EA: Battlefield 3 versus Modern Warfare 3 is most important battle in a decade

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for killzonexbox
killzonexbox

3019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 killzonexbox
Member since 2010 • 3019 Posts

EA CEO John Riccitiello says that Battlefield 3 and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 represents a clash of the titans in the games industry and he feels good about EA's position in the fight.


Continue reading on Examiner.com EA: Battlefield 3 versus Modern Warfare 3 is most important battle in a decade - National Console Gaming | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/console-gaming-in-national/ea-battlefield-3-versus-modern-warfare-3-is-most-important-battle-a-decade#ixzz1OcRMeWrU
Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

Well I don't know bout anyone else but I believe BF3 will be the catalyst for the downfall of the CoD series.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

No rehashes, actual good gameplay. Battlefield 3 won this battle before it began.

Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts
hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more important
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#5 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

Ha, right. Which will dominate? Typical modern era shooter A or typical Modern era shooter B. Choose carefully, One has betterer graphics so obviously it's the better one.

I swear, Battlefield 3 is closest gaming example of people acting like it's the second coming Christ.

Avatar image for majadamus
majadamus

10292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#6 majadamus
Member since 2003 • 10292 Posts
Don't try to deny you all know Modern Warfare 3 is going to sell a lot more than Battlefield 3. Activision is just too good at marketing. Battlefield 3 might be the better game, but it doesn't really matter. CoD series is more well known.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
MW3 will crush BF3 on consoles. BF3 will crush MW3 on PC. COD is too popular to crush with one game.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more importantLed_poison
Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.
Avatar image for RoOodriGowW
RoOodriGowW

3309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RoOodriGowW
Member since 2008 • 3309 Posts

Well I don't know bout anyone else but I believe BF3 will be the catalyst for the downfall of the CoD series.

Mystic-G

Let's hope so , I mean , i kind of feel sorry because Acti has them on a leash , it's not the developer fault I'm sure , but anyways it has to be done , the elite service was the final nail in cod's coffin.

Avatar image for Golden_Boy187
Golden_Boy187

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Golden_Boy187
Member since 2007 • 787 Posts

MW3 will crush BF3 on consoles. BF3 will crush MW3 on PC. COD is too popular to crush with one game. i5750at4Ghz

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Well I don't know bout anyone else but I believe BF3 will be the catalyst for the downfall of the CoD series.

Mystic-G

I'm inclined to agree

Will BF3 kill MW3 in sales, no

Will the momentum start to shift away from the ageing franchise, yeah

Avatar image for majadamus
majadamus

10292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#13 majadamus
Member since 2003 • 10292 Posts

[QUOTE="Led_poison"]hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more importanti5750at4Ghz
Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts

[QUOTE="Led_poison"]hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more importanti5750at4Ghz
Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.

But theres more money invovled.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Led_poison"]hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more importantmajadamus

Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

Its not as exciting largely because SWOR has no chance.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Led_poison"]hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more importantLed_poison

Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.

But theres more money invovled.

Not really. Only MMO making these huge amounts of money is WoW. There are dozens of mmos barely making money.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Led_poison"]hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more importantmajadamus

Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

WoW is the one exception. Name me another MMO as popular or even remotely close. And it's 11 million now not 15, WoW is slowly dieing.

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

I can't wait to come back to all these CoD vs. BF threads in three years time when everyone is bashing Battlefield for being another milked, unoriginal bro-shooter franchise.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#19 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"]Ha, right. Which dominate? Typical modern era shooter A or typical Modern era shooter B. Choose carefully, One has betterer graphics so obviously it's the better one. I swear, Battlefield 3 is closest gaming example of people acting like it's the second coming Christ. argetlam00

LMAO, you come here acting all smartass when infact your unbelievably ignorant. Typical modern shooter? Have you seen the power of the Battlefield 3 engine and the immense online gameplay the Battlefield games offer?

The engine, case in point. It's going to play the same but it's just such a huge deal since it has better graphics. I promise you, gameplay wise it's not going to do anything significantly different than past Battlefields.
Avatar image for majadamus
majadamus

10292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#20 majadamus
Member since 2003 • 10292 Posts

[QUOTE="majadamus"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.argetlam00

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

Its not as exciting largely because SWOR has no chance.

WoW is starting to show its age. I think The Old Republic can put a dent in WoW's popularity. It looks better, BioWare's working on it, and has the Star Wars name in it. I'll probably even The Old Republic a chance. Star Wars geeks like can miss out on games like this. ;)

Avatar image for majadamus
majadamus

10292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#21 majadamus
Member since 2003 • 10292 Posts

[QUOTE="majadamus"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.i5750at4Ghz

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

WoW is the one exception. Name me another MMO as popular or even remotely close. And it's 11 million now not 15, WoW is slowly dieing.

Wasn't Everquest pretty popular in its prime? It's a pretty popular genre on PC's at least, and Final Fantasy XI kind of made it more popular on consoles.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Battlefield 3 will definitely be the better game but MW3 will sell tons more

Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts

[QUOTE="Led_poison"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.i5750at4Ghz

But theres more money invovled.

Not really. Only MMO making these huge amounts of money is WoW. There are dozens of mmos barely making money.

I meant in terms of the money being invested into SW:TOR. Surely they would want a large piece of WoW's userbase.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="vashkey"]Ha, right. Which dominate? Typical modern era shooter A or typical Modern era shooter B. Choose carefully, One has betterer graphics so obviously it's the better one. I swear, Battlefield 3 is closest gaming example of people acting like it's the second coming Christ. vashkey

LMAO, you come here acting all smartass when infact your unbelievably ignorant. Typical modern shooter? Have you seen the power of the Battlefield 3 engine and the immense online gameplay the Battlefield games offer?

The engine, case in point. It's going to play the same but it's just such a huge deal since it has better graphics. I promise you, gameplay wise it's not going to do anything significantly different than past Battlefields.

Its the true sequel to Battlefield 2, a game we have been waiting for like 5 years now. Huge 64 player maps, amazing destruction and physics engine, insane animations, all vehicles including jets and on top of all that a coop campaign. Its literally better in every single way.

Avatar image for D-RS
D-RS

2003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#25 D-RS
Member since 2009 • 2003 Posts
BF3 just looks so much better.
Avatar image for Tresca_
Tresca_

869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Tresca_
Member since 2008 • 869 Posts

I swear, Battlefield 3 is closest gaming example of people acting like it's the second coming Christ.

vashkey

That's because Call of Duty is the Antichrist.

Go DICE!!

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
BF3 will easily be the better game. Hell BFBC2 is better than the COD series, if EA was looking just to make a better game they should probably know they did that years ago. I have no doubt now that BF3 will sell huge, more than BFBC2 did at least but it won't outsell MW3. It's like some really awesome band that went from a indy hit and now they're releasing their first album with a record company and their saying their going to outsell Lady Gaga or Justin Beiber. It's just not going to happen. I think BF3 will be the game that is so much better than COD that it either forces some real changes onto the next COD or could, in the future, be responsible for it's fall.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#28 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="argetlam00"]

LMAO, you come here acting all smartass when infact your unbelievably ignorant. Typical modern shooter? Have you seen the power of the Battlefield 3 engine and the immense online gameplay the Battlefield games offer?

argetlam00

The engine, case in point. It's going to play the same but it's just such a huge deal since it has better graphics. I promise you, gameplay wise it's not going to do anything significantly different than past Battlefields.

Its the true sequel to Battlefield 2, a game we have been waiting for like 5 years now. Huge 64 player maps, amazing destruction and physics engine, insane animations, all vehicles including jets and on top of all that a coop campaign. Its literally better in every single way.

Oh boy, better graphics and more vehicles. Thats definitely not standard sequel fare. 64 Players? Oh man, Battlefield 2 didn't do that already or anything. Le gasp! Co-op campaign, now that revolutionary! I've never heard of such a magical feature!
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#29 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
It really is clash of the titans but people who believe that battlefield will defeat cod :lol:, propably havent realized yet that its an impossibility since cod is gonna get higher ratings and the double if not triple the sales already. For cod to die, it has to sell 2-3 million, which is standard for the survival of a game in the current multiplatform market.

No rehashes, actual good gameplay. Battlefield 3 won this battle before it began.

argetlam00
The entire bf franchise is a rehash with diffirent time settings, they stepped up with bf2 back then in the golden age of pc gaming, but bc1 and bc2 were basicly lesser version of bf2. Bf3 has to be massive in order to sucseed. Personally i dont think better graphics and engine make a proper sequel. I would rather keep playing bf2 than bc2 because its actually a better game.

Ha, right. Which will dominate? Typical modern era shooter A or typical Modern era shooter B. Choose carefully, One has betterer graphics so obviously it's the better one.

I swear, Battlefield 3 is closest gaming example of people acting like it's the second coming Christ.

vashkey
That too, bf3 is hardly showing anything, it was terrible at E3, mw3 did not even have to try to put up a better show. People act like its the best thing ever, but so far all we saw was a dx11 tech demo on the most powerfull rig outhere and a cod ripped singleplayer....followed by a borring tank sequence. Where is mp dice? Where are the airplanes and choppers?
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="vashkey"] The engine, case in point. It's going to play the same but it's just such a huge deal since it has better graphics. I promise you, gameplay wise it's not going to do anything significantly different than past Battlefields.vashkey

Its the true sequel to Battlefield 2, a game we have been waiting for like 5 years now. Huge 64 player maps, amazing destruction and physics engine, insane animations, all vehicles including jets and on top of all that a coop campaign. Its literally better in every single way.

Oh boy, better graphics and more vehicles. Thats definitely not standard sequel fare. 64 Players? Oh man, Battlefield 2 didn't do that already or anything. Le gasp! Co-op campaign, now that revolutionary! I've never heard of such a magical feature!

There is a reason its a sequel. It introduces a ton of new features on top of the ones already had in Battlefield 3. Have you heard of coop campaigns in battlefield games? No you haven't.

Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts
I also think that this truly is the year that CoD sales go on the decline, that MW3 demo looked like average crap. There are too many good games coming out, especially BF3. I think the BF3 open beta should bring in sales too.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#32 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Its the true sequel to Battlefield 2, a game we have been waiting for like 5 years now. Huge 64 player maps, amazing destruction and physics engine, insane animations, all vehicles including jets and on top of all that a coop campaign. Its literally better in every single way.

argetlam00

Oh boy, better graphics and more vehicles. Thats definitely not standard sequel fare. 64 Players? Oh man, Battlefield 2 didn't do that already or anything. Le gasp! Co-op campaign, now that revolutionary! I've never heard of such a magical feature!

There is a reason its a sequel. It introduces a ton of new features on top of the ones already had in Battlefield 3. Have you heard of coop campaigns in battlefield games? No you haven't.

But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics. Not saying it wont be good but to suggest that which will sell better is important is bull crap. The world and the game industry will not change from it and certainly not an a positive or negative way. They're just making an new Battlefield, they aren't changing the world.

And Battlefield finally incorporating co-op campaign, a standard feature games have been including for much of this console generation is not impressive. Even if the morons are Infinity Ward and Treyarch still don't do it.

Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="vashkey"] Oh boy, better graphics and more vehicles. Thats definitely not standard sequel fare. 64 Players? Oh man, Battlefield 2 didn't do that already or anything. Le gasp! Co-op campaign, now that revolutionary! I've never heard of such a magical feature!vashkey

There is a reason its a sequel. It introduces a ton of new features on top of the ones already had in Battlefield 3. Have you heard of coop campaigns in battlefield games? No you haven't.

But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics. Not saying it wont be good but to suggest that which will sell better is important is bull crap. The world and the game industry will not change from it and certainly not an a positive or negative way. They're just making an new Battlefield, they aren't changing the world.

You're talking about the console version. The PC version with 64 players on one map, the best graphics across any platform, fully destructible environments, tons of vehicular warfare, and the most amazing audio in any game? There has been no FPS of this quality until now dude. This is the next generation of games.
Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#34 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

[QUOTE="majadamus"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.i5750at4Ghz

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

WoW is the one exception. Name me another MMO as popular or even remotely close. And it's 11 million now not 15, WoW is slowly dieing.

Perfect World has 50 million people worldwide, in all versions. Look at League of Legends, for another example..

There are thousands of MMOs out there, be it RPGs, Racing or shooting. MMO games are the most popular form of gaming on the planet.. since Ultima Online.

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

I actually think MW3 will outsell Blackops.... Many who play Blackops do consider COD4, and MW2 the betters games. I dont see sales slowing down. I do think BF3 will sell a lot as well more that BC2 at least.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

[QUOTE="majadamus"]

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

Lucianu

WoW is the one exception. Name me another MMO as popular or even remotely close. And it's 11 million now not 15, WoW is slowly dieing.

Perfect World has 50 million people worldwide, in all versions. Look at League of Legends, for another example..

There are thousands of MMOs out there, be it RPGs, Racing or shooting. MMO games are the most popular form of gaming on the planet.. since Ultima Online.

Well they are free. Not exactly the same as a pay to play MMO.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="argetlam00"]

There is a reason its a sequel. It introduces a ton of new features on top of the ones already had in Battlefield 3. Have you heard of coop campaigns in battlefield games? No you haven't.

-RocBoys9489-

But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics. Not saying it wont be good but to suggest that which will sell better is important is bull crap. The world and the game industry will not change from it and certainly not an a positive or negative way. They're just making an new Battlefield, they aren't changing the world.

You're talking about the console version. The PC version with 64 players on one map, the best graphics across any platform, fully destructible environments, tons of vehicular warfare, and the most amazing audio in any game? There has been no FPS of this quality until now dude. This is the next generation of games.

Nothing you listed hasn't been done before...

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"][QUOTE="vashkey"] But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics. Not saying it wont be good but to suggest that which will sell better is important is bull crap. The world and the game industry will not change from it and certainly not an a positive or negative way. They're just making an new Battlefield, they aren't changing the world.i5750at4Ghz

You're talking about the console version. The PC version with 64 players on one map, the best graphics across any platform, fully destructible environments, tons of vehicular warfare, and the most amazing audio in any game? There has been no FPS of this quality until now dude. This is the next generation of games.

Nothing you listed hasn't been done before...

Lol what? Show me a game that has a physics engine at the level of battlefield 3 along with the destructibility of it. Also, show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="majadamus"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Only effects one platform. And a niche genre.argetlam00

A niche genre? With 15 million people playing WoW alone?

Its not as exciting largely because SWOR has no chance.

swtor unlike battlefield actually does have a chance of beating wow. You really think bf3 is going to outsell bf3 ? I mean I think it's generally accepted by most people that mw3 will win without a doubt.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"] You're talking about the console version. The PC version with 64 players on one map, the best graphics across any platform, fully destructible environments, tons of vehicular warfare, and the most amazing audio in any game? There has been no FPS of this quality until now dude. This is the next generation of games.argetlam00

Nothing you listed hasn't been done before...

Lol what? Show me a game that has a physics engine at the level of battlefield 3 along with the destructibility of it. Also, show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....

your taking what he said too literally. Obvious it has improvements but it doesn't fundamentally do anything new with a shooter.
Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"] You're talking about the console version. The PC version with 64 players on one map, the best graphics across any platform, fully destructible environments, tons of vehicular warfare, and the most amazing audio in any game? There has been no FPS of this quality until now dude. This is the next generation of games.argetlam00

Nothing you listed hasn't been done before...

Lol what? Show me a game that has a physics engine at the level of battlefield 3 along with the destructibility of it. Also, show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....

Exactly, sure all that has been done before, but has it all been done at the same time?! Yeah right, the closest thing was Bad Company 2, but this is just a whole new level. This is what I'd expect from the next gen consoles.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#42 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics.vashkey
Its BF2 with better graphics and modern aiming mechanics. So far all they showing is a cod ripped SP

WAW had coop. Its not that important

show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....argetlam00

I do believe cod has better audio, many will dissagree, but cod games always got an award for their animation, everyone ignored that, when i said it so many times, its funny that now it started to matter.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#43 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45433 Posts
though I think BF3 looks better I think MW3 will sell better, though I'll probably end up getting both
Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"] But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics.dakan45

Its BF2 with better graphics and modern aiming mechanics. So far all they showing is a cod ripped SP

WAW had coop. Its not that important

show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....argetlam00

I do believe cod has better audio, many will dissagree, but cod games always got an award for their animation, everyone ignored that, when i said it so many times, its funny that now it started to matter.

CoD has better audio than Battlefield?! HA, don't make me laugh more son
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"] But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics.dakan45

Its BF2 with better graphics and modern aiming mechanics. So far all they showing is a cod ripped SP

WAW had coop. Its not that important

show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....argetlam00

I do believe cod has better audio, many will dissagree, but cod games always got an award for their animation, everyone ignored that, when i said it so many times, its funny that now it started to matter.

-Sectional Vehicle damage -even better destruction than BFBC2 -suppression mechanic -TDM -Rush Pretty big changes from BF2 right there. COD has godawful audio, Frostbite just completely blows it out of the water when it comes to sound effects. Also seriously? After the blops free weekend pretty much everyone I game with was making fun of how bad the running and death animations were.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#46 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"] But nothing Battlefield 3 is doing is particularly special. Just better graphics.dakan45

Its BF2 with better graphics and modern aiming mechanics. So far all they showing is a cod ripped SP

WAW had coop. Its not that important

show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....argetlam00

I do believe cod has better audio, many will dissagree, but cod games always got an award for their animation, everyone ignored that, when i said it so many times, its funny that now it started to matter.

CoD game's animations are extremely prebaked and don't come across during multiplayer or in general gameplay, just during their scripted events. Though the single player in CoD is pretty much 100% scripted events that have you hit X to blow something up. The audio in CoD is also terrible. All of the guns sound like toys and are not effected by the environment.

Avatar image for WW3_MW3
WW3_MW3

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 WW3_MW3
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="vashkey"] Its BF2 with better graphics and modern aiming mechanics. So far all they showing is a cod ripped SP

WAW had coop. Its not that important

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]show me a shooter that has better audio and animations? I'm waiting....-RocBoys9489-

I do believe cod has better audio, many will dissagree, but cod games always got an award for their animation, everyone ignored that, when i said it so many times, its funny that now it started to matter.

CoD has better audio than Battlefield?! HA, don't make me laugh more son

MW2's epic soundtrack eclipses anything DICE has provided us with thus far. MW2 was also a global phenomenon, being mentioned in the news, selling over 20 million and scoring AAA, all of which BC2 failed to do.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#48 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] WoW is the one exception. Name me another MMO as popular or even remotely close. And it's 11 million now not 15, WoW is slowly dieing.

i5750at4Ghz

Perfect World has 50 million people worldwide, in all versions. Look at League of Legends, for another example..

There are thousands of MMOs out there, be it RPGs, Racing or shooting. MMO games are the most popular form of gaming on the planet.. since Ultima Online.

Well they are free. Not exactly the same as a pay to play MMO.

Doesn´t really matter if they´re paid or free to be honest, in terms of sheer numbers(money made and comunity size) it´s probably the most popular genre aside FPS´s these days,hardly what I would call niche.

Avatar image for Ninja_Odin
Ninja_Odin

386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Ninja_Odin
Member since 2011 • 386 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Lucianu"]

Perfect World has 50 million people worldwide, in all versions. Look at League of Legends, for another example..

There are thousands of MMOs out there, be it RPGs, Racing or shooting. MMO games are the most popular form of gaming on the planet.. since Ultima Online.

Arach666

Well they are free. Not exactly the same as a pay to play MMO.

Doesn´t really matter if they´re paid or free to be honest, in terms of sheer numbers(money made and comunity size) it´s probably the most popular genre aside FPS´s these days,hardly what I would call niche.

actually aside from WoW they don't sell that well. Also Everyone knows BF3 will be a more high quality game. The battle is in the Marketing. They did ok with MoH despite it being an average game. Lets see what they can do with a AAA game this time.
Avatar image for AugustusGraham
AugustusGraham

343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 AugustusGraham
Member since 2011 • 343 Posts

Idk...After seeing that multiplayer gameplay. I wept.