[QUOTE="Tjeremiah1988"][QUOTE="nerds_return"][QUOTE="Led_poison"][QUOTE="nerds_return"][QUOTE="Led_poison"][QUOTE="nerds_return"] [QUOTE="Led_poison"]10.0 says nowaahammur
if you are not a fanboy, i dont know who is.
I'm sorry, that game deserved its 10.0, just because you could not have as much fun in the world as say GTA:SA does not make it a bad game. Rockstar did a great job of presenting, laying out a deep world with a great, humorous storyline filled with lots of satire.
its not a bad game, its a good game, but it its not worth a 10.0. i would honestly rate it as a 9.1.
So 9.1 is dissapointing?
yes, for a game like this, yes. its a 9+ soley because of the gameplay, but that gets repetitive. Thats its problem, its to repetitive, and i would give it a 3 at best for lasting appeal. Honestly, you do one mission, you've done them all.
and btw, thats not how you spell DISAPPOINTING...
but c'mon. The level of detail, story, and mission (all arent the same) are just "epic". Never have I felt part of a city in a video game like gta4 made me feel. Also, it has good game play and is a very long game unlike many today. It deserved every 10 it got. MGS, I dont understand how that game got a 10.
are you serious? everything is pretty much repetitive... if it wasnt for the euphoria physics engine the game wouldnt of have gotten a 10
yes im serious. Are you serious??? How was it repetitive? The game gave you choices and every mission wasnt the same.
Log in to comment