FPS 'console' king is HERE!!!

http://www.video.dpadmagazine.com/2008/10/29/eurogamer-expo-killzone-2-single-player-footage-pt-1

IMO that is. So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, but K2 will change that, not just visually for console, its the weight, depth and overall experience that IMO, hasn't been seen in a console FPS before, the animations are insane and just seems fun to play. I see my self just running around and shooting people to death, even after they are dead, just to see the reaction and insane blood work.

i think what i love the most is the movements/animations, it look real and handles real, GG wasn't joking when they said they want it to feel like a movie.

I still completely expect this to be a fairly run-of-the-mill FPS with great looking graphics.

That said, I have no problem with that.

So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Eyezonmii

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Vaasman

Imo it looks(Gameplay) looks about 1.5 to twice as good as cod4, anyway like you said, with ridiculously good graphics

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Al3x_n90

Imo it looks(Gameplay) looks about 1.5 to twice as good as cod4, anyway like you said, with ridiculously good graphics

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Vaasman

Imo it looks(Gameplay) looks about 1.5 to twice as good as cod4, anyway like you said, with ridiculously good graphics

A breaking bug? :o what happened?!

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Eyezonmii

didn't notice the IMO part?

with the many FPS games i've played, IMO...its a dying genre for my taste. the gameplay just hasn't expanded enough to keep on playing it. K2 seems to change that and it just looks purely FUN and REALSITIC. I want more FPS to be like this. thats all.

And to everything else I know it's your opinion I just think that it isn't sound, because fps have varied a lot from it's origins, but if you want some real variety play serious sam. That's some good ****

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Al3x_n90

Imo it looks(Gameplay) looks about 1.5 to twice as good as cod4, anyway like you said, with ridiculously good graphics

A breaking bug? :o what happened?!

Spoiler version

(j/k very very minor spoiler)

I was in Bloodstone talking to the 3rd hero, and I went to go get a quest to get more renoun, but none of the people would talk to me. I was expirementing and I can't pull any weapons out or use magic either. It's just this save file and just this town too, but I can't talk to the guy to advance the story is the point, so game over.

Man that sucks, try to start a new game, maybe it'll work :) Al3x_n90

:shock: look awesomess graphic. Wow killer FPS!

KillZone is king FPS in the world! period it~!

??????

forget the grphics... what is special exactly about this game? looks like some kinda cod4 ripoff from what i've seen. anyway i would say that the console FPS king is halo 3

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Eyezonmii

didn't notice the IMO part?

with the many FPS games i've played, IMO...its a dying genre for my taste. the gameplay just hasn't expanded enough to keep on playing it. K2 seems to change that and it just looks purely FUN and REALSITIC. I want more FPS to be like this. thats all.

If that's what you call realistic then never play ArmA:CO

That video wasn't that great anyway. I don't see how this game is so different from other shooters.

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Vaasman

It's a popular genre, but I would leave at that.

excuse me

but how exactly does KZ2 bring new things to the table and revive the genre???

its still the same thing with better graphics

FPS Console King when its not even out yet?

Give me a break.

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Leejjohno

It's a popular genre, but I would leave at that.

See, on the other hand, I would say its the best genre out.

[QUOTE="Leejjohno"]

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, SpruceCaboose

It's a popular genre, but I would leave at that.

See, on the other hand, I would say its the best genre out.

How on the earth is it? Nearly every FPS over the last few years has been an imense flop. Even new TPS games are pretty weak in the long run.

Did you ever think how good a game would be if it *Just* happened to have guns in it, rather than being a game about shooting people/things?

??????

forget the grphics... what is special exactly about this game? looks like some kinda cod4 ripoff from what i've seen. anyway i would say that the console FPS king is halo 3

pi3m4ster

but Halo is a half-life rip off...so it means halo sucks right?

see how silly your logic is?

originality doesn't make a game. gsus

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"]FPS console King :lol: ? this most be a joke thread..Eyezonmii

only thing FUNNY, is your horrible spelling.

I know I shouldn't laugh at that,but.....:lol:

[QUOTE="pi3m4ster"]

??????

forget the grphics... what is special exactly about this game? looks like some kinda cod4 ripoff from what i've seen. anyway i would say that the console FPS king is halo 3

Eyezonmii

but Halo is a half-life rip off...so it means halo sucks right?

see how silly your logic is?

originality doesn't make a game. gsus

halo isn't anything like half life at all... :S like wtf lol where did you get that from

I have a PS3 and am looking forward to playing this game...sort of.

What I saw was a fairly typical linear FPS with exploding barrels, rather dumb AI that I hope was on easy, with enemies with red eyes to make them easy to spot and distinguish, therefore easy to kill. Also, while the player wasn't quite doing a speed run, he was able to quickly make his way around the terrain, mostly in the open, without much concern for getting killed because most of the action wasn't centered around him. There was limited requirement to use cover or any special techniques. In these regards it seemed more like a game like Black, than say a COD, except you have a lot of other people running around doing not much which gives you that COD feeling, sort of. All of this with great graphics and great sound.

I am on the fence and that video keeps me firmly planted there.

COD4 runs @ 60 fps (which makes it extremely fluid and smooth running and it nessesary due to the intense gameplay) compared to K2 which runs @what ? 30 fps?-Mad_Rhetoric-

Damn! I'd forgotten that fps is the sole factor when deciding how good a game is! I knew SotC was a crap game with that erratic framerate and all :roll:

I still completely expect this to be a fairly run-of-the-mill FPS with great looking graphics.

That said, I have no problem with that.

SpruceCaboose

This game won't be anything special.

Sorry but

or

or

Would have been correct answers

It looks pretty well... as SpruceCaboose put it 'run of the mill'.

Design wise there is nothing that makes it more outstanding than the next shooter.

Quite frankly apart from its visuals I cant see any reason to be terribly exited for it. That is for me however.

Actually the multiplayer does have bots doesent it? Like the first? If it has split screen MP + bots id be somewhat interested, as that was a great thing about the first....

Sorry but

or

or

Would have been correct answers

SSCyborg

Apart from having exellent multiplayer, I wouldent call Halo 3 the console FPS 'king' at all.....

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]Man that sucks, try to start a new game, maybe it'll work :) Vaasman

Well guess you must not of liked it as much as you thought you did then. :P Actually a friend of mine had Ninja Gaiden 2 do the same thing to him, he got to this boss and after the game just locked up on him.

Side note, Killzone 2 does look good, but I am still going to wait until I know how it plays. If it plays like CoD4 then GREAT! I don't know why people would complain about that, however if it handles like KZ the first, well then not so great. I enjoyed the first one, but the controls did feel a little off to me.

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Sorry but

or

or

Would have been correct answers

skrat_01

Apart from having exellent multiplayer, I wouldent call Halo 3 the console FPS 'king' at all.....

The singleplayer campaign is awesome. Some of the best difficulty settings I've seen in any FPS, and the Skulls just add onto the replay experience. Add-in 4 player online co-op, and theatre, the game is a beast.

[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"]COD4 runs @ 60 fps (which makes it extremely fluid and smooth running and it nessesary due to the intense gameplay) compared to K2 which runs @what ? 30 fps?II_Seraphim_II

Damn! I'd forgotten that fps is the sole factor when deciding how good a game is! I knew SotC was a crap game with that erratic framerate and all :roll:

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Sorry but

or

or

Would have been correct answers

SSCyborg

Apart from having exellent multiplayer, I wouldent call Halo 3 the console FPS 'king' at all.....

The singleplayer campaign is awesome. Some of the best difficulty settings I've seen in any FPS, and the Skulls just add onto the replay experience. Add-in 4 player online co-op, and theatre, the game is a beast.

Uhh what? What I remember is the single player stinking to no end, and the multi-player being the thing that was keeping Halo going.

That is unless you like Ai who is just there to shoot at butterfly's and die, and where did they learn how to drive? From a kindergarten school?

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Sorry but

or

or

Would have been correct answers

Delsage

Apart from having exellent multiplayer, I wouldent call Halo 3 the console FPS 'king' at all.....

The singleplayer campaign is awesome. Some of the best difficulty settings I've seen in any FPS, and the Skulls just add onto the replay experience. Add-in 4 player online co-op, and theatre, the game is a beast.

Uhh what? What I remember is the single player stinking to no end, and the multi-player being the thing that was keeping Halo going.

That is unless you like Ai who is just there to shoot at butterfly's and die, and where did they learn how to drive? From a kindergarten school?

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Sorry but

or

or

Would have been correct answers

Delsage

Apart from having exellent multiplayer, I wouldent call Halo 3 the console FPS 'king' at all.....

The singleplayer campaign is awesome. Some of the best difficulty settings I've seen in any FPS, and the Skulls just add onto the replay experience. Add-in 4 player online co-op, and theatre, the game is a beast.

Uhh what? What I remember is the single player stinking to no end, and the multi-player being the thing that was keeping Halo going.

That is unless you like Ai who is just there to shoot at butterfly's and die, and where did they learn how to drive? From a kindergarten school?

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, Vaasman

I still completely expect this to be a fairly run-of-the-mill FPS with great looking graphics.

That said, I have no problem with that.

SpruceCaboose

same here, after trying out the beta at a friends i'm convinced this will be a run-of-the-mill FPS too.