Again, when comparing in-game images, KZ3 obviously looks much better
Compared to
This topic is locked from further discussion.
gears 3 is on par with UC2, killzone 3 destroys them both.delta3074"gears 3 is on par with UC2"....:|
BTW, the only bullshots posted were of Gears 3 (which are possibly the most enhanced imageson par withGT5 prologue's bullshots)
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]
In some parts in other no,and enemys are far less detailed,also notice how they let out the Berzerkers out.? is and enemy that in gears 1 was highly detailed,on gears 2 enemies where downgraded in detail in order to render more,the 3rd one i just saw a movies and the main character look far less detailed than in gears 2 as well,probably to render more on screen and render bigger open areas is a trade off.
clone01
wow man, do you honestly believe on that? :|
Gears2 is more detailed than Gears1 in every single departement, it´s a fact, not my opinion.
i provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.
"gears 3 is on par with UC2"....:|[QUOTE="delta3074"]gears 3 is on par with UC2, killzone 3 destroys them both.shroofnayef
The only difference is that non of those gears shots are actual gameplay angles you can see that real easy that is not how you play Gears,some of those in Kilzone 3 as well are not as well as they should be,but some are.
[QUOTE="shroofnayef"]
gears 3 is on par with UC2, killzone 3 destroys them both.delta3074"gears 3 is on par with UC2"....:|
The only difference is that non of those gears shots are actual gameplay angles you can see that real easy that is not how you play Gears,some of those in Kilzone 3 as well are not as well as they should be,but some are.
The KZ3 images are in-game, while the Gears 3 images are of Epics long streak of promotional bullshotsi provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="PAL360"]
wow man, do you honestly believe on that? :|
Gears2 is more detailed than Gears1 in every single departement, it´s a fact, not my opinion.
Eltormo
You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.
http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.[QUOTE="Eltormo"][QUOTE="clone01"] i provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.clone01
You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.
http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument. Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.[QUOTE="Eltormo"][QUOTE="clone01"] i provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.clone01
You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.
http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument. Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.
Nyuuuu
It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.
But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.
....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ...Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.
Nyuuuu
Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="clone01"] http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.Eltormo
It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.
But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.
I prefer sharp, clean textures, compared to Killzone 2s muddy, over excessive grain / blur filters. This is literally my initial reaction when I first booted up Killzone 2: "Eh? Looks abit better then Gears 2, but is this seriously what all the fuss was about". Killzone 2 was the first title I bought with my PS3. It looks good, but in comparison to PCs best looking games, when compared to Gears 2, there's a large enough difference to warrent a debate, but in Killzone 2s case, it isn't that much better looking in my opinion.....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ... http://www.laurenscorijn.com/udk-comparision.html Huge improvements to lighting. Have you actually tested the new UDK Unreal Tournament demo? The lighting surpasses Killzone 2s. :[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]
Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.
shroofnayef
http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]
You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.
Eltormo
Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol
you haven't gotten to me at all. you make claims, and then you don't have any evidence to back them up. that's all.[QUOTE="Eltormo"][QUOTE="Nyuuuu"] Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.Nyuuuu
It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.
But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.
I prefer sharp, clean textures, compared to Killzone 2s muddy, over excessive grain / blur filters. This is literally my initial reaction when I first booted up Killzone 2: "Eh? Looks abit better then Gears 2, but is this seriously what all the fuss was about". Killzone 2 was the first title I bought with my PS3. It looks good, but in comparison to PCs best looking games, when compared to Gears 2, there's a large enough difference to warrent a debate, but in Killzone 2s case, it isn't that much better looking in my opinion.Killzone 2 has some great textures,also comparing PC game to Killzone 2 is like the last act of famboysm we know the PS3 doesn't get a new GPU and CPU every 7 months with 4 GB of system Ram and 1 GB of video ram.
But Gears not only look bland compare to Killzone 2,is also draging badly when the topic is lighting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTvYPiEi4eU
Look how fusy Dom face look compare to Killzone 2 other character,look at the huge difference in lighting entering from the top,on Gears 2 was almost non existant,even the bullets and grenades are look more real,look at the end the volumetric smoke going under the brige because of the turbines which are pulling it.
They make look close graphics,but when you put atention to the details is not really close.
Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="clone01"] http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.Eltormo
It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.
But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.
why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.[QUOTE="Eltormo"][QUOTE="clone01"] http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.clone01
Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol
you haven't gotten to me at all. you make claims, and then you don't have any evidence to back them up. that's all.You know i did you are so mad that you fallow me every were quoting allot since i show you i did own a 360..lol
[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]
Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.
....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ... http://www.laurenscorijn.com/udk-comparision.html Huge improvements to lighting. Have you actually tested the new UDK Unreal Tournament demo? The lighting surpasses Killzone 2s. : :lol:. KZ3 uses Deffered rendering and Global Illumination for its lighting while Gears 3 (I think) only uses static and GI. Its also funny how you dropped the "KZ2 barely looking better than Gears 2" arguement :lol:. I suppose you realized how laughable that was since KZ2 factually is much more technically proficient, or simply put, factually looks much better graphically[QUOTE="Eltormo"][QUOTE="Nyuuuu"] Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.clone01
It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.
But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.
why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..
Gears 3 bullshots look a lot better than Killzone 3's... but Kz3 gameplay looks a lot better than gears 3 gameplay.
you haven't gotten to me at all. you make claims, and then you don't have any evidence to back them up. that's all.[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]
Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol
Eltormo
You know i did you are so mad that you fallow me every were quoting allot since i show you i did own a 360..lol
nah...you seem to be the one holding on to the argument. again, i must ask, where are these links to back your argument? i provided 2, and i'm not the one who even made these claims.why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]
It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.
But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.
Eltormo
He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..
original quote from Nyuuuu was "Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking than Gears 1" yes, i did read the post. what are you referring to?[QUOTE="Eltormo"][QUOTE="clone01"] why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.clone01
He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..
original quote from Nyuuuu was "Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking than Gears 1" yes, i did read the post. what are you referring to?Because you acuse me of changing the topic when it was him who say bring Killzone 2 first.
Either way i see you are incredibly obses with quoting me.
original quote from Nyuuuu was "Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking than Gears 1" yes, i did read the post. what are you referring to?[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]
He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..
Eltormo
Because you acuse me of changing the topic when it was him who say bring Killzone 2 first.
Either way i see you are incredibly obses with quoting me.
did you read the post? the argument at hand here is Gears 1 vs. Gears 2. you made a statement that you haven't been able to back. that's all i'm waiting on.I prefer sharp, clean textures, compared to Killzone 2s muddy, over excessive grain / blur filters. This is literally my initial reaction when I first booted up Killzone 2: "Eh? Looks abit better then Gears 2, but is this seriously what all the fuss was about". Killzone 2 was the first title I bought with my PS3. It looks good, but in comparison to PCs best looking games, when compared to Gears 2, there's a large enough difference to warrent a debate, but in Killzone 2s case, it isn't that much better looking in my opinion.[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]
It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.
But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.
Eltormo
Killzone 2 has some great textures,also comparing PC game to Killzone 2 is like the last act of famboysm we know the PS3 doesn't get a new GPU and CPU every 7 months with 4 GB of system Ram and 1 GB of video ram.
But Gears not only look bland compare to Killzone 2,is also draging badly when the topic is lighting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTvYPiEi4eU
Look how fusy Dom face look compare to Killzone 2 other character,look at the huge difference in lighting entering from the top,on Gears 2 was almost non existant,even the bullets and grenades are look more real,look at the end the volumetric smoke going under the brige because of the turbines which are pulling it.
They make look close graphics,but when you put atention to the details is not really close.
I mean, PC game vs Gears 2, compared to Killzone 2 vs Gear 2. The PC game looks ALOT better, while Killzone 2 did look better, but it wasn't enough to even warrant calling friends over to see it, in comparison to when I first loaded up Crysis, or Stalker, or Arma.http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]
You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.
Eltormo
Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol
Dude, why is this still a debate?
Everyone knows Gears2 looks better than Gears1. Complaining about this says alot about you :?
[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="shroofnayef"] ....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ...http://www.laurenscorijn.com/udk-comparision.html Huge improvements to lighting. Have you actually tested the new UDK Unreal Tournament demo? The lighting surpasses Killzone 2s. : :lol:. KZ3 uses Deffered rendering and Global Illumination for its lighting while Gears 3 (I think) only uses static and GI. Its also funny how you dropped the "KZ2 barely looking better than Gears 2" arguement :lol:. I suppose you realized how laughable that was since KZ2 factually is much more technically proficient, or simply put, factually looks much better graphically no, gears 3 uses fully dynamic realtime global illumination which technically is more impressive than Differed. differed is nothing special at al by any means.shroofnayef
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment