Digital Foundry vs Ryse- Looks worse than Assassins Creed!

I knew it was fishy that no screenshots were being posted,now we know why : )

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-ryse-son-of-rome

LOL

http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/6/1/0/7/XB1_001.bmp.jpg

http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/6/1/0/7/XB1_008.bmp.jpg

"That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest"

I guess you didn't read the article or are just trolling.

Ridiculous !! Just looks at the screenshots to see that is clearly BS.

http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/6/1/0/7/XB1_008.bmp.jpg

http://cfa.gamer-network.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/5/0/7/4/1080p_008_copy.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/80/format/jpg

Flat, undetailed ground, poor character shading, etc. I really don't understand why people think asscreed 4 looks good.

"That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest." - DF

my favorite game, lets quote things from the article that contradict the posters fanboyism

"Minor aliasing and shimmering do persist in certain instances, such as distant views of complex structures, but the overall image often more closely resembles a pre-rendered film than a typical game - an impressive achievement."

wow even crysis 1 on 360 looks better than this http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/6/1/0/7/XB1_008.bmp.jpg

to much blur, zooming out is doing it favors

This kind of embarrassment is easily avoided if the TC can at least skim-read the article before posting.

Maybe because its open world and yet still runs at 1080p,higher framerate and has better textures. On PS4 that is :)

"That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest." - DF

EDIT: Screens like this make me want to play this...

lol.. Thread backfired...

I don't know why you lems keep repeating what has already been said and not posting these amazing screenshots. oh wait : )

DF is not fooling anyone with such claims.

Ryse pre-rendered

http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/6/1/0/7/XB1_006.bmp.jpg

VS Killzone IN GAME!

http://abload.de/img/amarectv2013-11-1523-10u58.jpg

I posted a screenshot in the post above. DF already gave their analysis of KZ:SF, and "if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest." - DF

Why don't you people at least read the article you post? You link an article while at the same time giving it a title that goes the opposite of what the article says.

Lems are not going to like this since they posted it so much.

Writer of the article- http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=91351048&postcount=31

I do think Killzone Shadowfall is the best looking launch title between the two, though, but Ryse is definitely second place for me.

Ryse is a bad, bad, bad, bad corridor on rails qte fest whereas Ass Creed 4 is a really good, open world, fully traversable game... with PIRATES.

Idgaf that Ryse has pretty graphics, a shit game will stay a shit game.

Ryse looks great, second best looking next gen game behind KZ SF.

As for AssCreed 4... wow that game looks terrible.

Some of the thread in SW are really scraping the bottom of the barrel as far as quality goes. It's becoming more and more common for the link provided in the OP to NOT backup the statement made in the thread title.

I disagree I'm having a blast playing Ryse so you're opinion means nothing to me.

I stand by the statement. AC runs at higher resolution and framerate + is open world. I don't expect the lems to agree.

Blur of Thrones

http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/6/1/0/7/XB1_008.bmp.jpg

VS open world at 1080p

http://cfa.gamer-network.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/5/0/7/4/1080p_014_copy.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/80/format/jpg

http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/6/3/6/1/0/7/XB1_008.bmp.jpg

"A scene bathed in foliage highlights the effectiveness of SMAA 1TX when dealing with lots of alpha textures. Foliage appears clean and consistent across the image."

"That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest." - DF

sorry,but that is one of the ugliest next gen screenshots ever. In fact, could pass as current gen.

Dat double backfire. Even lem on neogaf is butthurting.

"But you said the following sentence in your article:

That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest

You specifically mention "next generation of console, not Xbox One, so it's a little misleading now that you are pointing Killzone as your pick."

Hahah.

You should be.

see how that works lol.

It towers over other xbone games maybe, but not even close to reach the same height as KZSF.

Nope.

lies, we all know ryse is the graphics king

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/now-that-ryse-is-confirmed-to-be-graphics-king-30932385/#133

yep. it really is no contest now. Killzone is so far ahead and that is against the so-called graphics god crytek. And if they can't come close, you can guarantee nobody else will.

They actually say it looks fantastic, and i agree! Framerate going under 30fps, on the other hand, is unacceptable!

Yep, TC picked the wrong thing to gripe about. Also, they actually say:

"That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest." - DF

under 30 at 900p is laughable really.

No. Judging from screens, Ryse looks so much better than AC4. So, so much better.

Some more PS4 AC screenshots.

http://abload.de/img/amarectv2013-11-1918-vxfnw.png

http://abload.de/img/amarectv2013-11-1919-t0d51.png

Ryse is the best looking game if you pretend Killzone SF doesn't exist..hahaha

Funny how he doesn't talk about how severely limited and enclosed the game is.

This is another thing the damn game even have drops under 20 FPS,most of the time runs at 26 to 28 FPS on 900p with very enclosed areas,tons of fog,horrible blur on far away object,and some still think this game is impressive.

If you ignore Killzone SF,and ignore Ryse 900p,16 FPS,blur fest and fog,those screen given by DF it self say it all,compare those to Killzone ones from DF.

I have AC4 on PC and play it at max settings and from the screeshots i've seen Ryse has higher quality assets than AC4.

Yeah i can also quote DF cheer leading for the xbox one as well doesn't make it true at all,the xbox one is so powerful it can't run COD Ghost a damn 8 year old engine at 1080p...hahaha

Read post 16 of this thread.

Lol i was going to say.. i've been, you know, actually playing Ryse and it is one of the best looking games I've ever seen. Plus it's actually been a lot of fun