Graphics don't matter, ey?

  • 134 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
For me graphics always were and will be 50% of the whole game. Even if the game is fun but have garbage graphics i'll enjoy it waaaaaay less but if it has both = kickass and thats why i have ps360.
Avatar image for wintermute0
wintermute0

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 wintermute0
Member since 2010 • 302 Posts

For me graphics always were and will be 50% of the whole game. Even if the game is fun but have garbage graphics i'll enjoy it waaaaaay less but if it has both = kickass and thats why i have ps360.silversix_

So every game on the NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Genesis, Dreamcast, and Gamecube must really suck for you then, amiright?

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#53 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
Although graphics will and always be an important part of a game, it should not take priority over gameplay. It's as ridiculous as putting CGI graphics over a proper script. At the end of the day, you need a proper foundation for your game, and gameplay is the frameworks of every good game.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#54 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]If, for some crazy reason, you're lumping graphics and art style together...then yes, graphics matter. But lumping the two together is inherently a bad idea. A game can have great technical graphics and a horrible art style (Killzone 2), or vice versa (let's say, for the sake of argument...Valkyria Chronicles). It's only in a couple very rare instances (think Crysis) that the art style relies on the good technical graphics. Most of the time, an art style can be fully realized regardless of how technically impressive the graphics shall be.locopatho
I just consider graphics to = how good the game looks. As, in everything I SEE in the game. Crysis looks good in a realistic way, Windwaker looks good in a cartooney way. But both are amazing.

Fallout 3 still looks better than any Wii game to date. Is that what you're suggesting - that it doesn't?
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

Crysis scored a 9.5 here and got AAA in many other places.... what do you think?

moistsandwich

I think that means its an excellent game. I know, crazy right :shock:

You think wrong...

Crysis is a very beautiful game, with good controls and mediocre to poor everything else... If thats excellence to you, then I guess I understand why you gave Demon's SOuls a 9.5. :lol:

Oh okay, my opinion is wrong. I'm glad you were there to tell me what to think . Thanks buddy! :) :| Serious mode now. It's a damn opinion. Although making some grand conspiracy theory that every reviewer on the internet only liked Crysis because of the graphics is far more laughable than anything you can (very poorly) attempt to poke fun at me for.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"]If, for some crazy reason, you're lumping graphics and art style together...then yes, graphics matter. But lumping the two together is inherently a bad idea. A game can have great technical graphics and a horrible art style (Killzone 2), or vice versa (let's say, for the sake of argument...Valkyria Chronicles). It's only in a couple very rare instances (think Crysis) that the art style relies on the good technical graphics. Most of the time, an art style can be fully realized regardless of how technically impressive the graphics shall be.jalexbrown
I just consider graphics to = how good the game looks. As, in everything I SEE in the game. Crysis looks good in a realistic way, Windwaker looks good in a cartooney way. But both are amazing.

Fallout 3 still looks better than any Wii game to date. Is that what you're suggesting - that it doesn't?

Nope. I'm suggesting it's graphics are intentionly grey, dark, dreary and depressing. And that many games would be ruined by having such graphics, Mario Galaxy, Halo 3, and Uncharted 2 to name a few. Thus proving that graphics do indeed matter :D
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]For me graphics always were and will be 50% of the whole game. Even if the game is fun but have garbage graphics i'll enjoy it waaaaaay less but if it has both = kickass and thats why i have ps360.wintermute0

So every game on the NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Genesis, Dreamcast, and Gamecube must really suck for you then, amiright?

If you play them now, will they be worse to you than when you played them when they came out? Of course they will. You know that aspects of that kind of game can be better now, so you're used to that.
Avatar image for PA_DUTCH
PA_DUTCH

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 PA_DUTCH
Member since 2008 • 908 Posts

washes and character design ie realistic vs cartoon...that is art style dude! just bease you can "see it" and call it graphics doesn't made it so. And to frame this topic using your wrong def. of graphics makes this topic FAIL

Avatar image for MrDziekuje
MrDziekuje

7730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#59 MrDziekuje
Member since 2004 • 7730 Posts

Graphics don't matter, people just blow their importance out of proportion. Many games don't need cutting-edge visuals to provide a fun gamingexperience. Look at Katamari, it's a fun series that has a place in a lot of gamer's hearts. Definitely not anystellar visuals there.

Avatar image for wintermute0
wintermute0

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 wintermute0
Member since 2010 • 302 Posts

[QUOTE="wintermute0"]

[QUOTE="silversix_"]For me graphics always were and will be 50% of the whole game. Even if the game is fun but have garbage graphics i'll enjoy it waaaaaay less but if it has both = kickass and thats why i have ps360.Skittles_McGee

So every game on the NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Genesis, Dreamcast, and Gamecube must really suck for you then, amiright?

