Do we really want the Wii to win?

  • 188 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#151 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]I know a lot of Nintendo fans see the Wii winning this gen due to the excellent sales it's already received, and it's a fair prediction, just like either PS3/360 winning this gen. I also know a lot of Sony/MS fans expect the Wii to win but I'm asking you right now:

Do we really want the Wii to win?

Think about the consequences for a second. If Wii wins both Sony and MS next gen will not upgrade their hardware significantly next gen and add something innovative like a touch pen, or Wiimote to their console to increase creativity among devs. Many seem to forget that devs can be creative or innovative with normal controllers/hardware too, like Okami for PS2, or Shadow of the Colossus. If Wii wins, next gen will be targeted mainly at non gamers who enjoy games like Wiisports, Nintendogs, Brain Training, Singstar etc.

I'm not saying "Don't buy a Wii" because I think it's a great console and I would like to see it fair much better than the GC but I certainly don't want it to win because it's quite obvious what effect that will have on the market. I just wanted to point that out. In any case I don't see it winning because I don't think it will be able to compete when GT5, Halo 3, GTAIV, FFXIII, MGSIV all arrive and take the media's attention.

What do you think? If Wii wins, would you be OK with MS/Sony not upgrading their hardware too much and focusing more on creativity or would you rather they take strong hardware + great graphics = good games route?


matteno1
Why do people think that there's only room for one, dominating console concept on the market. Competition is making the console makers try harder and as a result we as gamers get better games and more value for our money. The gaming market is expanding, and as is the case in any other industry you will start seeing more diversity. Making a parallel to the automotive indistry: In the beginning you could only have the T-Ford, and in addition only in the colour black. Today mini buses live along side sports cars. Sony and MS won't automatically throw out performance just cause Nintendo has now widened the appeal of video gaming. I hope this generation is a three-way draw. That would benefit us as gamers the most.



Yeah, Wii Play, Wario Ware, Brain Training games, and Cooking Mama really push the envelope.
Avatar image for PaintballinDude
PaintballinDude

1092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 PaintballinDude
Member since 2004 • 1092 Posts
I know a lot of Nintendo fans see the Wii winning this gen due to the excellent sales it's already received, and it's a fair prediction, just like either PS3/360 winning this gen. I also know a lot of Sony/MS fans expect the Wii to win but I'm asking you right now:

Do we really want the Wii to win?

Think about the consequences for a second. If Wii wins both Sony and MS next gen will not upgrade their hardware significantly next gen and add something innovative like a touch pen, or Wiimote to their console to increase creativity among devs. Many seem to forget that devs can be creative or innovative with normal controllers/hardware too, like Okami for PS2, or Shadow of the Colossus. If Wii wins, next gen will be targeted mainly at non gamers who enjoy games like Wiisports, Nintendogs, Brain Training, Singstar etc.

I'm not saying "Don't buy a Wii" because I think it's a great console and I would like to see it fair much better than the GC but I certainly don't want it to win because it's quite obvious what effect that will have on the market. I just wanted to point that out. In any case I don't see it winning because I don't think it will be able to compete when GT5, Halo 3, GTAIV, FFXIII, MGSIV all arrive and take the media's attention.

What do you think? If Wii wins, would you be OK with MS/Sony not upgrading their hardware too much and focusing more on creativity or would you rather they take strong hardware + great graphics = good games route?


the-very-best
After i play MGS4, Ill move on to PC if that crap ever happens.
Avatar image for matteno1
matteno1

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#153 matteno1
Member since 2002 • 356 Posts
[QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="Gamer46"]Should we want the Wii to win? No. Will it win? Unfortunately, yes.Gamer46


so accodring to your logic pc should be winiining all the time...

ps2 - less powerful and grapchis

ps1 - same

n64- powerful than ps1 and grapchis better

cube- powerful and grpachis better than ps2

xbox- powerful than all of them

so accodring to you logic it should go nes, sega, dreacast, n64, xbox, ps3


Wrong.  My problem with Nintendo isn't that it's console it the least powerful.  It's that they're focusing too much on games for non-gamers and not enough on games for the more hardcore crowd.  Sorry, but Cooking Mama or Wii Play does not appeal to a majority of hardcore gamers.  At least not the ones I know.

Also, I'd just like to point out that while PSone and PS2 weren't the most powerful consoles on the market, at least they did a decent job.  The games did not look as good as they did on competing consoles, but the gap was no where near as ridiculous as it is between Wii and 360/PS3, only a fool would argue otherwise.

All gamers were non-gamers at one point. Why do you feel like you should be able to dictate who should play video games, what they should play or how they should play? The more the merrier.
Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts
[QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="Gamer46"]Should we want the Wii to win? No. Will it win? Unfortunately, yes.Gamer46


so accodring to your logic pc should be winiining all the time...

ps2 - less powerful and grapchis

ps1 - same

n64- powerful than ps1 and grapchis better

cube- powerful and grpachis better than ps2

xbox- powerful than all of them

so accodring to you logic it should go nes, sega, dreacast, n64, xbox, ps3


Wrong.  My problem with Nintendo isn't that it's console it the least powerful.  It's that they're focusing too much on games for non-gamers and not enough on games for the more hardcore crowd.  Sorry, but Cooking Mama or Wii Play does not appeal to a majority of hardcore gamers.  At least not the ones I know.

Also, I'd just like to point out that while PSone and PS2 weren't the most powerful consoles on the market, at least they did a decent job.  The games did not look as good as they did on competing consoles, but the gap was no where near as ridiculous as it is between Wii and 360/PS3, only a fool would argue otherwise.

1. that was the point of selling it to non gamers

2. there is hardcore games (and gamers there)

3. yea you got to ingore the other games too? Mp3, smg, no more heros, sadness, raid over river

4.  this is the so stupid statemnet when havent seen wii powerful yet. we all know its not going to be near 360 or ps3. but its not as bad as a leap you making it sound it be in between xbox and 360

5. decent job my ***

6.

Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="Gamer46"]Should we want the Wii to win? No. Will it win? Unfortunately, yes.matteno1


so accodring to your logic pc should be winiining all the time...

ps2 - less powerful and grapchis

ps1 - same

n64- powerful than ps1 and grapchis better

cube- powerful and grpachis better than ps2

xbox- powerful than all of them

so accodring to you logic it should go nes, sega, dreacast, n64, xbox, ps3


Wrong.  My problem with Nintendo isn't that it's console it the least powerful.  It's that they're focusing too much on games for non-gamers and not enough on games for the more hardcore crowd.  Sorry, but Cooking Mama or Wii Play does not appeal to a majority of hardcore gamers.  At least not the ones I know.

Also, I'd just like to point out that while PSone and PS2 weren't the most powerful consoles on the market, at least they did a decent job.  The games did not look as good as they did on competing consoles, but the gap was no where near as ridiculous as it is between Wii and 360/PS3, only a fool would argue otherwise.

All gamers were non-gamers at one point. Why do you feel like you should be able to dictate who should play video games, what they should play or how they should play? The more the merrier.

he is just a plain lame troll like almost everyone here

Avatar image for matteno1
matteno1

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#156 matteno1
Member since 2002 • 356 Posts
Well it's creating enough gamers to make you sweat and moan. Seriously, have you ever played anything like those games? The DO push the envelope.
Avatar image for gamenux
gamenux

5308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 gamenux
Member since 2006 • 5308 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]I know a lot of Nintendo fans see the Wii winning this gen due to the excellent sales it's already received, and it's a fair prediction, just like either PS3/360 winning this gen. I also know a lot of Sony/MS fans expect the Wii to win but I'm asking you right now:

Do we really want the Wii to win?

Think about the consequences for a second. If Wii wins both Sony and MS next gen will not upgrade their hardware significantly next gen and add something innovative like a touch pen, or Wiimote to their console to increase creativity among devs. Many seem to forget that devs can be creative or innovative with normal controllers/hardware too, like Okami for PS2, or Shadow of the Colossus. If Wii wins, next gen will be targeted mainly at non gamers who enjoy games like Wiisports, Nintendogs, Brain Training, Singstar etc.

I'm not saying "Don't buy a Wii" because I think it's a great console and I would like to see it fair much better than the GC but I certainly don't want it to win because it's quite obvious what effect that will have on the market. I just wanted to point that out. In any case I don't see it winning because I don't think it will be able to compete when GT5, Halo 3, GTAIV, FFXIII, MGSIV all arrive and take the media's attention.

What do you think? If Wii wins, would you be OK with MS/Sony not upgrading their hardware too much and focusing more on creativity or would you rather they take strong hardware + great graphics = good games route?


Blue-Sphere
I'd rather the Wii win than to have to the PS3 win, and the PS4 end up being $999 US Dollars. :P

Seriously though, you could look at it another way and say that if the Wii loses, then there won't be any sigificant innovations made, at least within the next gen or so, because if Nintendo couldn't pull it off, what would make MS or Sony think they could? Egos aside of course. If the Wii wins, don't you believe that that would lead to all systems having a little bit of everything?

I know what thing if Wii wins, nintendo will make another cheap and affordable console and will continue to make a hugh profit at launch. In terms of graphics, I doubt they will push it. So yes, gamers who like graphics will probably suffer. Casual gamers will benefit. Nitnendo motto seems to be make profit first anyway you can. sony motto is take the lost now and hope to earn it back in the long run. 360 is we will buy into any market we cannot win.
Avatar image for lilrush
lilrush

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#158 lilrush
Member since 2005 • 1695 Posts
Well, I think it's not god if wii wins, but at the same time, I think it may win.
Avatar image for lilrush
lilrush

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#159 lilrush
Member since 2005 • 1695 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]I know a lot of Nintendo fans see the Wii winning this gen due to the excellent sales it's already received, and it's a fair prediction, just like either PS3/360 winning this gen. I also know a lot of Sony/MS fans expect the Wii to win but I'm asking you right now:

Do we really want the Wii to win?

Think about the consequences for a second. If Wii wins both Sony and MS next gen will not upgrade their hardware significantly next gen and add something innovative like a touch pen, or Wiimote to their console to increase creativity among devs. Many seem to forget that devs can be creative or innovative with normal controllers/hardware too, like Okami for PS2, or Shadow of the Colossus. If Wii wins, next gen will be targeted mainly at non gamers who enjoy games like Wiisports, Nintendogs, Brain Training, Singstar etc.

I'm not saying "Don't buy a Wii" because I think it's a great console and I would like to see it fair much better than the GC but I certainly don't want it to win because it's quite obvious what effect that will have on the market. I just wanted to point that out. In any case I don't see it winning because I don't think it will be able to compete when GT5, Halo 3, GTAIV, FFXIII, MGSIV all arrive and take the media's attention.

What do you think? If Wii wins, would you be OK with MS/Sony not upgrading their hardware too much and focusing more on creativity or would you rather they take strong hardware + great graphics = good games route?


Blue-Sphere
I'd rather the Wii win than to have to the PS3 win, and the PS4 end up being $999 US Dollars. :P

Seriously though, you could look at it another way and say that if the Wii loses, then there won't be any sigificant innovations made, at least within the next gen or so, because if Nintendo couldn't pull it off, what would make MS or Sony think they could? Egos aside of course. If the Wii wins, don't you believe that that would lead to all systems having a little bit of everything?

You're forgetting.....the value of money decreases over periods of time. There were days when a coke was 5 cents, and now it is a dollar. Now i'm not saying that the Next PS should be 999$ US or even that it will be, i'm just saying that in the future we can expect a spike in prices...
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#160 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
I certainly don't. The fact of the matter is a significant number of games for the platform are simple or minigames. In fact, look at Sonic- need to give the game more "value"? Pack in minigames! Super Monkey Ball used to have some small minigames that were enjoyable and just complimented the main game. Now it's the other way- it's got tons of minigames and the campaign is shorter (and by many accounts, shorter and easier). Sorry, but that's NOT the direction I want the industry to go in. I'm not saying the motion sensing can't be good (though as of now, I've seen no full-games make good use of it in a meaningful way), but this focus on the ultra casual gamer scares me to death. Fortunately, if the console market were to go this way, I'd bite the bullet and just use a PC.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#161 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="Gamer46"]Should we want the Wii to win? No. Will it win? Unfortunately, yes.matteno1


so accodring to your logic pc should be winiining all the time...

ps2 - less powerful and grapchis

ps1 - same

n64- powerful than ps1 and grapchis better

cube- powerful and grpachis better than ps2

xbox- powerful than all of them

so accodring to you logic it should go nes, sega, dreacast, n64, xbox, ps3


Wrong. My problem with Nintendo isn't that it's console it the least powerful. It's that they're focusing too much on games for non-gamers and not enough on games for the more hardcore crowd. Sorry, but Cooking Mama or Wii Play does not appeal to a majority of hardcore gamers. At least not the ones I know.

Also, I'd just like to point out that while PSone and PS2 weren't the most powerful consoles on the market, at least they did a decent job. The games did not look as good as they did on competing consoles, but the gap was no where near as ridiculous as it is between Wii and 360/PS3, only a fool would argue otherwise.

All gamers were non-gamers at one point. Why do you feel like you should be able to dictate who should play video games, what they should play or how they should play? The more the merrier.



Not if it starts killing off the market for stuff like MGS, Gears of War, etc.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#162 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
Well it's creating enough gamers to make you sweat and moan. Seriously, have you ever played anything like those games? The DO push the envelope.matteno1


:lol:  They don't do anything, they're boring as hell.  I'll take something like the upcoming Assassin's Creed over Cooking Mama any day.
Avatar image for WeAreToast
WeAreToast

2365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 WeAreToast
Member since 2006 • 2365 Posts
Think about this:

If Microsoft and Sony go their routes and keep improving graphics. They will reach a capacity if they do this, and depending how they handle it, we could see the downfall of gaming.
Avatar image for deactivated-57d773aa56272
deactivated-57d773aa56272

2292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#164 deactivated-57d773aa56272
Member since 2006 • 2292 Posts
It'd be cool to play something like Wii Sports but have yet to play the Wii.  The last thing I played was the DS Lite at Toys R Us.  They had New Super Mario Bros. set up which was underwhelming.
Avatar image for Cronaroth
Cronaroth

3011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#165 Cronaroth
Member since 2004 • 3011 Posts
my view-Id like them to at least make a dent since MS and Sony are doing alot of the same things from last gen-except with prettier graphics and online-really for a LONG time-Xbox 360 simply felt like a prettier Xbox,same goes for PS3-the games simply feel like prettier PS2 games...innovation is good...new series being born are good...
Avatar image for omarguy01
omarguy01

8139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 omarguy01
Member since 2004 • 8139 Posts
what else does the future hold if nintendo wins ms cleo?
Avatar image for Zaistev_basic
Zaistev_basic

2975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 Zaistev_basic
Member since 2002 • 2975 Posts
[QUOTE="matteno1"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="Gamer46"]Should we want the Wii to win? No. Will it win? Unfortunately, yes.Gamer46


so accodring to your logic pc should be winiining all the time...

ps2 - less powerful and grapchis

ps1 - same

n64- powerful than ps1 and grapchis better

cube- powerful and grpachis better than ps2

xbox- powerful than all of them

so accodring to you logic it should go nes, sega, dreacast, n64, xbox, ps3


Wrong. My problem with Nintendo isn't that it's console it the least powerful. It's that they're focusing too much on games for non-gamers and not enough on games for the more hardcore crowd. Sorry, but Cooking Mama or Wii Play does not appeal to a majority of hardcore gamers. At least not the ones I know.

Also, I'd just like to point out that while PSone and PS2 weren't the most powerful consoles on the market, at least they did a decent job. The games did not look as good as they did on competing consoles, but the gap was no where near as ridiculous as it is between Wii and 360/PS3, only a fool would argue otherwise.

All gamers were non-gamers at one point. Why do you feel like you should be able to dictate who should play video games, what they should play or how they should play? The more the merrier.



Not if it starts killing off the market for stuff like MGS, Gears of War, etc.

No! The Wii will not kill games like MGS and Gears of War. Do you think these games became popular because of the graphics especially in the MGS case? No! It became popular because they introduce new gameplay concepts. Like the GTA 3, VC, and SA, in which it's graphics were horrible according to lemmings standards last 3-4 years ago, but the gameplay is new. Do not blame Nintendo for not producing 3rd party games; It is the 3rd party developers who miscalculate the situation and counted Nintendo out early on even before X360 was released. The games for X360 and PS3 are already in develop even before X360 was released. Still, despite Wii having the fewest released games, it is still selling out after 4 months. It is the consumers hardcore, casuals, and non-gamers who will dictate who the winner is not the hardcore gamers like you. Wii cannot please everyone as it is the case for PS2, X360, especially the PS3. 
Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#168 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts
I do want the Wii to win because I view it as a matter of battling business strategies. Microsoft and Sony's business strategies seem to be "More and better". They provide consoles with plenty of high tech and multimedia capabilities. However, they're engaging in the power race very recklessly. What are the results? Well, you have a high tech piece of equipment, which pleases the hardcore, but you have a high priced piece of hardware ($400 for the 360, $600 for the PS3) that serves as a strong deterrant to non-hardcore gamers picking up the console, and the dramatic increases in development prices put a pinch on developers and publishers trying to make a buck, causing a trend away from riskier games and towards more proven formulas, resulting in a creative dirth of the industry. Nintendo, by contrast, takes a more wide-market approach. They've sacrificed hardware advancements to create a more affordable machine, making it more accessible to everyone, and using the controller, they've created a console which results in something unique. Further, this results in a much more developer friendly console, with lower development times and costs. That results in games which are more unique and creative, as the potential loss from a bomb is smaller. Be honest, do you think we'd see games like Opoona, Elebits, or Treasure Hunter Z on the 360 or PS3? Potentially, yes, but I believe we'd be more likely to get something less original and creative in design. And even the loss in hardware is overstated. Yes, the Wii isn't nearly as powerful as the 360 or PS3, but it has plenty of power yet to be unlocked. I think we'll see within the next year or so games that will look simply awesome at 480p. As for the whole minigames argument, I ask, how many copies did Mario Party sell during the life of the GameCube? How many copies of Singstar and Buzz! were sold? How many copies of WarioWare Touched, Feel the Magic, etc sold? Yet, the GameCube, PS2, and DS all have a strong library of games aimed at the hardcore. Why? Because casuals may make up a larger market share, but they don't buy games with the frequency hardcore gamers do. Frankly, I think the business paths Microsoft and Sony are following lead to destruction, forcing the gaming hobby further into the niche status by making it less appealing to the general populace. Becuase I believe the wide-market strategy of the Wii is necessary for the future of gaming, I do want the Wii to win.
Avatar image for Zaistev_basic
Zaistev_basic

2975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 Zaistev_basic
Member since 2002 • 2975 Posts

I do want the Wii to win because I view it as a matter of battling business strategies.
Microsoft and Sony's business strategies seem to be "More and better". They provide consoles with plenty of high tech and multimedia capabilities. However, they're engaging in the power race very recklessly. What are the results? Well, you have a high tech piece of equipment, which pleases the hardcore, but you have a high priced piece of hardware ($400 for the 360, $600 for the PS3) that serves as a strong deterrant to non-hardcore gamers picking up the console, and the dramatic increases in development prices put a pinch on developers and publishers trying to make a buck, causing a trend away from riskier games and towards more proven formulas, resulting in a creative dirth of the industry.

--> You must consider as well that when PS2, GC, and XBox were in competition, the price difference was not as big as of todays generation.  Second, the last gen has no product differential, you just pick the console with the most popular games. In case of the Wii, they have penetrated the casual market introduce more new gamers than X360 and PS3 did as the sales proved it. Product differential, price, positive media and consumer reaction, and broad target market as the reasons why the Wii is selling so fast.

Nintendo, by contrast, takes a more wide-market approach. They've sacrificed hardware advancements to create a more affordable machine, making it more accessible to everyone, and using the controller, they've created a console which results in something unique. Further, this results in a much more developer friendly console, with lower development times and costs. That results in games which are more unique and creative, as the potential loss from a bomb is smaller. Be honest, do you think we'd see games like Opoona, Elebits, or Treasure Hunter Z on the 360 or PS3? Potentially, yes, but I believe we'd be more likely to get something less original and creative in design.
And even the loss in hardware is overstated. Yes, the Wii isn't nearly as powerful as the 360 or PS3, but it has plenty of power yet to be unlocked. I think we'll see within the next year or so games that will look simply awesome at 480p.

As for the whole minigames argument, I ask, how many copies did Mario Party sell during the life of the GameCube? How many copies of Singstar and Buzz! were sold? How many copies of WarioWare Touched, Feel the Magic, etc sold? Yet, the GameCube, PS2, and DS all have a strong library of games aimed at the hardcore. Why? Because casuals may make up a larger market share, but they don't buy games with the frequency hardcore gamers do.

--> So true, it has always been true that casuals + non-gamers buys most of the consoles compare to hardcores.

Frankly, I think the business paths Microsoft and Sony are following lead to destruction, forcing the gaming hobby further into the niche status by making it less appealing to the general populace. Becuase I believe the wide-market strategy of the Wii is necessary for the future of gaming, I do want the Wii to win.

--> The plan of MS and Sony is to conquer your entire home entertainment. Sounds good but in reality, it will cost a lot as proven by the prices of the X360 + add-ons, and PS3 plus add-ons. If it does go their way, consoles will be no longer consoles and the price of the consoles plus games will drastically increase like what happened to X360 and PS3.

Avatar image for Ultimate_Peon
Ultimate_Peon

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Ultimate_Peon
Member since 2003 • 587 Posts
Some of you people are so melodramatic it's hilarious.
Avatar image for cobrax80
cobrax80

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 114

User Lists: 0

#171 cobrax80
Member since 2003 • 4658 Posts

Hell to the no!!! If the Wii wins, this will the be the most embarrasing thing the gaming community has faced. FFVII_Madness55

err, if the Wii wins, most of the gaming community will own a Wii.

Avatar image for SkyRaid
SkyRaid

2001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#172 SkyRaid
Member since 2004 • 2001 Posts
Depends, I have a GC and while it was cool at first, it really sucked when it came to number of games. I mean yeah, it had some great titles but not nearly as many as the ps2, not too far from the xbox though. So if they don't abaddon their product this time around, doesn't matter to me.
Avatar image for RKFS
RKFS

1096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 RKFS
Member since 2005 • 1096 Posts
[QUOTE="SkyRaid"]Depends, I have a GC and while it was cool at first, it really sucked when it came to number of games. I mean yeah, it had some great titles but not nearly as many as the ps2, not too far from the xbox though. So if they don't abaddon their product this time around, doesn't matter to me.

They didn't abandon the GC...
Avatar image for Bisset
Bisset

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 Bisset
Member since 2006 • 261 Posts

Systems are not based on the successful systems before them:

the weakest system, the PS2, won last gen and this gen Sony and MS have tried to make the most powerfull system and Nintendo have made something revolutionary. Can you draw similarities here?

Avatar image for Bisset
Bisset

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Bisset
Member since 2006 • 261 Posts
[QUOTE="matteno1"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="Gamer46"]Should we want the Wii to win? No. Will it win? Unfortunately, yes.Gamer46


so accodring to your logic pc should be winiining all the time...

ps2 - less powerful and grapchis

ps1 - same

n64- powerful than ps1 and grapchis better

cube- powerful and grpachis better than ps2

xbox- powerful than all of them

so accodring to you logic it should go nes, sega, dreacast, n64, xbox, ps3


Wrong. My problem with Nintendo isn't that it's console it the least powerful. It's that they're focusing too much on games for non-gamers and not enough on games for the more hardcore crowd. Sorry, but Cooking Mama or Wii Play does not appeal to a majority of hardcore gamers. At least not the ones I know.

Also, I'd just like to point out that while PSone and PS2 weren't the most powerful consoles on the market, at least they did a decent job. The games did not look as good as they did on competing consoles, but the gap was no where near as ridiculous as it is between Wii and 360/PS3, only a fool would argue otherwise.

All gamers were non-gamers at one point. Why do you feel like you should be able to dictate who should play video games, what they should play or how they should play? The more the merrier.



Not if it starts killing off the market for stuff like MGS, Gears of War, etc.

But it won't. Devs will make games for hardcore and non-gamers because although there are more non-gamers, hardcore gamers buy ten times as many games as non-gamers

Avatar image for sumo1973
sumo1973

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 sumo1973
Member since 2005 • 1195 Posts

The Wii has to sell more than the Xbox 360 before anyone can get really scared about Nintendo killing off hardcore gaming or can say that the Wii is winning.

I was a cube owner last generation and was sick of the number of games that were cancelled because the console wasn't so popular so I'm glad that the Wii is doing better. I've been a gamer for many years and don't feel that the Wii is going to kill of gaming. If people don't like the Wii then don't buy one. You have two other alternatives.

The market is big enough for all 3 consoles to survive. People's seem to have lost their step because for once Sony aren't the leaders so far in this generation and Nintendo are doing better than in their N64 and cube days. Things change.

Avatar image for jeffwulf
jeffwulf

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 jeffwulf
Member since 2004 • 1569 Posts

Heres a question for everyone in the thread.  If you're so supportive of hardcore games, why aren't you worried about consoles beating PCs?  I play both consoles and PC, but the games on PC are much more hardcore, such as Crusader Kings, Europa Univeralis and such, which are so complex that the learning curve goes beyond vertical.  Oblivion was dumbed down for consoles, so why don't you criticise the XBox 360 and PS3 for casualizing gaming?  Also, since you also seem very adament about graphics, why are you not worried that people will go to consoles, so developers will develop for consoles instead of trying to get the most out of the newest and greatest PC hardware?  PC hardware easily trumps consoles, and the hardware in consoles is easily outdated.

So pretty much, if you are going to worry about the Wii dumbing down gaming or holding back graphics, you have to also worry about all console beating PCs.  So I ask again, why aren't you also worried about them winning?

Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts

Systems are not based on the successful systems before them:

the weakest system, the PS2, won last gen and this gen Sony and MS have tried to make the most powerfull system and Nintendo have made something revolutionary. Can you draw similarities here?

Bisset
If you dont think Ps2 was helped with the success of the Ps1, they you are mistaken. You you want to know when the last time the video games industry almost had a crash. I am talking worldwide. 32/64bit era, that is when. What era did Nintendo start to lose alot of it fanbase N64, same era. When did bc become such a powerful tool. Ps2 with Ps1 bc. If Ps1 wasnt an important part of the success of Ps2, then bc wouldnt be as important as it is today. Then again the industry would be in trouble. Without a Xbox we would be stuck in a Sony dominated world. Maybe you could even question if the Wii would come out. 20M isnt so bad when your 3rd to another 20M company. 20M is dead, when your 2nd to a 100M+ Alot is based upon history.
Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts

Heres a question for everyone in the thread.  If you're so supportive of hardcore games, why aren't you worried about consoles beating PCs?  I play both consoles and PC, but the games on PC are much more hardcore, such as Crusader Kings, Europa Univeralis and such, which are so complex that the learning curve goes beyond vertical.  Oblivion was dumbed down for consoles, so why don't you criticise the XBox 360 and PS3 for casualizing gaming?  Also, since you also seem very adament about graphics, why are you not worried that people will go to consoles, so developers will develop for consoles instead of trying to get the most out of the newest and greatest PC hardware?  PC hardware easily trumps consoles, and the hardware in consoles is easily outdated.

So pretty much, if you are going to worry about the Wii dumbing down gaming or holding back graphics, you have to also worry about all console beating PCs.  So I ask again, why aren't you also worried about them winning?

jeffwulf
You do know that pcs gamers do this already. They too must acknowledge, while a game might be slightly dumbed down for 360. It is even worse for the Ps3. Part of this is the popularity of the Sony brand. They know that 360 is the closest to a pc out of the console. Dont believe check the Obilvion board after the Ps3 version was announced. Now this is my big problem, when people like you try to hide behind this. Then turn round and ignore a very simple thing. Dumbing down for 360 is a world of difference then dumbing down for the Wii. So stop hiding behind it. Infact you should be using the examples of these games already being made more accesable because of wider auidences. Now it will be 100x worse, since the audience is being broaden by the Wii. Its like going from a 18 rated Terminator to a 12a terminator3 which is what happened. Bring more casual gamers isnt as bad as more non gamers. Big difference between what any console before has done and what the Wii is doing. I myself am worried. Any here listen to VGO, even the chick on it hates the idea of games becoming more accessabile at the expense of the long standing fans. This was aimed at the Graw and RB6. People if its happening now to the 360 then imagine how much worse it can get, esp with higher budgets.
Avatar image for Teh_Stevz
Teh_Stevz

5678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 Teh_Stevz
Member since 2005 • 5678 Posts
I thought there'd be an simpler solution to the question asked but it seems there's no other choice.:? Let me first stste how much power and/or features is needed to make a good game... Enough. It was enough for GeOW to get GOTY. It was enough for Zelda WW to get the same award. It was enough for Mario Kart DS to get AAA. If you haven't caught onto what I'm getting at is games are as good as the devs developing it. I don't think I can tell it any clear-cut than that. The important part. Does anyone agree that there was a change in a games ethic when the PS1/Saturn/N64 was released? I say there was. the scope of 3D wasn't to be realised just for games like Mario, Street Fighter, Final Fantasy(Which I think embraced it well in FF8) or Gunstar Heroes but for games like Ridge Racer, FF8, Gran Turismo, Tekken, Virtua Fighter, Resident Evil, Syphon Filter, Sport franchise games and the like. These games pushed a 'realistic' approach of gaming. Many gamers were turned off from such a development. It caused an outcry of ravid fans of the SNES/Genisis era to even condemn people who liked such games to a 'lower-level' of gamer. 'Casuals' is what they were called... And it's just wrong to say so. It's a sign of desperation of losing what you already had to such. These ''Gamers' had every right to play games as much as someone who'd played it long before they were interested despite some games being different. OK, so what does that have to do with the arguement? Easy. I'm seeing the same thing happen right now. The said 'Casuals' who survived the scrutiny are now calling into question games like Brain Training and Cooking Mama as 'Low-level games.' Calling them, as spoon-fed by Nintendo 'Non-gamers.' The thing is, such a transition is alot more noticable now than it was when 3D/Realism came around. the char would look like... Video Gaming Timeline: Birth>Establishment>3D/Realism>????What the hell is '????' ? That would be 'Practicality.' It's been the most used excuse for these new gamers to stay away from VGs in general. I almost fell into the same void too. Being 23(24 on the 26th... :| ... :?) I almost gave up gaming in general. Thought I was 'Too old' for it. That's was up until aquired Brain Training and experienced soem Nintendogs... Wait, what about the Wii? Well, maybe Nintendo have already started the transition with the DS. Maybe the Wii is just the larger placeholder for the focus. But it still wants to carry that focus for gaming to be attractive to all. To answer The-very-best's question, Do we really want the Wii to win? I, honestly, don't know. What I do know is that games like Super Mario Galaxy, Halo 3 and Heavenly Sword won't just dissapear of the face of the Earth. But even I've embraced these new games and not just see their value from a practical standpoint but even enjoy and play them more than other games(UT2k4, SSBM and Mario Kart say differently :P). On a lighter note on this thread I had to read alot of posts and still find nothing that holds too well. Except...
Some of you people are so melodramatic it's hilarious.Ultimate_Peon
:lol: ... And to that I agree.
Avatar image for nintendo-4life
nintendo-4life

18281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 nintendo-4life
Member since 2004 • 18281 Posts
I know a lot of Nintendo fans see the Wii winning this gen due to the excellent sales it's already received, and it's a fair prediction, just like either PS3/360 winning this gen. I also know a lot of Sony/MS fans expect the Wii to win but I'm asking you right now:

Do we really want the Wii to win?

Think about the consequences for a second. If Wii wins both Sony and MS next gen will not upgrade their hardware significantly next gen and add something innovative like a touch pen, or Wiimote to their console to increase creativity among devs. Many seem to forget that devs can be creative or innovative with normal controllers/hardware too, like Okami for PS2, or Shadow of the Colossus. If Wii wins, next gen will be targeted mainly at non gamers who enjoy games like Wiisports, Nintendogs, Brain Training, Singstar etc.

I'm not saying "Don't buy a Wii" because I think it's a great console and I would like to see it fair much better than the GC but I certainly don't want it to win because it's quite obvious what effect that will have on the market. I just wanted to point that out. In any case I don't see it winning because I don't think it will be able to compete when GT5, Halo 3, GTAIV, FFXIII, MGSIV all arrive and take the media's attention.

What do you think? If Wii wins, would you be OK with MS/Sony not upgrading their hardware too much and focusing more on creativity or would you rather they take strong hardware + great graphics = good games route?


the-very-best
i actually think the Wii will win because it will have better games, that's what i believe, no other reason, same reason will carry out the 360 or PS3. and the Wii is bringing out new ideas and such, how do you know that sony won't create something cool and entersting? how don't you know MS will do something SO different from the others WHILE having great graphics? i know your concern, but really now we've seen the route of the graphics upgrade and it has not ben pleasant, yes it was awesome but Wii is a breath of fresh air, and when the hardcore games hit, it will be massive. BTW you included two system sellers on two different platforms and you did not include any Wii titles, that's not fair to say the least.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#182 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoffgod"]I do want the Wii to win because I view it as a matter of battling business strategies. Microsoft and Sony's business strategies seem to be "More and better". They provide consoles with plenty of high tech and multimedia capabilities. However, they're engaging in the power race very recklessly. What are the results? Well, you have a high tech piece of equipment, which pleases the hardcore, but you have a high priced piece of hardware ($400 for the 360, $600 for the PS3) that serves as a strong deterrant to non-hardcore gamers picking up the console, and the dramatic increases in development prices put a pinch on developers and publishers trying to make a buck, causing a trend away from riskier games and towards more proven formulas, resulting in a creative dirth of the industry. Nintendo, by contrast, takes a more wide-market approach. They've sacrificed hardware advancements to create a more affordable machine, making it more accessible to everyone, and using the controller, they've created a console which results in something unique. Further, this results in a much more developer friendly console, with lower development times and costs. That results in games which are more unique and creative, as the potential loss from a bomb is smaller. Be honest, do you think we'd see games like Opoona, Elebits, or Treasure Hunter Z on the 360 or PS3? Potentially, yes, but I believe we'd be more likely to get something less original and creative in design. And even the loss in hardware is overstated. Yes, the Wii isn't nearly as powerful as the 360 or PS3, but it has plenty of power yet to be unlocked. I think we'll see within the next year or so games that will look simply awesome at 480p. As for the whole minigames argument, I ask, how many copies did Mario Party sell during the life of the GameCube? How many copies of Singstar and Buzz! were sold? How many copies of WarioWare Touched, Feel the Magic, etc sold? Yet, the GameCube, PS2, and DS all have a strong library of games aimed at the hardcore. Why? Because casuals may make up a larger market share, but they don't buy games with the frequency hardcore gamers do. Frankly, I think the business paths Microsoft and Sony are following lead to destruction, forcing the gaming hobby further into the niche status by making it less appealing to the general populace. Becuase I believe the wide-market strategy of the Wii is necessary for the future of gaming, I do want the Wii to win.



But I don't understand why "more and better" can't provide great games for casuals too. Casuals tend to buy the consoles late in their life anyway (In Australia 75% of PS2 sales came when the price was under $200 AU, that's about the time it was $350 in the US)...they don't buy the consoles at launch and when they do buy the consoles there are plenty of games available.

Who's to say PS3/360 can't allow devs to create (cheap) non gamer titles and put them for sale via the online download service? It doesn't all have to be store bought. Take Warhawk for example. It's an online game now.

And you seem to be under the impression that Wii will have many hardcore titles like the GC but I have to disagree because the system is more of a "party" console, and look at the latest top selling games, Wiisports and Wiiplay. Why wouldn't they make more non gamer titles?

And that's why I don't want them to win. I don't want Sony/MS to focus on non gamer titles.
Avatar image for kiruyama
kiruyama

1205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#183 kiruyama
Member since 2006 • 1205 Posts
Just because the Wii could win, doesn't mean MS and Sony will suddenly change their game plan and decide to mimic Nintendo's strategy. Not everyone will want to look at it that way, and I know Sony won't convert their famed PS controller's design to some sort of motion controller just to try to steal some of Nintendo's market share. And if the Wii does win, then good. It will only push the industry further and expand it's audience. Just because non gamer titles are selling does not mean every dev will decide to drop their series' and new IPs to cater to a new audience rather than feeding the already large core gameing audience. Nintendo is adding to the market share, not taking from it. There is still a huge audience for hardcore games. And the notion that MS and Sony would cop out and hardly upgrade their hardware is laughable. At least Microsoft, for sure, will want to be able to deliver near-PC quality effects and visuals, and PCs aren't going to just slow down and say "oh well teh nintendo doesn't upgrade so we won't lol." And Sony has stated they want to see consoles become more upgradable, as PCs are. It really makes no difference, Nintendo itself has plenty of hardcore games, and they won't dumb them down to make them more accesible.

Yes, it's fine if the Wii wins.
Avatar image for postulio14
postulio14

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#184 postulio14
Member since 2007 • 729 Posts
simple, yes, i do want the wii to win
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#185 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
Even if wii wins; it's not going to stop sony, and m$ from upgrading their console. ninjiijitsu
You can't stick with the same tactics...the TC is right...
Avatar image for Sonicplys
Sonicplys

2605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#186 Sonicplys
Member since 2004 • 2605 Posts

What do you think? If Wii wins, would you be OK with MS/Sony not upgrading their hardware too much and focusing more on creativity or would you rather they take strong hardware + great graphics = crappy games route?

Im OK with that.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#187 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]I do like my party games and strange/abstract third party games. /sarcasm I really know the Wii will win, but I don't WANT it to win. Simply because it may make other companies tailor more to the casual consumer, and we will see less and less incredibly indepth games.

so.....your saying that the wii won't have in deph games? hmm..I suppose that if the 360 wins..the next gen after this will have nothing but shooters :roll:
Avatar image for MoldOnHold
MoldOnHold

11760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#188 MoldOnHold
Member since 2005 • 11760 Posts
I love the Wii, but for some reason I wouldn't want it to win. The PS3/360 is more advanced, so it's only logical that they continue to push the industry forward. Wii's too casual.