I've been wondering what the concensus on a question about FFVII and Ocarina of Time is...
Many people will tell you FFVII was the best FF (yes I know opinions differ obviously, don't post just to remind everyone of the obvious, this is why I said many and not most, cause it may not be most (though it may be also)).
Many people happen to think Ocarina of Time is the best Zelda game ever...
What to these statements have in common? Well, the historic moment in each series took place in each of these games... they went 3-d.
Could it be the Ocarina of Time is overrated due to the fact that Zelda games were already huge, largely loved games before they went 3-d, and because of the successful translation into 3-d this game was overrated? I think this is what happened with FFVII to some extent... the first 3-d FF garners itself a MASSIVE following... would it have been this way if, say, VIII had been the first 3-d FF as opposed to VII? Would people still laud Sephiroth as the badass that he is if he wasn't in 3-d to behold at first?
Many hardcore Zelda fans will tell you Ocarina wasn't even the best Zelda game, yet the generic fan who knows something about games, but not a LOT will tell you Ocarina is the best game ever (many siting gamerankings and metacritic to back this up ironically, as if those two sites somehow have the power to end this argument)... many hardcore Zelda freaks I know like Majora's Mask more, Link to the Past more, Twilight I hear being called the best Zelda at times too (and once in a great while even Wind Waker)...
Point I'm making this be obvious at this point... were both of these games, and specifically FFVII overrated due to the fact that they were both the first translations of mega series into 3-d and they both happened to do a successful job of it also? If so, isn't this a shallow way to look at how these games are viewed in retrospect? VIII and X (among the 3-d FF's) were better than VII imo (purely opinion spittin there (very few people I know actually got the message VIII was sending, it's actually a much deeper game than it first seemed when you research it a bit look for hidden connotations)). Ocarina was great, but maybe Link to the Past was better... maybe FFVI is the best FF (I hear this a lot, probably the number one thing I hear people counter the VII is the best argument with, I usually hear those people saying 6 ruled 7... and maybe it did, but it wasn't 3-d, so I think some people don't properly consider this)....
What is the concensus on this? Were some of the "greatest games of all time" and games reverred as the best in their series good, but not actually the best, but regarded as such because they were the first big 3-d leap? (Yes, I realize some series truly did excel at their first 3-d attempt, for instance, I feel that Metal Gear Solid was the best Metal Gear game and it happened to be the first 3-d, but I don't think that was the reason it was best, I actually just thought it was best straight up).
What do yall think?
Log in to comment