[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] * Did graphics excel Goldeneye N64? No Giancargraphics were amazing back in the day, just amazing Ya, but it didn't excel Goldeneye. But the gameplay and level design did.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] * Did graphics excel Goldeneye N64? No Giancargraphics were amazing back in the day, just amazing Ya, but it didn't excel Goldeneye. But the gameplay and level design did.
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] You never say anything positive about the Wii, so I'm not surprised On-topic: I'm excitedfarnhamWell, it wasn't exciting. The graphics are mediocre, the gameplay looks alright, but doesn't seem to be anything special, and has these weird cinematics you would find in cod, the story in it wont be alot better either. I credit the game when i have too, wii or not. I wouldnt say this was good if it was on a 360. its on the wii the graphics will never look good on the wii even the high bar wii games like super mario galaxy look complete sh** compared to the worst 360 games this is a given and everybody knows that Umm, wii can do great graphics.
[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] * Did graphics excel Goldeneye N64? No LastRambo341graphics were amazing back in the day, just amazing Ya, but it didn't excel Goldeneye. But the gameplay and level design did. it made it's work and helped to make the whole package better
Well, it wasn't exciting. The graphics are mediocre, the gameplay looks alright, but doesn't seem to be anything special, and has these weird cinematics you would find in cod, the story in it wont be alot better either. I credit the game when i have too, wii or not. I wouldnt say this was good if it was on a 360.[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] You never say anything positive about the Wii, so I'm not surprised On-topic: I'm excitedstvee101
I've got to agree.Goldeneye is one of my favourite Fps ever,I don't see how this can be as good let alone improve on it.So whats the point of re-releasing it?
Just for nostalga's sake?? Seems like it'll just sully the memory of the original.
This, it might be a fun game, but that trailer doesn't look like it's alot better. Might as well be better with goldeneye source mod. Free, better graphics, better gameplay, better controls, better anything. I'd like to be proven wrong though.[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]Craig destroys Brosnan in every possible way Heck, Casino Royale is better than all Brosnan Bond movies put together Casino Royale is the best Bond movie... THERE, I SAID IT!I won't lie I though this was going to be a joke for a moment. I wish they would use Pierce Brosnon bond instead of Daniel Craig.
Giancar
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] You never say anything positive about the Wii, so I'm not surprised On-topic: I'm excitedLastRambo341Well, it wasn't exciting. The graphics are mediocre, the gameplay looks alright, but doesn't seem to be anything special, and has these weird cinematics you would find in cod, the story in it wont be alot better either. I credit the game when i have too, wii or not. I wouldnt say this was good if it was on a 360. * Did graphics excel Goldeneye N64? No * You're judging the gameplay from the video? Gameplay is judged from PLAYING the game * If it was on the 360, you would have loved it. Ofcourse The graphics were great for the 64 version. I'm judging from what i have here and now, if people are allowed to say its looks great, im allowed to say it looks mediocre. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB1zWEhgrLs cant i say this looks bad? And if its on the wii, you will always be there to defend it, no matter what.
[QUOTE="Thunderdrone"] Casino Royale is the best Bond movie... THERE, I SAID IT!Giancarnot the best, but in top 5 let's not forget oldies Bond movies one thing for sure, Brosnan Bond movies are the worst of all
the oldies are great...but idk, casino royale was just a freakin masterpiece
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="farnham"] its on the wii the graphics will never look good on the wii even the high bar wii games like super mario galaxy look complete sh** compared to the worst 360 games this is a given and everybody knows thatfarnhamIt looks bad a for a wii game. it doesnt I would wait till the game is done and judge it in person rather than an internet video
[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="Mercenary848"]Craig destroys Brosnan in every possible way Heck, Casino Royale is better than all Brosnan Bond movies put together Casino Royale is the best Bond movie... THERE, I SAID IT! which one, :oI won't lie I though this was going to be a joke for a moment. I wish they would use Pierce Brosnon bond instead of Daniel Craig.
Thunderdrone
[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="Sandvichman"] Well, it wasn't exciting. The graphics are mediocre, the gameplay looks alright, but doesn't seem to be anything special, and has these weird cinematics you would find in cod, the story in it wont be alot better either. I credit the game when i have too, wii or not. I wouldnt say this was good if it was on a 360. Sandvichman* Did graphics excel Goldeneye N64? No * You're judging the gameplay from the video? Gameplay is judged from PLAYING the game * If it was on the 360, you would have loved it. Ofcourse The graphics were great for the 64 version. I'm judging from what i have here and now, if people are allowed to say its looks great, im allowed to say it looks mediocre. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB1zWEhgrLs cant i say this looks bad? And if its on the wii, you will always be there to defend it, no matter what. Gameplay and graphics cannot be judged from internet videos, its a game, not a movie. At least I give credit where its due for consoles that i dont own, you dont
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] * Did graphics excel Goldeneye N64? No * You're judging the gameplay from the video? Gameplay is judged from PLAYING the game * If it was on the 360, you would have loved it. OfcourseLastRambo341The graphics were great for the 64 version. I'm judging from what i have here and now, if people are allowed to say its looks great, im allowed to say it looks mediocre. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB1zWEhgrLs cant i say this looks bad? And if its on the wii, you will always be there to defend it, no matter what. Gameplay and graphics cannot be judged from internet videos, its a game, not a movie. At least I give credit where its due for consoles that i dont own, you dont You do not get to decide how a judge my games, i thought the gameplay of halo wars looked fun, i bought and never regretted it, but i though that far cry 2 looked mediocre based in videos, bought it anyways and regret it to this day. I decide how i judge my games, there is no golden law on doing that. That's good for you, want something for it?
[QUOTE="Thunderdrone"]
Took some crappy print screens of the YT video
Sandvichman
Sorry, that looks like a psp game, SMG2 stomps all over it, with the hammer of zues, tens times larger, that has been bathing in horse crap, for 200 years, beaten to death, then beaten some more, chewed up, pooped up, beaten to death again, in a blender, eaten again, thrown up beaten some more with the automatic version of zues hammer, then turned into a biscuit that was sent to the center of the sun. Where it got beaten to death again.
Well...um...I was going to agree and say the visuals need some work but then I completely read what he posted.
Graphics need improvement!
Only old school Goldeneye fans will be interested in this. And by the looks of it, this will flop. There are WAY too many changes from the original that people will notice.
Aiming down the sights for Goldeneye? Are you serious?
[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="Sandvichman"] The graphics were great for the 64 version. I'm judging from what i have here and now, if people are allowed to say its looks great, im allowed to say it looks mediocre. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB1zWEhgrLs cant i say this looks bad? And if its on the wii, you will always be there to defend it, no matter what. SandvichmanGameplay and graphics cannot be judged from internet videos, its a game, not a movie. At least I give credit where its due for consoles that i dont own, you dont You do not get to decide how a judge my games, i thought the gameplay of halo wars looked fun, i bought and never regretted it, but i though that far cry 2 looked mediocre based in videos, bought it anyways and regret it to this day. I decide how i judge my games, there is no golden law on doing that. That's good for you, want something for it? * Meh.... * Ya, i want you to chill and stop acting biased.
[QUOTE="LastRambo341"]@Sandvichman Ya, judge the graphics from screenshots from an unfinished game. That is how reviewers review graphics of a game, right?SandvichmanIt looks bad right now, am i not allowed to say that? I'm not a reviewer, but games don't get a magic touch from being on my tv screen witch is vastly inferior to my pc screen. Oh yes, they do get a touch
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] Gameplay and graphics cannot be judged from internet videos, its a game, not a movie. At least I give credit where its due for consoles that i dont own, you dontLastRambo341You do not get to decide how a judge my games, i thought the gameplay of halo wars looked fun, i bought and never regretted it, but i though that far cry 2 looked mediocre based in videos, bought it anyways and regret it to this day. I decide how i judge my games, there is no golden law on doing that. That's good for you, want something for it? * Meh.... * Ya, i want you to chill and stop acting biased. That's it, maybe you should stop talking nonsense the whole time. I said this game looks mediocre, nothing about that is biased.
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"]@Sandvichman Ya, judge the graphics from screenshots from an unfinished game. That is how reviewers review graphics of a game, right?LastRambo341It looks bad right now, am i not allowed to say that? I'm not a reviewer, but games don't get a magic touch from being on my tv screen witch is vastly inferior to my pc screen. Oh yes, they do get a touch Not a big difference.
[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="Sandvichman"] It looks bad right now, am i not allowed to say that? I'm not a reviewer, but games don't get a magic touch from being on my tv screen witch is vastly inferior to my pc screen. SandvichmanOh yes, they do get a touch Not a big difference. Thats what I said about Red Steel 2, then the game looked much better on my TV than it did on the computer. This will be the same case with Goldeneye
[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]Brosnan is the original goldeneye bond though, also that is a matter of opinion. Casino Royale was alright, but not specialGiancarBrosnan Bond movies were just a buck of ***** seriously Casino Royale resurrected the franchise
Personally my problem with the DC ones are they do not seem to have the as much of the fun, almost insanity of the classic bonds. Quantum of solace was almost painful, to the point it felt more like transporter(although I liked the first transporter). It missed the greatness of Ian Flemming, Bond was never meant to be a dark action movie that takes itself to seriously. Look at the classic charachters like goldfinger, Jaws, Baron Samedi oddjob & Mr. big. The JB stories have at some points bordered on scif.
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] Oh yes, they do get a touchLastRambo341Not a big difference. Thats what I said about Red Steel 2, then the game looked much better on my TV than it did on the computer. This will be the same case with Goldeneye I have a 24 inch computer that runs at 1920x1080 and 100 hz Anything that i see here is better then my tv screen. There can be a difference, but a game like goldeneye probably wont hide any goodies. You know what the fun thing is, you kept saying i was stalking you, yet here you are arguing against me based on what i thought about this video.
[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="Sandvichman"] Not a big difference. SandvichmanThats what I said about Red Steel 2, then the game looked much better on my TV than it did on the computer. This will be the same case with Goldeneye I have a 24 inch computer that runs at 1920x1080 and 100 hz Anything that i see here is better then my tv screen. There can be a difference, but a game like goldeneye probably wont hide any goodies. You know what the fun thing is, you kept saying i was stalking you, yet here you are arguing against me based on what i thought about this video. Adding fuel to the flame, eh brother?
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] Thats what I said about Red Steel 2, then the game looked much better on my TV than it did on the computer. This will be the same case with GoldeneyeLastRambo341I have a 24 inch computer that runs at 1920x1080 and 100 hz Anything that i see here is better then my tv screen. There can be a difference, but a game like goldeneye probably wont hide any goodies. You know what the fun thing is, you kept saying i was stalking you, yet here you are arguing against me based on what i thought about this video. Adding fuel to the flame, eh brother? You are the one that took up this dicussion, not me.
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]hd remake with horrible dual analog controls. Pc gamer here, have no problem with analog.That looks bloody brilliant!
Maybe they finally got an FPS right for once!
To bad we won't see the HD Remake on the 360 anymore though.
Rahnyc4
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment