GT5 - Very 2D Trees

The trees look more 2D than ever. Check out 1:25. Even though Im not going to be driving up to trees to observe them, it does feel CHEAP that trees are two intersecting pieces of paper. I can see the game being marked down for this.

Thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oD6AyNb7o4&feature=player_embedded#!

Nerdy argument.Fightingfan

Ive said it before and i will say it again. When it comes to the environments, GT5 isin't all that, Dirt 2 has it beat on that aspect hands down.

Not a huge issue. I mean, its a racing sim, not a nature watch sim.

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Nerdy argument.ferret-gamer

I'm not too worried about 2D trees in a racing sim. If this was Bear Grylls Forest Exploration 2 than maybe I would care a little

very 2d trees and grilled cheese front ends, still a day 1 game for me.

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Nerdy argument.ferret-gamer

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Nerdy argument.Fightingfan

2D TREES? Oh noessssssssssssssss!!!!!! 2/10 confirmed.bleehum

Ive said it before and i will say it again. When it comes to the environments, GT5 isin't all that, Dirt 2 has it beat on that aspect hands down.

Snagal123

Dirt 2 beat GT5 in all graphical aspect from what I have seen.

And this is just the Directx 9 version.

The trees look more 2D than ever. Check out 1:25. Even though Im not going to be driving up to trees to observe them, it does feel CHEAP that trees are two intersecting pieces of paper. I can see the game being marked down for this.

Thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oD6AyNb7o4&feature=player_embedded#!

erglesmergle

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Ive said it before and i will say it again. When it comes to the environments, GT5 isin't all that, Dirt 2 has it beat on that aspect hands down.

Hakkai007

Dirt 2 beat GT5 in all graphical aspect from what I have seen.

The trees look more 2D than ever. Check out 1:25. Even though Im not going to be driving up to trees to observe them, it does feel CHEAP that trees are two intersecting pieces of paper. I can see the game being marked down for this.

Thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oD6AyNb7o4&feature=player_embedded#!

erglesmergle

Dirt has less cars racing at the same time and runs at a lower resolution/framerate compared to GT5 (at least on the PS3).

Jrfanfreak88

Which is why it has much better looking environments.

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Ive said it before and i will say it again. When it comes to the environments, GT5 isin't all that, Dirt 2 has it beat on that aspect hands down.

Jrfanfreak88

Dirt 2 beat GT5 in all graphical aspect from what I have seen.

Dirt 2is a preety game. Me like

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

Ive said it before and i will say it again. When it comes to the environments, GT5 isin't all that, Dirt 2 has it beat on that aspect hands down.

Jrfanfreak88

Dirt 2 beat GT5 in all graphical aspect from what I have seen.

Why people keep posting PC screens in a console game thread?

[QUOTE="Jrfanfreak88"]

Dirt has less cars racing at the same time and runs at a lower resolution/framerate compared to GT5 (at least on the PS3).

Snagal123

Which is why it has much better looking environments.

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

[QUOTE="Jrfanfreak88"]

Dirt has less cars racing at the same time and runs at a lower resolution/framerate compared to GT5 (at least on the PS3).

Fightingfan

Which is why it has much better looking environments.

I'm saying on PS3, Dirt 2 has better looking environments than GT5. Dirt 2 on 360 has better looking environments than Forza 3.Higher fps means less detail.

Dirt has less cars racing at the same time and runs at a lower resolution/framerate compared to GT5 (at least on the PS3).

Jrfanfreak88

Well Dirt 2 is not the kind of racing game like GT5. The races are usually smaller for a reason. But you can find a race with a large amount of cars for the long distance ones.

I am talking about he PC version, which could handle many more cars if it wanted to and it can go well beyond 1080P.

I play on 1680x1050 and 8XCSAA which can make a big difference in some areas. Even going from 8XMSAA to 8XCSAA made a difference.

And I have it modded so it now has "ultra high" settings.

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

[QUOTE="Jrfanfreak88"]

Dirt has less cars racing at the same time and runs at a lower resolution/framerate compared to GT5 (at least on the PS3).

Fightingfan

Which is why it has much better looking environments.

im more focused on racing then the trees ohwell cars still look better then any out therestereointegrity

Not as good looking as Dirt 2 cars.

im more focused on racing then the trees ohwell cars still look better then any out therestereointegrity

very 2d trees and grilled cheese front ends, still a day 1 game for me.

ProjectNatalFan

Nerdy argument.Fightingfan

this is gamespot bro

[QUOTE="Jrfanfreak88"]

Dirt has less cars racing at the same time and runs at a lower resolution/framerate compared to GT5 (at least on the PS3).

Hakkai007

Well Dirt 2 is not the kind of racing game like GT5. The races are usually smaller for a reason. But you can find a race with a large amount of cars for the long distance ones.

I am talking about he PC version to which could handle many more cars if it wanted to and it can go well beyond 1080P.

I play on 1680x1050 and 8XCSAA which was make a big difference in some areas. Even going from 8XMSAA to 8XCSAA made a difference.

And I have it modded so it now has "ultra high" settings.

I play on 1680x1050 and 8XCSAA which can make a big difference in some areas. Even going from 8XMSAA to 8XCSAA made a difference.

Hakkai007

Wut? 16xCSAA has more or less the same Quality of 8xMSAA.

16xCSAA:

8xmsaa

If you are going to be looking at trees rather than your next apex you are going tosuck so hard at this game.

If this was a tree simulator game then yes that would be a problem, but its not so no big deal.

I'm not too worried about 2D trees in a racing sim. If this was Bear Grylls Forest Exploration 2 than maybe I would care a little

BPoole96

Everyone keeps saying that when your racing you won't see those trees, very true. I promise your notice how bad they look when your watching the replay though.

I thought GT5 was photorealistic? the best looking game ever? nothing can compare to its awesomeness? but the second someone does find fault, its excuses, excuses, excuses.

I played it at GameStop and it also had REALLY jaggy shadows on the cars.

um yeah? didnt you know? the sky line and sky are high def 2d bitmaps, and all trees, bushes and such are 2d textures set in a + pattern with a script to make them rotate to you. Its the same tech used in...Mario 64...

Edit: as well as the fans in the stands are just 2d textures.

um yeah? didnt you know? the sky line and sky are high def 2d bitmaps, and all trees, bushes and such are 2d textures set in a + pattern with a script to make them rotate to you. Its the same tech used in...Mario 64...

Edit: as well as the fans in the stands are just 2d textures.

WilliamRLBaker

Everyone keeps saying that when your racing you won't see those trees, very true. I promise your notice how bad they look when your watching the replay though.

I thought GT5 was photorealistic? the best looking game ever? nothing can compare to its awesomeness? but the second someone does find fault, its excuses, excuses, excuses.

Snagal123

2d tree's oh no the game sucks now, ever time I drive 15mph my eyes will burn. GT5 get's 3 out of 10 the tree's just made driving in the game horrible and I could not enjoy it at all. :roll:

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

I play on 1680x1050 and 8XCSAA which can make a big difference in some areas. Even going from 8XMSAA to 8XCSAA made a difference.

ferret-gamer

Wut? 16xCSAA has more or less the same Quality of 8xMSAA.

Did I say 16x?

Also the difference is better seen in motion. Pictures cannot do the AA justice.

And here are some nice pics of one of the cars.

Nerdy argument.Fightingfan

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Nerdy argument.JohnF111