Do you need to play the other Metal Gear games to understand 4?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jessejay420
jessejay420

4091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 jessejay420
Member since 2011 • 4091 Posts

you could play every mgs created and still be confused icyseanfitz

you took the words right out of my mouth :lol:

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] So you say that every game ever released with a metascore over 90 is objectively a quality game? Every single one, without exception?

Unless it has only a few reviews from blogger type critics lol yes. Any 90+ Metacritic with 50+ reviews or whatever is going to be quality, add tons of awards and I really don't see how you could deny that.

And this is the part where we agree to disagree, because I don't believe that.

Just out of curiosity, which 90+ Metacritic game with tons of reviews do you feel doesn't deserve to be called a quality game?

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] I never argued otherwise. But someone that same rule applies to a gamespot, ign, or gametrailers writer and then praising MGS4. It means they liked it. They'll give you reasons on why they liked it, and how it matches up in the grand scheme of gaming, but it doesn't automatically make it a quality experience.

Objectivity doesn't mean what you think it means.

jg4xchamp

We're on the same page and I am consistent however, I won't accept a single reviewers opinion as proof of quality because there are terrible critics that shouldn't be critics, there are hype machines and paid reviews and fanboys and etc. However, I don't see how it's possible for a 90+ metacritic title with tons of reviews NOT to be quality, I might not like it taste wise, but it's going to be quality for sure. Objectivity doesn't mean a reviewer giving a game a good review because he feels it's a well crafted game despite HATING the genre or the theme? Is that not a reviewer being objective? If not then maybe I really don't know what it means.

It would just mean that he likes it. That's the objective fact. It's not necessarily a sign of quality, because that argument works both ways.

"Dude he likes the game, and he hates sports games"

which can turn into

"um it's a sports game for people who don't like sports games".

SO you can b1tch and praise both ways. Really this argument seems more about the semantics and less black and white territory. I think the argument that MGS 4 is a bad game has too many holes in it. For all intents and purposes it does some fantastic sh1t. The argument of if it's actually great or just good is more dicey though.

The Wire has consistently been praised as one of the best shows ever, and has been argued plenty of times for numero uno. Last I checked the show doesn't have a single emmy to its name. Doesn't make that show any less excellent as far as I'm concerned.

I don't know I'm not big on doing some essay battle on the merits of MGS 4. I bought it, was really excited, disappointed, replayed it, and enjoyed it for what it did right, moved on. There are far more offensive games than MGS 4(Mafia 2 for starters), and I still think Kojima can get the job done.

The Wire IS the greatest show ever lol. But not winning awards doesn't go against my argument, like I said with the Oscars, maybe some other less deserving show won against the Wire, but I'm certain even though it was less deserving, it was still quality.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#154 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
I don't think I wrote that....but um. Mass Effect 1? I mean it's not straight up awful, but it's buggy, unpolished, has clunky gameplay, has repetitive side quests, the RPG elements are either half assed or just silly, the actual consequences aren't well done. I don't know if I'd call it bad, but it's average at best.
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#155 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]Unless it has only a few reviews from blogger type critics lol yes. Any 90+ Metacritic with 50+ reviews or whatever is going to be quality, add tons of awards and I really don't see how you could deny that. Eddie-Vedder

And this is the part where we agree to disagree, because I don't believe that.

Just out of curiosity, which 90+ Metacritic game with tons of reviews do you feel doesn't deserve to be called a quality game?

Skyrim, Oblivion, Fallout 3, Modern Warfare 2, Gears of War 2, Half-Life 2, GRAW, and Final Fantasy VIII off the top of my head.
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#156 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

I don't think I wrote that....but um. Mass Effect 1? I mean it's not straight up awful, but it's buggy, unpolished, has clunky gameplay, has repetitive side quests, the RPG elements are either half assed or just silly, the actual consequences aren't well done. I don't know if I'd call it bad, but it's average at best. jg4xchamp

You didn't.

But Mass Effect, too.

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

No worries, I wouldn't want to read it again myself.

And I agree to all that. I've never said MGS4 is a terrible game. Just extremely disappointing for a long time fan of the series that actually pays attention.

You actually recognize the issues. Eddie does not. When I present him with facts, he throws a tantrum that has nothing to do with the discussion. Hes just another one of these guys that doesn't know much about the series at all, but acts like an authority. Funny yes, but annoying.

All I'm saying is that when presented with undeniable facts he just gets upset. No point in trying to make him understand reviews, subjectivity and objectivity.

RyanShazam

:lol: Wiimotefan suddenly became this cool, calm and collected rational poster that's quite polite and non insulting. Oh please dude, you're famous on this board, you're in every MGS4 thread tearing it apart insulting people who like it and spamming :lol: :lol: :lol: B*tch please :lol:

I've maintained my cool with you throughout this thread, have I not? Kind of feel like I have to, or I might send some kid over the edge.

I doubt I'm famous on this board.

I never insult people for liking the game. You should ask FinalFantasy94 as most of my arguments about MGS have been with him.

I just know the series a little too well and when I see bs claims I shut them down. Yes, I tear MGS4 apart on a regular basis. Its pretty easy to do. I'm not alone in my distaste for the game either.

At least unlike a lot of other people that just say "herp derp movie gear lolololol" I actually support my arguments and claims. Sometimes with facts like the ones you couldnt deal with. Sometimes with well supported opinions.

Get over it.

I couldn't deal with? Wow you're so full of yourself, it's kind of pathetic. Seems like you can't deal with people liking the game, and it REALLY gets under your skin. Nothing you said about the game made me like it less, a lot of what you said is so nitpicky it's hilarious. You have a problem with mindset. No game is perfect, but you greatly exaggerate it's faults and blow them way out of proportion. You need to realize it's more your taste, and not some random darpa chief bs. The story is still incredible, even with all the nuttiness., not in a classic literature way, but in a crazy over the top MGS kojima way. Anyway I have to go so I won't answer for a while.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#158 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]We're on the same page and I am consistent however, I won't accept a single reviewers opinion as proof of quality because there are terrible critics that shouldn't be critics, there are hype machines and paid reviews and fanboys and etc. However, I don't see how it's possible for a 90+ metacritic title with tons of reviews NOT to be quality, I might not like it taste wise, but it's going to be quality for sure. Objectivity doesn't mean a reviewer giving a game a good review because he feels it's a well crafted game despite HATING the genre or the theme? Is that not a reviewer being objective? If not then maybe I really don't know what it means. Eddie-Vedder

It would just mean that he likes it. That's the objective fact. It's not necessarily a sign of quality, because that argument works both ways.

"Dude he likes the game, and he hates sports games"

which can turn into

"um it's a sports game for people who don't like sports games".

SO you can b1tch and praise both ways. Really this argument seems more about the semantics and less black and white territory. I think the argument that MGS 4 is a bad game has too many holes in it. For all intents and purposes it does some fantastic sh1t. The argument of if it's actually great or just good is more dicey though.

The Wire has consistently been praised as one of the best shows ever, and has been argued plenty of times for numero uno. Last I checked the show doesn't have a single emmy to its name. Doesn't make that show any less excellent as far as I'm concerned.

I don't know I'm not big on doing some essay battle on the merits of MGS 4. I bought it, was really excited, disappointed, replayed it, and enjoyed it for what it did right, moved on. There are far more offensive games than MGS 4(Mafia 2 for starters), and I still think Kojima can get the job done.

The Wire IS the greatest show ever lol. But not winning awards doesn't go against my argument, like I said with the Oscars, maybe some other less deserving show won against the Wire, but I'm certain even though it was less deserving, it was still quality.

The Wire got stuck with the golden age of HB0(SOpranos, Dead Wood, Six Feet Under) and then The Shield.

It's like how John Hamm keeps being emmyless every year. His Don Draper is fantastic, but he's stuck with Bryan Cranston's Walter White almost every year.


Avatar image for Wiimotefan
Wiimotefan

4151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 Wiimotefan
Member since 2010 • 4151 Posts

I couldn't deal with? Wow you're so full of yourself, it's kind of pathetic. Seems like you can't deal with people liking the game, and it REALLY gets under your skin. Nothing you said about the game made me like it less, a lot of what you said is so nitpicky it's hilarious. You have a problem with mindset. No game is perfect, but you greatly exaggerate it's faults and blow them way out of proportion. You need to realize it's more your taste, and not some random darpa chief bs. The story is still incredible, even with all the nuttiness., not in a classic literature way, but in a crazy over the top MGS kojima way. Anyway I have to go so I won't answer for a while. Eddie-Vedder

Eddie, I sincerely worry for you man.

I supplied you with information. Information that you could not retort. So instead you started trying to insult me and kept going off on this tangent about how I should play Nintendo games. In other words. You could not deal with the information I presented. Thats not being full of myself. Thats me pointing out exactly what happened. Its only a few pages back if you would like me to repost it for you.

I have no issues with people enjoying the game. Plenty of people on this board enjoy it. Do you see me telling them they're wrong for enjoying it? No. But as I said before, I'm quick to shut down any BS regarding the game. I am every bit as entitled to criticize the title as others are to praise it.

I didn't say any game is perfect. And I didn't exaggerate and blow things out of proportion. I gave direct statements. Again, I will repost these if you are not willing to go back and read it again.

And for the 3rd time now. The over the top craziness is not my issue at all. I have no idea why you keep bringing that up. MGS has always been over the top. I wouldnt have it any other way.

And excuse me for the Darpa Chief issue. Guess I'm in the wrong for paying attention to a story and its characters and maybe hoping for a bit of cohesiveness and continuity. Thats my bad. PLEASE KOJIMA! In the next MGS game I want you to bring The Boss back from the dead, but make her a dude that has a love affair with Sunny. I wont care!

Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]I think you need to stick to those Nintendo games.RyanShazam

You mean the higher rated Mario Galaxy series?

Eddie can't handle the truth lol
Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23833 Posts

Yo, wiimotefan being observant is for b*tches. Go home and play a Nintendo game. Stand back and watch us real MGS fans take a load down the throat for Kojima San, no questions asked.

Nah, but speaking on "retorts" you never did reply to my comment about Madnar. What gives?

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#162 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

I started with MGS4 as many very first MGS game ever and i was pretty fine with it tbh.. i will someday play the past one too but after MGS4 i can say im starting to become an MGS fan and cant wait for Rising and the other one

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23833 Posts

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]I think you need to stick to those Nintendo games.RyanShazam

You mean the higher rated Mario Galaxy series?

Eddie can't handle the truth lol

Eddie lives on a one way street, best back up! He might not see ya with them blinders on.

Avatar image for Wiimotefan
Wiimotefan

4151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Wiimotefan
Member since 2010 • 4151 Posts

Yo, wiimotefan being observant is for b*tches. Go home and play a Nintendo game. Stand back and watch us real MGS fans take a load down the throat for Kojima San, no questions asked.

Nah, but speaking on "retorts" you never did reply to my comment about Madnar. What gives?

ConanTheStoner

lol way to sum up the "argument". :P

And I didnt mean to ignore your post, I just got caught up with good old Eddie. I was under the impression that you and I agree, but for different reasons, so I didnt see a point in arguing about it. And tbh, I think you're absolutely right. I mixed up Madnar with Marv for some reason, but the point still stands. Even moreso actually.

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23833 Posts

[QUOTE="ConanTheStoner"]

Yo, wiimotefan being observant is for b*tches. Go home and play a Nintendo game. Stand back and watch us real MGS fans take a load down the throat for Kojima San, no questions asked.

Nah, but speaking on "retorts" you never did reply to my comment about Madnar. What gives?

Wiimotefan

lol way to sum up the "argument". :P

And I didnt mean to ignore your post, I just got caught up with good old Eddie. I was under the impression that you and I agree, but for different reasons, so I didnt see a point in arguing about it. And tbh, I think you're absolutely right. I mixed up Madnar with Marv for some reason, but the point still stands. Even moreso actually.

Nah son, I'm here to fight!

Show me your moves! :x

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]It's sad how upset you are. "bu bu I don't like it so it's bad" even though it's one of the highest rated and most acclaimed games of this generation and on most people top games of this gen list. But no no,. wiimote dude doesn't think so, and hes too bright for the rest of us so he must be right. You know whats really sad, how serious some of you haters can take a game series that has vampires, mechs, clones, fat dudes on roller blades among the rest of the crazy over the top sh*t. I don't understand how crazy a game can be, and how much some of you think it needs to be grounded and perfectly explained. It's like you completely missed the essence of MGS, and that's quite sad. You thinking you're too clever for MGS is what makes you look like a moron, it's a crazy over the top videogame, stop going all Freud on it. I really think you haters don't get it, and what sad is by saying that you'll think it has something to do with intelligence and understanding how the plot connects perfectly. Bu bu bu literature, plot holes. Videogame. Fat dude on roller blades. Vampires. Clones. Mechs. Understand what you're dealing with, and understand it doesn't have to be as tight as you expect it to still express something and get messages across. If every MGS game was like 3 it really wouldn't be MGS. A lot of us fell in love with 1 and 2, 3 was just an awesome change of pace.

The problem is that you're missing a huge bulk of MGS's writing, which enjoys delving into undergraduate philosophy class territory. Which is why I'd say MGS3 was the strongest in the writing department, it didn't try posing as something smarter then it was. Unlike MGS2, hoooboy. MGS4 strayed way too far into that territory either, thankfully it didn't go Red Tree.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
The Wire IS the greatest show ever lol. But not winning awards doesn't go against my argument, like I said with the Oscars, maybe some other less deserving show won against the Wire, but I'm certain even though it was less deserving, it was still quality. Eddie-Vedder
The Wire isn't simply based on the notion that comparing it to television in opposite territory is absurd, let alone quantifiable. Someone will yell Faulty Towers or I Love Lucy, another person will scream The Twilight Zone and another might even ramble on about Coronation Street, causing the person who was about to say Deadwood and Madmen to shatter their teeth. There's no metric value attachable to 'quality' and metacritic in itself is extremely flawed; and even the ratings systems on IMBD and Rotten Tomatoes have their gross share of faults. This isn't testament to outright 'quality' it's a selective critical aggregate. The Oscars is an elite circle jerk; highly prominent and by no means bad, for sure, but neither is it indicative of 'quality', as much as the next established awards ceremony. You're better off judging the actual subject for what it is.
Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
X_CAPCOM_X

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#168 X_CAPCOM_X
Member since 2004 • 9625 Posts

Only Metal Gear Solid 1 and 2. Definitely play Metal Gear Solid 2, it's the best in the series.

Peredith


Indeed. MGS2 is the greatest in the series, followed closely by MGS3, which I think is probably tied with MGS2 IMO.
MGS4's story was completely fanservice-driven by all of the people who were angry that Kojima did not turn MGS into "Adventures of Snake"


Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#169 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]The Wire IS the greatest show ever lol. But not winning awards doesn't go against my argument, like I said with the Oscars, maybe some other less deserving show won against the Wire, but I'm certain even though it was less deserving, it was still quality. skrat_01
The Wire isn't simply based on the notion that comparing it to television in opposite territory is absurd, let alone quantifiable. Someone will yell Faulty Towers or I Love Lucy, another person will scream The Twilight Zone and another might even ramble on about Coronation Street, causing the person who was about to say Deadwood and Madmen to shatter their teeth. There's no metric value attachable to 'quality' and metacritic in itself is extremely flawed; and even the ratings systems on IMBD and Rotten Tomatoes have their gross share of faults. This isn't testament to outright 'quality' it's a selective critical aggregate. The Oscars is an elite circle jerk; highly prominent and by no means bad, for sure, but neither is it indicative of 'quality', as much as the next established awards ceremony. You're better off judging the actual subject for what it is.

Yeah, exactly.

But The Wire is totally the best show ever

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#170 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

yes, yes you must!

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]The Wire IS the greatest show ever lol. But not winning awards doesn't go against my argument, like I said with the Oscars, maybe some other less deserving show won against the Wire, but I'm certain even though it was less deserving, it was still quality. jg4xchamp

The Wire isn't simply based on the notion that comparing it to television in opposite territory is absurd, let alone quantifiable. Someone will yell Faulty Towers or I Love Lucy, another person will scream The Twilight Zone and another might even ramble on about Coronation Street, causing the person who was about to say Deadwood and Madmen to shatter their teeth. There's no metric value attachable to 'quality' and metacritic in itself is extremely flawed; and even the ratings systems on IMBD and Rotten Tomatoes have their gross share of faults. This isn't testament to outright 'quality' it's a selective critical aggregate. The Oscars is an elite circle jerk; highly prominent and by no means bad, for sure, but neither is it indicative of 'quality', as much as the next established awards ceremony. You're better off judging the actual subject for what it is.

Yeah, exactly.

But The Wire is totally the best show ever

I dunno man,Garth Marenghi's Darkplace is pretty phenomenal.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#172 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42202 Posts
[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]

Do you need to play the other Metal Gear games to understand 4?

Kane04
Yes. Furthermore, MGS series always had a very "unic" gameplay, very love/hate kinda thing.

Is that supposed to be Snake in your avatar? He kind of reminds me of Sean Bean (Boromir in Lord of the Rings, Trevelyan in Goldeneye) in that pic.
Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

you could play every mgs created and still be confused :D but yeah play at least 2 but 1 and 3 if you can, there all brilliant games

icyseanfitz

Only thing they are NOT brilliant games except 4.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="icyseanfitz"]

you could play every mgs created and still be confused :D but yeah play at least 2 but 1 and 3 if you can, there all brilliant games

zeeshanhaider

Only thing they are NOT brilliant games except 4.

3 isn't 'brilliant' and 4 is? Hah.
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#175 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="icyseanfitz"]

you could play every mgs created and still be confused :D but yeah play at least 2 but 1 and 3 if you can, there all brilliant games

skrat_01

Only thing they are NOT brilliant games except 4.

3 isn't 'brilliant' and 4 is? Hah.

You have to understand that the people who praise 4 don't understand that the game hates them.
Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#176 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

MGS4 was one of the high points this gen for me. Nanomachines and all.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#177 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

MGS4 was one of the high points this gen for me. Nanomachines and all.

Master_ShakeXXX
If they remade 3 with 4's improvements to the gameplay, I'd sh!t my pants.
Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#178 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

MGS4 was one of the high points this gen for me. Nanomachines and all.

DarkLink77

If they remade 3 with 4's improvements to the gameplay, I'd sh!t my pants.

I want a proper remake of the original MGS more than anything. Not that Twin Snakes sh*t.

Avatar image for 1-UPking82
1-UPking82

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 1-UPking82
Member since 2013 • 102 Posts
Yes. It would certainly help a lot. But you can still enjoy the game regardless, MGS4 is a video game masterpiece that everyone should play.
Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"][QUOTE="RyanShazam"]You mean the higher rated Mario Galaxy series?

ConanTheStoner

Eddie can't handle the truth lol

Eddie lives on a one way street, best back up! He might not see ya with them blinders on.

Its pretty sad lol
Avatar image for Ilovegames1992
Ilovegames1992

14221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#181 Ilovegames1992
Member since 2010 • 14221 Posts

One of the most convoluted plots in gaming. Has some cool moments and some really stupid ones.

MGS4 kind of breaks everythning down i thought, the main story anyway.

Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

MGS4 was one of the high points this gen for me. Nanomachines and all.

Master_ShakeXXX

If they remade 3 with 4's improvements to the gameplay, I'd sh!t my pants.

I want a proper remake of the original MGS more than anything. Not that Twin Snakes sh*t.

Yup, I remember being sorely disappointed with Twin Snakes when it came out.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#183 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

MGS4 was one of the high points this gen for me. Nanomachines and all.

Master_ShakeXXX

If they remade 3 with 4's improvements to the gameplay, I'd sh!t my pants.

I want a proper remake of the original MGS more than anything. Not that Twin Snakes sh*t.

Isn't it the same game with different cutscenes?
Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#184 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

If you're going to play any of them before hand just play the first, it throws back to that far more than the others.

But there's also not much to understand in the first place...

Avatar image for Wiimotefan
Wiimotefan

4151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 Wiimotefan
Member since 2010 • 4151 Posts

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] If they remade 3 with 4's improvements to the gameplay, I'd sh!t my pants.DarkLink77

I want a proper remake of the original MGS more than anything. Not that Twin Snakes sh*t.

Isn't it the same game with different cutscenes?

In a way, yes, but those cutscenes are just too far over the top even for MGS.. well actually they're over the top for Snakes portrayal. Of course Snake is always portrayed as a bad ass in MGS, but not as a super human. He's supposed to be the underdog going against impossible odds. This is especially true of MGS since Liquid has the superior genes. But in Twin Snakes you have Snake doing stupid sh*t like surfing on missiles among many other ridiculous things. He also goes way out of character, losing his cool, being way too dramatic and really just not acting like the SS we know.

Then there is the gameplay. Twin Snakes was MGS1's level design and enemy layout coupled with MGS2's gameplay mechanics. This made the game way too easy. As if shoehorning those mechanics in without balancing the other aspects wasn't enough, they also give you a tranq gun that essentially breaks the game further.

Those tend to be the major gripes.

Beyond that a lot of people feel the atmosphere of MGS was lost in Twin Snakes and I would have to agree.

The last nitpick is the voice acting. All the characters lost their accents from the original. I never had beef with this, but a lot of fans do.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#186 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Seriously, TC, don't. You'll spend half the game trying to figure out which pieces of the previous games they retconned and which pieces they didn't.

Avatar image for mccoyca112
mccoyca112

5434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#187 mccoyca112
Member since 2007 • 5434 Posts

@heretrix, about that database. You'll never get the same experience from that as you would from playing the games. Furthermore, the database is full of errors. Kojima signed off on it as canon, but he didn't develop the database and he clearly didn't proof read it. There are many huge discrepancies between the database and the actual games.

At one point we compiled all the errors into a document on the old Gamefaqs MGS4 board. I'll see if I can dig it up.

Wiimotefan

Did not know this...I know my mgs, so I only skimmed through it though. I take back that suggestion.

Avatar image for Wiimotefan
Wiimotefan

4151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 Wiimotefan
Member since 2010 • 4151 Posts

[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]

@heretrix, about that database. You'll never get the same experience from that as you would from playing the games. Furthermore, the database is full of errors. Kojima signed off on it as canon, but he didn't develop the database and he clearly didn't proof read it. There are many huge discrepancies between the database and the actual games.

At one point we compiled all the errors into a document on the old Gamefaqs MGS4 board. I'll see if I can dig it up.

mccoyca112

Did not know this...I know my mgs, so I only skimmed through it though. I take back that suggestion.

Its not so bad if you're just looking for some broad info, but when you start trying to connect the dots things get messy. Especially some of the scenarios regarding MGS1 and MGS2.

And it would never be a good substitute for just playing the games, but I would sooner recommend just watching all the cutscenes on Youtuberather than digging through the database.

I tried to find the database error thread, but had no luck.

Avatar image for Sarge1442
Sarge1442

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 Sarge1442
Member since 2004 • 709 Posts

Only Metal Gear Solid 1 and 2. Definitely play Metal Gear Solid 3, it's the best in the series.

Peredith

fixed that for you

Avatar image for Bruce_Benzing
Bruce_Benzing

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 Bruce_Benzing
Member since 2012 • 1731 Posts

No you just need to smoke about 4 lbs of weed and then drink 2 gallons of Jack Danials and then drop 3 acids and then you'll have no trouble understanding the story at all....

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="icyseanfitz"]

you could play every mgs created and still be confused :D but yeah play at least 2 but 1 and 3 if you can, there all brilliant games

skrat_01

Only thing they are NOT brilliant games except 4.

3 isn't 'brilliant' and 4 is? Hah.

Yup, I don't like ultra serious game with enemies who shoots bees out of his mouth, a person who kills enemies by using electricity bolts through his body, or 100+ year sniper with eyes popping out and most stupid of them all a ghost.:roll:

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

Only thing they are NOT brilliant games except 4.

DarkLink77

3 isn't 'brilliant' and 4 is? Hah.

You have to understand that the people who praise 4 don't understand that the game hates them.

Even though 4 is still stupid, I kinda like it. So you can say I hate the MGS series except 4.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

Only thing they are NOT brilliant games except 4.

zeeshanhaider

3 isn't 'brilliant' and 4 is? Hah.

Yup, I don't like ultra serious game with enemies who shoots bees out of his mouth, a person who kills enemies by using electricity bolts through his body, or 100+ year sniper with eyes popping out and most stupid of them all a ghost.:roll:

MGS3 isn't ultra serious. No Metal Gear game is ultra serious, they're all different mixes of cheesy or camp and outrageous. If you're looking for serious or realistic then you're playing the wrong games entirely. MGS3 doesn't delve into bad philosophy rambling or high concepts that go nowhere, it's a story about characters and that's why it works well. MGS4 on the other hand wants to have its cake, eat it and in the process smears it across the room.
Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#194 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

[QUOTE="funsohng"]Yep. I'd say it's an absolute must. MGS4 is pretty much trying to cover up the mess they made in MGS2.mems_1224
This I still have no clue what happened in MGS4 :lol:

Story too difficult ?

OT: I suggest you play the previous games first, starting with MG4 is a bad plan, you won't understand it at all.

Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#195 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

No, but it does help you enjoy the experience more

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#196 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] If they remade 3 with 4's improvements to the gameplay, I'd sh!t my pants.DarkLink77

I want a proper remake of the original MGS more than anything. Not that Twin Snakes sh*t.

Isn't it the same game with different cutscenes?

The new cutscenes were dreadful, and they also inexplicably replaced the original's excellent soundtrack for something more monotone and generic. They updated the graphics but the game ran like complete sh*t. The gameplay was improved but other than that it was a complete mess.

Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts
Not really. you can always download the Metal Gear database and read up on everything.. It can be a very long read , so I don't know about you but I made sure to have a few drinks while reading it (and ive even played every MG)// I really got hooked while reading it
Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"] 3 isn't 'brilliant' and 4 is? Hah.skrat_01

Yup, I don't like ultra serious game with enemies who shoots bees out of his mouth, a person who kills enemies by using electricity bolts through his body, or 100+ year sniper with eyes popping out and most stupid of them all a ghost.:roll:

MGS3 isn't ultra serious. No Metal Gear game is ultra serious, they're all different mixes of cheesy or camp and outrageous. If you're looking for serious or realistic then you're playing the wrong games entirely. MGS3 doesn't delve into bad philosophy rambling or high concepts that go nowhere, it's a story about characters and that's why it works well. MGS4 on the other hand wants to have its cake, eat it and in the process smears it across the room.

If they are not trying to be ultra serious then make it a fantasy game, what's with historical events and military $hit.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

Yup, I don't like ultra serious game with enemies who shoots bees out of his mouth, a person who kills enemies by using electricity bolts through his body, or 100+ year sniper with eyes popping out and most stupid of them all a ghost.:roll:

zeeshanhaider

MGS3 isn't ultra serious. No Metal Gear game is ultra serious, they're all different mixes of cheesy or camp and outrageous. If you're looking for serious or realistic then you're playing the wrong games entirely. MGS3 doesn't delve into bad philosophy rambling or high concepts that go nowhere, it's a story about characters and that's why it works well. MGS4 on the other hand wants to have its cake, eat it and in the process smears it across the room.

If they are not trying to be ultra serious then make it a fantasy game, what's with historical events and military $hit.

What's to say they can't do what they want? COD is extremely stupid and hyper-realistic in its portrayal of reality, Shogun 2 aims to create a historical backdrop for players to rewrite history with contextually accurate things. MGS is hyper-realistic with a mix of science fiction and fantasy; it's all pretty Japanese in its blend of elements - and it's capitalised on to build plot and characters, which is what gives the game so much character, separating it from something like Thief (which also mixes fantasy and steampunk/sci-fi) but in a medieval setting. That's the nature of fiction, if you don't dig what it's doing, 'scool.
Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"] MGS3 isn't ultra serious. No Metal Gear game is ultra serious, they're all different mixes of cheesy or camp and outrageous. If you're looking for serious or realistic then you're playing the wrong games entirely. MGS3 doesn't delve into bad philosophy rambling or high concepts that go nowhere, it's a story about characters and that's why it works well. MGS4 on the other hand wants to have its cake, eat it and in the process smears it across the room.skrat_01

If they are not trying to be ultra serious then make it a fantasy game, what's with historical events and military $hit.

What's to say they can't do what they want? COD is extremely stupid and hyper-realistic in its portrayal of reality, Shogun 2 aims to create a historical backdrop for players to rewrite history with contextually accurate things. MGS is hyper-realistic with a mix of science fiction and fantasy; it's all pretty Japanese in its blend of elements - and it's capitalised on to build plot and characters, which is what gives the game so much character, separating it from something like Thief (which also mixes fantasy and steampunk/sci-fi) but in a medieval setting. That's the nature of fiction, if you don't dig what it's doing, 'scool.

No matter how you spin MGS games are crap, both in gameplay and in storyline. Seriously nothing in MGS makes sense. Only the baddies have super human strength, not you and govt. always send you alone on a mission without anything. In one half the ENEMY is trying to kill you in the next half it's on your side, WTF is all this? Big Boss won't die no matter what, it will always reborn in the next game, I guess these kind of things are common to all Japanese games that's why I generally don't like Japanese games. All in all MGS doesn't make any sense and simply sucks.