Dark Souls 2 will absolutely destroy Witcher 3 in quality

  • 139 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#101  Edited By Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

@Joedgabe said:

I love Dark Souls but because i do really enjoy Dark Souls i really do hate fanboys who go on and do these type of threads. Makes me sick. When I play a game i like i don't give a shit about any other game outside of it.

So much agreement from me on that. The games are great, but the more ardent fanboys of the series idiotically think they have some skills that anyone criticizing anything about the series doesn't have. Fact is, these games require no more skill than any other game out there, they just demand extreme patience in the form of trial and error.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@MBirdy88 said:

@Cranler said:

I like the Souls series but CD Projekt could easily copy the Souls formula but are much more ambitious.

Souls is a very low budget, old school style of game. It doesn't create a living, breathing world like The Witcher.

Souls series has about 5 hours worth of content which is masked by the difficulty and lack of checkpoints. It's got 2 minutes worth of dialogue and very little story.

Thats not really fair as they are completely different.

But then that is what I think of this entire thread. its comparing a Bioware Style RPG to a friggin Diablo (hack n slash edition) RPG... both accel in two very different areas.

The Witcher will have a better story driven universe, but then dark souls is not about that. its about an atmosphere of isolation, no hope and mystery... nothing is meant to make sense in the form of 1000s of lines of dialogue. It also does emergent gameplay in the form of player interaction... something the witcher cannot do.

And the witcher's difficulty was what exactly? cheap.... and even less skillful. just spam your highest potions and twirl away. out of the 2. dark souls beat witcher in challenge and gameplay. but witcher was better at role playing immersion and choices.

apples to oranges.

The Witcher 3 should be compared with Dragon Age: Inquisition this year if anything. not dark souls.

One things for certain is that Souls is the cheaper and easier game to make.

Please provide an example of this emergent gameplay you speak of.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

Both will be awesome and i will get both:P

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

@Cranler said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@Cranler said:

I like the Souls series but CD Projekt could easily copy the Souls formula but are much more ambitious.

Souls is a very low budget, old school style of game. It doesn't create a living, breathing world like The Witcher.

Souls series has about 5 hours worth of content which is masked by the difficulty and lack of checkpoints. It's got 2 minutes worth of dialogue and very little story.

Thats not really fair as they are completely different.

But then that is what I think of this entire thread. its comparing a Bioware Style RPG to a friggin Diablo (hack n slash edition) RPG... both accel in two very different areas.

The Witcher will have a better story driven universe, but then dark souls is not about that. its about an atmosphere of isolation, no hope and mystery... nothing is meant to make sense in the form of 1000s of lines of dialogue. It also does emergent gameplay in the form of player interaction... something the witcher cannot do.

And the witcher's difficulty was what exactly? cheap.... and even less skillful. just spam your highest potions and twirl away. out of the 2. dark souls beat witcher in challenge and gameplay. but witcher was better at role playing immersion and choices.

apples to oranges.

The Witcher 3 should be compared with Dragon Age: Inquisition this year if anything. not dark souls.

One things for certain is that Souls is the cheaper and easier game to make.

Please provide an example of this emergent gameplay you speak of.

I don't think the first line in your post is a point in favour of the witcher in any shape or form. and not entirely true, the witcher has much higher production values granted. and narrative... neither of which is hardwork from the gameplay standpoint in which the witcher is a very simple game with very little custimization (so far anyway) ... whereas the dark souls games had far more custimization and factors into balance (which sadly was poorly done, better luck with dark souls 2 hopefully) and making meaningful player interactions is something not considered. I would argue Dragon: Age Inquisition is a MUCH bigger project than the Witcher and will offer so much more again, does that make it automatically the better game?

Geralt has a measley handful of powers.... even now they say its only double in TWIII ..... DA:A will have what 8-10 characters and many different class branches.... and its hard to make a 1-character rpg as complex as a 4 group RPG.

"Emergent" gameplay might of been a stretch. but the fact that in DSII your forced into the PvP element adds a layer you can't get in standard RPGs. and the heavier faction intergration this time around.

apples to oranges.

easy for witcher fans to ignore the "real" competition.... DA:A. and pinpoint on Dark Souls .... a PvE/PvP hybrid game with a very different focus... that happens to also be an rpg.

its like comparing the witcher to path of exile? the people playing PoE don't give a damn about your 1000s of lines of "boring pointless storytelling" ... to them... PoE is a miles better "RPG" because it actually focuses 100% on gameplay and custimization and manages to make it endless with player interaction.

so again, this topic is borderline pointless.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Nah. The Witcher 3 is my most anticipated game right now. They are also very different games.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@MBirdy88 said:

@Cranler said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@Cranler said:

I like the Souls series but CD Projekt could easily copy the Souls formula but are much more ambitious.

Souls is a very low budget, old school style of game. It doesn't create a living, breathing world like The Witcher.

Souls series has about 5 hours worth of content which is masked by the difficulty and lack of checkpoints. It's got 2 minutes worth of dialogue and very little story.

Thats not really fair as they are completely different.

But then that is what I think of this entire thread. its comparing a Bioware Style RPG to a friggin Diablo (hack n slash edition) RPG... both accel in two very different areas.

The Witcher will have a better story driven universe, but then dark souls is not about that. its about an atmosphere of isolation, no hope and mystery... nothing is meant to make sense in the form of 1000s of lines of dialogue. It also does emergent gameplay in the form of player interaction... something the witcher cannot do.

And the witcher's difficulty was what exactly? cheap.... and even less skillful. just spam your highest potions and twirl away. out of the 2. dark souls beat witcher in challenge and gameplay. but witcher was better at role playing immersion and choices.

apples to oranges.

The Witcher 3 should be compared with Dragon Age: Inquisition this year if anything. not dark souls.

One things for certain is that Souls is the cheaper and easier game to make.

Please provide an example of this emergent gameplay you speak of.

I don't think the first line in your post is a point in favour of the witcher in any shape or form. and not entirely true, the witcher has much higher production values granted. and narrative... neither of which is hardwork from the gameplay standpoint in which the witcher is a very simple game with very little custimization (so far anyway) ... whereas the dark souls games had far more custimization and factors into balance (which sadly was poorly done, better luck with dark souls 2 hopefully) and making meaningful player interactions is something not considered. I would argue Dragon: Age Inquisition is a MUCH bigger project than the Witcher and will offer so much more again, does that make it automatically the better game?

Geralt has a measley handful of powers.... even now they say its only double in TWIII ..... DA:A will have what 8-10 characters and many different class branches.... and its hard to make a 1-character rpg as complex as a 4 group RPG.

"Emergent" gameplay might of been a stretch. but the fact that in DSII your forced into the PvP element adds a layer you can't get in standard RPGs. and the heavier faction intergration this time around.

apples to oranges.

easy for witcher fans to ignore the "real" competition.... DA:A. and pinpoint on Dark Souls .... a PvE/PvP hybrid game with a very different focus... that happens to also be an rpg.

its like comparing the witcher to path of exile? the people playing PoE don't give a damn about your 1000s of lines of "boring pointless storytelling" ... to them... PoE is a miles better "RPG" because it actually focuses 100% on gameplay and custimization and manages to make it endless with player interaction.

so again, this topic is borderline pointless.

Witcher is all about playing Geralt. Cant fault it for not having more customization.

To me, liking Dark Souls over The Witcher because of combat is like enjoying Gears more than GTA because of the shooting mechanics.

Dragon Age and Witcher differ just as much as Souls and Witcher. The thread is about Souls VS Witcher anyways.

More powers isnt always better. I would take Unreals 10 or so guns over all of Borderlands guns for example.

Like all point and click games, Path of Exile has no immersion and the combat is awful, at least in the first 10 minutes which is where I stopped playing. Maybe I should give it another chance.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

ALL I know is I wouldn't want to be the poor sap caught playing these on consoles.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108  Edited By clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts

Apples and oranges.

Avatar image for king_allant
King_Allant

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#109 King_Allant
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts

As said before the two are better at different things.
Dark Souls2 will have better combat,boss fights,level design,atmosphere. Where The Witcher 3 will have better graphics,better story telling,more meaningful choices,better open world and overall a better rpg.
I am personally stoked for both of them. One is gonna be out in a month. So you guys will get to know stuff really soon :)

Avatar image for deactivated-5a44ec138c1e6
deactivated-5a44ec138c1e6

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

#110  Edited By deactivated-5a44ec138c1e6
Member since 2013 • 2638 Posts

@Thunder7151: Listen dude....

The Witcher series and Dark Souls series are both insane.

But I don’t think you can say that The Witcher has bad quality because it has a different control or gameplay mechanic.

I can even say that The Witcher series has more focus on the character of the game than in Dark Souls but is that what DS wanted to achieve ? NO!

Both are aiming for different things.

Dark Souls II will be insane.

But The Witcher 3 is created by CD Projekt Red and they shouldn’t be underestimated.

They are probably one of the best Developers alongside Bethesda in the RPG genre.

Avatar image for Thunder7151
Thunder7151

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#111  Edited By Thunder7151
Member since 2013 • 456 Posts

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@aroxx_ab said:

Both will be awesome and i will get both:P

agreed both will be amazing on PC

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@Thunder7151 said:

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

Most of these are opinions, and the graphics one is factually wrong. (TW2 looks far superior). I find TW2's gameplay, atmosphere, story, story teling, and characters considerably superior.

The only point you have is choice of character class and replay value, which isn't always a PRO depending on game's style and objective.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114  Edited By deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

@Thunder7151 said:

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

Gameplay - Debatable.
Atmosphere - Debatable
Graphics - Witcher 3... you tool.
story - debatable but very likely to be the witcher... unless we are pretending the souls games have good stories now ... sigh.
choice - .... yes cherry pick intentional game design differences that are purely subjective to the game's differences.
replay value - subjective again.

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#115 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

OP is stating the obvious. Graphics whores and people looking for big spectacle and things that make them go "oo" and "ah" will of course eat up Witcher 3 (basically 99% of the gaming press and casual gamers).

Gaming enthusiasts will have a greater appreciation for the deep, intricate, and methodical nature that can only be found in Dark Souls II.

Comparing Witcher to Dark Souls is like comparing fast food to expensive high class dining.

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#116 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

@MBirdy88 said:

The Witcher 3 should be compared with Dragon Age: Inquisition this year if anything. not dark souls.

Also this. A much better comparison would be Witcher 3 and DA: Inquisition seeing as both of those games appeal more to people looking for instant gratification.

Dark Souls II is doing something else entirely. Something incredibly rare in this day and age, which makes it far more special imo.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

Dark Souls 2 is the only game I'm looking forward to this year. It'll probably be the best rpg of this gen.

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

I will be getting both, but TW3 will more than likely be the better game in all areas except combat. Story, graphics, world design, characters, etc all go to TW3 more than likely. It's going to be funny when DS2 comes out and they have done what they said, appeal to a wider audience....which will really lower the appeal of the game to the douchers who only praise it because it is difficult. See above.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts
@MBirdy88 said:

@Thunder7151 said:

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

Gameplay - Debatable.

Atmosphere - Debatable

Graphics - Witcher 3... you tool.

story - debatable but very likely to be the witcher... unless we are pretending the souls games have good stories now ... sigh.

choice - .... yes cherry pick intentional game design differences that are purely subjective to the game's differences.

replay value - subjective again.

If TW3 is anything like TW2 gameplay and replay value aren't debateable. DS2 would crush TW3 harder than an industrial hammer thrown on a chunk of chalk.

Rest I agree with.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

@N30F3N1X said:
@MBirdy88 said:

@Thunder7151 said:

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

Gameplay - Debatable.

Atmosphere - Debatable

Graphics - Witcher 3... you tool.

story - debatable but very likely to be the witcher... unless we are pretending the souls games have good stories now ... sigh.

choice - .... yes cherry pick intentional game design differences that are purely subjective to the game's differences.

replay value - subjective again.

If TW3 is anything like TW2 gameplay and replay value aren't debateable. DS2 would crush TW3 harder than an industrial hammer thrown on a chunk of chalk.

Rest I agree with.

well, look at it from my perspective, couldn't care less about building new character stats.... even for PvP ... waste of my time.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#121 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@Sushiglutton said:

I expect TW3 to be better in every single way tbh.

Me too. That's the one I'll be getting anyways. Dark Souls 2 can wait. I still haven't beaten the first game. I wonder if they will have a collectors edition as well?

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#122 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@Thunder7151 said:

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

You've played Dark Souls 2 already. I thought developers were still finishing it.

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

@Thunder7151 said:

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

lol, how are the graphics debatable? Witcher 3 is a next gen game with PC being the lead platform. Dark Souls II is a last gen game being ported to PC. Witcher 3 wins that one by default. And the character class thing is totally irrelevant.

Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts

This game had me at "Hello"

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#125 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

All I'll say is Dark Souls 2 is just more Dark Souls, while The Witcher 3 is promising to literally redefine RPGs. Whether that will be the case remains to be seen (we've all heard it before), but looking at TW3, there's just a lot more to get hyped for.

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@N30F3N1X said:
@MBirdy88 said:

@Thunder7151 said:

Dark Souls 2 versus Witcher 3

  • Better Gameplay = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Atmosphere = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Graphics = Debatable
  • Better Story = Debatable
  • Choice of Character Classes = Dark Souls 2
  • Better Replay Value = Dark Souls 2

DARK SOULS 2 WINS BY A LANDSLIDE!!!!

Gameplay - Debatable.

Atmosphere - Debatable

Graphics - Witcher 3... you tool.

story - debatable but very likely to be the witcher... unless we are pretending the souls games have good stories now ... sigh.

choice - .... yes cherry pick intentional game design differences that are purely subjective to the game's differences.

replay value - subjective again.

If TW3 is anything like TW2 gameplay and replay value aren't debateable. DS2 would crush TW3 harder than an industrial hammer thrown on a chunk of chalk.

Rest I agree with.

If what they say is true then TW3 is suppose to be 30 times the size of TW2 and the combat is suppose ot be more tactical. If you ask me, that is why the Souls games' combat has more strategy. It sounds like that is the route that they are going in TW3's combat plus inspiration from the Arkham games.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

@jhcho2: The Witcher offers next to nothing in terms of customization? Um besides equipment and weapons it had three separate skill trees you could pick and choose from. Talk about a fail post. Both games are in my top 10 of games of last gen but an open world Witcher 3 is my most anticpated game of 2014 with ease

Avatar image for Vecna
Vecna

3425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Vecna
Member since 2002 • 3425 Posts

LMAO!

Witcher 3 is gonna bend DS2 over like a cheap hooker. You shouldn't compare games that aren't even in the same league.

Avatar image for Thunder7151
Thunder7151

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#129 Thunder7151
Member since 2013 • 456 Posts

@Master_ShakeXXX said:

Gaming enthusiasts will have a greater appreciation for the deep, intricate, and methodical nature that can only be found in Dark Souls II.

Comparing Witcher to Dark Souls is like comparing fast food to expensive high class dining.

Well said.

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#130  Edited By Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

@princeofshapeir said:

All I'll say is Dark Souls 2 is just more Dark Souls, while The Witcher 3 is promising to literally redefine RPGs. Whether that will be the case remains to be seen (we've all heard it before), but looking at TW3, there's just a lot more to get hyped for.

What? Who said this, or are you just talking out of your ass?

Avatar image for DefconRave
DefconRave

806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#131 DefconRave
Member since 2013 • 806 Posts

Maybe you played it on console, I played it on pc and the kb/m worked great for the game.

I can see why it would be clunky using a controller, with the clumsy inventory/menu system.

Found the combat ok, but blocking seemed to be useless when you can just dodge everywhere for no damage. But its a pretty flawed combat system, hated the auto lock on to 1 enemy.

Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts

@Vecna said:

LMAO!

Witcher 3 is gonna bend DS2 over like a cheap hooker. You shouldn't compare games that aren't even in the same league.

Basically. It sounds like Op sucks at RPGs. Dark Souls battle system is much more simple than that in the Witcher games.

Avatar image for Thunder7151
Thunder7151

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#133  Edited By Thunder7151
Member since 2013 • 456 Posts

@firefox59 said:

Dark Souls battle system is much more simple than that in the Witcher games.

Yet, Dark Souls combat system is considered far far better than Witcher's combat system. So the combat complexity is not helping the Witcher games, that's for sure. The Souls games' combat have less buttons to deal with, yet are much more intuitive, deeper, and more rewarding that Witcher's complex tedious annoying combat.

Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134  Edited By firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts
@Thunder7151 said:

@firefox59 said:

Dark Souls battle system is much more simple than that in the Witcher games.

Yet, Dark Souls combat system is considered far far better than Witcher's combat system. So the combat complexity is not helping the Witcher games, that's for sure. The Souls games' combat have less buttons to deal with, yet are much more intuitive, deeper, and more rewarding that Witcher's complex tedious annoying combat.

They have less buttons but they are deeper? That doesn't even make sense. Dark Souls is trial and error with a sword and shield. Oh the depth. There is also no general consensus on which game has better combat.

Avatar image for Thunder7151
Thunder7151

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#135  Edited By Thunder7151
Member since 2013 • 456 Posts

@firefox59 said:
@Thunder7151 said:

@firefox59 said:

Dark Souls battle system is much more simple than that in the Witcher games.

Yet, Dark Souls combat system is considered far far better than Witcher's combat system. So the combat complexity is not helping the Witcher games, that's for sure. The Souls games' combat have less buttons to deal with, yet are much more intuitive, deeper, and more rewarding that Witcher's complex tedious annoying combat.

They have less buttons but they are deeper? That doesn't even make sense. Dark Souls is trial and error with a sword and shield. Oh the depth. There is also no general consensus on which game has better combat.

Yes, Souls games combat is deeper as in - timing matters much more and how you handle groups of enemies has to be strategized more than Witcher games. Even weapon speed and such matters more in Souls games. Having a bunch of tedious buttons (like Witcher does) doesn't equal deeper gameplay. The Souls games are well known for having the BEST combat yet seen in Action RPGs and that is well known.

Really, Witcher games just do not compare. Maybe the new Witcher technically has more advanced graphics but that's about it. However, I myself, and I am sure many others, prefer the graphics and art style of Dark Souls 2 much more than Witcher 3. Therefore, Dark Souls wins in ALL categories.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#136  Edited By PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

So, you are basing your judgement of one of the games with the deepest lore, story and characters, based on 30 minutes of gameplay? Riiight...

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#137 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

@Thunder7151 said:

@firefox59 said:
@Thunder7151 said:

@firefox59 said:

Dark Souls battle system is much more simple than that in the Witcher games.

Yet, Dark Souls combat system is considered far far better than Witcher's combat system. So the combat complexity is not helping the Witcher games, that's for sure. The Souls games' combat have less buttons to deal with, yet are much more intuitive, deeper, and more rewarding that Witcher's complex tedious annoying combat.

They have less buttons but they are deeper? That doesn't even make sense. Dark Souls is trial and error with a sword and shield. Oh the depth. There is also no general consensus on which game has better combat.

Yes, Souls games combat is deeper as in - timing matters much more and how you handle groups of enemies has to be strategized more than Witcher games. Even weapon speed and such matters more in Souls games. Having a bunch of tedious buttons (like Witcher does) doesn't equal deeper gameplay. The Souls games are well known for having the BEST combat yet seen in Action RPGs and that is well known.

Really, Witcher games just do not compare. Maybe the new Witcher technically has more advanced graphics but that's about it. However, I myself, and I am sure many others, prefer the graphics and art style of Dark Souls 2 much more than Witcher 3. Therefore, Dark Souls wins in ALL categories.

It is called clunky, and you just revealed that you never playied a Witcher game, grats your oppinion is worthless, why?

The witcher very much rely on swing speeds of weapons and tradeoff which you can not in any way miss in a Witcher game.

In a witcher game you will get absolutely KILLED if you do not prepare, just walking into a mob of enemies will get you very dead, very fast. If you have not read about monsters you will not even get teh benefits of fighting them.

Again you have never playied mosnter hunter, otherwise you would not claim th souls games to have the best of anything.

And your personal oppinion holds no value for how Things objectively is.

Yup so far it sounds like you have'nt got a clue between an ARPG and an RPG, and you clearly demonstrated that you only ever playied one of the above.

Avatar image for -Damien-
-Damien-

5355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#138 -Damien-
Member since 2004 • 5355 Posts

Dark Souls 2

1. Better combat mechanic. No explanation needed. TW3 is not even in the same league

2. Better enemy AI. Souls series has the best boss and most variety bosses

3. More balanced difficulty. It looks challenging, but so many ways you can beat the game, tactical sword/shield, ranged, rushing/not fighting enemies, dual swords, level 1 character, etc, etc

4. Better atmosphere.

5. Better art direction. No one does dark fantasy art better than the Souls team

6. Better Level Design. More variety envrionments, shortcuts from one area to another

The Witcher 3

1. Better (Technical) graphic: framerate, texture, resolution. This is primarily because it is made for next gen machines

IN CONCLUSION: DARK SOULS 2 BY LANDSLIDE, NOT EVEN CLOSE

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@-Damien- said:

Dark Souls 2

1. Better combat mechanic. No explanation needed. TW3 is not even in the same league

2. Better enemy AI. Souls series has the best boss and most variety bosses

3. More balanced difficulty. It looks challenging, but so many ways you can beat the game, tactical sword/shield, ranged, rushing/not fighting enemies, dual swords, level 1 character, etc, etc

4. Better atmosphere.

5. Better art direction. No one does dark fantasy art better than the Souls team

6. Better Level Design. More variety envrionments, shortcuts from one area to another

The Witcher 3

1. Better (Technical) graphic: framerate, texture, resolution. This is primarily because it is made for next gen machines

IN CONCLUSION: DARK SOULS 2 BY LANDSLIDE, NOT EVEN CLOSE

So,in a nutshell: you played both?

And I lol'd at the bold part

Avatar image for Tqricardinho
Tqricardinho

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Tqricardinho
Member since 2013 • 477 Posts

They're different kinds of RPGs and do not forget that Dark Souls shall use the mechanics of it's predecessor.

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#141  Edited By cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

Dark Souls 2 is not really doing anything new to its mechanics. A lot of the things that make Souls games hard could be regulated with different difficulty levels. Take away high damaging enemies and it gives people the opportunity to make more mistakes. Another big thing is the time in between swings. TW3 is actually going for something like that too, but you will not be stuck in an animation.

Dark Souls will have more enemies but I believe that the witcher 3 will allow you to interact with its enemies and world in more ways.