Digital Foundry tech analysis of Titanfall is out! (E3 Demo)

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

Wow. Lems are in full denial/damage control mode.

To those blaming Microsoft, don't. Blame Respawn. Respawn could have said "**** you Microsoft!" but instead they took the moneyhats and now are spewing garbage left and right in favor of Microsoft. Some thoughts:

1. Titan is using the Source Engine. There is no excuse for poor textures and sub par 1080p graphics. Left 4 Dead has better looking graphics than Titan Fall...hell even user made video games using the source engine destroy Titanfall in graphics using the source engine. Did Respawn really have to dial down the textures that much to get 60 FPS? If this is running on X1 hardware, it's not looking good for the X1.
2. This is Respawn's first game. Why go (console) exclusive? If this is your first game, you want as much exposure as possible, cause you will need the revenue down the road for other projects. What is Respawn thinking? That Microsoft is going to fund their games will moneyhats?
3. To make this more confusing, this is an EA title. Why would EA only release a game on 3 platforms? Did Microsoft moneyhat EA? Of course this is speculation, but EA usually likes to release on as many platforms as they can, to maximize profits. 
4. Respawn is not developing the 360 verison of Titanfall, which makes sense because, who would buy it on 360?

RR360DD

Wow so much wrong information bro :( Im disappointed in your weak damage control

1. Its a year from release. Calm your jets.

• Doesn't change anything. What people can't make a game run on the source engine these days? If Respawn wants to keep the game running at 60 FPS, compromises must be made (no physics, ragdolls, dynamic shadows, etc.) I thought Titanfall was next gen, certainly doesn't look like it.

1. Because its their first game. They're a small team. They went to MS AND Sony at the same time to talk about the games back-end support. Its a game that needs dedicated servers. MS offered them Azure for a very competitive price whereas Sony had nothing to offer. Therefore the game is on MS platforms (Windows, XOne and 360) Its as simple as that.

• What are you smoking? Sony definitely has dedicated servers. The PS3 had lots of games on dedicated servers. The 360 had very little, despite this Azure. Your talking out of your ass for 2 reasons: A) Titanfall used the Source Engine because it was going to released on the PS3, so it was being developed for a Sony console platform (it's in the link on the OP). When next gen consoles were announced it was quickly moved to the XB1 because respawn accepted the moneyhats from Microsoft (which happens all the time, so nothing wrong there). B) Microsoft Azure is overblown to the max by people like yourself. Your touting it as the savior for next gen with no evidence to support it, just Microsoft's ramblings and Respawn spewing about how the cloud is so great. Open your mind, and stop being a tool.

1. Its an EA partners title, so not a full blown EA game. Thats important to remember.

• EA is the publisher, Until I see a link that says otherwise.

1. Already been said. Respawn is a small team of around 80 people. They don't have the manpower to develop 3 different versions in-house so they outsourced the 360 version.

• This is curious to me as Respawn was working on a PS3 version of the game. Did Respawn actually outsource it or did Microsoft? Either way, it's confusing.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

Wow. Lems are in full denial/damage control mode.

To those blaming Microsoft, don't. Blame Respawn. Respawn could have said "**** you Microsoft!" but instead they took the moneyhats and now are spewing garbage left and right in favor of Microsoft. Some thoughts:

1. Titan is using the Source Engine. There is no excuse for poor textures and sub par 1080p graphics. Left 4 Dead has better looking graphics than Titan Fall...hell even user made video games using the source engine destroy Titanfall in graphics using the source engine. Did Respawn really have to dial down the textures that much to get 60 FPS? If this is running on X1 hardware, it's not looking good for the X1.
2. This is Respawn's first game. Why go (console) exclusive? If this is your first game, you want as much exposure as possible, cause you will need the revenue down the road for other projects. What is Respawn thinking? That Microsoft is going to fund their games will moneyhats?
3. To make this more confusing, this is an EA title. Why would EA only release a game on 3 platforms? Did Microsoft moneyhat EA? Of course this is speculation, but EA usually likes to release on as many platforms as they can, to maximize profits. 
4. Respawn is not developing the 360 verison of Titanfall, which makes sense because, who would buy it on 360?

dream431ca

Wow so much wrong information bro :( Im disappointed in your weak damage control

1. Its a year from release. Calm your jets.

• Doesn't change anything. What people can't make a game run on the source engine these days? If Respawn wants to keep the game running at 60 FPS, compromises must be made (no physics, ragdolls, dynamic shadows, etc.) I thought Titanfall was next gen, certainly doesn't look like it.

1. Because its their first game. They're a small team. They went to MS AND Sony at the same time to talk about the games back-end support. Its a game that needs dedicated servers. MS offered them Azure for a very competitive price whereas Sony had nothing to offer. Therefore the game is on MS platforms (Windows, XOne and 360) Its as simple as that.

• What are you smoking? Sony definitely has dedicated servers. The PS3 had lots of games on dedicated servers. The 360 had very little, despite this Azure. Your talking out of your ass for 2 reasons: A) Titanfall used the Source Engine because it was going to released on the PS3, so it was being developed for a Sony console platform (it's in the link on the OP). When next gen consoles were announced it was quickly moved to the XB1 because respawn accepted the moneyhats from Microsoft (which happens all the time, so nothing wrong there). B) Microsoft Azure is overblown to the max by people like yourself. Your touting it as the savior for next gen with no evidence to support it, just Microsoft's ramblings and Respawn spewing about how the cloud is so great. Open your mind, and stop being a tool.

1. Its an EA partners title, so not a full blown EA game. Thats important to remember.

• EA is the publisher, Until I see a link that says otherwise.

1. Already been said. Respawn is a small team of around 80 people. They don't have the manpower to develop 3 different versions in-house so they outsourced the 360 version.

• This is curious to me as Respawn was working on a PS3 version of the game. Did Respawn actually outsource it or did Microsoft? Either way, it's confusing.

80 people and they cant make grass move??? IM SHOCKED!

Tearaway is being made by a 15 people team and looks SO MUCH MORE innovative than this Titanfail... and btw... grass moves in Tearaway, and its a VITA game...

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

Wow. Lems are in full denial/damage control mode.

To those blaming Microsoft, don't. Blame Respawn. Respawn could have said "**** you Microsoft!" but instead they took the moneyhats and now are spewing garbage left and right in favor of Microsoft. Some thoughts:

1. Titan is using the Source Engine. There is no excuse for poor textures and sub par 1080p graphics. Left 4 Dead has better looking graphics than Titan Fall...hell even user made video games using the source engine destroy Titanfall in graphics using the source engine. Did Respawn really have to dial down the textures that much to get 60 FPS? If this is running on X1 hardware, it's not looking good for the X1.
2. This is Respawn's first game. Why go (console) exclusive? If this is your first game, you want as much exposure as possible, cause you will need the revenue down the road for other projects. What is Respawn thinking? That Microsoft is going to fund their games will moneyhats?
3. To make this more confusing, this is an EA title. Why would EA only release a game on 3 platforms? Did Microsoft moneyhat EA? Of course this is speculation, but EA usually likes to release on as many platforms as they can, to maximize profits. 
4. Respawn is not developing the 360 verison of Titanfall, which makes sense because, who would buy it on 360?

dream431ca

Wow so much wrong information bro :( Im disappointed in your weak damage control

1. Its a year from release. Calm your jets.

• Doesn't change anything. What people can't make a game run on the source engine these days? If Respawn wants to keep the game running at 60 FPS, compromises must be made (no physics, ragdolls, dynamic shadows, etc.) I thought Titanfall was next gen, certainly doesn't look like it.

1. Because its their first game. They're a small team. They went to MS AND Sony at the same time to talk about the games back-end support. Its a game that needs dedicated servers. MS offered them Azure for a very competitive price whereas Sony had nothing to offer. Therefore the game is on MS platforms (Windows, XOne and 360) Its as simple as that.

• What are you smoking? Sony definitely has dedicated servers. The PS3 had lots of games on dedicated servers. The 360 had very little, despite this Azure. Your talking out of your ass for 2 reasons: A) Titanfall used the Source Engine because it was going to released on the PS3, so it was being developed for a Sony console platform (it's in the link on the OP). When next gen consoles were announced it was quickly moved to the XB1 because respawn accepted the moneyhats from Microsoft (which happens all the time, so nothing wrong there). B) Microsoft Azure is overblown to the max by people like yourself. Your touting it as the savior for next gen with no evidence to support it, just Microsoft's ramblings and Respawn spewing about how the cloud is so great. Open your mind, and stop being a tool.

1. Its an EA partners title, so not a full blown EA game. Thats important to remember.

• EA is the publisher, Until I see a link that says otherwise.

1. Already been said. Respawn is a small team of around 80 people. They don't have the manpower to develop 3 different versions in-house so they outsourced the 360 version.

• This is curious to me as Respawn was working on a PS3 version of the game. Did Respawn actually outsource it or did Microsoft? Either way, it's confusing.

• It changes everything. The game is a year from release. A lot of time to add and polish. People love to defend Drive Clubs lackluster textures by saying its only 35% complete, and thats a freaking launch title LOL
• Uh no the PS3 doesn't have lots of games on dedicated servers. It has a few 1st party games but recently they're all client hosted (TLOU, Uncharted, KZ3 etc) 360 has its share of games on dedicated servers. And maybe you MISREAD WHAT I WROTE because Sony doesn't provide dedicated servers for third party games. Never has. Now MS are offering that infrastructure to all devs. ALL DEVS incase you misread that again. Not just MSs first party, like with Sony. Also, I'm well aware why they chose the Source engine, but one BIG factor was to have the game running at 60FPS. So no, I'm not talking out my ass. Respawn were originally developing a game with no Titans. They kept adding and adding, and moved to next gen platforms. Microsoft offered Azure, so they went with them. That all came from Respawns own mouth, and if you want to stick your tin foil hat on and call them liars, go ahead. I'll make sure you laugh twice as long at you.
• "The EA Partners co-publishing arm is dedicated to publishing and distributing games developed by third-party developers." I never said EA weren't publishing, but its an EA partners game meaning we don't know what the exact terms of their agreement are. Bioware developing Mass Effect for 360 and PC - you know there was some agreement between MS and EA there because they own Bioware. But Respawn is third party, so this is different.

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Wow so much wrong information bro :( Im disappointed in your weak damage control

1. Its a year from release. Calm your jets.

• Doesn't change anything. What people can't make a game run on the source engine these days? If Respawn wants to keep the game running at 60 FPS, compromises must be made (no physics, ragdolls, dynamic shadows, etc.) I thought Titanfall was next gen, certainly doesn't look like it.

1. Because its their first game. They're a small team. They went to MS AND Sony at the same time to talk about the games back-end support. Its a game that needs dedicated servers. MS offered them Azure for a very competitive price whereas Sony had nothing to offer. Therefore the game is on MS platforms (Windows, XOne and 360) Its as simple as that.

• What are you smoking? Sony definitely has dedicated servers. The PS3 had lots of games on dedicated servers. The 360 had very little, despite this Azure. Your talking out of your ass for 2 reasons: A) Titanfall used the Source Engine because it was going to released on the PS3, so it was being developed for a Sony console platform (it's in the link on the OP). When next gen consoles were announced it was quickly moved to the XB1 because respawn accepted the moneyhats from Microsoft (which happens all the time, so nothing wrong there). B) Microsoft Azure is overblown to the max by people like yourself. Your touting it as the savior for next gen with no evidence to support it, just Microsoft's ramblings and Respawn spewing about how the cloud is so great. Open your mind, and stop being a tool.

1. Its an EA partners title, so not a full blown EA game. Thats important to remember.

• EA is the publisher, Until I see a link that says otherwise.

1. Already been said. Respawn is a small team of around 80 people. They don't have the manpower to develop 3 different versions in-house so they outsourced the 360 version.

• This is curious to me as Respawn was working on a PS3 version of the game. Did Respawn actually outsource it or did Microsoft? Either way, it's confusing.

RR360DD

• It changes everything. The game is a year from release. A lot of time to add and polish. People love to defend Drive Clubs lackluster textures by saying its only 35% complete, and thats a freaking launch title LOL

Hello?? Source Engine?? AKA Half Life 2 Engine?? A 9 year old engine and it's next gen? :lol: Come on man. What more can they add to the game? Keep in mind, if Respawn wants to keep the game at 60FPS, it's gonna look last gen.

• Uh no the PS3 doesn't have lots of games on dedicated servers. It has a few 1st party games but recently they're all client hosted (TLOU, Uncharted, KZ3 etc) 360 has its share of games on dedicated servers. And maybe you MISREAD WHAT I WROTE because Sony doesn't provide dedicated servers for third party games. Never has. Now MS are offering that infrastructure to all devs. ALL DEVS incase you misread that again. Not just MSs first party, like with Sony. Also, I'm well aware why they chose the Source engine, but one BIG factor was to have the game running at 60FPS. So no, I'm not talking out my ass. Respawn were originally developing a game with no Titans. They kept adding and adding, and moved to next gen platforms. Microsoft offered Azure, so they went with them. That all came from Respawns own mouth, and if you want to stick your tin foil hat on and call them liars, go ahead. I'll make sure you laugh twice as long at you.

• "The EA Partners co-publishing arm is dedicated to publishing and distributing games developed by third-party developers." I never said EA weren't publishing, but its an EA partners game meaning we don't know what the exact terms of their agreement are. Bioware developing Mass Effect for 360 and PC - you know there was some agreement between MS and EA there because they own Bioware. But Respawn is third party, so this is different.

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Wow so much wrong information bro :( Im disappointed in your weak damage control

1. Its a year from release. Calm your jets.

• Doesn't change anything. What people can't make a game run on the source engine these days? If Respawn wants to keep the game running at 60 FPS, compromises must be made (no physics, ragdolls, dynamic shadows, etc.) I thought Titanfall was next gen, certainly doesn't look like it.

1. Because its their first game. They're a small team. They went to MS AND Sony at the same time to talk about the games back-end support. Its a game that needs dedicated servers. MS offered them Azure for a very competitive price whereas Sony had nothing to offer. Therefore the game is on MS platforms (Windows, XOne and 360) Its as simple as that.

• What are you smoking? Sony definitely has dedicated servers. The PS3 had lots of games on dedicated servers. The 360 had very little, despite this Azure. Your talking out of your ass for 2 reasons: A) Titanfall used the Source Engine because it was going to released on the PS3, so it was being developed for a Sony console platform (it's in the link on the OP). When next gen consoles were announced it was quickly moved to the XB1 because respawn accepted the moneyhats from Microsoft (which happens all the time, so nothing wrong there). B) Microsoft Azure is overblown to the max by people like yourself. Your touting it as the savior for next gen with no evidence to support it, just Microsoft's ramblings and Respawn spewing about how the cloud is so great. Open your mind, and stop being a tool.

1. Its an EA partners title, so not a full blown EA game. Thats important to remember.

• EA is the publisher, Until I see a link that says otherwise.

1. Already been said. Respawn is a small team of around 80 people. They don't have the manpower to develop 3 different versions in-house so they outsourced the 360 version.

• This is curious to me as Respawn was working on a PS3 version of the game. Did Respawn actually outsource it or did Microsoft? Either way, it's confusing.

ManatuBeard

80 people and they cant make grass move??? IM SHOCKED!

Tearaway is being made by a 15 people team and looks SO MUCH MORE innovative than this Titanfail... and btw... grass moves in Tearaway, and its a VITA game...

[QUOTE="ManatuBeard"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

Tessellation

80 people and they cant make grass move??? IM SHOCKED!

Tearaway is being made by a 15 people team and looks SO MUCH MORE innovative than this Titanfail... and btw... grass moves in Tearaway, and its a VITA game...

is this the xbox 360 version of Titanfall? did they show x360 Titanfall gameplay at E3? 

:lol:

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Wow so much wrong information bro :( Im disappointed in your weak damage control

1. Its a year from release. Calm your jets.

• Doesn't change anything. What people can't make a game run on the source engine these days? If Respawn wants to keep the game running at 60 FPS, compromises must be made (no physics, ragdolls, dynamic shadows, etc.) I thought Titanfall was next gen, certainly doesn't look like it.

1. Because its their first game. They're a small team. They went to MS AND Sony at the same time to talk about the games back-end support. Its a game that needs dedicated servers. MS offered them Azure for a very competitive price whereas Sony had nothing to offer. Therefore the game is on MS platforms (Windows, XOne and 360) Its as simple as that.

• What are you smoking? Sony definitely has dedicated servers. The PS3 had lots of games on dedicated servers. The 360 had very little, despite this Azure. Your talking out of your ass for 2 reasons: A) Titanfall used the Source Engine because it was going to released on the PS3, so it was being developed for a Sony console platform (it's in the link on the OP). When next gen consoles were announced it was quickly moved to the XB1 because respawn accepted the moneyhats from Microsoft (which happens all the time, so nothing wrong there). B) Microsoft Azure is overblown to the max by people like yourself. Your touting it as the savior for next gen with no evidence to support it, just Microsoft's ramblings and Respawn spewing about how the cloud is so great. Open your mind, and stop being a tool.

1. Its an EA partners title, so not a full blown EA game. Thats important to remember.

• EA is the publisher, Until I see a link that says otherwise.

1. Already been said. Respawn is a small team of around 80 people. They don't have the manpower to develop 3 different versions in-house so they outsourced the 360 version.

• This is curious to me as Respawn was working on a PS3 version of the game. Did Respawn actually outsource it or did Microsoft? Either way, it's confusing.

RR360DD

• It changes everything. The game is a year from release. A lot of time to add and polish. People love to defend Drive Clubs lackluster textures by saying its only 35% complete, and thats a freaking launch title LOL
• Uh no the PS3 doesn't have lots of games on dedicated servers. It has a few 1st party games but recently they're all client hosted (TLOU, Uncharted, KZ3 etc) 360 has its share of games on dedicated servers. And maybe you MISREAD WHAT I WROTE because Sony doesn't provide dedicated servers for third party games. Never has. Now MS are offering that infrastructure to all devs. ALL DEVS incase you misread that again. Not just MSs first party, like with Sony. Also, I'm well aware why they chose the Source engine, but one BIG factor was to have the game running at 60FPS. So no, I'm not talking out my ass. Respawn were originally developing a game with no Titans. They kept adding and adding, and moved to next gen platforms. Microsoft offered Azure, so they went with them. That all came from Respawns own mouth, and if you want to stick your tin foil hat on and call them liars, go ahead. I'll make sure you laugh twice as long at you.
• "The EA Partners co-publishing arm is dedicated to publishing and distributing games developed by third-party developers." I never said EA weren't publishing, but its an EA partners game meaning we don't know what the exact terms of their agreement are. Bioware developing Mass Effect for 360 and PC - you know there was some agreement between MS and EA there because they own Bioware. But Respawn is third party, so this is different.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

HiraiKazuo

• It changes everything. The game is a year from release. A lot of time to add and polish. People love to defend Drive Clubs lackluster textures by saying its only 35% complete, and thats a freaking launch title LOL
• Uh no the PS3 doesn't have lots of games on dedicated servers. It has a few 1st party games but recently they're all client hosted (TLOU, Uncharted, KZ3 etc) 360 has its share of games on dedicated servers. And maybe you MISREAD WHAT I WROTE because Sony doesn't provide dedicated servers for third party games. Never has. Now MS are offering that infrastructure to all devs. ALL DEVS incase you misread that again. Not just MSs first party, like with Sony. Also, I'm well aware why they chose the Source engine, but one BIG factor was to have the game running at 60FPS. So no, I'm not talking out my ass. Respawn were originally developing a game with no Titans. They kept adding and adding, and moved to next gen platforms. Microsoft offered Azure, so they went with them. That all came from Respawns own mouth, and if you want to stick your tin foil hat on and call them liars, go ahead. I'll make sure you laugh twice as long at you.
• "The EA Partners co-publishing arm is dedicated to publishing and distributing games developed by third-party developers." I never said EA weren't publishing, but its an EA partners game meaning we don't know what the exact terms of their agreement are. Bioware developing Mass Effect for 360 and PC - you know there was some agreement between MS and EA there because they own Bioware. But Respawn is third party, so this is different.

he doesnt sound, he is a desperate apologist

kinda sad the only game xbots are bragging about and im going to be playing it in my pc, the way its meant to be played (tm) while they get blurry textures and horrible animations. Xbone no games confirmed, ps4 + pc the way to go.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

dream431ca

• It changes everything. The game is a year from release. A lot of time to add and polish. People love to defend Drive Clubs lackluster textures by saying its only 35% complete, and thats a freaking launch title LOL

Hello?? Source Engine?? AKA Half Life 2 Engine?? A 9 year old engine and it's next gen? :lol: Come on man. What more can they add to the game? Keep in mind, if Respawn wants to keep the game at 60FPS, it's gonna look last gen.

• Uh no the PS3 doesn't have lots of games on dedicated servers. It has a few 1st party games but recently they're all client hosted (TLOU, Uncharted, KZ3 etc) 360 has its share of games on dedicated servers. And maybe you MISREAD WHAT I WROTE because Sony doesn't provide dedicated servers for third party games. Never has. Now MS are offering that infrastructure to all devs. ALL DEVS incase you misread that again. Not just MSs first party, like with Sony. Also, I'm well aware why they chose the Source engine, but one BIG factor was to have the game running at 60FPS. So no, I'm not talking out my ass. Respawn were originally developing a game with no Titans. They kept adding and adding, and moved to next gen platforms. Microsoft offered Azure, so they went with them. That all came from Respawns own mouth, and if you want to stick your tin foil hat on and call them liars, go ahead. I'll make sure you laugh twice as long at you.

To my knowledge, a lot of games on PS3 had dedicated servers, but you are right that no third party game had them on PS3. When you say Microsoft is offering dedicated servers to ALL DEVS, as you put it, what makes you think all Devs will use them? I personally think this dedicated server thing is so overblown it's laughable. A) All we get is Microsoft and Respawn spewing out that the cloud makes it "so much better", even better than the PC, which is hard to believe, since PC is undoubtly the best platform for gaming, any kind of gaming. B) How does the "cloud" provide dedicated servers to everyone? That makes no sense. Game servers are usually seperate from a cloud enviroment. What the cloud does is choose a game server based upon certain conditions (bandwidth limitations, ping, etc.). The cloud can also store data, which the most common tool clouds are used for, so your XB1 profile could be stored on the cloud. You seem to be caught up in the cloud stuff, so I recommend you read how Google uses a dedicated server cloud. This is more or less how Microsoft is most likely to do it. https://cloud.google.com/resources/articles/dedicated-server-gaming-solution

• "The EA Partners co-publishing arm is dedicated to publishing and distributing games developed by third-party developers." I never said EA weren't publishing, but its an EA partners game meaning we don't know what the exact terms of their agreement are. Bioware developing Mass Effect for 360 and PC - you know there was some agreement between MS and EA there because they own Bioware. But Respawn is third party, so this is different.

If EA is involved, it's going to come other platforms than Microsoft's, unless EA sees big sales. 

What I'm saying is that there is a year for them to polish this game. And it most certainly looks better than last gen games. I play online all the time on 360, I know exactly how good the graphics are. I downloaded the 1080p 60 FPS E3 Titanfall demo off Eurogamer and it looks really great in motion. Games journalists have said the same thing in many stories Ive read. I'm not saying this is some graphical powerhouse like Quantum Break or Infamous, but its certainly not bad looking.

A lot of early PS3 games like Warhawk, Resistance, MGO, KZ2 (Used a client and server hybrid) but after a while they started going with client hosted games with some exceptions like MAG. Some third party games use them too, like BF3 on both platforms but EA provide those servers.

Yeah I said offers devs those servers, not forces them to use them. Not every game needs them, but the ones that do its available to use. And as Respawn said, they could've went to Google or Amazon and rented from their clouds, but that would've been much more expensive than through MS and Azure which is pretty cool.

"Microsoft and Respawn spewing out that the cloud makes it "so much better", even better than the PC"

I don't think they said that (link?) I know fanboys have said crap like that but it doesn't make sense considering TitanFall will use the cloud on all 3 platforms (Windows, XOne and 360).

The cloud is just a marketing term everyone uses now for basically a network of servers. Its not limited to one thing. Some clouds may be set uo just to store data, but Azure isn't. Its one of the best in the world when it comes to cloud computing. I'm not sure what that proves, thats just Googles cloud and it just appears to show that their cloud handles everything from matchmaking to hosting multiplayer?

kinda sad the only game xbots are bragging about and im going to be playing it in my pc, the way its meant to be played (tm) while they get blurry textures and horrible animations. Xbone no games confirmed, ps4 + pc the way to go.

Krelian-co

:lol:

You're an idiot. I'm glad you've caved and you'll be playing this great game. Just a pity most cows won't :( Oh well

[QUOTE="HiraiKazuo"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

• It changes everything. The game is a year from release. A lot of time to add and polish. People love to defend Drive Clubs lackluster textures by saying its only 35% complete, and thats a freaking launch title LOL
• Uh no the PS3 doesn't have lots of games on dedicated servers. It has a few 1st party games but recently they're all client hosted (TLOU, Uncharted, KZ3 etc) 360 has its share of games on dedicated servers. And maybe you MISREAD WHAT I WROTE because Sony doesn't provide dedicated servers for third party games. Never has. Now MS are offering that infrastructure to all devs. ALL DEVS incase you misread that again. Not just MSs first party, like with Sony. Also, I'm well aware why they chose the Source engine, but one BIG factor was to have the game running at 60FPS. So no, I'm not talking out my ass. Respawn were originally developing a game with no Titans. They kept adding and adding, and moved to next gen platforms. Microsoft offered Azure, so they went with them. That all came from Respawns own mouth, and if you want to stick your tin foil hat on and call them liars, go ahead. I'll make sure you laugh twice as long at you.
• "The EA Partners co-publishing arm is dedicated to publishing and distributing games developed by third-party developers." I never said EA weren't publishing, but its an EA partners game meaning we don't know what the exact terms of their agreement are. Bioware developing Mass Effect for 360 and PC - you know there was some agreement between MS and EA there because they own Bioware. But Respawn is third party, so this is different.

Krelian-co

he doesnt sound, he is a desperate apologist

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

kinda sad the only game xbots are bragging about and im going to be playing it in my pc, the way its meant to be played (tm) while they get blurry textures and horrible animations. Xbone no games confirmed, ps4 + pc the way to go.

RR360DD

:lol:

You're an idiot. I'm glad you've caved and you'll be playing this great game. Just a pity most cows won't :( Oh well

wtf are u talking about? as always some random stupidity i bet.

The only idiot here is you who hypes a multiplat as ownage. But then again since xbox has no game its not the first time they have t resort to multiplats.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

kinda sad the only game xbots are bragging about and im going to be playing it in my pc, the way its meant to be played (tm) while they get blurry textures and horrible animations. Xbone no games confirmed, ps4 + pc the way to go.

Krelian-co

:lol:

You're an idiot. I'm glad you've caved and you'll be playing this great game. Just a pity most cows won't :( Oh well

wtf are u talking about? as always some random stupidity i bet.

The only idiot here is you who hypes a multiplat as ownage. But then again since xbox has no game its not the first time they have t resort to multiplats.

"hypes a multiplat as ownage."

What does that even mean :lol:

Its cows who get butthurt over TitanFall because they're missing out. You can't blame lems making 20 threads on it a day when they know its effective at getting cows riled up. Its their own faults, and if it was the other way around it would still happen LOL

Also, Xbox has more exclusives than the PS4

shhh no more tears

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]'Bu bu I thought the E3 demo was being shown on PC :cry:'

:lol:

You're an idiot. I'm glad you've caved and you'll be playing this great game. Just a pity most cows won't :( Oh well

RR360DD

wtf are u talking about? as always some random stupidity i bet.

The only idiot here is you who hypes a multiplat as ownage. But then again since xbox has no game its not the first time they have t resort to multiplats.

"hypes a multiplat as ownage."

What does that even mean :lol:

Its cows who get butthurt over TitanFall because they're missing out. You can't blame lems making 20 threads on it a day when they know its effective at getting cows riled up. Its their own faults, and if it was the other way around it would still happen LOL

Also, Xbox has more exclusives than the PS4

shhh no more tears

:lol:

Hey lems, hows that sub HD on SOURCE engine feeling today?

I bet all the hardcore xbots right now saying graphics and tech don't matter wouldn't say the same thing if this was a Sony exclusive. Now all of them sound like Nintendo fanboys from the wii era over this game. The hypocrisy in SW is insane. While its true that graphics don't matter it be nice to play a game that was playable and immerse. The game might as well be a indie FPS...why is this considered a AAA title?

I bet all the hardcore xbots right now saying graphics and tech don't matter wouldn't say the same thing if this was a Sony exclusive. Now all of them sound like Nintendo fanboys from the wii era over this game. The hypocrisy in SW is insane. While its true that graphics don't matter it be nice to play a game that was playable and immerse. The game might as well be a indie FPS...why is this considered a AAA title?

Lambent7

Yeah, it looks like an indie game :roll:

:lol:

So many doubters are gonna get owned in due time

Looking forward to the 'bu bu EA and MS paid reviewers to give it good scores :cry:' LOL

FIVE BILLION TRANSISTORS and can't handle a game running On Source. What an epic failure the X1 is bound to be, my gawd

BRAH YOUR SIG IS OF THE CHAIN LMFAO

silversix_

Hey lems, hows that sub HD on SOURCE engine feeling today?

 

Douevenlift_bro

Hey stupid cows, Titanfall is 1080p @ 60fps when the game is out next year. I can't say the same about Killzone or Driveflop! 

I'm a cow, and i wont be missing out on titanfall, infact, I can't wait to see what the mod community does with it. Really wanting some Gundam character model replacements. Maybe there will even be an EMB mod too. 

[QUOTE="Lambent7"]

I bet all the hardcore xbots right now saying graphics and tech don't matter wouldn't say the same thing if this was a Sony exclusive. Now all of them sound like Nintendo fanboys from the wii era over this game. The hypocrisy in SW is insane. While its true that graphics don't matter it be nice to play a game that was playable and immerse. The game might as well be a indie FPS...why is this considered a AAA title?

RR360DD

Yeah, it looks like an indie game :roll:

:lol:

So many doubters are gonna get owned in due time

Looking forward to the 'bu bu EA and MS paid reviewers to give it good scores :cry:' LOL

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

Any idiot lemmings wanna hype this anymore?

Well, it's either this or Ryse. Tough choices :lol:

robybaggio

Titanfall > any exclusive on PS4. 

Actually:

Forza 5 > anythign Ps4. 

Sunsset Overdrive > PS4. 

Cry some more. :D

I don't think I've ever seen anyone claim this was going to have amazing graphics. Why are so many people hating on this game?

Just another thread filled with console fanboys that make me sad for the future of gaming 

Why are people going nuts over Call of Gundam?

It's coming to PC anyway, and it's Source engine, which means it's gonna run even on toasters, so what's the big deal?

Why are people going nuts over Call of Gundam?

It's coming to PC anyway, and it's Source engine, which means it's gonna run even on toasters, so what's the big deal?

QQabitmoar

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Lambent7"]

I bet all the hardcore xbots right now saying graphics and tech don't matter wouldn't say the same thing if this was a Sony exclusive. Now all of them sound like Nintendo fanboys from the wii era over this game. The hypocrisy in SW is insane. While its true that graphics don't matter it be nice to play a game that was playable and immerse. The game might as well be a indie FPS...why is this considered a AAA title?

Lambent7

Yeah, it looks like an indie game :roll:

:lol:

So many doubters are gonna get owned in due time

Looking forward to the 'bu bu EA and MS paid reviewers to give it good scores :cry:' LOL

:lol: Oh man, bookmarked

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

Hey lems, hows that sub HD on SOURCE engine feeling today?

 

xhawk27

Hey stupid cows, Titanfall is 1080p @ 60fps when the game is out next year. I can't say the same about Killzone or Driveflop! 

I don't think I've ever seen anyone claim this was going to have amazing graphics. Why are so many people hating on this game?

Just another thread filled with console fanboys that make me sad for the future of gaming 

Ly_the_Fairy

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

I don't think I've ever seen anyone claim this was going to have amazing graphics. Why are so many people hating on this game?

Just another thread filled with console fanboys that make me sad for the future of gaming 

Chris_Williams

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

I don't think I've ever seen anyone claim this was going to have amazing graphics. Why are so many people hating on this game?

Just another thread filled with console fanboys that make me sad for the future of gaming 

Chris_Williams

Both the 360 and PC have full access to Microsoft's Azure network, so I don't know how the game being on both those systems would disprove that statement.

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"][QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

I don't think I've ever seen anyone claim this was going to have amazing graphics. Why are so many people hating on this game?

Just another thread filled with console fanboys that make me sad for the future of gaming 

RR360DD

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"] when the lead developer says this game couldn't be made with "the cloud" I wanna see something that truly proves that statement. The fact that this game is also on the 360 and pc proves the cloud is some ol bullstereointegrity

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

I can see plenty of clouds

Look harder :cool:

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

RR360DD

I can see plenty of clouds

Look harder :cool:

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

RR360DD

I can see plenty of clouds

Look harder :cool:

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

RR360DD

I can see plenty of clouds

Look harder :cool:

 

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

RR360DD

And there is no fu**ing cloud that can make the xbox 360 be as powerful as the PS4,not even a quart so yeah cloud = bullsh**.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"] i wonder why digital foundry didnt see any clouds.....Douevenlift_bro

I can see plenty of clouds

Look harder :cool:

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

 

PC and 360 use MSs cloud as well.

Seriously, do some f*cking research or you'll just end up self--owning yourself again

:lol:

tormentos

And there is no fu**ing cloud that can make the xbox 360 be as powerful as the PS4,not even a quart so yeah cloud = bullsh**.

Who said there was? The clould just handles the AI. It doesn't effect the graphics at all

:cool:

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

I can see plenty of clouds

Look harder :cool:

stereointegrity

Re-read the DF article. The entire E3 demo was 60FPS :lol:

Learn to read

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]'Bu bu I thought the E3 demo was being shown on PC :cry:'

:lol:

You're an idiot. I'm glad you've caved and you'll be playing this great game. Just a pity most cows won't :( Oh well

RR360DD

wtf are u talking about? as always some random stupidity i bet.

The only idiot here is you who hypes a multiplat as ownage. But then again since xbox has no game its not the first time they have t resort to multiplats.

"hypes a multiplat as ownage."

What does that even mean :lol:

Its cows who get butthurt over TitanFall because they're missing out. You can't blame lems making 20 threads on it a day when they know its effective at getting cows riled up. Its their own faults, and if it was the other way around it would still happen LOL

Also, Xbox has more exclusives than the PS4

shhh no more tears

who is hyping a multiplat do you see me hyping it? damn i swear you dont stop amazing me with your stupidity. The only ones who hype multiplats are xbots cause they have no other games to hype.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"] i wonder why digital foundry didnt see any clouds.....I_can_haz

I can see plenty of clouds

Look harder :cool:

[QUOTE="Lambent7"]

I bet all the hardcore xbots right now saying graphics and tech don't matter wouldn't say the same thing if this was a Sony exclusive. Now all of them sound like Nintendo fanboys from the wii era over this game. The hypocrisy in SW is insane. While its true that graphics don't matter it be nice to play a game that was playable and immerse. The game might as well be a indie FPS...why is this considered a AAA title?

RR360DD

Yeah, it looks like an indie game :roll:

:lol:

So many doubters are gonna get owned in due time

Looking forward to the 'bu bu EA and MS paid reviewers to give it good scores :cry:' LOL

Titanfall is an indie game, since it is made by an indie company.

If you don't believe me then check out Respawn Entertainments description of itself on their own website.

http://www.respawn.com/company/