Game you hope to see most at E3?

[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="Jonwh18"] but 4 will suck so bad they might as well not release it 343 is no bungie, nice try though

Jonwh18

LOL that bungie couldn't achieve WOW that was a fail! Bungie had experience as a team and a developer, anything 343 comes up with will be a rehash of bungies old work, All they have been allowed to do is shadow bungie and tag along. There is a reason they haven't been given a real project until now. If you really think 343 is going to make a bungie quality game first try you are deluded.No way a green dev like 343 beats out bungie.That wasn't even a nice try that was a epic fail.

Bungie were fantastic, but what I said was that 343, being a new studio, will bring a freshness to the series that Bungie wouldn't have been able to. Common sense.

And considering 343 is full of world-renowned developers including ex-bungie employees, I dont think they'll have a problem matching the quality of past Halo games.

Half Life 3 or you're doing it wrong.

wii u lineup, thats about it.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="sakura_Ex"]Well if you're a " Lemming" there's really no point in even watching E3.inb4uall

wii u lineup, thats about it.

idill23

Glacier 4 for Wii. Looks to be the real swan song. The screens also look pretty good:

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Actually it will be incredible, and be a fresh entry in the series that Bungie wouldn't have bene able to achieve. Nice try though.RR360DD

LOL that bungie couldn't achieve WOW that was a fail! Bungie had experience as a team and a developer, anything 343 comes up with will be a rehash of bungies old work, All they have been allowed to do is shadow bungie and tag along. There is a reason they haven't been given a real project until now. If you really think 343 is going to make a bungie quality game first try you are deluded.No way a green dev like 343 beats out bungie.That wasn't even a nice try that was a epic fail.

Bungie were fantastic, but what I said was that 343, being a new studio, will bring a freshness to the series that Bungie wouldn't have been able to. Common sense.

And considering 343 is full of world-renowned developers including ex-bungie employees, I dont think they'll have a problem matching the quality of past Halo games.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

LOL that bungie couldn't achieve WOW that was a fail! Bungie had experience as a team and a developer, anything 343 comes up with will be a rehash of bungies old work, All they have been allowed to do is shadow bungie and tag along. There is a reason they haven't been given a real project until now. If you really think 343 is going to make a bungie quality game first try you are deluded.No way a green dev like 343 beats out bungie.That wasn't even a nice try that was a epic fail.

Jonwh18

Bungie were fantastic, but what I said was that 343, being a new studio, will bring a freshness to the series that Bungie wouldn't have been able to. Common sense.

And considering 343 is full of world-renowned developers including ex-bungie employees, I dont think they'll have a problem matching the quality of past Halo games.

Jut because a development house doesn't have experience, doesn't mean they cant make a great game. Tons of dev studios have cracked out brilliant first games.

Do you really think Microsoft would hand over their most important franchise to an incapable dev team?

And they have already announced some changes that are pissing off fans, but you cant please everyone. I welcome the change.

Announced: Dishonored

Unannounced: *list of games that would never be announced at E3*

Announced: Dishonored

Unannounced: *list of games that would never be announced at E3*

Yangire

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Bungie were fantastic, but what I said was that 343, being a new studio, will bring a freshness to the series that Bungie wouldn't have been able to. Common sense.

And considering 343 is full of world-renowned developers including ex-bungie employees, I dont think they'll have a problem matching the quality of past Halo games.

RR360DD

Jut because a development house doesn't have experience, doesn't mean they cant make a great game. Tons of dev studios have cracked out brilliant first games.

Do you really think Microsoft would hand over their most important franchise to an incapable dev team?

And they have already announced some changes that are pissing off fans, but you cant please everyone. I welcome the change.

Anything Wii U related

The Last Guardian

Halo 4

GTA V

Assassin's Creed 3

Resident Evil 6

God of War 4

(NEW IP)

Actual Kinect games that are worth buying

Skyrim DLC

Other Unannounced Games

3DS redesign and green color option

[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="inb4uall"]Yeah like halo4 and forza5 and gears 4 lol inb4uall

Half Life Episode 3

GTA V, and people can say BO2 if they want to.millerlight89

Is Rockstar present at this E3 ? They aren't usually.

Wasteland 2

and BO2 for teh lulz and facepalmz

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"] but the dev team doesn't have the experience together that bungie had. I'm not even trolling you bro. I think that they might have a game on par with halo 5, but it just unlikely with halo 4. It might be an okay game but it won't be the quality that halo fans have come to expect. And being a new studio they are going to cling to the formula bungie has created not deviate from it, they don't want to piss of the fans. A rehash is better then a complete **** up because they tried something new and people didn't like it.

Jonwh18

Jut because a development house doesn't have experience, doesn't mean they cant make a great game. Tons of dev studios have cracked out brilliant first games.

Do you really think Microsoft would hand over their most important franchise to an incapable dev team?

And they have already announced some changes that are pissing off fans, but you cant please everyone. I welcome the change.

How can you call them inferior when you've seen nothing from them? They're unproven, yes, but not inferior.

Microsoft have always owned Halo. Bungie was owned by, and a part of, Microsoft. There was no contract. Bungie asked for creative freedom, and so the two came to a mutual agreement where Bungie would split from Microsoft. Microsoft then rounded up world renowned talent to build a new development studio that would handle Halo.

[QUOTE="inb4uall"][QUOTE="RR360DD"] Oh yeah, I forgot only exclusive games are shown at E3. Oh wait ... inb4uall

Didn't see your reply.

It will still be at E3, and there will still be a ton of games there for the 360. Go watch a microsoft conference, they show games that are exclusive, games that are PC/360 and multiplats.

Any new first-party Wii U or 3DS games. Last of Us stage demo. Title Fight if that exists.

Is GTA ever at E3?

A Game I would rreally love to see announced, but know it's highly unlikely... an

Age of Empires 4!

_Matt_

Ow yeah, I would love to see that aswell.

Unfortunatly (maybe not the right word but still) they are still busy working on Age of Empires online right now, adding civs and other content.

And Robot Entertainment (the old Ensemble) is now working on Orcs must Die 2! which I'm also looking forward to.

Is GTA ever at E3?

Cherokee_Jack

No, Rockstar never attended E3 and never will.

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

Is GTA ever at E3?

R4gn4r0k

No, Rockstar never attended E3 and never will.

Well, there was Chinatown Wars, but yeah, GTA V will probably not show up.

Shame.

Well, there was Chinatown Wars, but yeah, GTA V will probably not show up.

Shame.

Cherokee_Jack

That was at the Nintendo conference if I remember correctly, right ?

And Peter Moore had that GTA IV tatoo to show that it was coming to the 360 too.

But Rockstar themselves never attended, and they don't have to because they can creat enough hype on their own :P

Conker 2 or Banjo Threeie :(

Realistically, there are a LOT of games I would love to have announced, but the first game that came to mind was Baten Kaitos 3. We're long overdue for another game in that series, and it would make me really happy if it were to happen. Wii U would be my platform of choice for it, but I'd be cool with it being on 3DS.

GTA V, Last of Us, Last Guardian, Halo 4, and some Wii U games, whatever those may be. I'm also kinda curious to see the 3DS and Vita annoucements.

[QUOTE="inb4uall"][QUOTE="inb4uall"] well if it's not an exclusive then m$ won't be showing it will they, it will be the studio that made the game showing off. Lol and if the best Xbox has to offer are multiplayer then what's the freaking point? I'll play it on ps3 with free online or pc with better graphicsRR360DD

Didn't see your reply.

It will still be at E3, and there will still be a ton of games there for the 360. Go watch a microsoft conference, they show games that are exclusive, games that are PC/360 and multiplats.

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Jut because a development house doesn't have experience, doesn't mean they cant make a great game. Tons of dev studios have cracked out brilliant first games.

Do you really think Microsoft would hand over their most important franchise to an incapable dev team?

And they have already announced some changes that are pissing off fans, but you cant please everyone. I welcome the change.

RR360DD

How can you call them inferior when you've seen nothing from them? They're unproven, yes, but not inferior.

Microsoft have always owned Halo. Bungie was owned by, and a part of, Microsoft. There was no contract. Bungie asked for creative freedom, and so the two came to a mutual agreement where Bungie would split from Microsoft. Microsoft then rounded up world renowned talent to build a new development studio that would handle Halo.

Wii U stuff

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

Is GTA ever at E3?

R4gn4r0k

No, Rockstar never attended E3 and never will.

Super Smash Bros for WiiU.

And maybe even Zelda WiiU even if i know that both games won't be released in at least 2 years.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"] i believe that we have reached an impass because you and I both know that you will never admit to 343's inferiority even though its obvious they are. Microsoft owns halo now the contract that the two companies had was up. So bungie moved on to other things and 343 gets a promotion.

Jonwh18

How can you call them inferior when you've seen nothing from them? They're unproven, yes, but not inferior.

Microsoft have always owned Halo. Bungie was owned by, and a part of, Microsoft. There was no contract. Bungie asked for creative freedom, and so the two came to a mutual agreement where Bungie would split from Microsoft. Microsoft then rounded up world renowned talent to build a new development studio that would handle Halo.

I agree. It's beyond me how anyone can say with any ounce of certainty that 343i is on the same level, or anywhere near the same level as Bungie. I'm a big Halo fan, own every single Halo game, but lets not kid ourselves here. 343i may end up being good, they may not, but don't crown them before they've done anything. A lot is riding on the release of Halo 4, because they've already announced a trilogy under 343i. If Halo 4 doesn't live up to expectations, it will be a huge blow to both Microsoft and the Halo franchise.

I have a wait and see approach. I'm not gonna say 343i sucks, but I'm not gonna say they're any good either. I'll wait until I play the game to judge for myself. That said, I'm a lot more skeptical for this Halo game than I would be if it were being made by Bungie.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"] i believe that we have reached an impass because you and I both know that you will never admit to 343's inferiority even though its obvious they are. Microsoft owns halo now the contract that the two companies had was up. So bungie moved on to other things and 343 gets a promotion.

Jonwh18

How can you call them inferior when you've seen nothing from them? They're unproven, yes, but not inferior.

Microsoft have always owned Halo. Bungie was owned by, and a part of, Microsoft. There was no contract. Bungie asked for creative freedom, and so the two came to a mutual agreement where Bungie would split from Microsoft. Microsoft then rounded up world renowned talent to build a new development studio that would handle Halo.

Bungie wanted to leave, but ultimately it was up to Microsoft. Microsoft, if they wanted, could've said no and made Bungie continue to work on Halo, but they didn't. They let them break off and as a result the 2 still have a good relationship today.

343 hadn't been involved in the Halo series. Don't know what you are on about, 343 was created because Microsoft let Bungie go. They didn't exist while Bungie was a part of Microsoft.

Final Fantasy Versus 13 by far.

I'd also like to see what Sony Santa Monica and Sucker Punch are working on, and we need more new IPs.

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

How can you call them inferior when you've seen nothing from them? They're unproven, yes, but not inferior.

Microsoft have always owned Halo. Bungie was owned by, and a part of, Microsoft. There was no contract. Bungie asked for creative freedom, and so the two came to a mutual agreement where Bungie would split from Microsoft. Microsoft then rounded up world renowned talent to build a new development studio that would handle Halo.

arkephonic

I agree. It's beyond me how anyone can say with any ounce of certainty that 343i is on the same level, or anywhere near the same level as Bungie. I'm a big Halo fan, own every single Halo game, but lets not kid ourselves here. 343i may end up being good, they may not, but don't crown them before they've done anything. A lot is riding on the release of Halo 4, because they've already announced a trilogy under 343i. If Halo 4 doesn't live up to expectations, it will be a huge blow to both Microsoft and the Halo franchise.

I have a wait and see approach. I'm not gonna say 343i sucks, but I'm not gonna say they're any good either. I'll wait until I play the game to judge for myself. That said, I'm a lot more skeptical for this Halo game than I would be if it were being made by Bungie.

I find it funny you agree when he has so many of his facts wrong.

As for 343, ive already said they are unproven. But for people to call them inferior when we havent seen a finished game from them yet is just hating. You can't lie that the studio is filled with a lot of talent, from world class developers around the world. Question is, will they work well as a team. Im not crowning 343 now, or saying they are better than Bungie. But you're right, this is Microsoft biggest franchise, they would not give it to a development studio that isn't capable.

What we have seen of Halo 4 so far though has been great. Already you can tell 343 are better when it comes to animation, and graphics in general, than Bungie ever was.

SW Battlefront 3 and a console version of Heroes of Might and Magic VI.

Gameplay wise, GTA V and Halo 4.

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

How can you call them inferior when you've seen nothing from them? They're unproven, yes, but not inferior.

Microsoft have always owned Halo. Bungie was owned by, and a part of, Microsoft. There was no contract. Bungie asked for creative freedom, and so the two came to a mutual agreement where Bungie would split from Microsoft. Microsoft then rounded up world renowned talent to build a new development studio that would handle Halo.

RR360DD

Bungie wanted to leave, but ultimately it was up to Microsoft. Microsoft, if they wanted, could've said no and made Bungie continue to work on Halo, but they didn't. They let them break off and as a result the 2 still have a good relationship today.

343 hadn't been involved in the Halo series. Don't know what you are on about, 343 was created because Microsoft let Bungie go. They didn't exist while Bungie was a part of Microsoft.

heres a link to wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/343_Industries in case you're to lazy to do it yourself

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="inb4uall"] lol rr360dd doesn't want to own up to his **** upinb4uall

Didn't see your reply.

It will still be at E3, and there will still be a ton of games there for the 360. Go watch a microsoft conference, they show games that are exclusive, games that are PC/360 and multiplats.

I want to see something New at E3.

Half Life 3

Unreal 3

Fallout 4

Battlefront 3

New Jedi Knight FPS

Luigis Mansion 2

Super Smash Bros.

Paper Mario

Pikmin

A M$ exclusice not related to Kinect (is that to much to ask?)

Whatever Bungie is working on.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"] My point was bungie left of its own choice. They didn't want to make halo anymore and microsoft can't make them anymore. So they handed halo to 343 who had been involved with the halo series but hadn't done much in the was of actual creating. They handled mainly severes and some dlc. Microsoft gave halo to an inferior (as of this point in time) studio because they had to not because they wanted to.

Jonwh18

Bungie wanted to leave, but ultimately it was up to Microsoft. Microsoft, if they wanted, could've said no and made Bungie continue to work on Halo, but they didn't. They let them break off and as a result the 2 still have a good relationship today.

343 hadn't been involved in the Halo series. Don't know what you are on about, 343 was created because Microsoft let Bungie go. They didn't exist while Bungie was a part of Microsoft.

heres a link to wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/343_Industries in case you're to lazy to do it yourself

How is this difficult to understand.

Microsoft bought Bungie in 2000. The ownedBungie. Bungie were a part of Microsoft, therefore Microsoft told Bungie what to do. If Microsoft had wanted to, they could have force Bungie to work on Halo 4 and onwards, but they didn't.

Bungie are only independant now because Microsoft let them go. That is the only reason. Fact. Bungie had no authority to just leave, they had to ask for Microsofts permission and come to an agreement whereby Bungie would become indepandant as they craved creative freedom.

There is no argument dude. You're just plain wrong, do some research. Even in your own damn link it says that 343 was formed in 2007, THE YEAR MICROSOFT LET BUNGIE GO INDEPENDANT.

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Bungie wanted to leave, but ultimately it was up to Microsoft. Microsoft, if they wanted, could've said no and made Bungie continue to work on Halo, but they didn't. They let them break off and as a result the 2 still have a good relationship today.

343 hadn't been involved in the Halo series. Don't know what you are on about, 343 was created because Microsoft let Bungie go. They didn't exist while Bungie was a part of Microsoft.

RR360DD

heres a link to wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/343_Industries in case you're to lazy to do it yourself

How is this difficult to understand.

Microsoft bought Bungie in 2000. The ownedBungie. Bungie were a part of Microsoft, therefore Microsoft told Bungie what to do. If Microsoft had wanted to, they could have force Bungie to work on Halo 4 and onwards, but they didn't.

Bungie are only independant now because Microsoft let them go. That is the only reason. Fact. Bungie had no authority to just leave, they had to ask for Microsofts permission and come to an agreement whereby Bungie would become indepandant as they craved creative freedom.

There is no argument dude. You're just plain wrong, do some research. Even in your own damn link it says that 343 was formed in 2007, THE YEAR MICROSOFT LET BUNGIE GO INDEPENDANT.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"] how the hell could microsoft "MAKE" them stay when bungie is independent now? they can offer them more money but they can't MAKE anyone do anything. do a simple wikipedia search bro. You are the one with your facts wrong. Its obvious though you will lap up any halo game that microsoft throws at you, regardess of qualitiy, from looking at your sig and avatar so there really isn't any point in arguing i guess.

heres a link to wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/343_Industries in case you're to lazy to do it yourself

Jonwh18

How is this difficult to understand.

Microsoft bought Bungie in 2000. The ownedBungie. Bungie were a part of Microsoft, therefore Microsoft told Bungie what to do. If Microsoft had wanted to, they could have force Bungie to work on Halo 4 and onwards, but they didn't.

Bungie are only independant now because Microsoft let them go. That is the only reason. Fact. Bungie had no authority to just leave, they had to ask for Microsofts permission and come to an agreement whereby Bungie would become indepandant as they craved creative freedom.

There is no argument dude. You're just plain wrong, do some research. Even in your own damn link it says that 343 was formed in 2007, THE YEAR MICROSOFT LET BUNGIE GO INDEPENDANT.

Bungie didn't want to work on Halo after Reach, so why force them?

Microsoft didn't 'settle' for 343. They said okay, we need a world class studio to take the helms of this billion dollar franchise, and so they grabbed a huge amount of talent and formed 343.

You're so transparant dude with all this hating on 343. I don't understand it. They may be unproven, but they're a talented bunch. Only time will tell wether they can surpass Bungie.

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

How is this difficult to understand.

Microsoft bought Bungie in 2000. The ownedBungie. Bungie were a part of Microsoft, therefore Microsoft told Bungie what to do. If Microsoft had wanted to, they could have force Bungie to work on Halo 4 and onwards, but they didn't.

Bungie are only independant now because Microsoft let them go. That is the only reason. Fact. Bungie had no authority to just leave, they had to ask for Microsofts permission and come to an agreement whereby Bungie would become indepandant as they craved creative freedom.

There is no argument dude. You're just plain wrong, do some research. Even in your own damn link it says that 343 was formed in 2007, THE YEAR MICROSOFT LET BUNGIE GO INDEPENDANT.

RR360DD

Bungie didn't want to work on Halo after Reach, so why force them?

Microsoft didn't 'settle' for 343. They said okay, we need a world class studio to take the helms of this billion dollar franchise, and so they grabbed a huge amount of talent and formed 343.

You're so transparant dude with all this hating on 343. I don't understand it. They may be unproven, but they're a talented bunch. Only time will tell wether they can surpass Bungie.

I'm interested in BO2, Halo 4, Last of US, Bioshock Infinite, Rainbow Six Patriots, but most is Tomb Raider.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"] Not sure how 343 being made latter rather then sooner is good for your arguement but watever. Anyway it doesn't matter if they did own bungie they don't now, aka they can't make bungie do anything like make halo 4. therefore Microsoft has to settle for 343.

Jonwh18

Bungie didn't want to work on Halo after Reach, so why force them?

Microsoft didn't 'settle' for 343. They said okay, we need a world class studio to take the helms of this billion dollar franchise, and so they grabbed a huge amount of talent and formed 343.

You're so transparant dude with all this hating on 343. I don't understand it. They may be unproven, but they're a talented bunch. Only time will tell wether they can surpass Bungie.

Because Microsoft made a point to build a studio filled with talented people. They have ex-employees from Bungie, Kojima productions, Bioware, Retro studios, Guerilla games, Bethesda, Rockstar, Infinity Ward, Naughty Dog, Vigil games, Sony santa monica, Sucker punch, valve etc who have all worked on AAA games.

The studio is unproven, but the talent isn't. It just remains to be seen whether they can work as a team and build a great Halo game.

And who gives a fuk if i have a Halo sig and ava. Im a fan of the series. Big fuking deal.