Tinted eyes, perfect name.
MC3887
Just what I thought too.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
no I'll keep posting :) dont get mad[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="epicstory"]
You should really stop posting. You're post never offer anything worth reading honestly.
epicstory
TintedEyes...Name really suits you.
that's my name :) nothing i said has changed though[QUOTE="epicstory"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] yeah it is kind of sad, and i agree, it's almost as good, not quite there yet.TintedEyes
You should really stop posting. You're post never offer anything worth reading honestly.
no I'll keep posting :) dont get madDenial. So Awesome. You make it look like Uncharted 2 features Direct X11 effects. Because seriously me and a million other people aren't seeing it.
no I'll keep posting :) dont get mad[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="epicstory"]
You should really stop posting. You're post never offer anything worth reading honestly.
CorbraMax
Denial. So Awesome. You make it look like Uncharted 2 features Direct X11 effects. Because seriously me and a million other people aren't seeing it.
where's the million people?I'm going to put serious no life hours into the beta starting Monday. Tried to play Gears 2, it was still pretty wack. I need me some Gears!
Grawse
Beta is basically Gears of War 2 but slightly faster paced.
Don't make a judgment until you put serious time into the beta, I know a lot of people who were like "OMG GAEM IZ S0O0 GUUD!" and then once that shiny new game feeling wore off, they changed their mind about it.
On the bright side, the lag is pretty non-existant.
fact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmarkAll this doesn't even matter crysis 2 is the new benchmark. Currently, I don't see GEOW 3 surpassing it.
MC3887
[QUOTE="MC3887"]fact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmarkAll this doesn't even matter crysis 2 is the new benchmark. Currently, I don't see GEOW 3 surpassing it.
TintedEyes
The effects in Crysis 2 surpass it so...
[QUOTE="MC3887"]fact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmarkAll this doesn't even matter crysis 2 is the new benchmark. Currently, I don't see GEOW 3 surpassing it.
TintedEyes
This seems like a more exclusive vs. exclusive kinda thing going here. I love how in the Crysis 2 thread you played all this "subjective" stuff as well, but now you seem to have a tone of objectivity.
[QUOTE="Grawse"]
I'm going to put serious no life hours into the beta starting Monday. Tried to play Gears 2, it was still pretty wack. I need me some Gears!
I-Scarface-I
Beta is basically Gears of War 2 but slightly faster paced.
Don't make a judgment until you put serious time into the beta, I know a lot of people who were like "OMG GAEM IZ S0O0 GUUD!" and then once that shiny new game feeling wore off, they changed their mind about it.
On the bright side, the lag is pretty non-existant.
The thing that turned me off Gears 2 is the Lancer. Whoah, what happened there? The thing is so powerful now :shock: Hammerburst speed seems to be a bit nerfed too. Shotty works a lot better than before, but it's hard with the lancer so powerful to get close.fact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmark[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
All this doesn't even matter crysis 2 is the new benchmark. Currently, I don't see GEOW 3 surpassing it.
MC3887
This seems like a more exclusive vs. exclusive kinda thing going here. I love how in the Crysis 2 thread you played all this "subjective" stuff as well, but now you seem to have a tone of objectivity.
um when did i say u2 looking better was factfact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmark[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
All this doesn't even matter crysis 2 is the new benchmark. Currently, I don't see GEOW 3 surpassing it.
CorbraMax
The effects in Crysis 2 surpass it so...
then why do so many compare it to u2?[QUOTE="CorbraMax"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] fact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmarkTintedEyes
The effects in Crysis 2 surpass it so...
then why do so many compare it to u2? Why do you think? Because cows keep on saying it's something the 360 will never surpass maybe?[QUOTE="Grawse"]
I'm going to put serious no life hours into the beta starting Monday. Tried to play Gears 2, it was still pretty wack. I need me some Gears!
I-Scarface-I
Beta is basically Gears of War 2 but slightly faster paced.
Don't make a judgment until you put serious time into the beta, I know a lot of people who were like "OMG GAEM IZ S0O0 GUUD!" and then once that shiny new game feeling wore off, they changed their mind about it.
On the bright side, the lag is pretty non-existant.
For some people, though, non-existent lag is all that is needed for a full purchase. :P[QUOTE="MC3887"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] fact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmarkTintedEyes
This seems like a more exclusive vs. exclusive kinda thing going here. I love how in the Crysis 2 thread you played all this "subjective" stuff as well, but now you seem to have a tone of objectivity.
um when did i say u2 looking better was factYou said it is the benchmark, meaning you think it is fact. We also said that crysis 2 looks better, but all you threw at us was "not to everyone" and that is was subjective LMFAO.
Not only is that a bullshot, it's clearly photoshoped. You cows and your need to lie to believe your games are better. :Pjdt532, rendering all of that grass is very fillrate intensive which the RSX just can't afford in high end PS3 games. If the PS3 had a fillrate like the PS2... You would be seeing Gears level grass in any Uncharted game or multiplat.
But if you could make a game just about rendering grass on the PS3 and nothing else...
You would get Flower.
CorbraMax
um when did i say u2 looking better was fact[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
This seems like a more exclusive vs. exclusive kinda thing going here. I love how in the Crysis 2 thread you played all this "subjective" stuff as well, but now you seem to have a tone of objectivity.
MC3887
You said it is the benchmark, meaning you think it is fact. We also said that crysis 2 looks better, but all you threw at us was "not to everyone" and that is was subjective LMFAO.
no i think the fact that people keep comparing them is evidence it's the bench mark[QUOTE="MC3887"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] um when did i say u2 looking better was factTintedEyes
You said it is the benchmark, meaning you think it is fact. We also said that crysis 2 looks better, but all you threw at us was "not to everyone" and that is was subjective LMFAO.
no i think the fact that people keep comparing them is evidence it's the bench markIt is an obvious exclusive vs. exclusive thing. We all remember how the Crysis 2 vs. KZ3/UC2 went, and overall it seemed to be in the lems favor. W/ reviewer/DF/Lof comments. Also, with UC2 having been it for so long it is pretty hard to transition so quickly, especially when all these games are so close graphically. Honestly IMO, The top games graphically since KZ2 or maybe even GEOW 2 look almost the same(overall).
no i think the fact that people keep comparing them is evidence it's the bench mark[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
You said it is the benchmark, meaning you think it is fact. We also said that crysis 2 looks better, but all you threw at us was "not to everyone" and that is was subjective LMFAO.
MC3887
It is an obvious exclusive vs. exclusive thing. We all remember how the Crysis 2 vs. KZ3/UC2 went, and overall it seemed to be in the lems favor. W/ reviewer/DF/Lof comments. Also, with UC2 having been it for so long it is pretty hard to transition so quickly, especially when all these games are so close graphically. Honestly IMO, The top games graphically since KZ2 or maybe even GEOW 2 look almost the same(overall).
to me it looks like people are comparing them because its the best looking[QUOTE="MC3887"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] no i think the fact that people keep comparing them is evidence it's the bench markTintedEyes
It is an obvious exclusive vs. exclusive thing. We all remember how the Crysis 2 vs. KZ3/UC2 went, and overall it seemed to be in the lems favor. W/ reviewer/DF/Lof comments. Also, with UC2 having been it for so long it is pretty hard to transition so quickly, especially when all these games are so close graphically. Honestly IMO, The top games graphically since KZ2 or maybe even GEOW 2 look almost the same(overall).
to me it looks like people are comparing them because its the best lookingIt would make more sense for it for it to be an exclusive vs. exclusive because, it is more "personal". Crysis 2 is running on both systems so to a fanboy, it isn't a "big" win. I can see it now Lems saying GEOW 3>C2. Which most reviewers and alot of SW decided, looks better than UC2/KZ3/GEOW2 etc, etc.
to me it looks like people are comparing them because its the best looking[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
It is an obvious exclusive vs. exclusive thing. We all remember how the Crysis 2 vs. KZ3/UC2 went, and overall it seemed to be in the lems favor. W/ reviewer/DF/Lof comments. Also, with UC2 having been it for so long it is pretty hard to transition so quickly, especially when all these games are so close graphically. Honestly IMO, The top games graphically since KZ2 or maybe even GEOW 2 look almost the same(overall).
MC3887
It would make more sense for it for it to be an exclusive vs. exclusive because, it is more "personal". Crysis 2 is running on both systems so to a fanboy, it isn't a "big" win. I can see it now Lems saying GEOW 3>C2. Which most reviewers and alot of SW decided, looks better than UC2/KZ3/GEOW2 etc, etc.
its not decided crysis 2 looks better than uncharted 2 a lot of people on sw disagreeall I got from this thread is that people think this games multiplayer looks better than uncharted 2's single player. no.... looks a little better than uncharted 2's multiplayer, that's it. of course multiplayer won't look as good as single player, texture resolutions have to be reduced and there's no aa.
single player gears of war 3 will look better than uncharted 2 though. and will be on par more or less with uncharted 3.
The problem here is that Gears 3 looks better than anything out right now for consoles. It's not right that cows don't want to admit to that. We admitted that UC2 was the best looking for a while, so they should do the same.percech
in the last thread you said that uncharted 2 had terrible textures and that gears of war 2 looked crisp.
you need to realize 2 things.
1. gears of war 3's multiplayer graphics isn't up to uncharted 2's single player. if it did, magic would be involved. texture resolution has to be lowered for mp and gears 3 multiplayer has no AA. (neither does uncharted 2 mp
2. gears of war 3's single will look better than uncharted 2, but at the same time uncharted 3 will be just as impressive.
[QUOTE="percech"]The problem here is that Gears 3 looks better than anything out right now for consoles. It's not right that cows don't want to admit to that. We admitted that UC2 was the best looking for a while, so they should do the same.theuncharted34
in the last thread you said that uncharted 2 had terrible textures and that gears of war 2 looked crisp.
you need to realize 2 things.
1. gears of war 3's multiplayer graphics isn't up to uncharted 2's single player. if it did, magic would be involved. texture resolution has to be lowered for mp and gears 3 multiplayer has no AA. (neither does uncharted 2 mp
2. gears of war 3's single will look better than uncharted 2, but at the same time uncharted 3 will be just as impressive.
Well I never admitted anything. I guess I meant lemmings did. I still think UC2's textures are mushy and the trees/leaves look terrible.[QUOTE="theuncharted34"][QUOTE="percech"]The problem here is that Gears 3 looks better than anything out right now for consoles. It's not right that cows don't want to admit to that. We admitted that UC2 was the best looking for a while, so they should do the same.percech
in the last thread you said that uncharted 2 had terrible textures and that gears of war 2 looked crisp.
you need to realize 2 things.
1. gears of war 3's multiplayer graphics isn't up to uncharted 2's single player. if it did, magic would be involved. texture resolution has to be lowered for mp and gears 3 multiplayer has no AA. (neither does uncharted 2 mp
2. gears of war 3's single will look better than uncharted 2, but at the same time uncharted 3 will be just as impressive.
Well I never admitted anything. I guess I meant lemmings did. I still think UC2's textures are mushy and the trees/leaves look terrible.that's a nice contradiction there.
Yeah Crysis 2 looks bloody amazing to.As good as the lighting looks in Gears 3 and Uncharted 3... I don't see it beating Crysis 2 in lighting effects.
Maybe Battlefield 3 on consoles might pull it off.
CorbraMax
[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="CorbraMax"]then why do so many compare it to u2? Why do you think? Because cows keep on saying it's something the 360 will never surpass maybe?The effects in Crysis 2 surpass it so...
ocstew
hit the nail on the head...explains it all.
[QUOTE="MC3887"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"]to me it looks like people are comparing them because its the best lookingTintedEyes
It would make more sense for it for it to be an exclusive vs. exclusive because, it is more "personal". Crysis 2 is running on both systems so to a fanboy, it isn't a "big" win. I can see it now Lems saying GEOW 3>C2. Which most reviewers and alot of SW decided, looks better than UC2/KZ3/GEOW2 etc, etc.
its not decided crysis 2 looks better than uncharted 2 a lot of people on sw disagreea lot of cows disagree u mean...and they have an agenda wouldn't you agree?
