GTA IV limited to one city because of Xbox 360's DVD9

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
You are all idiots if you actually believe that line of cow snot. :roll: And so is anyone who only reads the thread title and ignores this ONE LINE post. That includes cows and lemmings.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?
Avatar image for -Daddy-
-Daddy-

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -Daddy-
Member since 2007 • 417 Posts
Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?the-very-best
 .
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
You're absolutely right, topic creator.
Avatar image for Sagacious_Tien
Sagacious_Tien

12562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#5 Sagacious_Tien
Member since 2005 • 12562 Posts

The game was in development just after GTA: SA launched. They would have known exactly what they were creating long before the Xbox 360 and PS3 had their full specs out.

GTA 4 was always going to be one city. 

Avatar image for StealthSting
StealthSting

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 StealthSting
Member since 2006 • 6915 Posts

Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?the-very-best

 

Actually, thats even more ridiculous. 

Avatar image for wugglez
wugglez

719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 wugglez
Member since 2004 • 719 Posts

You are all idiots if you actually believe that line of cow snot. :roll: And so is anyone who only reads the thread title and ignores this ONE LINE post. That includes cows and lemmings.mjarantilla

 

i would have to go with GTA4 being smaller than san andreas because it was tedious driving (or flying) over all that open countryside to get to places 

Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts

Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?the-very-best

Only Rock* knows the truth behind our questions and claims.

Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
He has bridges that connect you to other parts of the city. It's probably HUGE!
Avatar image for Heyheyitsdanray
Heyheyitsdanray

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Heyheyitsdanray
Member since 2005 • 77 Posts
I don't get why people think it's gonna be small if it's just new york, i mean if it's the whole 5 boroughs it'll be 320 sqare miles, whereas san andreas ws oly 18. Good thread TC.
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?the-very-best
Both claims are dumb. We need to wait to see more then a trailer before we say anything close to stuff like that. Both will at very least IMO be close to eachother.

 

Avatar image for geodisicdome
geodisicdome

13663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#12 geodisicdome
Member since 2005 • 13663 Posts

He has bridges that connect you to other parts of the city. It's probably HUGE!Tony-Baxter

they have said its smaller than SA. 

Avatar image for Idonomeus
Idonomeus

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Idonomeus
Member since 2006 • 2273 Posts

[QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"]He has bridges that connect you to other parts of the city. It's probably HUGE!geodisicdome

they have said its smaller than SA. 

I'm not questioning the truth of this but does anyone have a link so I can read what was said?

Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts

I'm not questioning the truth of this but does anyone have a link so I can read what was said?

Idonomeus

Here's the GS new article about it: GTAIV details.

And brief summary from GTA legends union newsletter:

» The protagonist's name is Niko Bellic - an Eastern European immigrant who has come to Liberty City to live the "American Dream." The game is set in Liberty City in 2007, but it is bigger than the Liberty City we saw in GTA III.

» The GTA 4 equivalent of the Statue of Liberty is called the Statue of Happiness... Broker is the GTA IV equivalent of Brooklyn, Manhattan is now called Algonquin, Queens is now Dukes, the Bronx is Bohan, and New Jersey is Alderney. The map is smaller than San Andreas, but considerably more detailed. No countryside or desert, we are led to believe.

» Rockstar is giving its players more freedom, more choice, and more sense of control over their destiny - the structure of GTA4's storyline is quite different to it's predecessors as it can be told in a number of different ways. You can talk to people in person, by cell phones, and there are a bunch of other ways of giving the player information... In previous GTA games you were like a slave because you had to constantly take orders from people when doing missions. There is still an element of that in Grand Theft Auto 4, but you can also choose how you want to spend your time...

» There are no planes in GTA IV because there is only one city, and Rockstar want the game to seem realistic. That means there will be no rollerblades, no unicycles, probably no jetpacks and indeed no planes. Rockstar are giving choice and variety which feels right for the character. However there will be motorbikes.

» After an initial load sequence, the game will never load again. Not even during exterior-interior transitions (and vice versa).

» Both versions of the game (Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3) will likely be identical, but the Xbox 360 version will have exclusive downloadable episodic (sizeable) content. Rockstar have now spent over 3 years developing the game, and Dan Houser compares the leap from GTA III to GTA IV, to the leap from GTA to GTA III.

» GTA IV will have multiplayer, but it's not going to be a massively multiplayer online game, says Dan Houser. They are trying to make something that is interesting, fun, progressive and which goes along nicely with the single-player game.

 

Avatar image for Idonomeus
Idonomeus

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Idonomeus
Member since 2006 • 2273 Posts

Rockstar have now spent over 3 years developing the game, and Dan Houser compares the leap from GTA III to GTA IV, to the leap from GTA to GTA III.
the-very-best

Disappointed about the size but that sounds promising. I'm not really looking for another SA with better graphics anyway, so I'm willing to give them a chance but I do have high expectations.

Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts

[QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"]He has bridges that connect you to other parts of the city. It's probably HUGE!geodisicdome

they have said its smaller than SA.

SA was too big for me anyway. There was a freaking interstate on that sob.
Avatar image for danneswegman
danneswegman

12937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 danneswegman
Member since 2005 • 12937 Posts

that is so silly if people believe that. probably insecure PS3 owners.

 

AND: New York is pretty big........ 

Avatar image for justforlotr2004
justforlotr2004

10935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 justforlotr2004
Member since 2004 • 10935 Posts
At 309 square miles, New York City is the largest city in the United States, and one of the largest in the world.  If anything the game will be bigger than GTA:SA
Avatar image for bindip
bindip

2585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 bindip
Member since 2005 • 2585 Posts
whats stoping them for putting on 2 disks ? nothing. Pc games come in 2 disk, hell even 3 some times. Nothings stopping them from doing this.
Avatar image for chrisoff_1
chrisoff_1

4138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 chrisoff_1
Member since 2003 • 4138 Posts

im guessing rockstar want a more focused well realised single city, san andreas had to be huge for them to one up themselfs from the previous games, making a state sized map with the kinda detail shown in the GTA IV trailer would have been a astronomical undertaking there's no hardware issues at play here its more i a time/design thing id say

Avatar image for gokurocks2442
gokurocks2442

3371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#21 gokurocks2442
Member since 2004 • 3371 Posts

You are all idiots if you actually believe that line of cow snot. :roll: And so is anyone who only reads the thread title and ignores this ONE LINE post. That includes cows and lemmings.mjarantilla
lol let cows be cows and fanboys be fanboys and even though this post will not even be seen by 10% of the cows on gamespot

GTA4 was desighned for DVD 9 not blu-ray there for meaning xbox360 did not downgrade gta4 in anyway however if gta 4 was desighned for blu-ray then you could say xbox360 is limited to one city but it doesnt matter because GTA4 was made and formatted for DVD 9

Get over it

Avatar image for Oemenia
Oemenia

10416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#22 Oemenia
Member since 2003 • 10416 Posts
Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?the-very-best
Recent eveidence suggests otherwise...
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

At 309 square miles, New York City is the largest city in the United States, and one of the largest in the world.  If anything the game will be bigger than GTA:SAjustforlotr2004

Its been confirmed that the world will be smaller then its previous game.

Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts

You're absolutely right, topic creator.KeyWii

:lol:

didnt you read it???

Avatar image for mmogoon
mmogoon

7311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#25 mmogoon
Member since 2006 • 7311 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"]You're absolutely right, topic creator.wavebrid

:lol:

didnt you read it???

 :lol::lol:

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts

To keep all realism in play here, I have to say that I do not believe 360 is making this game smaller because of the DVD9.  I think it this way because its the first GTA on the next gen consoles.  There was a lot to do to get the game so it could release on both consoles at the same time.

Now, GTA 5 may be a different story.  It remains to be seen.

At 309 square miles, New York City is the largest city in the United States, and one of the largest in the world.  If anything the game will be bigger than GTA:SA

justforlotr2004

 

The problem with this statement is that LA is also a large city and SA also incorporated San Fran and Vegas.  So, I'm not to sure you're right.

Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#27 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

You are all idiots if you actually believe that line of cow snot. :roll: And so is anyone who only reads the thread title and ignores this ONE LINE post. That includes cows and lemmings.mjarantilla

Yeah, I remember the ownage we served up last night in the PS3 forums! :lol:  So many misiinformed cows..

"bu....but.....BR is needed for games. DVD9 was maxed out last gen. teh cell is like a 2nd GPU"

Cows believe every word Sony says! :lol:

ON topic: I guess DVD9 is holding back PC games too......:roll:

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts

ON topic: I guess DVD9 is holding back PC games too......:roll:

LosDaddie

PC can install a large section of the game on a hard drive.  Big difference between that and the 360.  You can't argue that.

Avatar image for tango90101
tango90101

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 tango90101
Member since 2006 • 5977 Posts

Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?the-very-best

not when the vast majority of mulitplat games look worse on the ps3...;)

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?tango90101

not when the vast majority of mulitplat games look worse on the ps3...;)

 

Isn't Tango a joke.  We all know that's not true.  That all of the multiplats, thus far, have looked identical.

Avatar image for Cedmln
Cedmln

8802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#31 Cedmln
Member since 2006 • 8802 Posts

Who ever made up this whole "GTA 4 is smaller than GTA SA because of the 360's DVD9" is an idiot...

The only reason this game will be smaller is if the developers want it ot be that way, not because of the DVD9. Isn't DVD9 superior to the PS2's DVD? Thats the only way it can be force to be smaller than GTA SA, is if it was Inferior to it.

Now stop these foolish threads. NOW!

 

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

» Both versions of the game (Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3) will likely be identical, but the Xbox 360 version will have exclusive downloadable episodic (sizeable) content. Rockstar have now spent over 3 years developing the game, and Dan Houser compares the leap from GTA III to GTA IV, to the leap from GTA to GTA III.

Like i just said in another thread. How if 360 is holding back GTA are they getting in Rockstars own words Xbox 360 version will have EXCLUSIVE downlowdable episodic (SIZEABLE) content.? So if the Sony fanboys are right how could 360 have room for this sizeable content?

Avatar image for Cedmln
Cedmln

8802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#33 Cedmln
Member since 2006 • 8802 Posts

» Both versions of the game (Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3) will likely be identical, but the Xbox 360 version will have exclusive downloadable episodic (sizeable) content. Rockstar have now spent over 3 years developing the game, and Dan Houser compares the leap from GTA III to GTA IV, to the leap from GTA to GTA III.

Like i just said in another thread. How if 360 is holding back GTA are they getting in Rockstars own words Xbox 360 version will have EXCLUSIVE downlowdable episodic (SIZEABLE) content.? So if the Sony fanboys are right how could 360 have room for this sizeable content?

Eltroz

THe PS3 version is getting the same treatment... Just not the same stuff.

Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts

You're absolutely right, topic creator.KeyWii

I dont think you read the message.

Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#35 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

ON topic: I guess DVD9 is holding back PC games too......:roll:

dubvisions

PC can install a large section of the game on a hard drive.  Big difference between that and the 360.  You can't argue that.

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]Isn't it ridiculous to claim the PS3 version will be worse just because the game was shown off on the 360 first?tango90101

not when the vast majority of mulitplat games look worse on the ps3...;)

I wish people would stop saying crap like this. The games don't look worse on the PS3, the differences are marginal at best going either way. Definitely not enough of a difference to say that it looks WORSE. That's a pretty strong word and it is just as inaccurate when the cows say the 360 version of Oblivion looks worse than the PS3 version. If you have to look hard to find the differences, it isn't even worth discussing.
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

» Both versions of the game (Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3) will likely be identical, but the Xbox 360 version will have exclusive downloadable episodic (sizeable) content. Rockstar have now spent over 3 years developing the game, and Dan Houser compares the leap from GTA III to GTA IV, to the leap from GTA to GTA III.

Like i just said in another thread. How if 360 is holding back GTA are they getting in Rockstars own words Xbox 360 version will have EXCLUSIVE downlowdable episodic (SIZEABLE) content.? So if the Sony fanboys are right how could 360 have room for this sizeable content?

Cedmln

THe PS3 version is getting the same treatment... Just not the same stuff.

Missed the point. I just want a fanboy to explain how GTA could not make the game any bigger because of the 360 cause of lack of blue-ray but yet there is still room for sizeable content? Since they keep saying that
Avatar image for polarguy
polarguy

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 polarguy
Member since 2007 • 42 Posts

At 309 square miles, New York City is the largest city in the United States, and one of the largest in the world.  justforlotr2004

No it isnt.  Not even close.

Sitka, Alaska is the largest (at 2874 square miles).

Jacksonville, Florida is the largest city in area in the contiguous 48 states at 758 square miles.

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts
[QUOTE="dubvisions"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

ON topic: I guess DVD9 is holding back PC games too......:roll:

LosDaddie

PC can install a large section of the game on a hard drive.  Big difference between that and the 360.  You can't argue that.

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

 

What kind of question is this?  It makes no sense.  They put games on DVD9 because there's nearly no one who has a blu-ray drive on their pC and HD-DVD isn;t available yet.  What else would they put PC games on?  What a jack.

Avatar image for Cedmln
Cedmln

8802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#40 Cedmln
Member since 2006 • 8802 Posts
[QUOTE="Cedmln"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Eltroz

THe PS3 version is getting the same treatment... Just not the same stuff.

Missed the point. I just want a fanboy to explain how GTA could not make the game any bigger because of the 360 cause of lack of blue-ray but yet there is still room for sizeable content? Since they keep saying that

Oh ok. I did get that, i just wasn't sure if you were talking about that or not. Sorry for the inconvenience (I hope i spelled that right because I never spelled it before in my life) :)...

Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#41 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="dubvisions"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

ON topic: I guess DVD9 is holding back PC games too......:roll:

dubvisions

PC can install a large section of the game on a hard drive.  Big difference between that and the 360.  You can't argue that.

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

 

What kind of question is this?  It makes no sense.  They put games on DVD9 because there's nearly no one who has a blu-ray drive on their pC and HD-DVD isn;t available yet.  What else would they put PC games on?  What a jack.

Don't dodge the question, cow

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts
[QUOTE="dubvisions"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="dubvisions"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

ON topic: I guess DVD9 is holding back PC games too......:roll:

LosDaddie

PC can install a large section of the game on a hard drive.  Big difference between that and the 360.  You can't argue that.

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

 

What kind of question is this?  It makes no sense.  They put games on DVD9 because there's nearly no one who has a blu-ray drive on their pC and HD-DVD isn;t available yet.  What else would they put PC games on?  What a jack.

Don't dodge the question, cow

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

 

i answered the question.  Can't you read.

Avatar image for polarguy
polarguy

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 polarguy
Member since 2007 • 42 Posts
[QUOTE="dubvisions"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="dubvisions"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

ON topic: I guess DVD9 is holding back PC games too......:roll:

LosDaddie

PC can install a large section of the game on a hard drive.  Big difference between that and the 360.  You can't argue that.

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

 

What kind of question is this?  It makes no sense.  They put games on DVD9 because there's nearly no one who has a blu-ray drive on their pC and HD-DVD isn;t available yet.  What else would they put PC games on?  What a jack.

Don't dodge the question, cow

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

 

It looks like they did answer your question with a valid point.  But why dont you give us the answer you were looking for.

Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts

I'm glad it's just one city.  GTA had this problem of "Hey, if we make it bigger, we don't have to make it better!  That play is FLAWLESS!!!"

Neither Vice City nor San Andreas actually played better, or any different, than GTA3.  GTA4 is going to have to do some things different if it's going to be worth my money.

Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#45 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

i answered the question.  Can't you read.

dubvisions

I can read. Obviously you cannot

Question:

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

Answer:

They put games on DVD9 because there's nearly no one who has a blu-ray drive on their pC and HD-DVD isn;t available yet. 

 

How many PC games ship on multiple DVD9s?

Avatar image for Ericvon71
Ericvon71

3219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Ericvon71
Member since 2004 • 3219 Posts

You are all idiots if you actually believe that line of cow snot. :roll: And so is anyone who only reads the thread title and ignores this ONE LINE post. That includes cows and lemmings.mjarantilla

Who the @#@$ cares as long as it is a good game....................man you people complain about the most ridiculous things.

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts
[QUOTE="dubvisions"]

i answered the question.  Can't you read.

LosDaddie

I can read. Obviously you cannot

Question:

Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD, but still ship on DVD9?

Answer:

They put games on DVD9 because there's nearly no one who has a blu-ray drive on their pC and HD-DVD isn;t available yet. 

 

How many PC games ship on multiple DVD9s?

 

Are you kidding?  You have to be.  Your answer was what i already said.  READ, little guy, READ!!!  I told YOU that no one had the blu-ray or HD-DVD drives.

 

And to your new question:  "How many PC games ship on multiple DVD9s?"  Probably not very many, any more.  I think that now that most people have PC's in the GB and not the MB that developers take advantage of the PC's hard drive.  Which I already stated earlier.

You have a particluar point you're trying to prove and its failing, hard.  Why don;t you take a little break, take adeep breath, and tell yourself, "I'm a good person, I'm good looking, and darnit, people love me."  Then come back and see if you can make some sense.

Avatar image for shadow8585
shadow8585

2947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 shadow8585
Member since 2006 • 2947 Posts
look at oblivion 360 and laughs at thread title
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#49 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

And to your new question:  "How many PC games ship on multiple DVD9s?"  Probably not very many, any more.  I think that now that most people have PC's in the GB and not the MB that developers take advantage of the PC's hard drive.  Which I already stated earlier.

You have a particluar point you're trying to prove and its failing, hard.  Why don;t you take a little break, take adeep breath, and tell yourself, "I'm a good person, I'm good looking, and darnit, people love me."  Then come back and see if you can make some sense.

dubvisions

:lol:

Oh man....the courage online anonymity gives you is downright hilarious! :lol: Yup, typical cow. :)

All that ranting and still no answer to my original question: Do you know why PC games install info on the HDD yet still ship on a single DVD9?

Is it because DVD9 is not enough? Or because the HDD's speed is far greater than an optical disc speed?

Avatar image for rykaziel
rykaziel

1149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 rykaziel
Member since 2003 • 1149 Posts
While the land mass isn't necessarily larger, I think that the land mass that is there will be much more packed with things to do than GTASA.  I think it will be very similar to the jump from Daggerfall to Morrowind.  Daggerfall was huge, and larger than Morrowind, but Morrowind felt a bit larger just because it was more populated with things to do.