For 600 dollars, a PS3 and Elite is so much better than a 600 dollar Gaming PC.

[QUOTE="TheDogout"][QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

pc is better in every way . a 300$ pc would have better graphics then both put together .

I hope this is just a joke post or sarcasm.

If not http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150351&Tpk=XFX%20HD-485X-ZDFC

How wrong you are.

idream2010 whats 2+7= ? what

[QUOTE="TheDogout"][QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

pc is better in every way . a 300$ pc would have better graphics then both put together .

789shadow

You both fail massively.:| You will not need to spend at least $500 to get better graphics than a console, and no PC has better graphics than both consoles put together.

This doesn't even make sense. That's like me saying "Hey put these two Accuras together and they'll outperform this Ferrari".

It's not even possible so there's no point even making a hypothesis of it.

One way to end this debate on "the power" behind the console gpu's, transistor counts tell the performance differences. the more the merrier. The 360 Xenos has around 236 million and the PS3 has around the same all being under 250 million.

Nvidia 7800GTX 300 million - .25 x more = 50% faster

ATI 3870 over 660 milliom - 1.8 x = 400% faster (4x)

Nvidia 8800GT 754 million 2.2 x more = 500% faster (5x)

ATI 4870 950 million - 3.1 x more = 700% faster (7x)

ATI 5870 over 2 billion - 7.6 x more = 1700% faster(15x)

[QUOTE="789shadow"]

[QUOTE="TheDogout"] This is so much fail on every single level. First of all your gonna need to spend atleast 500$ to get graphics better than 1 console And your gonna need 5 grand to get graphics better than both combinedEggimannd

You both fail massively.:| You will not need to spend at least $500 to get better graphics than a console, and no PC has better graphics than both consoles put together.

This doesn't even make sense. That's like me saying "Hey put these two Accuras together and they'll outperform this Ferrari".

It's not even possible so there's no point even making a hypothesis of it.

I know, it makes no sense whatsoever.

Why would you take 2 systems against 1 anyway? AAA 11(PC) vs 14(PS360) AA 74(PC) vs 22(PS360) Completly destroyed! They have 3 more AAA's for more than 3 times less the AAMonsieurX

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Why would you take 2 systems against 1 anyway? AAA 11(PC) vs 14(PS360) AA 74(PC) vs 22(PS360) Completly destroyed! They have 3 more AAA's for more than 3 times less the AAIdream2010

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

Sales mean absolutely nothing.

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheDogout"] This is so much fail on every single level. First of all your gonna need to spend atleast 500$ to get graphics better than 1 console And your gonna need 5 grand to get graphics better than both combinedurdead18

I hope this is just a joke post or sarcasm.

If not http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150351&Tpk=XFX%20HD-485X-ZDFC

How wrong you are.

Damn. My bad I thought I saw video card in his post.

Listen guys, hermit's profile is pretty obvious. I won't say it, because it seems u can't voice ur opinion in this site. HOWEVER, I can say that 360/ps3 combo is MUCH BETTER than ANY HIGH-END PC. It doesn't really matter how many AAA's or graphics or whatsoever. It comes down to how social you are (I hope u guys get my point about hermit's profiles with this).

How exactly am I full of lies? =/

Eggimannd

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Why would you take 2 systems against 1 anyway? AAA 11(PC) vs 14(PS360) AA 74(PC) vs 22(PS360) Completly destroyed! They have 3 more AAA's for more than 3 times less the AAIdream2010

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

[QUOTE="Idream2010"]

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Why would you take 2 systems against 1 anyway? AAA 11(PC) vs 14(PS360) AA 74(PC) vs 22(PS360) Completly destroyed! They have 3 more AAA's for more than 3 times less the AAadv_tr00per

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

Um, that's generally the accepted rule.:|

I've got a PC/PS3/360. The PS3/360 combo is nice but really, neither of the consoles can provide an experience that measures up to PC gaming, so most of my gaming is still on the PC. They get a few fun games every once in awhile though. :)KHAndAnime

Do u play with a custom pad or keyboard/mouse? If the latter, I don't get how u can stand that. It's UTTERLY boring.

[QUOTE="adv_tr00per"][QUOTE="Idream2010"]

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

789shadow

Um, that's generally the accepted rule.:|

ok thanks for posting that, now combine the PS3/360 exclusives and compare them both to the PC, oh no now it doesnt look so good for the PC. Thanks for making my point, next time be fully aware of what my point is before you prove it for me!

Idream2010

As I said, you would encourage a defensive response because you enjoy arguing and want to prolong this thread. On top of that you are lieing again, most likely intentionally. I've already touched on this subject in this thread, you just ignored it.

PS3

AAAA (1) AAA (6) AA (9) A (15) Total = 31 Exclusives

360

AAAA (0) AAA (8) AA (13) A (12) Total = 33 Exclusives

PC

AAAA (0) AAA (11) AA (74) A (-) Total = 85 Exclusives

31 PS3 exclusives plus 33 360 exclusives equals 64 exclusives, which doesn't even cover PCs AA exclusive line-up.

So as you can see, the PS3/360 line-up combined does not look bad for PC as you claimed. However you are now going to respond in a manner that will provoke another defensive response, then another, that's what flame baiters do. You are not interested in being right or wrong, simply continuing the argument.

I love my PS3 and my PSP but how can i compare it to my PC really ? There is no comparison.

Getting a PC with superior technology than a PS3 or 360, vast array of exclusives, and a Bluray driver for under $1000 is well worth it, especially when you're able to use it for more than just games.

Thread of the day right he-uh!

[QUOTE="789shadow"]

[QUOTE="adv_tr00per"] But that's only counting games that came out after 2005. Include earlier PC games and the consoles get nuked to hell and back. Oh and if you're one of those people that thinks 'old games don't count', than we shouldn't even take you seriously.adv_tr00per

Um, that's generally the accepted rule.:|

That when comparing lineups only PC games from the launch of the 360 on are used.

I love my PS3 and my PSP but how can i compare it to my PC really ? There is no comparison.

telefanatic

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]I've got a PC/PS3/360. The PS3/360 combo is nice but really, neither of the consoles can provide an experience that measures up to PC gaming, so most of my gaming is still on the PC. They get a few fun games every once in awhile though. :)GiveMeSomething

Do u play with a custom pad or keyboard/mouse? If the latter, I don't get how u can stand that. It's UTTERLY boring.

I love my PS3 and my PSP but how can i compare it to my PC really ? There is no comparison.

telefanatic

Exactly. Consoles are much much socially oriented. PC's are just for [insert adjetive here].

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Why would you take 2 systems against 1 anyway? AAA 11(PC) vs 14(PS360) AA 74(PC) vs 22(PS360) Completly destroyed! They have 3 more AAA's for more than 3 times less the AAIdream2010

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

So better sales = better games?

[QUOTE="telefanatic"]

I love my PS3 and my PSP but how can i compare it to my PC really ? There is no comparison.

GiveMeSomething

Exactly. Consoles are much much socially oriented. PC's are just for [insert adjetive here].

There is a social part of PC gaming. Have you ever heard of clans?

[QUOTE="GiveMeSomething"]

[QUOTE="telefanatic"]

I love my PS3 and my PSP but how can i compare it to my PC really ? There is no comparison.

blizzvalve

Exactly. Consoles are much much socially oriented. PC's are just for [insert adjetive here].

There is a social part of PC gaming. Have you ever heard of clans?

I have to leave at the moment. But we can continue talking about this later. And trust me, they are both on VERY different social levels.

[QUOTE="adv_tr00per"][QUOTE="789shadow"]

Um, that's generally the accepted rule.:|

789shadow

That when comparing lineups only PC games from the launch of the 360 on are used.

[QUOTE="blizzvalve"]

[QUOTE="GiveMeSomething"]

Exactly. Consoles are much much socially oriented. PC's are just for [insert adjetive here].

GiveMeSomething

There is a social part of PC gaming. Have you ever heard of clans?

I have to leave at the moment. But we can continue talking about this later. And trust me, they are both on VERY different social levels.

[QUOTE="GiveMeSomething"]

[QUOTE="blizzvalve"]

There is a social part of PC gaming. Have you ever heard of clans?

adv_tr00per

I have to leave at the moment. But we can continue talking about this later. And trust me, they are both on VERY different social levels.

[QUOTE="Idream2010"]

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Why would you take 2 systems against 1 anyway? AAA 11(PC) vs 14(PS360) AA 74(PC) vs 22(PS360) Completly destroyed! They have 3 more AAA's for more than 3 times less the AAadv_tr00per

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

look at the spreadsheet and all these pc gamers going nuts over the AA list, LOOK at the AA list for PS3, 360, and PC. The AA list on the PC is horrible compared to the list on the PS3/360. And the 74 AAE's, well thats because they are alot of RTS's and expansions, whereas the 360 and PS3 have less AAE's because they are actually not exclusive because they are on the PS3/360 and NOT the PC lol, look at the AA list, if you call PS3/360 games that are AA and not on the PC and make them now AAE's whichis basically what im saying in this thread,the list is drastically different with a much better AAE list on the PS3/360 side! Oh man I love how I completely just shutdown about everyone in this thread. again LOOK at the AA list and consider everything I said. THE PS3/360 DESTROYSSSSSSSSSSSSSS the PC, it aint even debatable. I REST MY Case and YES i am coming out of this thread LOVING myself! My opening statement is confirmed true! I rest my case!

[QUOTE="adv_tr00per"][QUOTE="Idream2010"]

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

Idream2010

look at the spreadsheet and all these pc gamers going nuts over the AA list, LOOK at the AA list for PS3, 360, and PC. The AA list on the PC is horrible compared to the list on the PS3/360. And the 74 AAE's, well thats because they are alot of RTS's and expansions, whereas the 360 and PS3 have less AAE's because they are actually not exclusive because they are on the PS3/360 and NOT the PC lol, look at the AA list, if you call PS3/360 games that are AA and not on the PC and make them now AAE's whichis basically what im saying in this thread,the list is drastically different with a much better AAE list on the PS3/360 side! Oh man I love how I completely just shutdown about everyone in this thread. again LOOK at the AA list and consider everything I said. THE PS3/360 DESTROYSSSSSSSSSSSSSS the PC, it aint even debatable. I REST MY Case and YES i am coming out of this thread LOVING myself! My opening statement is confirmed true! I rest my case!

I'll also add in that my PC is practically a $600 gaming PC. E8400, a 9800GTX, a 160GB HD, and 2 GB of RAM with a borrowed copy of Windows is pretty much what a $600 PC would be today. My console setup consists of a 42" 1080P Panasonic (from the highly rated G10 series) and a surround sound setup which I built costing me around $1,300. I've got at least 40 games spread out in between my PS3/360. But when it comes to down gaming with friends, you'll find me playing on my PC. I play Starcraft almost daily - a game from 1999 (or 1998?). Still seems consoles don't really have any multiplayer games that can match up to Starcraft, a game that's older than a decade. It's really not hard to see why PC Gaming is just more satisfying for some people. Consoles really fail to provide that engaging online experience. It probably doesn't help too that the 360/PS3 are so slow. It would take me probably 5 minutes to get into a multiplayer match of Uncharted 2 if I left to it after hitting "submit". On the flip side, if I wanted to get into a game of Counter-Strike: Source, it would take me not much longer than 20 seconds. Console players whine about the PC being difficult to use, but if you've played PC Games for longer than a few years, you'll see that PC Gaming features unmatched convenience and functionality. KHAndAnime

starcraft? id take Halo 3 over that with multiplayer and the numbers prove more gamers playing Halo 3 than starcraft as well

[QUOTE="adv_tr00per"][QUOTE="Idream2010"]

look at the spreadsheet! lol PS3/360 completely is the better choice, and oh yeah, the sales prove this as well.

Idream2010

look at the spreadsheet and all these pc gamers going nuts over the AA list, LOOK at the AA list for PS3, 360, and PC. The AA list on the PC is horrible compared to the list on the PS3/360. And the 74 AAE's, well thats because they are alot of RTS's and expansions, whereas the 360 and PS3 have less AAE's because they are actually not exclusive because they are on the PS3/360 and NOT the PC lol, look at the AA list, if you call PS3/360 games that are AA and not on the PC and make them now AAE's whichis basically what im saying in this thread,the list is drastically different with a much better AAE list on the PS3/360 side! Oh man I love how I completely just shutdown about everyone in this thread. again LOOK at the AA list and consider everything I said. THE PS3/360 DESTROYSSSSSSSSSSSSSS the PC, it aint even debatable. I REST MY Case and YES i am coming out of this thread LOVING myself! My opening statement is confirmed true! I rest my case!

[QUOTE="Idream2010"]

[QUOTE="adv_tr00per"] But that's only counting games that came out after 2005. Include earlier PC games and the consoles get nuked to hell and back. Oh and if you're one of those people that thinks 'old games don't count', than we shouldn't even take you seriously.MonsieurX

look at the spreadsheet and all these pc gamers going nuts over the AA list, LOOK at the AA list for PS3, 360, and PC. The AA list on the PC is horrible compared to the list on the PS3/360. And the 74 AAE's, well thats because they are alot of RTS's and expansions, whereas the 360 and PS3 have less AAE's because they are actually not exclusive because they are on the PS3/360 and NOT the PC lol, look at the AA list, if you call PS3/360 games that are AA and not on the PC and make them now AAE's whichis basically what im saying in this thread,the list is drastically different with a much better AAE list on the PS3/360 side! Oh man I love how I completely just shutdown about everyone in this thread. again LOOK at the AA list and consider everything I said. THE PS3/360 DESTROYSSSSSSSSSSSSSS the PC, it aint even debatable. I REST MY Case and YES i am coming out of this thread LOVING myself! My opening statement is confirmed true! I rest my case!

YES it does work this way according to what I am saying and that completely blows the PC out of the water, and yeah who plays more? RTS's or SHooters? lol its funny all the bigtime devs are going with the shooters!!!! and oh yeah sales back my arguement as well. I have the hat trick for making my point. You guys have nothing!!! keep grasping at straws!

starcraft? id take Halo 3 over that with multiplayer and the numbers prove more gamers playing Halo 3 than starcraft as well

Idream2010

I win.

YES it does work this way according to what I am saying and that completely blows the PC out of the water, and yeah who plays more? RTS's or SHooters? lol its funny all the bigtime devs are going with the shooters!!!! and oh yeah sales back my arguement as well. I have the hat trick for making my point. You guys have nothing!!! keep grasping at straws!

Idream2010

/thread.

Thank you,come again.

Build me a reasonable 600 dollar gaming rig then.Vandalvideo

You know I get the feeling TC tried to get into PC gaming but it didn't work out for him. What's wrong TC, couldn't figure out where to put the video card?

Hasn't the TC already made a bunch of topics exactly like this one? I've seen his name on quite a few PC related topics in the past couple of days.

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]I'll also add in that my PC is practically a $600 gaming PC. E8400, a 9800GTX, a 160GB HD, and 2 GB of RAM with a borrowed copy of Windows is pretty much what a $600 PC would be today. My console setup consists of a 42" 1080P Panasonic (from the highly rated G10 series) and a surround sound setup which I built costing me around $1,300. I've got at least 40 games spread out in between my PS3/360. But when it comes to down gaming with friends, you'll find me playing on my PC. I play Starcraft almost daily - a game from 1999 (or 1998?). Still seems consoles don't really have any multiplayer games that can match up to Starcraft, a game that's older than a decade. It's really not hard to see why PC Gaming is just more satisfying for some people. Consoles really fail to provide that engaging online experience. It probably doesn't help too that the 360/PS3 are so slow. It would take me probably 5 minutes to get into a multiplayer match of Uncharted 2 if I left to it after hitting "submit". On the flip side, if I wanted to get into a game of Counter-Strike: Source, it would take me not much longer than 20 seconds. Console players whine about the PC being difficult to use, but if you've played PC Games for longer than a few years, you'll see that PC Gaming features unmatched convenience and functionality. Idream2010

starcraft? id take Halo 3 over that with multiplayer and the numbers prove more gamers playing Halo 3 than starcraft as well

[QUOTE="Idream2010"]

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]I'll also add in that my PC is practically a $600 gaming PC. E8400, a 9800GTX, a 160GB HD, and 2 GB of RAM with a borrowed copy of Windows is pretty much what a $600 PC would be today. My console setup consists of a 42" 1080P Panasonic (from the highly rated G10 series) and a surround sound setup which I built costing me around $1,300. I've got at least 40 games spread out in between my PS3/360. But when it comes to down gaming with friends, you'll find me playing on my PC. I play Starcraft almost daily - a game from 1999 (or 1998?). Still seems consoles don't really have any multiplayer games that can match up to Starcraft, a game that's older than a decade. It's really not hard to see why PC Gaming is just more satisfying for some people. Consoles really fail to provide that engaging online experience. It probably doesn't help too that the 360/PS3 are so slow. It would take me probably 5 minutes to get into a multiplayer match of Uncharted 2 if I left to it after hitting "submit". On the flip side, if I wanted to get into a game of Counter-Strike: Source, it would take me not much longer than 20 seconds. Console players whine about the PC being difficult to use, but if you've played PC Games for longer than a few years, you'll see that PC Gaming features unmatched convenience and functionality. KHAndAnime

starcraft? id take Halo 3 over that with multiplayer and the numbers prove more gamers playing Halo 3 than starcraft as well

[QUOTE="telefanatic"]

I love my PS3 and my PSP but how can i compare it to my PC really ? There is no comparison.

xsubtownerx

And judging from my sig i play only shooters ? Hows that ? I got a military sim, shooter, RPG, TPS, and RTS games that i play ? I belong to few clans onhttp://gamebattles.com/profile/SovietSSwhich i mostly play Socom and Modern Warfare 2 and MAG all for my PS3. So what does that saY ?

[QUOTE="Idream2010"]

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]I'll also add in that my PC is practically a $600 gaming PC. E8400, a 9800GTX, a 160GB HD, and 2 GB of RAM with a borrowed copy of Windows is pretty much what a $600 PC would be today. My console setup consists of a 42" 1080P Panasonic (from the highly rated G10 series) and a surround sound setup which I built costing me around $1,300. I've got at least 40 games spread out in between my PS3/360. But when it comes to down gaming with friends, you'll find me playing on my PC. I play Starcraft almost daily - a game from 1999 (or 1998?). Still seems consoles don't really have any multiplayer games that can match up to Starcraft, a game that's older than a decade. It's really not hard to see why PC Gaming is just more satisfying for some people. Consoles really fail to provide that engaging online experience. It probably doesn't help too that the 360/PS3 are so slow. It would take me probably 5 minutes to get into a multiplayer match of Uncharted 2 if I left to it after hitting "submit". On the flip side, if I wanted to get into a game of Counter-Strike: Source, it would take me not much longer than 20 seconds. Console players whine about the PC being difficult to use, but if you've played PC Games for longer than a few years, you'll see that PC Gaming features unmatched convenience and functionality. KHAndAnime

starcraft? id take Halo 3 over that with multiplayer and the numbers prove more gamers playing Halo 3 than starcraft as well

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"][QUOTE="Idream2010"]

starcraft? id take Halo 3 over that with multiplayer and the numbers prove more gamers playing Halo 3 than starcraft as well

Skittles_McGee