[QUOTE="c1o2d3y"]
[QUOTE="Keep-the-Faith"]
what does that matter? Im talking features. Price shouldnt be a factor. So I guess every subscription based MMO is total garbage compared to the free ones right? offcourse not. WOW is king for a reason. You get what you pay for. I feel very strong on that statement.
If you have a job, god knows you can spare $50 over the course of one year.........or if your like 80% of the people here (kids)..........just get your parents to buy everything.
Keep-the-Faith
Since live costs 50$'s more than PSN, that means it should be better everyone knows that
live is 50$ a year times 50$ by the 14mil suscribers and you are talking about a lot of money
LIVE has the features to back up its cost.
and yes, it also gives MS plenty money.....money used for improvements and income to secure timed exclusives/exclusive DLC. Everybody wins! (if you own a 360 that is).
"LIVE has the features to back up its cost." HARDLY a good argument.
XBL only has a couple of features that PSN doesnt. And on top of that, PSN performs better with dedicated servers instead of P2P. Especially with exclusive online games.
The 50 $/yr and free PSN argument is the same as the $199 xbox arcade vs $399 PS3 argument.
Lemmings go off and say. Oh, its only $199 to play with the 360's library with a skeleton system and say..bluray, wifi, inbuilt PSU bla bla bla is luxury, but then when it gets to XBL (The price of a new game per year to play online vs no price to play PS3's entire online enabled game library for free) thier like....
Oh no, we get these extra stuff for the price.
guess what....its luxury too....altho, the extra stuff comming with live isnt much from PSN, and PSN's performace is awsome.
Log in to comment