VS hundreds of better looking/performing multiplats.....humm. I prefer the second one :P

Avatar image for Vadamee
Vadamee

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 Vadamee
Member since 2009 • 1195 Posts
Oh God, he didn't say which was running better on which platform between consoles... :lol: He simply said that the PS3 versions of multiplats are inferior to 360/PC ones; that developers struggle to get their graphics engine running up to par with the other two. This is why COWS, not PS3 owners, but cows, are considered the worst fanboys because they are grandmasters of spin!
Avatar image for ChiSoxBombers
ChiSoxBombers

3700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 ChiSoxBombers
Member since 2006 • 3700 Posts
PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. AAllxxjjnn
i agree. but i think this thread is strictly PS3 vs. 360
Avatar image for beekayjay
beekayjay

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#196 beekayjay
Member since 2008 • 1732 Posts
Its NEVER mentioned in the tech demo that the PS3 is running the engine better than the other platforms. IF ANYTHING, he was critical of the architecture, saying that they have it running well DESPITE the complexity of the Cell and the low end nature of the RSX. God dammit, TC. This BS of yours barely even qualifies as spin, its so bloody off the mark. And yes, I am a PS3 owner. Thanks for continuing to give us a bad name.
Avatar image for ToScA-
ToScA-

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 ToScA-
Member since 2006 • 5783 Posts
This is why COWS, not PS3 owners, but cows, are considered the worst fanboys because they are grandmasters of spin!Vadamee
I figure they lost the plot after GT's review of Uncharted 2.
Avatar image for themerlin
themerlin

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 themerlin
Member since 2006 • 481 Posts

Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 have had special engines made to use the Cell the best they can but the 360 has awesome looking games on multiplatform engines like Gears Of War.

Multiplats will always look better on the 360 because the console was developed with easy developement in mind unlike the PS3 which is not developer friendly which is why Valve don`t like working on the PS3 because of it`s obscure architecture.

And for the argument that exclusives always look better than multiplats well last gen the Xbox best looking games where mostly using middleware engines like splinter cell chaos theory, Doom 3, Chronicles of riddick, so i think Cryengine 3 and Rage willl be much better looking than Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#199 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
PC demolishes them both. It's like William Wallace vs. a bunch of 6th graders. AAllxxjjnn
Haha. Funny but true. PC wins as usual.
Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

I love this topic. :)