Why does everyone hate the fake screens. I actually wish the Panda was real...along with the Scorpion...maybe. The dolphin is just weird.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why does everyone hate the fake screens. I actually wish the Panda was real...along with the Scorpion...maybe. The dolphin is just weird.
I'm pretty sure those aren't the real ones. lol
Those are most likely fake since they look nothing like the official shadows.
I personally think the Scorpion looks badass and the Panda is okay.
No idea what the Water type is supposed to be. But at least they don't look all cutesy like the 4th gens.
I actually wish they were real.
Those are not the new pokemon.... The starters have been semi shown here, and they look nothing like what you posted
http://serebii.net/index2.shtml
Those are not the new pokemon.... The starters have been semi shown here, and they look nothing like what you posted
http://serebii.net/index2.shtml
mexicangordo
crap, i'd actually take the shown fake starters than those. the outlines already screams being even worse.
[QUOTE="mexicangordo"]
Those are not the new pokemon.... The starters have been semi shown here, and they look nothing like what you posted
http://serebii.net/index2.shtml
bionicle_lover
crap, i'd actually take the shown fake starters than those. the outlines already screams being even worse.
The fake starters look way to "dramatic" and trying to look cool. The only one i liked was the fire ant (unique design) Though from the only picture we have of the real starters, they do look rather un-original. :(Hopefully the pictures clear everything up.
the thing about pokemon starters for me is that they must go through a 3 phases.
1. somewhat "cute" or babyish but still intimidating
2. meaner and tougher
3. hugea$$
Charmander, squirtle and bulbasaur all had that. They were cute, but not too cute, especially the ways they were originally portrayed. cut out all that special add-on transformation bull**** to get the girls or the really young kids (though it definitely worked). remember, Pikachu was a freaken rat ball with yellow fur. it was ugly as hell when it was first shown, before all the anime makeup.
cyndiquil i wasnt a fan of, but it turned into something worth reckoning with. Totodile fits the bill. chikorita i hate with a passion, and if it hadnt turned into a big dinosaur thing, i would despise it even more.
generation 3 is where it stops sort of. i mean, mudkip was alright, is 3 stages fit well. but then the other 2 went for the small, "pikachu" effect where its size and well, physical build didnt seem to change. Treeko didnt change much each evolution. torchic wasnt intimidating at all, and its 3 evolutions were some ugly chicken/ human combo because they realized that no one would really want a chicken. i mean, if it had become some bad@$$ dragon bird, i would have been, alright.
generation 4 im really not a big fan of. It basically only has small pokemon. and its evolutions just looked uninspired. the monkey (the one i chose in the game) just grew bigger with different accessories. The turtles is basically bulbusaur but looks like a, well, i wont say it... and the penguin is obviously put in there because they knew it'd appeal to, well, almost anybody.
the thing is the later generations' starter pokemons just started to lose their charm. they lost their wow factor, from training them from things half your size to 5 times your size. they used to go from pets to behemoths. now, its like, great, an evolution, i hope its stats rose. In the past, you could tell they kick more *** the moment their outlines appeared after reaching level 30 whatever it was.
whatever, just my opinion :)
Cruse34
These are not the Pokemon that appeared in silhouettes from Pokemon Sunday. Compare the above Pokemon to the silhouetted Pokemon below:
Why does everyone hate the fake screens. I actually wish the Panda was real...along with the Scorpion...maybe. The dolphin is just weird.
AmayaPapaya
the panda one does look good. it would be awesome imo if it was like grass and fighting. someone did a good job making them look real
Well it's nice these aren't starters. I kinda like them, as I said, but as starters they'd be weak. I can't see a good evolution form for any of them. I'd like to see them appear as wild Pokemon in the game though.
Good, they all looked pretty lame anyway. :PNot to burst anyones bubble, but again guys these pictures ARE FAKE. :P
mexicangordo
Oh. Well, just wait until the real ones come out and we'll be wishing these were real.Not to burst anyones bubble, but again guys these pictures ARE FAKE. :P
mexicangordo
hey look another fake. or is it?
TheShadowLord07
I was HOPING that the pig tailed pokemon is not the fire one
grass and water seems legit, wtf is the thing in the middle supposed to be
[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]
hey look another fake. or is it?
kontejner44
I was HOPING that the pig tailed pokemon is not the fire one
grass and water seems legit, wtf is the thing in the middle supposed to be
That picture is also FAKE people. There's only one site in the entire internet that gets leaked pokemon information, and it has yet to reveal the starters, any thing else that is coming up is FAKE and not real.I like how people think Pokemon has been getting worse when it's only been getting better.
Lord_Omikron666
Idk man.. people always say "the first is the best" I honestly don't get that. Same goes on with OoT vs TP, the latter is clearly better but it's just the impact of the first game that leaves a strong memory behind I guess
Horrific. What has come over the Pokemon designers of late? They must be laughing their asses off over this. They look more and more ridiculous with each gen.Messiahbolical-
yea i somewhat agree with you over there. Why can't we get starters looking like these?
[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]Horrific. What has come over the Pokemon designers of late? They must be laughing their asses off over this. They look more and more ridiculous with each gen.TheShadowLord07
yea i somewhat agree with you over there. Why can't we get starters looking like these?
why do they all look like real life animals? (and dinosaurs) no imagination?
the only ok one was fire nr 1
yea i somewhat agree with you over there. Why can't we get starters looking like these?
TheShadowLord07
Those look pretty sick. But I know i'm gonna buy the game regardless. *hangs my head in shame*
[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]
yea i somewhat agree with you over there. Why can't we get starters looking like these?
mrmusicman247
Those look pretty sick. But I know i'm gonna buy the game regardless. *hangs my head in shame*
whats there to be a shame of?
whats there to be a shame of?
TheShadowLord07
I've always loved pokemon. Its probably because i'll buy any pokemon game. It doesn't matter if its a good or bad game.
why do they all look like real life animals? (and dinosaurs) no imagination?kontejner44At least the designs make some visual sense, and don't look like rejects from some failed 90s toyline.
If these are what the sillouettes will look like I'm choosing the Grass pokemon because it looks like a combination of a duck and a dinosaur.
hey look another fake. or is it?
TheShadowLord07
[QUOTE="Silverbond"]
[QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]
True, and quiet sad. No starter...and very few Pokemon in general have come close to Charizard.
shakmaster13
Whoa!
Blaziken is number 1, dude.
But Charizard can fly. Blaziken is an evolved form of a fire-breathing chicken.
It also has a weakness to electric types and a one hit ko with rock moves.[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]
hey look another fake. or is it?
789shadow
OH god no.
Definitely fake.
They are probably fake but they match the silhouettes that Pokemon Sunday and Serebii has up. But it isn't supposed to be revealed until later this week.Yeah, they shouldnt make that many pokemon games so soon, maybe 1 pokemon game for gen.Good grief, Nintendo is really running out of idea for Pokemon.
Vesica_Prime
Good grief, Nintendo is really running out of idea for Pokemon.
Vesica_Prime
Nah, people are running out of ideas for fake Pokemon.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment