Gears of War 4 looks best on X1X @ 4k.

Weak hardware and lack of exclusives. Unless you're into JRPGs and movie games, there is just as little there as on Xbox.

I briefly considered getting a PS4 for Bloodborne, but then I realized that was literally the only game I wanted to play on the console. Since then they've added HZD, but that's still only two games.

@m3Boarder32 said:

@pdogg93 said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@pdogg93 said:

Gears 4 was so disappointing, even at 1440p at 100fps

Don’t you have a notebook? No 1440p, Ultra, 100+ FPS for you

Yes I do. How much do you want to bet?

Minimum vs Minimum

no you don’t, get wrecked

Looks like your brain is rekt. GTX 1080 at 99.3 avg fps, pretty close to the 100fps I noticed while playing on my laptop with a GTX 1080. Stay dumb lemming.

Comparing performance in terms of "minimum vs minimum" is such an abstraction from what performance actually means to any reasonable person in a typical scenario. It's not unreasonable that if a game's averaging 99.3 FPS in a benchmark that you're getting over 100 FPS most of the time in actual gameplay. The only other thing that matters is if the game stutters. No one cares about anything other than what they're getting "most of the time" unless it's for the sake of some retarded SW argument.

The argument only matters when trying to bolster the battered soul of a sad lem whose chosen to back the losing horse and is now stuck with a mediocre library of shit.

Uncharted 4

Bloodborne

R&C 2016

Horizon: Zero Dawn

Yakuza 0

The Lastt Guardian

Infamous: Second Son

God of War

That's just off the top of my head. It's not the PS2. Hell it's not even the Gamecube in terms of exclusives but in this day and age where nearly every third party developer is multiplatform that's pretty solid.

Over 90% of video games are objectively better played on a high end PC. No matter what trash you write on an internet forum.

Ouch, looks like Gears 4 is better on PC.

Looks about the same, but runs at double the FPS. That's night and day.

If I’m getting 99 FPS Average and 72 minimum(1%) FPS, and 54 FPS minimum (.1%) I would frame cap the game to 72 FPS especially with a 144hz LCD, even if it’s 120-144 Gsync I would still cap to 72.

so in this case it’s best to compare 1440p @ 72 FPS (GTX 1080 Ti) vs 4k @ 30 FPS (X1X)

You sir talk sense!

I used to do this back in the day with Radeon Pro...... benchmark games and cap them just above the minimum and lowest recorded frame rates (This was only on games I couldn't run at a locked 60fps)