EA: Battlefield 3 versus Modern Warfare 3 is most important battle in a decade

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for butisitbluray
butisitbluray

186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 butisitbluray
Member since 2011 • 186 Posts

[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Dont forget sitting in a corner waiting for someone to walk by and then eventually get a Harrier or chopper gunner KS.

Fizzman

Yeah we also shouldn't forget camping at your base for a chopper,or hiding behind a tree dropping mortars at the same spot,or camping at your base for a tank....Oops wrong game thought you were talking about battlefield.

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

designed..more like thats all they make with that crappy engine

same old gameplay from quake with fresh paint and killstreaks

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#102 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"] Yeah we also shouldn't forget camping at your base for a chopper,or hiding behind a tree dropping mortars at the same spot,or camping at your base for a tank....Oops wrong game thought you were talking about battlefield.butisitbluray

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

designed..more like thats all they make with that crappy engine

same old gameplay from quake with fresh paint and killstreaks

Paint is very old at this point. Its the same engine that COD2 used.

The game is just a massive milking machine.

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

very noble going after the monster...but it's a monster for a reason.

I can't wait to come back to all these CoD vs. BF threads in three years time when everyone is bashing Battlefield for being another milked, unoriginal bro-shooter franchise.

PBSnipes

o and this

Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Dont forget sitting in a corner waiting for someone to walk by and then eventually get a Harrier or chopper gunner KS.

Fizzman

Yeah we also shouldn't forget camping at your base for a chopper,or hiding behind a tree dropping mortars at the same spot,or camping at your base for a tank....Oops wrong game thought you were talking about battlefield.

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

Camping is not waiting for a vehicle. Dont know why you bothered writing that last part.

Staying at your spawn sniping until a vehicle shows up isn't camping?Also would you rather be killed by some sitting in a corner that can easily be stunned or by someone sitting at their spawn waiting for a chopper that would be too much trouble to kill.
Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#105 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"] Yeah we also shouldn't forget camping at your base for a chopper,or hiding behind a tree dropping mortars at the same spot,or camping at your base for a tank....Oops wrong game thought you were talking about battlefield.butisitbluray

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

designed..more like thats all they make with that crappy engine

same old gameplay from quake with fresh paint and killstreaks

Oh I see. You're one of those "OMFG COD SUXXORZ LOLOL BF3 GOTY 2011"-people. No matter what anyone says, you'll just keep spouting random sentences like "small baby maps" and "same old quake gameplay". It's like talking to a rock.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#106 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"] Yeah we also shouldn't forget camping at your base for a chopper,or hiding behind a tree dropping mortars at the same spot,or camping at your base for a tank....Oops wrong game thought you were talking about battlefield.genaroll

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

Camping is not waiting for a vehicle. Dont know why you bothered writing that last part.

Staying at your spawn sniping until a vehicle shows up isn't camping?Also would you rather be killed by some sitting in a corner that can easily be stunned or by someone sitting at their spawn waiting for a chopper that would be too much trouble to kill.

Ummm BF2's spawns arent eight feet from your opponents spawn so its not camping. If an enemy comes to my base and wants to try and camp it go for it. YOU WAITING FOR A VEHICLE IN YOUR OWN SPAWN IS NOT CAMPING.

Bad Company 2 had a pretty good spawn system. Enemy could rarely kill you in your own spawn. Isla Incontes and I forget the snowy mountain map.

COD spawn system is just Ohh ok there is an enemy in the next room so you are safe. Or the spawn point had a clear LOS where an enemy could just wait.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"] Yeah we also shouldn't forget camping at your base for a chopper,or hiding behind a tree dropping mortars at the same spot,or camping at your base for a tank....Oops wrong game thought you were talking about battlefield.genaroll

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

Camping is not waiting for a vehicle. Dont know why you bothered writing that last part.

Staying at your spawn sniping until a vehicle shows up isn't camping?Also would you rather be killed by some sitting in a corner that can easily be stunned or by someone sitting at their spawn waiting for a chopper that would be too much trouble to kill.

Ew. Who spawns recon when they're going for a vehicle? Helis are pretty damn easy to take out, way easier than someone with all the right camping gear in COD and if you're not an engi with a tank than the tank will probably get half way to a point before being blown up.
Avatar image for rastotm
rastotm

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 rastotm
Member since 2011 • 1380 Posts

BF 3 is winning on all fronts, even their marketing is superior at the moment.
However COD is a completely different kind of game which appeals to casual games alot more then BF 3.

Personally I believe that if COD doesn't up the marketing BF 3 wins in sales.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="butisitbluray"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

001011000101101

designed..more like thats all they make with that crappy engine

same old gameplay from quake with fresh paint and killstreaks

Oh I see. You're one of those "OMFG COD SUXXORZ LOLOL BF3 GOTY 2011"-people. No matter what anyone says, you'll just keep spouting random sentences like "small baby maps" and "same old quake gameplay". It's like talking to a rock.

Yeah! You strawman that guy because you can't come up with a counter argument for what he's saying! That will teach him!
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

Camping is not waiting for a vehicle. Dont know why you bothered writing that last part.

Fizzman

Staying at your spawn sniping until a vehicle shows up isn't camping?Also would you rather be killed by some sitting in a corner that can easily be stunned or by someone sitting at their spawn waiting for a chopper that would be too much trouble to kill.

Ummm BF2's spawns arent eight feet from your opponents spawn so its not camping. If an enemy comes to my base and wants to try and camp it go for it. YOU WAITING FOR A VEHICLE IN YOUR OWN SPAWN IS NOT CAMPING.

Bad Company 2 had a pretty good spawn system. Enemy could rarely kill you in your own spawn. Isla Incontes and I forget the snowy mountain map.

COD spawn system is just Ohh ok there is an enemy in the next room so you are safe. Or the spawn point had a clear LOS where an enemy could just wait.

You have alot of excuses,so try to make mortar spamming.circle strafing,spawn trapping,and the newly added perks to the list of excuses for bc2 and battlefield 3.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Hahahaha, no it really isn't. MW3 will outsell BF, it's a damn Call of Dooty game casual 'core' gamers buy it in droves. Battlefield undoubtedly will be better, it's a Battlefield game we're talking about, the pedigree of multiplayer alone has been outstanding since 2002.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#112 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"] Staying at your spawn sniping until a vehicle shows up isn't camping?Also would you rather be killed by some sitting in a corner that can easily be stunned or by someone sitting at their spawn waiting for a chopper that would be too much trouble to kill.genaroll

Ummm BF2's spawns arent eight feet from your opponents spawn so its not camping. If an enemy comes to my base and wants to try and camp it go for it. YOU WAITING FOR A VEHICLE IN YOUR OWN SPAWN IS NOT CAMPING.

Bad Company 2 had a pretty good spawn system. Enemy could rarely kill you in your own spawn. Isla Incontes and I forget the snowy mountain map.

COD spawn system is just Ohh ok there is an enemy in the next room so you are safe. Or the spawn point had a clear LOS where an enemy could just wait.

You have alot of excuses,so try to make mortar spamming.circle strafing,spawn trapping,and the newly added perks to the list of excuses for bc2 and battlefield 3.

Mortar spamming isnt on the same level of the absurdity that encompasses KS rewards like in COD. The area of effect with mortars is pretty small and if you the mortar person can see you then you can see him and kill him. I played BC2 for a very long time and never died to mortar strikes on a consistent basis. Spawn trapping only works if you are undermanned or are playing with dumb people, and COD has the monopolyon dumb players.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#113 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

hmm i would have thought WoW vs. SW:TOR might have been more importantLed_poison
That's a strange way to abbreviate Guild Wars 2.

Avatar image for rastotm
rastotm

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 rastotm
Member since 2011 • 1380 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"] Staying at your spawn sniping until a vehicle shows up isn't camping?Also would you rather be killed by some sitting in a corner that can easily be stunned or by someone sitting at their spawn waiting for a chopper that would be too much trouble to kill.genaroll

Ummm BF2's spawns arent eight feet from your opponents spawn so its not camping. If an enemy comes to my base and wants to try and camp it go for it. YOU WAITING FOR A VEHICLE IN YOUR OWN SPAWN IS NOT CAMPING.

Bad Company 2 had a pretty good spawn system. Enemy could rarely kill you in your own spawn. Isla Incontes and I forget the snowy mountain map.

COD spawn system is just Ohh ok there is an enemy in the next room so you are safe. Or the spawn point had a clear LOS where an enemy could just wait.

You have alot of excuses,so try to make mortar spamming.circle strafing,spawn trapping,and the newly added perks to the list of excuses for bc2 and battlefield 3.

Mortar spamming < killstreak spamming
Circle srafing < dropshotting
spawn trapping < worst spawn system ever designed
BF perks are crap, i agree.

Avatar image for LazyMushroom
LazyMushroom

914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 LazyMushroom
Member since 2011 • 914 Posts

MW3 single player didn't look bad but as an all round package, BF3 is where it's at.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#116 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

MW3 single player didn't look bad but as an all round package, BF3 is where it's at.

LazyMushroom

MW3 story is now three hours long. THREE EPIC HOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Paint is very old at this point. Its the same engine that COD2 used.

The game is just a massive milking machine.

Fizzman
It's actually the same engine COD1 used, at the base of the thing is the Quake 3 engine that has been pulled and stretched. It looks good for such a dated piece of tech, but it is amazing that it has lasted so long, competent coders have had a good go at it. Nonetheless yeah it pales compared to recent engines.
Avatar image for CwlHeddwyn
CwlHeddwyn

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 CwlHeddwyn
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts

[QUOTE="LazyMushroom"]

MW3 single player didn't look bad but as an all round package, BF3 is where it's at.

Fizzman

MW3 story is now three hours long. THREE EPIC HOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Single Player is becoming superfluous to COD games.
Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts
I am honestly surprised more gamers arent getting both. I'm a huge fan of both games, played BF2 600 hours, MW2 400 hours, and COD4 and WaW a lot. I still think best COD online game was COD1, but hey I still had a ton of fun with MW2. They are both different games but still fun to be. I will be buying both on PC.
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Ummm BF2's spawns arent eight feet from your opponents spawn so its not camping. If an enemy comes to my base and wants to try and camp it go for it. YOU WAITING FOR A VEHICLE IN YOUR OWN SPAWN IS NOT CAMPING.

Bad Company 2 had a pretty good spawn system. Enemy could rarely kill you in your own spawn. Isla Incontes and I forget the snowy mountain map.

COD spawn system is just Ohh ok there is an enemy in the next room so you are safe. Or the spawn point had a clear LOS where an enemy could just wait.

Fizzman

You have alot of excuses,so try to make mortar spamming.circle strafing,spawn trapping,and the newly added perks to the list of excuses for bc2 and battlefield 3.

Mortar spamming isnt on the same level of the absurdity that encompasses KS rewards like in COD. The area of effect with mortars is pretty small and if you the mortar person can see you then you can see him and kill him. I played BC2 for a very long time and never died to mortar strikes on a consistent basis. Spawn trapping only works if you are undermanned or are playing with dumb people, and COD has the monopolyon dumb players.

So I guess everyone is a pro player in bc2 everyone shares a chopper,heals,gives ammo,perfectly flies a chopper at the first go,throws motion sensors,attacks objective,and communicates.I play bc2 and black ops both games have the same amount of slow players.But the big difference between the two is when a chopper gunner or hind is up it takes one idiot to destroy it in less than 20 seconds.But in bc2 once you see an apache it takes a whole squad of idiots,making chopper whoring in bc2 ten times easier than in black ops.
Avatar image for SuperNecro
SuperNecro

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 SuperNecro
Member since 2005 • 1423 Posts
From a business standpoint, this isn't a clash of titans. It's going to be a massacre when sales are compared. MW3 will slaughter BF3 and that's what investors care about at the end of the day. For us gamers, we'll get to enjoy two very entertaining games.
Avatar image for rastotm
rastotm

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 rastotm
Member since 2011 • 1380 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="genaroll"] You have alot of excuses,so try to make mortar spamming.circle strafing,spawn trapping,and the newly added perks to the list of excuses for bc2 and battlefield 3.genaroll

Mortar spamming isnt on the same level of the absurdity that encompasses KS rewards like in COD. The area of effect with mortars is pretty small and if you the mortar person can see you then you can see him and kill him. I played BC2 for a very long time and never died to mortar strikes on a consistent basis. Spawn trapping only works if you are undermanned or are playing with dumb people, and COD has the monopolyon dumb players.

So I guess everyone is a pro player in bc2 everyone shares a chopper,heals,gives ammo,perfectly flies a chopper at the first go,throws motion sensors,attacks objective,and communicates.I play bc2 and black ops both games have the same amount of slow players.But the big difference between the two is when a chopper gunner or hind is up it takes one idiot to destroy it in less than 20 seconds.But in bc2 once you see an apache it takes a whole squad of idiots,making chopper whoring in bc2 ten times easier than in black ops.

By the same logic a tard can get a Copper gunner in COD and only a pro can fly a chopper....
And yes i play BO and BFBC 2 aswell.

Avatar image for Ratatak2
Ratatak2

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Ratatak2
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Both are great shooters...but CoD has been around longer and has a better reputation. Better game overall.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#125 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

Both are great shooters...but CoD has been around longer and has a better reputation. Better game overall.Ratatak2

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COD - Release Date: Oct 29, 2003

BF1942 - Release Date: Sep 10, 2002

Avatar image for CwlHeddwyn
CwlHeddwyn

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 CwlHeddwyn
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts

[QUOTE="Ratatak2"]Both are great shooters...but CoD has been around longer and has a better reputation. Better game overall.Fizzman

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COD - Release Date: Oct 29, 2003

BF1942 - Release Date: Sep 10, 2002

you forget COD didn't get COOL and ROXORZ until COD4 and most casuals aint never heard of Battlefield.
Avatar image for Mr_Cumberdale
Mr_Cumberdale

10189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#127 Mr_Cumberdale
Member since 2004 • 10189 Posts

No rehashes, actual good gameplay. Battlefield 3 won this battle before it began.

argetlam00
Good gameplay? For all we know, BF3 could play like crap. It looks excellent, but BF was never good in the gameplay department.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#128 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

No rehashes, actual good gameplay. Battlefield 3 won this battle before it began.

Mr_Cumberdale

but BF was never good in the gameplay department.

.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#129 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="Ratatak2"]Both are great shooters...but CoD has been around longer and has a better reputation. Better game overall.CwlHeddwyn

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COD - Release Date: Oct 29, 2003

BF1942 - Release Date: Sep 10, 2002

you forget COD didn't get COOL and ROXORZ until COD4 and most casuals aint never heard of Battlefield.

I thought the original COD was the best COD game I have ever played. It wasnt mainstream, but It was one of the best shooters of its time. COD4 was good and then the wheels fell off. BF1942 was the superior game though compared to COD. Strike at Karkand and Wake Island was hundreds of hours of fun.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#130 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

No rehashes, actual good gameplay. Battlefield 3 won this battle before it began.

Mr_Cumberdale
Good gameplay? For all we know, BF3 could play like crap. It looks excellent, but BF was never good in the gameplay department.

yes...battlefield 1942's and BF 2's success are based off they're visuals :roll:
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#131 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Except it isn't. At all. And it's not even a fight. Call of Duty will crush it in sales.

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for their fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

Edit: Battlefield should sell better than it ever has, but I don't see it crushing Call of Duty in any way. I still want to see some console foogate of BF3, too.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#133 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

MW3 - The Russians are invading USA and are using AK 47's.


derp.

MW3 lost.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#134 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for them fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

Episode_Eve

Respect a company that charges for stat tracking..........no thanks.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#135 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for them fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

Episode_Eve

Actvision would be doing the exact same thing..it's all for the marketing and hype.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#136 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

No rehashes, actual good gameplay. Battlefield 3 won this battle before it began.

Mr_Cumberdale

Good gameplay? For all we know, BF3 could play like crap. It looks excellent, but BF was never good in the gameplay department.

Seriously?

Avatar image for timmy00
timmy00

15360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#137 timmy00
Member since 2006 • 15360 Posts

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for them fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

Fizzman

Respect a company that charges for stat tracking..........no thanks.

Neither Dice or IW charge for stat tracking.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for them fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

Episode_Eve

Activision deserves little respect. IW might deserve some, now that West and Zampella are gone. They were talentless ****.

Avatar image for CwlHeddwyn
CwlHeddwyn

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 CwlHeddwyn
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts

MW3 - The Russians are invading USA and are using AK 47's.


derp.

MW3 lost.

GeneralShowzer

or if their not using AK47s (a gun they stopped using in the 1970s) they've got German G36s or Israeli TAR 21s. ridiculous IMO.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#140 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for them fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

timmy00

Respect a company that charges for stat tracking..........no thanks.

Neither Dice or IW charge for stat tracking.

http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/40356/call-of-duty-elite-explained

I was half joking with the stat tracking charge, but they are charging for stuff that should be free.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#141 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

Except it isn't. At all. And it's not even a fight. Call of Duty will crush it in sales.

DarkLink77
Implying Call of Duty will crush it in sales. BF3 will have a lot better reviews, marketing on the same level, and free features that Activision will charge for.
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

The bets are will MW3 out sell Blackops... Think it will. But I dont really care about sales, from the gameplay I have seen for BF3 MP I think it looks fantastic, I'm liking the maps I'm seeing. For MW3 I would have liked to see some MP, but the SP I saw looked great very over the top.

Avatar image for butisitbluray
butisitbluray

186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 butisitbluray
Member since 2011 • 186 Posts

[QUOTE="butisitbluray"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Difference is that BF maps are enormous. COD maps is ohh turn the corner same dude that killed me three seconds ago. Tiny little maps that just encourage camping and are designed for it.

001011000101101

designed..more like thats all they make with that crappy engine

same old gameplay from quake with fresh paint and killstreaks

Oh I see. You're one of those "OMFG COD SUXXORZ LOLOL BF3 GOTY 2011"-people. No matter what anyone says, you'll just keep spouting random sentences like "small baby maps" and "same old quake gameplay". It's like talking to a rock.

oh i see you are one of those smart people

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for their fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

Edit: Battlefield should sell better than it ever has, but I don't see it crushing Call of Duty in any way. I still want to see some console foogate of BF3, too.

Fizzman

Respect a company that charges for stat tracking..........no thanks.

I said "developer". But, still, I haven't read anything where Activision will be charging for stat tracking.

Here's what Elite will be offering for free:

• Access Elite through the web as well as Elite's free custom iOS and Android applications for smartphones and tablets
• Communicate any way you want across mobile, console and the web with your friends
• Track and share thousands of stats with friends – k/d ratios, score-per-minute, win % and loads more, all represented in easy to understand charts and infographics
• Create your own custom leaderboards to track friendly rivalries – who is moving up and down in your group of friends?
• Analyze advanced heat maps detailing your match-by-match performance – where you killed or got killed, when it happened, and more
• Analyze your weapons performance – which weapons you are best with in which situations
• Upload and share videos of your greatest moments through our exclusive theater mode with the touch of a button
• After you analyze your performance to your heart's content - Customize your loadout – search through all the weapons, attachments and perks, and push them directly into the game menu from the web or your mobile device with the touch of a button
• Join dozens of groups and find other players with common interests to play with and compete against – find people who make the game the most fun for you – TDM, Lakers' fans, Weekend Warriors?
• Create a private Clan with players who share your interests and skill level
• Bring your Facebook friends right into the game, easily taking your existing network into the Call of Duty experience.
• Seamlessly be placed into matches into Groups who share your affinities and interests based on your Facebook profile to elevate your in-game experience.
• Career? Start tracking your Call of Duty career – everything you wanted to know about your performance across the franchise starting with Black Ops.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#145 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for them fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

DarkLink77

Activision deserves little respect. IW might deserve some, now that West and Zampella are gone. They were talentless ****.

I love how you just know that, without any actual knowledge of what kind of contributions they made to the games they worked on.

Avatar image for timmy00
timmy00

15360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#146 timmy00
Member since 2006 • 15360 Posts

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Respect a company that charges for stat tracking..........no thanks.

Fizzman

Neither Dice or IW charge for stat tracking.

http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/40356/call-of-duty-elite-explained

"We also know that the career section of Elite and the stat tracking that incorporates performance, maps and trends will also be free to access."

Seems like most of it is free. :?

Avatar image for butisitbluray
butisitbluray

186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 butisitbluray
Member since 2011 • 186 Posts

From a business standpoint, this isn't a clash of titans. It's going to be a massacre when sales are compared. MW3 will slaughter BF3 and that's what investors care about at the end of the day. For us gamers, we'll get to enjoy two very entertaining games.SuperNecro

haha...2

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#148 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

Except it isn't. At all. And it's not even a fight. Call of Duty will crush it in sales.

GeneralShowzer

Implying Call of Duty will crush it in sales. BF3 will have a lot better reviews, marketing on the same level, and free features that Activision will charge for.

The bolded is a maybe.

And you don't have to tell me about the difference in quality between Battlefield and Call of Duty, man trust me. I'm just sayin'.

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think both games will be great. It's obviously trendy to hate on COD, and people seem to always want an antagonist, but I don't fall into that.

What disappoints me is the constant cheap shots at IW / COD that DICE and EA take. Like, do they not have respect for their fellow developers? Stop being a lil' b**** and just do you! It's like they're jealous of their success. I understand they're the competition, but Battlefield's presence and fanbase is respectable. Battlefield is respected and praised; you guys make awesome games (SP for Bad Company 2 was the worst of its kind in recent years, though, lol).

Edit: Battlefield should sell better than it ever has, but I don't see it crushing Call of Duty in any way. I still want to see some console foogate of BF3, too.

DarkLink77

Activision deserves little respect. IW might deserve some, now that West and Zampella are gone. They were talentless ****.

Aw, you didn't like them? I'm eager to see what Respawn does...

You know, I have faith in IW's future. Like I've mentioned before, they received over 5,000 employment applications since the fallout (def. more by now). I'm sure they have / will staff the studio with great talent.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#150 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="timmy00"]Neither Dice or IW charge for stat tracking.

timmy00

http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/40356/call-of-duty-elite-explained

"We also know that the career section of Elite and the stat tracking that incorporates performance, maps and trends will also be free to access."

Seems like most of it is free. :?

The fact that they plan to charge for something is ridiculous. Milking machine is at maximum milkage level. Bungie.net offers even more services and features and they have never charged.