Gears of War 3 vs Killzone 3 Graphics (PICS)

  • 184 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts

Again, when comparing in-game images, KZ3 obviously looks much better

Image 4

Image 9

Image 12

Image 17

Image 20

Image 39

Compared to

Gears of War 3 Screenshot

Gears of War 3 Picture

Gears of War 3 Picture

Gears of War 3 Picture

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts

gears 3 is on par with UC2, killzone 3 destroys them both.delta3074
"gears 3 is on par with UC2"....:|

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts

BTW, the only bullshots posted were of Gears 3 (which are possibly the most enhanced imageson par withGT5 prologue's bullshots)

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

In some parts in other no,and enemys are far less detailed,also notice how they let out the Berzerkers out.? is and enemy that in gears 1 was highly detailed,on gears 2 enemies where downgraded in detail in order to render more,the 3rd one i just saw a movies and the main character look far less detailed than in gears 2 as well,probably to render more on screen and render bigger open areas is a trade off.

clone01

wow man, do you honestly believe on that? :|

Gears2 is more detailed than Gears1 in every single departement, it´s a fact, not my opinion.

i provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.

You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"]gears 3 is on par with UC2, killzone 3 destroys them both.shroofnayef

"gears 3 is on par with UC2"....:|

The only difference is that non of those gears shots are actual gameplay angles you can see that real easy that is not how you play Gears,some of those in Kilzone 3 as well are not as well as they should be,but some are.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="shroofnayef"]

gears 3 is on par with UC2, killzone 3 destroys them both.delta3074
"gears 3 is on par with UC2"....:|

The only difference is that non of those gears shots are actual gameplay angles you can see that real easy that is not how you play Gears,some of those in Kilzone 3 as well are not as well as they should be,but some are.

The KZ3 images are in-game, while the Gears 3 images are of Epics long streak of promotional bullshots
Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts
They both look pretty bland in my opinion, and those Gears 3 screenies are bullshots. If going by the latest UDK Unreal Engine lighting improvements, Gears is going to trounce Killzone 3 graphically. The new lighting is absolutely gorgeous.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

wow man, do you honestly believe on that? :|

Gears2 is more detailed than Gears1 in every single departement, it´s a fact, not my opinion.

Eltormo

i provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.

You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.

http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.
Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="clone01"] i provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.clone01

You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.

http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.

Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="clone01"] i provided him an article that disproved his statement. he's yet to get back to me.clone01

You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.

http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.

Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.

Nyuuuu

http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.

Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.

It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.

But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts

Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.

Nyuuuu

....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ...

Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="clone01"] http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.Eltormo

Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.

It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.

But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.

I prefer sharp, clean textures, compared to Killzone 2s muddy, over excessive grain / blur filters. This is literally my initial reaction when I first booted up Killzone 2: "Eh? Looks abit better then Gears 2, but is this seriously what all the fuss was about". Killzone 2 was the first title I bought with my PS3. It looks good, but in comparison to PCs best looking games, when compared to Gears 2, there's a large enough difference to warrent a debate, but in Killzone 2s case, it isn't that much better looking in my opinion.
Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.

shroofnayef

....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ...

http://www.laurenscorijn.com/udk-comparision.html Huge improvements to lighting. Have you actually tested the new UDK Unreal Tournament demo? The lighting surpasses Killzone 2s. :
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.

Eltormo

http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.

Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol

you haven't gotten to me at all. you make claims, and then you don't have any evidence to back them up. that's all.
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"] Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.Nyuuuu

It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.

But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.

I prefer sharp, clean textures, compared to Killzone 2s muddy, over excessive grain / blur filters. This is literally my initial reaction when I first booted up Killzone 2: "Eh? Looks abit better then Gears 2, but is this seriously what all the fuss was about". Killzone 2 was the first title I bought with my PS3. It looks good, but in comparison to PCs best looking games, when compared to Gears 2, there's a large enough difference to warrent a debate, but in Killzone 2s case, it isn't that much better looking in my opinion.

Killzone 2 has some great textures,also comparing PC game to Killzone 2 is like the last act of famboysm we know the PS3 doesn't get a new GPU and CPU every 7 months with 4 GB of system Ram and 1 GB of video ram.

But Gears not only look bland compare to Killzone 2,is also draging badly when the topic is lighting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTvYPiEi4eU

Look how fusy Dom face look compare to Killzone 2 other character,look at the huge difference in lighting entering from the top,on Gears 2 was almost non existant,even the bullets and grenades are look more real,look at the end the volumetric smoke going under the brige because of the turbines which are pulling it.

They make look close graphics,but when you put atention to the details is not really close.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="clone01"] http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.Eltormo

Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.

It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.

But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.

why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="clone01"] http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.clone01

Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol

you haven't gotten to me at all. you make claims, and then you don't have any evidence to back them up. that's all.

You know i did you are so mad that you fallow me every were quoting allot since i show you i did own a 360..lol

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts
[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="shroofnayef"]

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.

....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ...

http://www.laurenscorijn.com/udk-comparision.html Huge improvements to lighting. Have you actually tested the new UDK Unreal Tournament demo? The lighting surpasses Killzone 2s. :

:lol:. KZ3 uses Deffered rendering and Global Illumination for its lighting while Gears 3 (I think) only uses static and GI. Its also funny how you dropped the "KZ2 barely looking better than Gears 2" arguement :lol:. I suppose you realized how laughable that was since KZ2 factually is much more technically proficient, or simply put, factually looks much better graphically
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"] Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking then Gears 1. Infact, Gears 2 wowed me more then Killzone 2, but I'll have to agree that overall Killzone 2 was the better looking game, but barely.clone01

It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.

But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.

why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.

He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..

Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#171 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts

Gears 3 bullshots look a lot better than Killzone 3's... but Kz3 gameplay looks a lot better than gears 3 gameplay.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol

Eltormo

you haven't gotten to me at all. you make claims, and then you don't have any evidence to back them up. that's all.

You know i did you are so mad that you fallow me every were quoting allot since i show you i did own a 360..lol

nah...you seem to be the one holding on to the argument. again, i must ask, where are these links to back your argument? i provided 2, and i'm not the one who even made these claims.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.

But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.

Eltormo

why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.

He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..

original quote from Nyuuuu was "Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking than Gears 1" yes, i did read the post. what are you referring to?
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="clone01"] why did you change the subject? i thought this argument was about gears 1 vs. gears 2.clone01

He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..

original quote from Nyuuuu was "Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking than Gears 1" yes, i did read the post. what are you referring to?

Because you acuse me of changing the topic when it was him who say bring Killzone 2 first.

Either way i see you are incredibly obses with quoting me.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

He say he was more wowed by Gears 2 than byu Killzone 2 so i ask him,did you read his post before quoting me.? lol dude for some one who is no fallowing me you surely love to quote me..

Eltormo

original quote from Nyuuuu was "Anyone who's played both should know Gears 2 is much better looking than Gears 1" yes, i did read the post. what are you referring to?

Because you acuse me of changing the topic when it was him who say bring Killzone 2 first.

Either way i see you are incredibly obses with quoting me.

did you read the post? the argument at hand here is Gears 1 vs. Gears 2. you made a statement that you haven't been able to back. that's all i'm waiting on.
Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

It does look better in some parts in other i remember Gears enemy's to be more detailed,than in gears 2,also gears 2 has a bigger scale.

But how come GOW 3 impressed you more than Killzone 2,Killzone 2 beat Gears 2 without even trying.

Eltormo

I prefer sharp, clean textures, compared to Killzone 2s muddy, over excessive grain / blur filters. This is literally my initial reaction when I first booted up Killzone 2: "Eh? Looks abit better then Gears 2, but is this seriously what all the fuss was about". Killzone 2 was the first title I bought with my PS3. It looks good, but in comparison to PCs best looking games, when compared to Gears 2, there's a large enough difference to warrent a debate, but in Killzone 2s case, it isn't that much better looking in my opinion.

Killzone 2 has some great textures,also comparing PC game to Killzone 2 is like the last act of famboysm we know the PS3 doesn't get a new GPU and CPU every 7 months with 4 GB of system Ram and 1 GB of video ram.

But Gears not only look bland compare to Killzone 2,is also draging badly when the topic is lighting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTvYPiEi4eU

Look how fusy Dom face look compare to Killzone 2 other character,look at the huge difference in lighting entering from the top,on Gears 2 was almost non existant,even the bullets and grenades are look more real,look at the end the volumetric smoke going under the brige because of the turbines which are pulling it.

They make look close graphics,but when you put atention to the details is not really close.

I mean, PC game vs Gears 2, compared to Killzone 2 vs Gear 2. The PC game looks ALOT better, while Killzone 2 did look better, but it wasn't enough to even warrant calling friends over to see it, in comparison to when I first loaded up Crysis, or Stalker, or Arma.
Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts
[QUOTE="shroofnayef"] :lol:. KZ3 uses Deffered rendering and Global Illumination for its lighting while Gears 3 (I think) only uses static and GI. Its also funny how you dropped the "KZ2 barely looking better than Gears 2" arguement :lol:. I suppose you realized how laughable that was since KZ2 factually is much more technically proficient, or simply put, factually looks much better graphically

Killzone 2 used prebaked SSAO, and I'm pretty sure GI will be prebaked, unless you have a link claiming that KZ3 uses real time GI? What was so good about Killzone 2s lighting? :? Wow, there was flashes of light, which Stalker does 10 times better, and it featured shadows that resembled Left 4 Dead 2. :roll:
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#178 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

You provided a link to a site which compare 1 gears 1 and 2 multiplaying stages not campaign.

Eltormo

http://www.spike.com/video/gears-of-war-2/2979628 here you go. its not a superb quality video, but should work for comparison purposes. about :38 seconds in, you can see that gears 2 was definitely better looking than gears 1. i'm still waiting on your link to back up your argument.

Is horrible quality to say the leats,dude in some part it does in other it don't,once again stop asking for articles or prove my god that bad i got into you..lol

Dude, why is this still a debate?

Everyone knows Gears2 looks better than Gears1. Complaining about this says alot about you :?

Avatar image for river_rat3117
river_rat3117

3474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 river_rat3117
Member since 2003 • 3474 Posts
still waiting to see all of KZ3 if anyone remembers in an interview they did say there would be jungle locations this time around. still havent seen them yet either
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#180 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="shroofnayef"] :lol:. KZ3 uses Deffered rendering and Global Illumination for its lighting while Gears 3 (I think) only uses static and GI. Its also funny how you dropped the "KZ2 barely looking better than Gears 2" arguement :lol:. I suppose you realized how laughable that was since KZ2 factually is much more technically proficient, or simply put, factually looks much better graphically

KZ3 uses dynamic radiosity, cheap,prebaked global illumination, and deffered rendering has been used in games for years, it's nothing special dude, even crackdown uses deffered rendering 'Digital Foundry: Wolfgang Engel's blog was where we first read about the concept of the light pre-pass rendition of deferred rendering with his work for GTA IV. Yet it seems that Crackdown's implementation predates this significantly. Can you tell us how and why this technique was chosen? What did you set out to achieve with it?' http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-crackdown2-tech-interview
Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

mgs4>gears2

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#182 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"][QUOTE="shroofnayef"] ....:lol:. Technically speaking, KZ3 factually trounces Gears 3 lighting, espicially considering the fact that graphical improvements just recently added to UE3.5 proves how outdated the engine was...Also, KZ2 looks much better in every graphical aspect factually when compared to Gears 2, espicially considering the engines of the extremely outdated UE3 ...

shroofnayef

http://www.laurenscorijn.com/udk-comparision.html Huge improvements to lighting. Have you actually tested the new UDK Unreal Tournament demo? The lighting surpasses Killzone 2s. :

:lol:. KZ3 uses Deffered rendering and Global Illumination for its lighting while Gears 3 (I think) only uses static and GI. Its also funny how you dropped the "KZ2 barely looking better than Gears 2" arguement :lol:. I suppose you realized how laughable that was since KZ2 factually is much more technically proficient, or simply put, factually looks much better graphically

no, gears 3 uses fully dynamic realtime global illumination which technically is more impressive than Differed. differed is nothing special at al by any means.

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#183 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts

mgs4>gears2

Aboogie5
in what? charactermodels? that's really about it.
Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts
[QUOTE="mayceV"][QUOTE="Aboogie5"]

mgs4>gears2

in what? charactermodels? that's really about it.

didn't it beat it in best graphics for that year?