This topic is locked from further discussion.
Power ususally comes with a higher price tag. I wouldn't pay over $400 for a new console, though. For anything more, I could significantly upgrade my PC.
I was just reading an article on how cloud gaming may be a much bigger influence on the next generation and if that proves to be the case hardware would cost exponentially less than what we're used to. In fact it wouldn't be uncommon to encounter deals that give you the hardware free with a service subscription. In fact cloud gaming would in essence change the whole home console model from the razor/ blades dynamic to more of what we currently see with cell phones.
I have thought about this too. Cloud gaming presents some unusual pros and cons, but one significant pro is that something like the PS360 is a viable piece of hardware for cloud gaming. In a way, I kind of wonder if the next gen will just be a stop gap until they can implement cloud gaming sufficiently to avoid releasing new end user hardware eg: quell the need for another 'gen'.I was just reading an article on how cloud gaming may be a much bigger influence on the next generation and if that proves to be the case hardware would cost exponentially less than what we're used to. In fact it wouldn't be uncommon to encounter deals that give you the hardware free with a service subscription. In fact cloud gaming would in essence change the whole home console model from the razor/ blades dynamic to more of what we currently see with cell phones.
BlendThree
No, I don't think there's a chance that the 720 will be anywhere near that expensive especially with MS' Live subscription subsidized console pricing model. And I also doubt the PS4 will be 600$ either, due to the damage is did to Sony early on last gen. Even if they're both powerful, they both should be focusing on services to get their money back while taking an initial hit on hardware cost. Inconsistancyps3 wont be $600 because theirs no new disc format this time around. Stand alone blu ray players in 2006 were $800+ and had slower accesstimes than ps 3.
I'd rather to spend that money upgrading my PC.
I'd buy consoles only if they have decent exclusives at a lower price.
I look forward to the meltdowns when people realize all next gen consoles will be tablet based.
"Nintendo killed gaming, going PC"
Fun times ahead of us.
Easilly, i dont want gtraphics like ZombiU and underpowered WiiU like hardware for next gen
WiiU is already obsolete the time it releases, PC has like 10x better hardware than that
I would pay 800$ if i was to get a system that will last me like xbox 360, with stunning looking games like Halo 4, Witcher 2 after 6+ years, games that WiiU cant even touch visually
Easilly, i dont want gtraphics like ZombiU and underpowered WiiU like hardware for next gen
loosingENDS
Cry more.
WiiU is already obsolete the time it releases, PC has like 10x better hardware than that
loosingENDS
It doesn't have the games you want. The most importantestest thing in life :cry:
I would pay 800$ if i was to get a system that will last me like xbox 360, with stunning looking games like Halo 4, Witcher 2 after 6+ years, games that WiiU cant even touch visually
loosingENDS
Assumptions + idiot = loosingENDS i.e. "I'm a dumbass"
ZombiU vs PD0
I would gladly pay 600$ to get graphics than are not so vastly behind launch xbox 360 games
I think you need a PC then not another crappy microsoft console.[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]
ZombiU vs PD0
I would gladly pay 600$ to get graphics than are not so vastly behind launch xbox 360 games
Jonwh18
Why waste money on PC when xbox gets the best graphics and games and all PC games i need ?
Not with AMD APUs e.g. AMD Kaveri APU (with Radeon HD 7750 @900Mhz level GPU) replaces AMD A10 Trinity APU.Does a high quality processor have a direct correlation with price?
If that is the case, will you spend $600+ on the PS4/720?
bbkkristian
ZombiU vs PD0
I would gladly pay 600$ to get graphics than are not so vastly behind launch xbox 360 games
loosingENDS
I really hope one of these new consoles produces a Wall Guy equivalent.
Where are you getting this figure from? Your ass? Did the 360 launch at $600? No.RR360DD
Talk about getting something from one's ass...
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]We have no idea how well the online system will work yet. A little early to be calling it inferior.RR360DD
Sorry bro, you're delusional if you think Nintendo are gonna come straight out with a service superior to XBL, something Microsoft has been working on since 2002.
Talk about getting something from one's ass...
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]We have no idea how well the online system will work yet. A little early to be calling it inferior.lundy86_4
Sorry bro, you're delusional if you think Nintendo are gonna come straight out with a service superior to XBL, something Microsoft has been working on since 2002.
Prove me wrong then. Ive already debunked this idiot as only the PS3 launched at $600 and it was a disaster. So why don't you counter my argument saying that Nintendo will not come out with an online service superior to XBL.
Or are you talking out your ass?
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
Talk about getting something from one's ass...
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Sorry bro, you're delusional if you think Nintendo are gonna come straight out with a service superior to XBL, something Microsoft has been working on since 2002.
RR360DD
Prove me wrong then. Ive already debunked this idiot as only the PS3 launched at $600 and it was a disaster. So why don't you counter my argument saying that Nintendo will not come out with an online service superior to XBL.
Or are you talking out your ass?
Erm...
Learn very common debate practice. You make the assertion, you prove it. Are you f*cking stupid?
Did you graduate, or even attend post-secondary education (university level)? As seminar (debate) is practiced extensively.
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
Talk about getting something from one's ass...
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Sorry bro, you're delusional if you think Nintendo are gonna come straight out with a service superior to XBL, something Microsoft has been working on since 2002.
RR360DD
Prove me wrong then. Ive already debunked this idiot as only the PS3 launched at $600 and it was a disaster. So why don't you counter my argument saying that Nintendo will not come out with an online service superior to XBL.
Or are you talking out your ass?
its free BAM instantly superior as long as it has basic match making[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
Jonwh18
Prove me wrong then. Ive already debunked this idiot as only the PS3 launched at $600 and it was a disaster. So why don't you counter my argument saying that Nintendo will not come out with an online service superior to XBL.
Or are you talking out your ass?
its free BAM instantly superior as long as it has basic match makingSorry bro, I'm not talking value here. Try again.
its free BAM instantly superior as long as it has basic match making[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Prove me wrong then. Ive already debunked this idiot as only the PS3 launched at $600 and it was a disaster. So why don't you counter my argument saying that Nintendo will not come out with an online service superior to XBL.
Or are you talking out your ass?
RR360DD
Sorry bro, I'm not talking value here. Try again.
Except the topic is about SPENDING, which indicate value, genius. How much in minimum do you think a person have to pay for a launch xbox360 up until now. Oh wait... you can't think.[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
lundy86_4
Prove me wrong then. Ive already debunked this idiot as only the PS3 launched at $600 and it was a disaster. So why don't you counter my argument saying that Nintendo will not come out with an online service superior to XBL.
Or are you talking out your ass?
Erm...
Learn very common debate practice. You make the assertion, you prove it. Are you f*cking stupid?
Did you graduate, or even attend post-secondary education (university level)? As seminar (debate) is practiced extensively.
I'm asking you now: Do you think Nintendo will come out with an online service for the Wii U thats superior to XBL?
Now I said it wouldn't. And I'm basing that on facts such as Microsoft having much more experience in this area, Microsoft having been working on XBL since 2002 and the fact that Nintendo still doesn't seem to take online seriously. (A lot of their upcoming games have NO online)
Now you come in here saying I'm talking out my ass, thats an assertion you've made, so you fuking prove it. Go on, educate me on Nintendos sure-to-be-brilliant online service :lol:
[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="Jonwh18"] its free BAM instantly superior as long as it has basic match making
rjdofu
Sorry bro, I'm not talking value here. Try again.
Except the topic is about SPENDING, which indicate value, genius. How much in minimum do you think a person have to pay for a launch xbox360 up until now. Oh wait... you can't think.Listen bro, I never brought up XBL or Wii online in this topic. Lundy did, he quoted me from ANOTHER topic that was NOTHING to do with spending. So either keep up or shut the fuk up.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment