Metacritic (360): 50
PS3: 62
PC: 76
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Duke Nukem --> OH MY GOD THIS IS IT HAIL TO THE KING, BABY!
Reality --> bleh, this is pretty terrible.
Both of these added together --> What a flop! I was expecting one of the best shooters of all time!
You say that as if people weren't really expecting it to suck. You obviously was not around before it released. Only the hardcore Duke fans stood up for this pile, and the sad thing is they still are :lol:Now that it's a fact everyone can say they expected it to suck, but I expected more from Gearbox.
KiZZo1
Not the most surprising though. Many of us expected it to get very low score. The most surprising flop goes to Infamous 2.
15strong
Infamous 2 has 85 on metacritic, and 90+ on user review scores. It's seems more that gamespot was a bit of an outlier, than the game itself being a flop. Afterall, they did give it one of the worst scores of any gaming website.
Duke Nukem on the other hand seems to universally be reviewed as a bad game and a flop, it's metacritic is 50 and if it's getting scores as low as 3/10 it must be REALLY bad.
Based on the 5.5 IGN review, yes. It scored way lower than I thought it would. They scored it lower than Conduit 2, but I think Conduit 2 should have scored higher than it did.
[QUOTE="15strong"]
Not the most surprising though. Many of us expected it to get very low score. The most surprising flop goes to Infamous 2.
2Chalupas
Infamous 2 has 85 on metacritic, and 90+ on user review scores. It's seems more that gamespot was a bit of an outlier, than the game itself being a flop. Afterall, they did give it one of the worst scores of any gaming website.
Duke Nukem on the other hand seems to universally be reviewed as a bad game and a flop, it's metacritic is 50 and if it's getting scores as low as 3/10 it must be REALLY bad.
On consoles it is, on PC it's at 76, seems to be the only version that's positive.No, that would be Infamous 2RR360DDas far as i'm concerned gamespot effed up their review of the score, while everyone else has given it 9's and high 8's, so yeah don't know what your talking about. whereas, duke hasn't been getting good words of mouth from any place and been getting very medicore reviews.
[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]
[QUOTE="15strong"]
Not the most surprising though. Many of us expected it to get very low score. The most surprising flop goes to Infamous 2.
mitu123
Infamous 2 has 85 on metacritic, and 90+ on user review scores. It's seems more that gamespot was a bit of an outlier, than the game itself being a flop. Afterall, they did give it one of the worst scores of any gaming website.
Duke Nukem on the other hand seems to universally be reviewed as a bad game and a flop, it's metacritic is 50 and if it's getting scores as low as 3/10 it must be REALLY bad.
On consoles it is, on PC it's at 76, seems to be the only version that's positive.I wonder what's so special about the pc version.
On consoles it is, on PC it's at 76, seems to be the only version that's positive.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]
Infamous 2 has 85 on metacritic, and 90+ on user review scores. It's seems more that gamespot was a bit of an outlier, than the game itself being a flop. Afterall, they did give it one of the worst scores of any gaming website.
Duke Nukem on the other hand seems to universally be reviewed as a bad game and a flop, it's metacritic is 50 and if it's getting scores as low as 3/10 it must be REALLY bad.
topgunmv
I wonder what's so special about the pc version.
yeah also what platforms was this suppose to be on 10 years ago?On consoles it is, on PC it's at 76, seems to be the only version that's positive.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]
Infamous 2 has 85 on metacritic, and 90+ on user review scores. It's seems more that gamespot was a bit of an outlier, than the game itself being a flop. Afterall, they did give it one of the worst scores of any gaming website.
Duke Nukem on the other hand seems to universally be reviewed as a bad game and a flop, it's metacritic is 50 and if it's getting scores as low as 3/10 it must be REALLY bad.
topgunmv
I wonder what's so special about the pc version.
The PC gamer review is what happened. They gave it an 80. They honestly gave bonus points becasue the game had a poor story. It has to be the worst excuse for a terrible story that I have ever heard.
"Even that flimsy B-movie tribute plot is resolved (sort of) half way through—DNF becomes simply about shooting aliens 'cause they're ugly, and bits of the script are little more than profane Mad Libs. Lazy writing or pointed critique of the state of story in first-person shooters? I prefer to think of it as the latter."
I hate to use this term but I suppose that it is with those scores. I think people out way too high expectations on this game.
Indeed. Flop of the last decade and a bit since that's how long it's been touted for effectively. :oMetacritic (360): 50
PS3: 62
PC: 76
Zensword
Infamous 2? A flop? Hardly. The GS score is an outlier. The overall reaction was positive.
But DNF? Man... after playing the demo twice, I simply canceled my pre-order once and for all. No way am I paying $50 to play a glorified UE 2.5 mod featuring the Duke.
Gamespot score isnt even an outlier, please stop spreading false information.Infamous 2? A flop? Hardly. The GS score is an outlier. The overall reaction was positive.
But DNF? Man... after playing the demo twice, I simply canceled my pre-order once and for all. No way am I paying $50 to play a glorified UE 2.5 mod featuring the Duke.
The_Capitalist
inFamous 2 is not flop considering it average 84 on Metacritic.ZenswordDidnt meet the hype in GS, hence its a flop.
[QUOTE="The_Capitalist"]Gamespot score isnt even an outlier, please stop spreading false information.Infamous 2? A flop? Hardly. The GS score is an outlier. The overall reaction was positive.
But DNF? Man... after playing the demo twice, I simply canceled my pre-order once and for all. No way am I paying $50 to play a glorified UE 2.5 mod featuring the Duke.
Dante2710
inFamous 2 is not flop considering it average 84 on Metacritic.ZenswordDidnt meet the hype in GS, hence its a flop. see i don't understand that, maybe here on this site its a "flop" but ign and gametrailers have given it 9's and game informer has given it a 8.75. Hardly call it a flop and everyone has been digging it so far. Duke is the flop of the year because its been 10 years in development, been pushed back so many times this year and hasn't been getting favorable reviews. But then again i'm sure you have no intention on playing infamous 2 and maybe your a hermit/or lemming who is happy to see a ps3 exclusive not do to well here. hmmmm?
On consoles it is, on PC it's at 76, seems to be the only version that's positive.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]
Infamous 2 has 85 on metacritic, and 90+ on user review scores. It's seems more that gamespot was a bit of an outlier, than the game itself being a flop. Afterall, they did give it one of the worst scores of any gaming website.
Duke Nukem on the other hand seems to universally be reviewed as a bad game and a flop, it's metacritic is 50 and if it's getting scores as low as 3/10 it must be REALLY bad.
topgunmv
I wonder what's so special about the pc version.
Better controls, better graphics, and better optimization. As a PC gamer, it's rather gratifying to see consoles get a sucky port for a change. I just wish it was a better game being ported.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment