[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]
http://www.videogamer.com/news/xbox_one_and_ps4_have_no_advantage_over_the_other_says_redlynx.html
Speaking to VideoGamer.com at E3, Ilvessuo said: " Obviously we have been developing this game for a while and you can see the comparisons. I would say if you know how to use the platform they are both very powerful. I don't see a benefit over the other with any of the consoles."
http://www.videogamer.com/xboxone/metal_gear_solid_5_the_phantom_pain/news/ps4_and_xbox_one_power_difference_is_minimal_says_kojima.html
"The difference is small, and I don't really need to worry about it," he said, suggesting versions for Xbox One and PS4 won't be dramatically different.
On paper(or VGleaks), PS4's hardware is slightly faster than X1, but you have to factor in the humans that programs the hardware.
In relation to commercial level AMD GPU experience, Sony has about 7 year deficit compared Turn10.
tormentos
This is why i consider you a joke of a poster..
You bias toward the damn xbox is so high that you want to pretend that there is not fu**ing difference between a 1.2TF GPU vs a 1,.84,you want to pretend that having 32MB of ESRAM will actually totally compensate for the lack of bandwidth of DDR3 vs GDDR5,i wonder if that is right why GPU didn't stay with DDR3 and used ESRAM to bring the performance to GDDR5 levels...
You are quoting developer which will not take a side,few developers if any takes side unless they are buthurt with companies or are first party or been pay,like Respown is by MS,which is why they go around screaming unlimited cloud power,when we all know it total bullsh**.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/549?vs=536
This ^^ is the reality you choose to ignore there is a difference in power period and it will be use sooner rather than latter,the generation hasn't even started yet,and already Forza 5 is using baked lighting,while at the same time is been use as poster child of the xbox one,wonder why not use 3rd person or first person shooter,since those engines require more power to show pretier graphics.
But is funny because the same power use to run BF3 at 30 FPS on the 7770 at 1920x1200 will make Dirt 3 runs at almost 60 FPS on that same resolution.
Deny it all you want and change the GPU again like you have do 3 times already on the xbox one,fact is that it has lower specs than the PS4 and MS knows it,when both hardware get push the xbox one will fall behind.
This is why i consider you a joke of a poster..
bias toward the damn Sony is so high that you want to pretend that there is fu**ing large difference with effective performance between a 1.228 TF GPU vs a 1.84. With GPUs, FLOP by themselves are useless.
Effective DDR3 vs GDDR5 performance according to AMD http://www.amd.com/us/products/technologies/gddr5/Pages/gddr5.aspx You DON'T get linear improvements with theoretical 2X bandwidth.
![Memory_Performance_chart_v3.png](http://www.amd.com/PublishingImages/Public/Graphic_ChartsDiagrams/PNG/Memory_Performance_chart_v3.png)
MS would need to close the above gap and X1's has JIT LZ+JPEG hardware decompression/compression and low latency SRAM (zero refresh overheads).
Anyone a with brain would know that you can't use the standard DDR3 vs GDDR5 comparison. One could calculate the effective bandwidth with the known LZ compression ratios.
Effective performance for Low latency DRAM + DDR3 setup according to Intel.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested/3
Intel claims that it would take a 100 - 130GB/s GDDR memory interface to deliver similar effective performance to Crystalwell since the latter is a cache. Accessing the same data (e.g. texture reads) over and over again is greatly benefitted by having a large L4 cache on package.
Sorry, I'm not X1 fanboy... You got the wrong camp.
---------
http://www.videogamer.com/news/xbox_one_and_ps4_have_no_advantage_over_the_other_says_redlynx.html
Speaking to VideoGamer.com at E3, Ilvessuo said: " Obviously we have been developing this game for a while and you can see the comparisons. I would say if you know how to use the platform they are both very powerful. I don't see a benefit over the other with any of the consoles."
http://www.videogamer.com/xboxone/metal_gear_solid_5_the_phantom_pain/news/ps4_and_xbox_one_power_difference_is_minimal_says_kojima.html
"The difference is small, and I don't really need to worry about it," he said, suggesting versions for Xbox One and PS4 won't be dramatically different.
Deny it all you want when the above statements indicates minor differences. Your claims on my bias with X1 is a joke. I don't plan to buy an X1.
Btw, I have used 7770's Dirt 3 results to debunked Cow's F5 being just F4 at 1080p/60fps claims. Dirt 3 DX11 at ultra details has improved textures and shader programs.
As for "and change the GPU again like you have do 3 times already on the xbox on", again
1. I have attached a large caveat with AMD VI and it's linked to 20 nm being on-line within a given time.
2. Dual APU was based from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2405922,00.asp
3. You can F**koff on fanboy wars.
Log in to comment