Are we even sure the KZ3 shots are bull cause it does have MLAA.Thanks for the bullshots
sergemyster8
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Are we even sure the KZ3 shots are bull cause it does have MLAA.Thanks for the bullshots
sergemyster8
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="sergemyster8"]Are we even sure the KZ3 shots are bull cause it does have MLAA. They are all downsized so that's technically bullshots. here they are in 720.The IQ looks similar to the GOW3 pic above which should be legit.Thanks for the bullshots
mystervj
Even if both are complete bullshots, KZ3 looks better no doubt. I am personally sick to death of the unreal engine. It just dosent appeal to me anymore.
They both look great, and they are very close in terms of quality. :)
psn8214
Your posts are like a breath of fresh air for the non-smoker in the smoking room. Srsly.
Based on art style, I like Gears better. Killzone just looks too orange, and ultimately bland.Anjunaddict
I was under the impression that the Helghast wear those respirators because the air quality on thier planet is very bad. (I am probably wrong on this though)
I would imagine that if so, that may have alot to do with those hazy orange colors...
Would people complain if a game was made that took place on Mars and say that is was too orange and hazy? Most likely they would.
Would people complain if a game was made that took place on Mars and say that is was too orange and hazy? Most likely they would.danjammer69
Doom 3. The most part of the game was in the dark confined rooms, so ppl were glad when they could go outdoors to the ORANGE mars surface. :P
Playstation 3 games tend to have a lot more low res textures. I think that Gears will have better texture qualities, and better art style. I think Killzone 3 will have be better looking (from a more technical perspective). They'll probably get comparable reviews as well.
Gears of War 3 gameplay video.
Killzone 3 gameplay video.
Keep in mind it's E3 footage, and both games are not out until April 2011, so there will be improvement in both cases.
That KZ3 video was captured from the 3D demo.Gears of War 3 gameplay video.
Killzone 3 gameplay video.
Keep in mind it's E3 footage, and both games are not out until April 2011, so there will be improvement in both cases.
IronBass
That KZ3 video was captured from the 3D demo. It's the 3D footage in 2D and no it's not more blurry because if it was in 3D it'd be obvious.[QUOTE="IronBass"]
Gears of War 3 gameplay video.
Killzone 3 gameplay video.
Keep in mind it's E3 footage, and both games are not out until April 2011, so there will be improvement in both cases.
killzowned24
To clear things up, those are multiplayer pics of Killzone 3 versus heavily modified pics of Gears 2 single player. We've all seen the videos of both correct? Let's ask ourselved which of these games look closer to those pictures in the OP.
---
Killzone 3: When I look at the mutliplayer footage of KZ3, it looks identical to the 720p pictures released by Guerrilla Games. You can even spot some minor jaggies and minuscule clipping issues. Looking at Guerrilla's history, they've never used a real bullshot to promote Killzone 2 (no the 2005 CGI video doesn't count, they specifically said it was CGI). With that, I'm inclined to believe the pictures they released for KZ3 are indeed a close, or even an identical representation of the final game (or at least its current state).
Gears 3: I'm 99.9999% positive Gears 3 won't look like those pictures in the OP when it comes out, and neither does it look like that now. At the same time, Gears 3 looks good as hell in videos! Just don't feed into Epic's promotional shots. They did the same with Gears 1, 2, and UT3, so history tells me they are following the same path in promoting this game. Their enhanced photos are amazingly good looking, even better looking than Killzone 3, Halo Reach, Rage, and Crysis 2, but they are not a legitimate representation of the actual game's visual quality. I believe they do this on purpose for 'cool wallpaper on desktop' purposes. It's likely they are beyond the normal bullshot where only jaggies are smoothed out. These are heavily enhanced in-engine shots and I think Epic themselves don't expect people to believe the final game will look like that.
EDIT: The first pic of Gears 3 looks like a legit cutscene. The last two are most likely heavily enhanced.
Based on art style, I like Gears better. Killzone just looks too orange, and ultimately bland.Anjunaddict
You forgot to add that Killzone is on PS3 also.
Xbox 360 is incapable of displaying high end ps3 visuals, as proven by the games released thus far. I predict that Gears 3 will be comparable to Gears 2, which itself was comparable to Gears 1--a game that is comparable to Splinter Cell Chaos Theory on the original xbox.
Heirren
Mission almost accomplished. You forgot to say that PS3 games look better than Crysis in a high ebd PC.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
Xbox 360 is incapable of displaying high end ps3 visuals, as proven by the games released thus far. I predict that Gears 3 will be comparable to Gears 2, which itself was comparable to Gears 1--a game that is comparable to Splinter Cell Chaos Theory on the original xbox.
PAL360
Mission almost accomplished. You forgot to say that PS3 games look better than Crysis in a high ebd PC.
LOL, epic fail on Heirren's part.art-wise i would say KZ3, just for start i never liked metal armors, always thought they were a cheap easy way out to make something look good with the least amount of effort (3D modeling & texturing) now i could go on and tell why else, but....Which do you think looks better? I think they both look awesome ;)
XxHoosierdaddy
Is there gameplay footage of GeOW 3?red12355this, so yeah, pointless...
Got to love the extra AA added to the shots. No one will be expecting the crappy texture filtering and LOD either when they start playing.
[QUOTE="XxHoosierdaddy"]art-wise i would say KZ3, just for start i never liked metal armors, always thought they were a cheap easy way out to make something look good with the least amount of effort (3D modeling & texturing) now i could go on and tell why else, but....Which do you think looks better? I think they both look awesome ;)
Kane04
Is there gameplay footage of GeOW 3?red12355this, so yeah, pointless... Fabric isn't exactly hard to make either, you have a normal map and specs too, exactly the same as metal.
I'm certain they will both have a very high visual appeal though I'm betting Gears 3 will be the better game. :P
Oh and also....
...my "bullshot" > yours. :twisted:
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
Xbox 360 is incapable of displaying high end ps3 visuals, as proven by the games released thus far. I predict that Gears 3 will be comparable to Gears 2, which itself was comparable to Gears 1--a game that is comparable to Splinter Cell Chaos Theory on the original xbox.
PAL360
Mission almost accomplished. You forgot to say that PS3 games look better than Crysis in a high ebd PC.
Huh? I'm confused. Consoles don't even compete against high end pcs. I have a hard time understanding why people even bother comparing the ps3 to new PCs, though the fact that they do is interesting.
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
Xbox 360 is incapable of displaying high end ps3 visuals, as proven by the games released thus far. I predict that Gears 3 will be comparable to Gears 2, which itself was comparable to Gears 1--a game that is comparable to Splinter Cell Chaos Theory on the original xbox.
Heirren
Mission almost accomplished. You forgot to say that PS3 games look better than Crysis in a high ebd PC.
Huh? I'm confused. Consoles don't even compete against high end pcs. I have a hard time understanding why people even bother comparing the ps3 to new PCs, though the fact that they do is interesting.
I was kidding man, you said nothing about PC.
My point is that what you said about 360 is just as biased as when ppl compare PS3 games to Crysis ;)
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
Mission almost accomplished. You forgot to say that PS3 games look better than Crysis in a high ebd PC.
PAL360
Huh? I'm confused. Consoles don't even compete against high end pcs. I have a hard time understanding why people even bother comparing the ps3 to new PCs, though the fact that they do is interesting.
I was kidding man, you said nothing about PC.
My point is that what you said about 360 is just as biased as when ppl compare PS3 games to Crysis ;)
Oh, sorry.:)
I just find it funny that people think there is some sort of hidden power in consoles that will unleash fury upon a PC from TWO THOUSAND AND TEN! Sheesh. Imo, it's almost just as funny that people seem to think the 360 is as graphically capable as the ps3. The proof is in the games, and the fact is that 360 fanboys have essentially been saying, for years, "Oh you ps3 fanboys just wait, one day the 360 will release a game that looks better than Uncharted 2."
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
Huh? I'm confused. Consoles don't even compete against high end pcs. I have a hard time understanding why people even bother comparing the ps3 to new PCs, though the fact that they do is interesting.
Heirren
I was kidding man, you said nothing about PC.
My point is that what you said about 360 is just as biased as when ppl compare PS3 games to Crysis ;)
Oh, sorry.:)
I just find it funny that people think there is some sort of hidden power in consoles that will unleash fury upon a PC from TWO THOUSAND AND TEN! Sheesh. Imo, it's almost just as funny that people seem to think the 360 is as graphically capable as the ps3. The proof is in the games, and the fact is that 360 fanboys have essentially been saying, for years, "Oh you ps3 fanboys just wait, one day the 360 will release a game that looks better than Uncharted 2."
I wouldnt find that part so funny because it´s most likelly true :P
You would be pretty biased if after looking at games like RDR, Halo Reach, Gears3, Rage, Bulletstorm, Crysis2, etc, still thought 360 wasnt capable of Uncharted2 graphics.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
I was kidding man, you said nothing about PC.
My point is that what you said about 360 is just as biased as when ppl compare PS3 games to Crysis ;)
PAL360
Oh, sorry.:)
I just find it funny that people think there is some sort of hidden power in consoles that will unleash fury upon a PC from TWO THOUSAND AND TEN! Sheesh. Imo, it's almost just as funny that people seem to think the 360 is as graphically capable as the ps3. The proof is in the games, and the fact is that 360 fanboys have essentially been saying, for years, "Oh you ps3 fanboys just wait, one day the 360 will release a game that looks better than Uncharted 2."
I wouldnt find that part so funny because it´s most likelly true :P
You would be pretty biased if after looking at games like RDR, Halo Reach, Gears3, Rage, Bulletstorm, Crysis2, etc, still thought 360 wasnt capable of Uncharted2 graphics.
I'm really not. My most played game this gen, by far, is halo 3 mp. The game I'm most looking forward to is halo Reach. I'll honestly tell you that I didn't find RDR impressive at all. Same deal with the Gears series, which throws soooo much bloom into the mix it is almost ugly. I will say Rage does look impressive, but it is scheduled to come out in a year from now--so until then I'll believe it when I see it. Bringing up those games is the same as bringing up Uncharted 3 though, really.
If someone showed me clips from Rage, which were completely playable, and then told me, "sooooo, this game will be coming out....in one year." Oh, really? But it looks pretty complete. Now on the other hand, considering what Naughty Dog did from Uncharted to Uncharted 2, if they just told me, "Uncharted 3, while maybe not as big a leap from 1 to 2, will still improve quite significantly, graphically." I would somehow believe them, because they actually delivered with the second game.
all rendered, but obviously KZ3 is going to be better, thats the only thing killzone has ever been good at
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
I was kidding man, you said nothing about PC.
My point is that what you said about 360 is just as biased as when ppl compare PS3 games to Crysis ;)
PAL360
Oh, sorry.:)
I just find it funny that people think there is some sort of hidden power in consoles that will unleash fury upon a PC from TWO THOUSAND AND TEN! Sheesh. Imo, it's almost just as funny that people seem to think the 360 is as graphically capable as the ps3. The proof is in the games, and the fact is that 360 fanboys have essentially been saying, for years, "Oh you ps3 fanboys just wait, one day the 360 will release a game that looks better than Uncharted 2."
I wouldnt find that part so funny because it´s most likelly true :P
You would be pretty biased if after looking at games like RDR, Halo Reach, Gears3, Rage, Bulletstorm, Crysis2, etc, still thought 360 wasnt capable of Uncharted2 graphics.
RDR doesn't look anywhere near as good as UC2, or KZ, or GoW, or GT5 or HR for that matter :? And neither to those other "UNRELEASED" games. 360 fans do wthis with every single game, then it comes out and doesn't stand up, like Gears 2, like Splinter Cell, like Halo Reach, like Alan Wake... I admit the consoles are similar but theres a clear advantage dor the PS3, the top 5+ greatest looking console games ever made are all PS3 exclusives. And for a system that came out latter, and is harder to develop for that says a lot. Not to mention the 360 hasn't been growing anywhere near as much as the PS3 in graphics. It's been stagnant for years now, the PS3 keeps looks better and better.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment