I was not aware anyone was giving the PS3 guys hell over the $55 cost, however they should not.
The fact of the matter is it only $5 more than a standard wireless 360 controller and still cheaper than a Wiimote/Nunchuck combo.
Anyone who bought a PS3 was apparantly more than willing to go without rumble. Now if rumble is REQUIRED for a game, than I agree that is somewhat bogus of Sony. They were late to put rumble in so should not penalize early adopters
However, if rumble is just an added feature, something that is optional, there should not even be an argument.
As someone who pretty much classifies themself as a lemming (eventhough I also own a Wii), I love options. I love only buying into the features I want or need. No one is forced (as far as I know) to buy a DS3, that is just an option for people who want it. If they don't care about having rumble, they are perfectly capable to continue playing with the regular six axis that came with the system and or they bought.
The whole argument is trivial.
Log in to comment