If you play them now, will they be worse to you than when you played them when they came out? Of course they will. You know that aspects of that kind of game can be better now, so you're used to that.

That's not really what we're talking about. I wouldn't like them any less because of their poor graphics in comparison with Ps3 graphics. Gameplay mechanics are what I look at, not graphics.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#61 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="locopatho"] I just consider graphics to = how good the game looks. As, in everything I SEE in the game. Crysis looks good in a realistic way, Windwaker looks good in a cartooney way. But both are amazing. locopatho
Fallout 3 still looks better than any Wii game to date. Is that what you're suggesting - that it doesn't?

Nope. I'm suggesting it's graphics are intentionly grey, dark, dreary and depressing. And that many games would be ruined by having such graphics, Mario Galaxy, Halo 3, and Uncharted 2 to name a few. Thus proving that graphics do indeed matter :D

Well, they could always do a palette swap: make the rocks pink, the ground turquoise, the sky purple, and all the fog neon-green.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

washes and character design ie realistic vs cartoon...that is art style dude! just bease you can "see it" and call it graphics doesn't made it so. And to frame this topic using your wrong def. of graphics makes this topic FAIL

PA_DUTCH
Gameplay = how the game plays Sound = how the game sounds Graphics = how the game looks Very easy :D
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"] Fallout 3 still looks better than any Wii game to date. Is that what you're suggesting - that it doesn't?jalexbrown
Nope. I'm suggesting it's graphics are intentionly grey, dark, dreary and depressing. And that many games would be ruined by having such graphics, Mario Galaxy, Halo 3, and Uncharted 2 to name a few. Thus proving that graphics do indeed matter :D

Well, they could always do a palette swap: make the rocks pink, the ground turquoise, the sky purple, and all the fog neon-green.

Yes and that'd ruin Fallout 3's atmosphere wouldn't it?
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="wintermute0"]

So every game on the NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Genesis, Dreamcast, and Gamecube must really suck for you then, amiright?

wintermute0

If you play them now, will they be worse to you than when you played them when they came out? Of course they will. You know that aspects of that kind of game can be better now, so you're used to that.

That's not really what we're talking about. I wouldn't like them any less because of their poor graphics in comparison with Ps3 graphics. Gameplay mechanics are what I look at, not graphics.

Why not look at the whole package? Graphics are a part of the package. Developers don't work on them for nothing. Why would you only appreciate some of a game and not all of it?
Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

Fallout 3 is a lot more graphically impressive than anything on the Wii tho

i think the point of the matter is you don't play graphics, you play the game, praising graphics over gameplay is like praising how your food is arranged on a plate over how satisfied you were with the actual dish

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#66 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="locopatho"] Nope. I'm suggesting it's graphics are intentionly grey, dark, dreary and depressing. And that many games would be ruined by having such graphics, Mario Galaxy, Halo 3, and Uncharted 2 to name a few. Thus proving that graphics do indeed matter :Dlocopatho
Well, they could always do a palette swap: make the rocks pink, the ground turquoise, the sky purple, and all the fog neon-green.

Yes and that'd ruin Fallout 3's atmosphere wouldn't it?

Throw in Mario and some golden blocks? *Goes off to write Nintendo*
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"] Well, they could always do a palette swap: make the rocks pink, the ground turquoise, the sky purple, and all the fog neon-green.jalexbrown
Yes and that'd ruin Fallout 3's atmosphere wouldn't it?

Throw in Mario and some golden blocks? *Goes off to write Nintendo*

Haha what? Maybe you misunderstand me :P
Avatar image for PA_DUTCH
PA_DUTCH

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 PA_DUTCH
Member since 2008 • 908 Posts

[QUOTE="PA_DUTCH"]

washes and character design ie realistic vs cartoon...that is art style dude! just bease you can "see it" and call it graphics doesn't made it so. And to frame this topic using your wrong def. of graphics makes this topic FAIL

locopatho

Gameplay = how the game plays Sound = how the game sounds Graphics = how the game looks Very easy :D

well at least your nice about it...;)

Avatar image for wintermute0
wintermute0

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 wintermute0
Member since 2010 • 302 Posts

[QUOTE="wintermute0"]

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] If you play them now, will they be worse to you than when you played them when they came out? Of course they will. You know that aspects of that kind of game can be better now, so you're used to that.Skittles_McGee

That's not really what we're talking about. I wouldn't like them any less because of their poor graphics in comparison with Ps3 graphics. Gameplay mechanics are what I look at, not graphics.

Why not look at the whole package? Graphics are a part of the package. Developers don't work on them for nothing. Why would you only appreciate some of a game and not all of it?

Graphics are cool. I don't hate on graphics. I just think that gameplay > graphics. I like good graphics, who doesn't? They just don't mean the world to me. I honestly still love most of my favorite SNES games, more so than I love newer games. If the graphics are bearable, then I'm fine. Also, graphics are part of the package in your opinion, in my opinion they are a very very tiny part of the package. When I go see a movie like Transformers, that's when I look at graphics...

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#70 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="locopatho"] Yes and that'd ruin Fallout 3's atmosphere wouldn't it?locopatho
Throw in Mario and some golden blocks? *Goes off to write Nintendo*

Haha what? Maybe you misunderstand me :P

No, at this point I'm pretty much just being stupid and contributing nothing productive to the thread. :P
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"] Throw in Mario and some golden blocks? *Goes off to write Nintendo*jalexbrown
Haha what? Maybe you misunderstand me :P

No, at this point I'm pretty much just being stupid and contributing nothing productive to the thread. :P

Ah wonderful :) Please continue, let's stick some Pinatas in there too :D
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="wintermute0"]

That's not really what we're talking about. I wouldn't like them any less because of their poor graphics in comparison with Ps3 graphics. Gameplay mechanics are what I look at, not graphics.

wintermute0

Why not look at the whole package? Graphics are a part of the package. Developers don't work on them for nothing. Why would you only appreciate some of a game and not all of it?

Graphics are cool. I don't hate on graphics. I just think that gameplay > graphics. I like good graphics, who doesn't? They just don't mean the world to me. I honestly still love most of my favorite SNES games, more so than I love newer games. If the graphics are bearable, then I'm fine. Also, graphics are part of the package in your opinion, in my opinion they are a very very tiny part of the package. When I go see a movie like Transformers, that's when I look at graphics...

But they are part of the package. So if you take off nostalgia goggles when you play an old game, you will enjoy it less today than you did when it came out because some aspect of it isn't as good as what you're used to.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#73 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="locopatho"] Haha what? Maybe you misunderstand me :Plocopatho
No, at this point I'm pretty much just being stupid and contributing nothing productive to the thread. :P

Ah wonderful :) Please continue, let's stick some Pinatas in there too :D

Maybe Mario could have a machine gun...you know, for "teh mature gamerz!!1!!!111!".
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#74 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

Lot's of people, many of them Wii folk, go beyond "Gameplay is better than graphics!" all the way to"Graphics don't matter!" Would anyone be happy if every game looked like this?

Image 159

If the next Halo, Mario and Uncharted look like a dull grey slop?

locopatho

BULLSHOT!

:lol:

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"] No, at this point I'm pretty much just being stupid and contributing nothing productive to the thread. :Pjalexbrown
Ah wonderful :) Please continue, let's stick some Pinatas in there too :D

Maybe Mario could have a machine gun...you know, for "teh mature gamerz!!1!!!111!".

No joke, I would play that game. Seriously. Seeing Mario go ****ing bat**** crazy, just snapping and shooting all the "good" characters like Luigi and Peach... taking Yoshi behind the shed and putting him out of his misery. It would be so bizarre and twisted I would definitely, definitely go out of my way to play it.
Avatar image for wintermute0
wintermute0

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 wintermute0
Member since 2010 • 302 Posts

[QUOTE="wintermute0"]

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] Why not look at the whole package? Graphics are a part of the package. Developers don't work on them for nothing. Why would you only appreciate some of a game and not all of it?Skittles_McGee

Graphics are cool. I don't hate on graphics. I just think that gameplay > graphics. I like good graphics, who doesn't? They just don't mean the world to me. I honestly still love most of my favorite SNES games, more so than I love newer games. If the graphics are bearable, then I'm fine. Also, graphics are part of the package in your opinion, in my opinion they are a very very tiny part of the package. When I go see a movie like Transformers, that's when I look at graphics...

But they are part of the package. So if you take off nostalgia goggles when you play an old game, you will enjoy it less today than you did when it came out because some aspect of it isn't as good as what you're used to.

Your opinion is completely formed by personal experience, obviously... that does not apply to everyone. I'm also going to go out on a limb here and say that most games for the SNES have more substance than Ps3 games.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"] No, at this point I'm pretty much just being stupid and contributing nothing productive to the thread. :Pjalexbrown
Ah wonderful :) Please continue, let's stick some Pinatas in there too :D

Maybe Mario could have a machine gun...you know, for "teh mature gamerz!!1!!!111!".

And Yoshi could be a super realistic high def T Rex. Quickly, to Nintendo, we have games to create!
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="wintermute0"]

Graphics are cool. I don't hate on graphics. I just think that gameplay > graphics. I like good graphics, who doesn't? They just don't mean the world to me. I honestly still love most of my favorite SNES games, more so than I love newer games. If the graphics are bearable, then I'm fine. Also, graphics are part of the package in your opinion, in my opinion they are a very very tiny part of the package. When I go see a movie like Transformers, that's when I look at graphics...

wintermute0

But they are part of the package. So if you take off nostalgia goggles when you play an old game, you will enjoy it less today than you did when it came out because some aspect of it isn't as good as what you're used to.

Your opinion is completely formed by personal experience, obviously... that does not apply to everyone. I'm also going to go out on a limb here and say that most games for the SNES have more substance than Ps3 games.

I wasn't aware what I said was an opinion. When you look at something objectively (where's the opinion?) and it's less advanced (still not seeing opinion) than something you have seen recently, you wouldn't hold it on the same level (logic! whoa.). Of course it won't apply to everyone though. Many people never take their nostalgia glasses off. As for the last part, whatever you say. Next you'll tell me NES and SNES games are longer than today's games.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#79 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="locopatho"] Ah wonderful :) Please continue, let's stick some Pinatas in there too :Dlocopatho
Maybe Mario could have a machine gun...you know, for "teh mature gamerz!!1!!!111!".

And Yoshi could be a super realistic high def T Rex. Quickly, to Nintendo, we have games to create!

I hope you mean a robot T. Rex, and instead of using his tongue, he just shoots lasers out of his mouth...and wrist-mounted rocket launchers...!
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"] Maybe Mario could have a machine gun...you know, for "teh mature gamerz!!1!!!111!".jalexbrown
And Yoshi could be a super realistic high def T Rex. Quickly, to Nintendo, we have games to create!

I hope you mean a robot T. Rex, and instead of using his tongue, he just shoots lasers out of his mouth...and wrist-mounted rocket launchers...!

Let's call him something original, I know, Mecha Godzilla!
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#81 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="locopatho"] And Yoshi could be a super realistic high def T Rex. Quickly, to Nintendo, we have games to create!locopatho
I hope you mean a robot T. Rex, and instead of using his tongue, he just shoots lasers out of his mouth...and wrist-mounted rocket launchers...!

Let's call him something original, I know, Mecha Godzilla!

How 'bout Super Mecha YoshWii? You know...you gotta have Wii in there somewhere.
Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#82 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

Visuals do matter to an extent. If Gears of War, Uncharted 2, or Crysis, all had average or below graphics I doubt they would score as high. Still AAA material, but not the 9.5 they all got.

Avatar image for bigblunt537
bigblunt537

6907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#83 bigblunt537
Member since 2003 • 6907 Posts

What you posted has good graphics.... It has a dull art style. I'm sure Mario using Cryteks engine would look a million times better.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#84 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
Gameplay certainly matters MORE than graphics - look at Lair, for example - but anyone saying they wouldn't appreciate that same awesome gameplay WITH incredible graphics is lying to themselves. You don't NEED great graphics, but pretending you shun them like they make an experience worse is a stance I don't see a lot of people taking.
Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#85 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Gameplay certainly matters MORE than graphics - look at Lair, for example - but anyone saying they wouldn't appreciate that same awesome gameplay WITH incredible graphics is lying to themselves. You don't NEED great graphics, but pretending you shun them like they make an experience worse is a stance I don't see a lot of people taking.

Unfortunately, people in general tend to side with two extremes rather than rationalize that while graphics certainly are important, it's only the material that's being built on top of a foundation.
Avatar image for deactivated-598fc45371265
deactivated-598fc45371265

13247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#86 deactivated-598fc45371265
Member since 2008 • 13247 Posts

Graphics do matter. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Thing is, are graphics important enough to be the only thing noteworthy about the game?Willy105

I don't think many people would argue that they are.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#87 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

:roll:

why are you exadgerating? No one says Graphics don't matter completely what they say including me.


GRAPHICS do not matter in the context of bad gameplay and story, A game is not good If its gameplay and story fail these are nearly 90% of the equation who cares how the story is told If its 5 lines of someone saying poop over and over, Or that to hear that story being told you have to put on a big funnel over your ear to hear it *gameplay*


Gameplay, and story should be the foremost graphics a distance 2nd or 3rd with sound and such.
Graphics DO NOT matter when it comes to story and gameplay, A good gameplay and story game can have 2d graphics and still capture my interest.

WilliamRLBaker

I never mentioned gameplay or story? What you on about?



don't act like you didn't understand.
your making these big exadgerated comments.

NO ONE has said graphics aren't important, They have said Gameplay and story are more important.

When saying that, they have said "graphics don't matter". I have seen it myself :|

Obviously they didn't mean it literally, but it has been said.

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

Visuals do matter to an extent. If Gears of War, Uncharted 2, or Crysis, all had average or below graphics I doubt they would score as high. Still AAA material, but not the 9.5 they all got.

brickdoctor

that's why i love to take breaks from those kind of games and play games like Metroid Prime, games that would be great if they had Crysis-level graphics and still be great if they had 8-bit graphics

those kind of games are special imo

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#89 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
On a serious note: I think part of the reason people have tended to gravitate towards graphics is because we spend so much time hyping up games before they're playable, when all we have to go by is the graphics. Can't look at screenshots and know rather or not the gameplay is any good.
Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

Who exactly are you arguing with though? because I haven't seen anybody say graphics don't matter in years, just that graphics aren't all that matters.

Also FO3 is a really impressive game visually so I don't think you should be using it as an example of a negative. Sometimes its safe to say too many colours = garish.

Avatar image for TrapMuzik92
TrapMuzik92

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 TrapMuzik92
Member since 2009 • 3424 Posts
gameplay over graphics anyday
Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#92 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

Lot's of people, many of them Wii folk, go beyond "Gameplay is better than graphics!" all the way to"Graphics don't matter!" Would anyone be happy if every game looked like this?

If the next Halo, Mario and Uncharted look like a dull grey slop?

locopatho

I would take that over every game looking like this:

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#93 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
Visuals are important... here's a good example. Rosie O'Donnell looks like a homeless moose with the hygiene of a renaissance-era orgy. Megan Fox looks like she was made in a test tube. If Rosie O'Donnell was clearly, clearly a better lay (gameplay), and Megan Fox was a dead fish who made unattractive monkey noises in the act, would you still go for Rosie for the better experience? :lol: This is why extremes are bad. I've always said as long as the graphics don't break immersion, I am okay with whatever. The last GTA was disappointing graphically because pop-in and framerate drops would remove me from the experience. If they had dumbed something down a little to make framerate tighter I wouldn't have minded uglier character models or something. Good graphics are more important in something like Killzone than something like GTA, so it's certainly all relative.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#94 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"]

Lot's of people, many of them Wii folk, go beyond "Gameplay is better than graphics!" all the way to"Graphics don't matter!" Would anyone be happy if every game looked like this?

If the next Halo, Mario and Uncharted look like a dull grey slop?

PublicNuisance

I would take that over every game looking like this:

Wow...is that actually what Far Cry looked like on the Wii? That's...laughable. :lol::lol::lol:

Avatar image for Shad0ki11
Shad0ki11

12576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Shad0ki11
Member since 2006 • 12576 Posts

Graphics do matter. Anyone who says otherwise is lying.

Gameplay and graphics go hand-in-hand. You can't have one without the other.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] I think that means its an excellent game. I know, crazy right :shock:Skittles_McGee

You think wrong...

Crysis is a very beautiful game, with good controls and mediocre to poor everything else... If thats excellence to you, then I guess I understand why you gave Demon's SOuls a 9.5. :lol:

Oh okay, my opinion is wrong. I'm glad you were there to tell me what to think . Thanks buddy! :) :| Serious mode now. It's a damn opinion. Although making some grand conspiracy theory that every reviewer on the internet only liked Crysis because of the graphics is far more laughable than anything you can (very poorly) attempt to poke fun at me for.

Wait? are you trying to pass off your opinions and some others' as fact?

And everyone rating the game highly even when it doesnt deserve it, has nothing to do with "conspiracy"... it has to do with being human.

Oh wait... no one has ever looked at another human being and thought they were better than they actually are because of their looks... right?

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#98 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

Graphics matter more in terms of artistry than technical merrit. But even then, they don't matter too much. Gameplay and sound are far more important

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#99 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

Graphics do matter. Anyone who says otherwise is lying.

Gameplay and graphics go hand-in-hand. You can't have one without the other.

Shad0ki11

Sure you can. Graphics can very easily exist without gameplay.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#100 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

[QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"]

Lot's of people, many of them Wii folk, go beyond "Gameplay is better than graphics!" all the way to"Graphics don't matter!" Would anyone be happy if every game looked like this?

If the next Halo, Mario and Uncharted look like a dull grey slop?

jalexbrown

I would take that over every game looking like this:

Wow...is that actually what Far Cry looked like on the Wii? That's...laughable. :lol::lol::lol:

That was N64 Virtual Console :|