[QUOTE="percech"]The problem here is that Gears 3 looks better than anything out right now for consoles. It's not right that cows don't want to admit to that. We admitted that UC2 was the best looking for a while, so they should do the same.theuncharted34
in the last thread you said that uncharted 2 had terrible textures and that gears of war 2 looked crisp.
you need to realize 2 things.
1. gears of war 3's multiplayer graphics isn't up to uncharted 2's single player. if it did, magic would be involved. texture resolution has to be lowered for mp and gears 3 multiplayer has no AA. (neither does uncharted 2 mp
2. gears of war 3's single will look better than uncharted 2, but at the same time uncharted 3 will be just as impressive.
I have to agree. Your getting games that show off both systems strengths.its not decided crysis 2 looks better than uncharted 2 a lot of people on sw disagree[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
It would make more sense for it for it to be an exclusive vs. exclusive because, it is more "personal". Crysis 2 is running on both systems so to a fanboy, it isn't a "big" win. I can see it now Lems saying GEOW 3>C2. Which most reviewers and alot of SW decided, looks better than UC2/KZ3/GEOW2 etc, etc.
LucidJubilation
a lot of cows disagree u mean...and they have an agenda wouldn't you agree?
Finally! This tintedeyes character has been devoid of logic ever since he started posting in this thread. "UC2 gets compared to, ITS TE BENCHMARK OMGOMGOMG". And guess what, it was the benchmark and it's been beaten.[QUOTE="epicstory"][QUOTE="percech"] Don't be a jealous fanboy in denial. Anyway, PS3 has no answer to this game.doomndukeRback
This man speaks the truth.
uncharted 3 will be superior. you can jump,climb,roll,use cover. gears 3 is only cover and roll LOL gears 3 is simplistic trash and doom 3 has better lighting n shadows too right? on topic, this game looks better than uc2 and 3 IMO.. and is only mp...Uncharted 2 is by far one of my favorite console games, but I do think that this game looks better now that I have seen more of it.
its not decided crysis 2 looks better than uncharted 2 a lot of people on sw disagree[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
It would make more sense for it for it to be an exclusive vs. exclusive because, it is more "personal". Crysis 2 is running on both systems so to a fanboy, it isn't a "big" win. I can see it now Lems saying GEOW 3>C2. Which most reviewers and alot of SW decided, looks better than UC2/KZ3/GEOW2 etc, etc.
LucidJubilation
a lot of cows disagree u mean...and they have an agenda wouldn't you agree?
a lot of people agree and disagree[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] its not decided crysis 2 looks better than uncharted 2 a lot of people on sw disagreeocstew
a lot of cows disagree u mean...and they have an agenda wouldn't you agree?
Finally! This tintedeyes character has been devoid of logic ever since he started posting in this thread. "UC2 gets compared to, ITS TE BENCHMARK OMGOMGOMG". And guess what, it was the benchmark and it's been beaten. i just used MCs logic, dont get upset, jeez.fact is the fact people still only compare the graphics to U2 shows that it's the benchmark[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="MC3887"]
All this doesn't even matter crysis 2 is the new benchmark. Currently, I don't see GEOW 3 surpassing it.
LucidJubilation
only sad and pathetic cows say Uncharted 2 is the game still the game to beat. that means nothing since they're obviously trying to hang onto to win in some category because they lost ground in everything else there is. its not a benchmark...its just all they have left...and they don't even have it left. Crysis 2 is the current graphics king, the majority decided. cows don't make the rules here.
not really if you think its the new king thats cool not fact though[QUOTE="jdt532"][QUOTE="percech"] I'm sure you haven't. Time to take those fanboy goggles off.percech
Yes I agree, it is time for you to take the fanboy goggles off. ;)
You like mushy textures, I like crisp textures. Clearly you have a problem. Yh, thats probably your fnboy gogglesPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment