GEARS OF WAR is the worst game i have played in awhile

omg its one of the best games ever!!!towie777

Too much bullet lag.

I completely disliked it!

The only people that enjoy it are graphical whore's and the 12 year old kids on XBL!

sadikovic

and almost every reviewer site, and nearly everyone who bought it

[QUOTE="mattyomo99"]

it takes way to many bullets to kill anything,Magical_Zebra

Then Casual is for you. Personally I looooove pumping an entire magazine into one of those freaks of nature (Locust Drones). Its always plenty of ammo laying around.

Say what?

Less bullets = sim or "tactical shooter". How does enjoying a more realistic approach make you a casual? Is GRAW more casual-oriented than Halo? Battlefield more casual-oriented than Unreal?

Think before you speak.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="mattyomo99"]

it takes way to many bullets to kill anything,XL83

Then Casual is for you. Personally I looooove pumping an entire magazine into one of those freaks of nature (Locust Drones). Its always plenty of ammo laying around.

Say what?

Less bullets = sim or "tactical shooter". How does enjoying a more realistic approach make you a casual? Is GRAW more casual-oriented than Halo? Battlefield more casual-oriented than Unreal?

Think before you speak.

Think before I speak? He said that it takes TOO MANY BULLETS to kill anything. If you have played GEoW then you know there is a setting called CASUAL where you damn near kill the Locust Drones with 10 bullets. Im not talking about if the game is "Casual", Im talking about the setting he had it on to make the enemies harder to kill. Its ok, your searching for OWNAGE and it found you. You tried an FAILED...

Think Before You Speak OH NOES!! :shock:

[QUOTE="XL83"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="mattyomo99"]

it takes way to many bullets to kill anything,Magical_Zebra

Then Casual is for you. Personally I looooove pumping an entire magazine into one of those freaks of nature (Locust Drones). Its always plenty of ammo laying around.

Say what?

Less bullets = sim or "tactical shooter". How does enjoying a more realistic approach make you a casual? Is GRAW more casual-oriented than Halo? Battlefield more casual-oriented than Unreal?

Think before you speak.

Think before I speak? He said that it takes TOO MANY BULLETS to kill anything. If you have played GEoW then you know there is a setting called CASUAL where you damn near kill the Locust Drones with 10 bullets. Im not talking about if the game is "Casual", Im talking about the setting he had it on to make the enemies harder to kill. Its ok, your searching for OWNAGE and it found you. You tried an FAILED...

Think Before You Speak OH NOES!! :shock:

:lol: :lol:

Ownage approved!! Very nicely done, zebra!

It seems reading comprehension is, as usual, lacking here in SW. I wish I could say I'm surprised.

[QUOTE="towie777"]omg its one of the best games ever!!!Slurms_M

Too much bullet lag.

only with Uk players other then that if you have a decent connection you should be fine however host is only problem to kill

So i picked up gears of war last night and i gotta say this game is awful. it takes way to many bullets to kill anything, the cover system is akward, the over the shoulder view is kind of dumb, and idk how anybody really enjoyed this game besides looking at it. im kind of pissed.

*edit* maybe the above post was a bit of a rant, this game looks great but just something about it isnt keeping me hooked. im well into the game but im just not enjoying it. The graphics are really good and the enimies are diverse, i guess my biggest complaint is gameplay.

mattyomo99

I agree so much with the OP. Gears of War is a bit of a mess. It does nothing right. I guess at the time, it had the best graphics, so everyone overrated the thing. Just goes to show you that pretty graphics do NOT make a good game.

So i picked up gears of war last night and i gotta say this game is awful. it takes way to many bullets to kill anything

mattyomo99

How is it the game's fault that your aiming is poor?

[QUOTE="Slurms_M"]

[QUOTE="towie777"]omg its one of the best games ever!!!Microsoft1234

Too much bullet lag.

only with Uk players other then that if you have a decent connection you should be fine however host is only problem to kill

Actually I have been leading my shots alot more than I used to so I like UK servers. But in general I have always found this game specifically laggy.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="XL83"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="mattyomo99"]

it takes way to many bullets to kill anything,LosDaddie

Then Casual is for you. Personally I looooove pumping an entire magazine into one of those freaks of nature (Locust Drones). Its always plenty of ammo laying around.

Say what?

Less bullets = sim or "tactical shooter". How does enjoying a more realistic approach make you a casual? Is GRAW more casual-oriented than Halo? Battlefield more casual-oriented than Unreal?

Think before you speak.

Think before I speak? He said that it takes TOO MANY BULLETS to kill anything. If you have played GEoW then you know there is a setting called CASUAL where you damn near kill the Locust Drones with 10 bullets. Im not talking about if the game is "Casual", Im talking about the setting he had it on to make the enemies harder to kill. Its ok, your searching for OWNAGE and it found you. You tried an FAILED...

Think Before You Speak OH NOES!! :shock:

:lol: :lol:

Ownage approved!! Very nicely done, zebra!

It seems reading comprehension is, as usual, lacking here in SW. I wish I could say I'm surprised.

Who cares about your silly opinion? lol.Riviera_Phantom

Well, actually he isn't far wrong. If that game had mediocre graphics it would have recieved an 8.0 and no attention whatsoever. Games like rainbow six are better, but still have too many glitches and exploit.

So i picked up gears of war last night and i gotta say this game is awful. it takes way to many bullets to kill anything, the cover system is akward, the over the shoulder view is kind of dumb, and idk how anybody really enjoyed this game besides looking at it. im kind of pissed.

*edit* maybe the above post was a bit of a rant, this game looks great but just something about it isnt keeping me hooked. im well into the game but im just not enjoying it. The graphics are really good and the enimies are diverse, i guess my biggest complaint is gameplay.

mattyomo99

You must just suck at it then.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="mattyomo99"]

it takes way to many bullets to kill anything,XL83

Then Casual is for you. Personally I looooove pumping an entire magazine into one of those freaks of nature (Locust Drones). Its always plenty of ammo laying around.

Say what?

Less bullets = sim or "tactical shooter". How does enjoying a more realistic approach make you a casual? Is GRAW more casual-oriented than Halo? Battlefield more casual-oriented than Unreal?

Think before you speak.

Actually dude, he just got it wrong, to the point its laughable. Sims aren't casual. Infact "omg the chainsaw makes blood and bits go everywhere" and "look at how COOL it looks" are the most unhardcore statements since 50 cent came out. Casuals tend to be affected by impractical "cool" looking things that wouldn't work in real life, or graphics that look awesome even when the gameplay only functions correctly, but does nothing ground breaking.

Sims are usually very difficult, too difficult and don't have pretty effects thrown all over them. Like I already said, Gears would have flopped if it wasn't for graphics. Gears IS CASUAL. Why else is there a chainsaw on the end of your friggin gun? Its the only feature that tactically adds nothing but looks nice. Gears is the EXACT opposite of hardcore man. Just because hardcores play a good game doesn't make it hardcore.

Over the shoulder view is better than FPS view IMO.
and cover system is great.

Maybe you just suck at it :|

Actually dude, he just got it wrong, to the point its laughable. Sims aren't casual. Infact "omg the chainsaw makes blood and bits go everywhere" and "look at how COOL it looks" are the most unhardcore statements since 50 cent came out. Casuals tend to be affected by impractical "cool" looking things that wouldn't work in real life, or graphics that look awesome even when the gameplay only functions correctly, but does nothing ground breaking.

Sims are usually very difficult, too difficult and don't have pretty effects thrown all over them. Like I already said, Gears would have flopped if it wasn't for graphics. Gears IS CASUAL. Why else is there a chainsaw on the end of your friggin gun? Its the only feature that tactically adds nothing but looks nice. Gears is the EXACT opposite of hardcore man. Just because hardcores play a good game doesn't make it hardcore.

leejohnson7

The sad part is, you didnt even read what the actual response was. That fact and the fact that you quoted someone who cleary didnt know what they were talking about means you INDIRECTLY got owned by the person you chose to defend. To make matters worse, the person your defending is very, very wrong. I think I have the quote...

[QUOTE="XL83"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="mattyomo99"]

it takes way to many bullets to kill anything,Magical_Zebra

Then Casual is for you. Personally I looooove pumping an entire magazine into one of those freaks of nature (Locust Drones). Its always plenty of ammo laying around.

Say what?

Less bullets = sim or "tactical shooter". How does enjoying a more realistic approach make you a casual? Is GRAW more casual-oriented than Halo? Battlefield more casual-oriented than Unreal?

Think before you speak.

Think before I speak? He said that it takes TOO MANY BULLETS to kill anything. If you have played GEoW then you know there is a setting called CASUAL where you damn near kill the Locust Drones with 10 bullets. Im not talking about if the game is "Casual", Im talking about the setting he had it on to make the enemies harder to kill. Its ok, your searching for OWNAGE and it found you. You tried an FAILED...

Think Before You Speak OH NOES!! :shock: