Destructoid can't be serious...

  • 123 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Captain__Tripps
Captain__Tripps

4523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Captain__Tripps
Member since 2006 • 4523 Posts

I think people are missing the point. Piracy DOES harm the PC gaming community. Developers see it as an evil. They see potentially lost sales. So they try to prevent that by adding DRM. PC gamers get indignant because DRM is inherently wrong, and rightfully so because many PC gamers are not pirates. So developers still seeing piracy as hurting their bottom line on PC only titles decide to go multiplatform. We see the consolification of games that were once great. And in the end, that is causing harm to the community. There really is no getting around that. You may argue that piracy does not equal a lost sale or that it's not wrong and blah blah blah. But can you seriously argue that piracy has done no damage to the PC community?

marq4porsche
Piracy is not the reason titles go multi platform though. They go multiplatform because developers want more money. A platform exclusive FPS for example, makes little sense financially, they sell well on PC, and sell like crazy on 360...
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"]I seem to remember all these argument about piracy killing PC gaming last gen, now it's stronger than ever. DD is the future of gaming and guess what the lead platform of that kind of dispersal? PC. LOXO7
What's it waiting for then? Consoles to do it first. PC the leader in interactive medium.

What the hell are you talking about? DD sales are huge and growing immensely, and PC obviously started it.
Avatar image for stiggy321
stiggy321

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 stiggy321
Member since 2009 • 609 Posts
[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

whats funny is, the full builds were leaked on PS3/XBOX360 2 weeks before PC leak, and destructoid had nothing to say about it.

Probably because they weren't pirated as much? Did you read the article or did you miss the point entirely?

The build was leaked internally and was barely downloaded, try again :roll:

The article is stupid and console games are leaked way more often and way more early.

PC games are stolen way more often and way more easily... that's the point.
Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts

This is pretty old. We had a big thread on it.

The cynic in me has to remind you that you're giving the sites more hits by doing this too.

Avatar image for Rekunta
Rekunta

8275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#105 Rekunta
Member since 2002 • 8275 Posts

[QUOTE="marq4porsche"]

I think people are missing the point. Piracy DOES harm the PC gaming community. Developers see it as an evil. They see potentially lost sales. So they try to prevent that by adding DRM. PC gamers get indignant because DRM is inherently wrong, and rightfully so because many PC gamers are not pirates. So developers still seeing piracy as hurting their bottom line on PC only titles decide to go multiplatform. We see the consolification of games that were once great. And in the end, that is causing harm to the community. There really is no getting around that. You may argue that piracy does not equal a lost sale or that it's not wrong and blah blah blah. But can you seriously argue that piracy has done no damage to the PC community?

Captain__Tripps

Piracy is not the reason titles go multi platform though. They go multiplatform because developers want more money. A platform exclusive FPS for example, makes little sense financially, they sell well on PC, and sell like crazy on 360...

That may be true, I was having a conversation about someone about the same thing. But it makes me wonder....if that were entirely true, why didn't the first game come out for consoles as well? If they wanted to maximize profits from the get-go, it only seems logical that they'd design every game they made for all platforms from the start. They didn't with Crysis 1, because their priority wasn't money, it was being able to realize their game to its fullest extent. For the amount Crysis was pirated, I can completely see why they went to consoles.

I think claiming piracy has no hand in titles moving multi-plat is somewhat disingenuous. It may not be the sole cause, but I have no doubt it plays a larger part than simply being a scapegoat.

Avatar image for marq4porsche
marq4porsche

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 marq4porsche
Member since 2005 • 512 Posts

[QUOTE="marq4porsche"]

I think people are missing the point. Piracy DOES harm the PC gaming community. Developers see it as an evil. They see potentially lost sales. So they try to prevent that by adding DRM. PC gamers get indignant because DRM is inherently wrong, and rightfully so because many PC gamers are not pirates. So developers still seeing piracy as hurting their bottom line on PC only titles decide to go multiplatform. We see the consolification of games that were once great. And in the end, that is causing harm to the community. There really is no getting around that. You may argue that piracy does not equal a lost sale or that it's not wrong and blah blah blah. But can you seriously argue that piracy has done no damage to the PC community?

Captain__Tripps

Piracy is not the reason titles go multi platform though. They go multiplatform because developers want more money. A platform exclusive FPS for example, makes little sense financially, they sell well on PC, and sell like crazy on 360...

That is also true, the consoles do make a lot of money for a developer. But it does hurt the confidance a company has in the market when people are pirating their games by the millions. So that doesn't help the developer give their best to that demographic. They take away mod support and only give us a resolution bump instead of treating the game to the full PC treatment which it could have, had the company been less wary of the market.

Avatar image for thespywholied
thespywholied

3358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 thespywholied
Member since 2008 • 3358 Posts

Truth be told if someone pirates a game they really didnt plan on buying it in the first place so where is this ''lost sale''?

Avatar image for thespywholied
thespywholied

3358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 thespywholied
Member since 2008 • 3358 Posts

[QUOTE="thespywholied"]

Cheers Destructoid i such love being compared to a criminal for being a PC gamer. :roll:

Truth be told if someone pirates a game they really didnt plan on buying it in the first place so where is this ''lost sale''?

AncientDozer

That's misreading and you know it. The second part, however, is more accurate.

Edited that bit out after a closer look, still. He is an idiot if he thinks devs do not care about us.

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#111 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

Truth be told if someone pirates a game they really didnt plan on buying it in the first place so where is this ''lost sale''?

thespywholied

You might think that what you're doing is harmless. On an individual level, it is. But it's not just you doing it. There are heaps of you. You're doing harm to an industry you should be supporting if you want more good games, and there is literally no excuse for you. If you can't afford it, suck it up. There are lots of things most of us can't afford, and we don't go out stealing them. If you think DRM is bad, don't buy the game. Don't just f**** help yourself to it illegally, because all that does is qualify the DRM in the first place. Anything you can use to justify piracy is easily refuted because, guess what, piracy ain't bloody justifiable.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

Truth be told if someone pirates a game they really didnt plan on buying it in the first place so where is this ''lost sale''?

thespywholied
Love how this a stone cold "truth". I'm developers who's games get pirated millions of times will be soooo comforted by this big assumption.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#113 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="thespywholied"]

Truth be told if someone pirates a game they really didnt plan on buying it in the first place so where is this ''lost sale''?

locopatho

Love how this a stone cold "truth". I'm developers who's games get pirated millions of times will be soooo comforted by this big assumption.

The biggest publisher in the world admits it's not a lost sale. Who are we to doubt them?

http://news.softpedia.com/news/EA-Admits-Pirated-Copies-Do-Not-Equal-Lost-Sales-94516.shtml

Avatar image for alfredooo
alfredooo

2664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 alfredooo
Member since 2007 • 2664 Posts

The biggest publisher in the world admits it's not a lost sale. Who are we to doubt them?

http://news.softpedia.com/news/EA-Admits-Pirated-Copies-Do-Not-Equal-Lost-Sales-94516.shtml

Espada12

"Stepping aside from the whole issue of DRM, people need to recognize thatevery BitTorrent download doesn't represent a successful copy of a game, let alone a lost sale" key word there.

what your own source is saying is that NOT ALL pirated copies equal sales. there is no denying plenty of pirated copies do equal lost sales.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Here we go again

Piracy is not killing pc gaming, PERIOD. Stop listening to the total crap the companies are feeding you. PC games have grown at a large the past several years. Consoles have been declining accross the board, and if you count all the random crap on pc, last year in NA pc had a larger marketshare than consoles.

Companies try to use it justifacation for going multiplatform, as that sounds better in the news, then well we want more of the moneyz.

Is piracy wrong, sure, is it killing any one no.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#116 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
Jim Sterling is a moron, nothing more nothing less.Robbazking
This is true as well.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
The article is pretty contradicting. It says "Killzone 3 was also recently leaked." and then "And this is why developers don't give a **** about PC gamers anymore, folks." Whoever wrote that doesn't have much credibility.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#118 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
It is the truth that no one wants to hear.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#119 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
It is the truth that no one wants to hear. biggest_loser
Nope... This article is just a fat guy trolling the internet.
Avatar image for DarthBilf
DarthBilf

1357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 DarthBilf
Member since 2004 • 1357 Posts
ITT: PC gamers react to an inflammatory article by stating that pirating on the consoles is on the same level as pirating on the PC, and that pirated copies /= any lost sales. Why can't anyone actually be reasonable?
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#121 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

ITT: PC gamers react to an inflammatory article by stating that pirating on the consoles is on the same level as pirating on the PC, and that pirated copies /= any lost sales. Why can't anyone actually be reasonable?DarthBilf
Did anyone actually read the article?

It calls a lynch on PC gamers and it calls out to developers to stop making games on PC, because someone from EA/Crytek leaked the beta on the internet.

Makes any sense to you?

It sure as **** doesn't make any sense to me.

Avatar image for anthonycg
anthonycg

2017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 anthonycg
Member since 2009 • 2017 Posts

[QUOTE="thespywholied"]

Truth be told if someone pirates a game they really didnt plan on buying it in the first place so where is this ''lost sale''?

R3FURBISHED

You might think that what you're doing is harmless. On an individual level, it is. But it's not just you doing it. There are heaps of you. You're doing harm to an industry you should be supporting if you want more good games, and there is literally no excuse for you. If you can't afford it, suck it up. There are lots of things most of us can't afford, and we don't go out stealing them. If you think DRM is bad, don't buy the game. Don't just f**** help yourself to it illegally, because all that does is qualify the DRM in the first place. Anything you can use to justify piracy is easily refuted because, guess what, piracy ain't bloody justifiable.

The quote may not even support pirating so please take that holier-than-thou crap somewhere else. Perhaps answering his question would be the normal thing to do? :roll:

Anyway, it is seen as a loss of sale because the product similar or otherwise was aquired by another source instead of the main one.

For example, if there are two stores across from each other and they both sell the same product, any sells that the competition will make is called a "loss of sale." The reasoning is that a sale made to the competition is a sell that they could've had. In the case of pirating, while the other entity does not profit or lose anything, the main source of the product is still at a loss because the product they made was aquired but they could not profit from it. This can't apply to people that don't buy the game because - well, they don't have the game.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="thespywholied"]

Cheers Destructoid i such love being compared to a criminal for being a PC gamer. :roll:

Truth be told if someone pirates a game they really didnt plan on buying it in the first place so where is this ''lost sale''?

AncientDozer

That's misreading and you know it. The second part, however, is more accurate.

No because that's still spinning it. "Plan on"? I don't plan on buying it because I plan on pirating it. If it's not interesting. Don't play it...? Do people still follow this rule? Yes. This makes it a definitely lost sale.