[QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(yo_foosure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore
Halo 3 Won't Be Successful
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(killtacticssure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore FPS, and what else? You can't a console is worse than the other just cus of one genre. Look at all the lacking of the others.....
[QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(killtacticssure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'(
wow..........you just got owned by the GUINESS BOOK OF WORLD RECORDS.........go look at a recent copy.....then cry yourself to sleep of your FAILURE to diss the MEGAVERSE that is HALO.........you lose :P nextjazrealWow, ultimate ownage....., undeniable, unadulterrated ownage. GET PWND ALREADY!!!!
[QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(yo_foosure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version.Â
Halo: Combat Evolved. Or rather - Combat DeEvolved. That should be the slogan that Microsoft should run with for the latest in its One Hit Wonder trilogy - Halo 3.
Now don't get me wrong. Halo was a good game, although a little over rated, and fulfilled itself as the only official X-Box game worth buying the console for (although it came out on PC! Bad move). It developed tactical shooting and developed a good fanbase for those interested in that kind of thing. It had satisfactory multiplayer content which was good solid fun but also applied the use of tactics like in the missions.
Then enter Halo 2. To increase Halo fanbase, they decided to dumb the game down for those who don't have the time for tactics and made the game just a full on shooter with limited tactics and cruddy weapons. Yes Halo 1s weapons were far superior.
And now Halo 3 which promises to be a rehash of Halo 2s style of gameplay to keep these gamers who don't like to think that much and just shoot (the types of gamers who thought Doom 3 and Prey were Gods Gift to Gaming) and still keep in pretty well the same style as Tribes only without the jetpacks. Plus the same repetitive nature of the game will drastically annoy fans of the original and soon enough people will just ignore Halo and remember it for what the series really is - A One Hit Wonder, much in the same vain as the Baha Men's "Who Let the Dogs Out" and the original Rocky film.
Resistance is the Halo killer for this generation of gaming. No doubt about it.
:'(
yo_foo
He's back and still clever.
[QUOTE="jazreal"]wow..........you just got owned by the GUINESS BOOK OF WORLD RECORDS.........go look at a recent copy.....then cry yourself to sleep of your FAILURE to diss the MEGAVERSE that is HALO.........you lose :P nextSpartan070Wow, ultimate ownage....., undeniable, unadulterrated ownage. GET PWND ALREADY!!!! so the guiness world records tells me Halo is the greatest series ever? phail x infinity :'(
[QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(coolviper2003sure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version. opinion yet again :'(
[QUOTE="yo_foo"]Halo: Combat Evolved. Or rather - Combat DeEvolved. That should be the slogan that Microsoft should run with for the latest in its One Hit Wonder trilogy - Halo 3.
Now don't get me wrong. Halo was a good game, although a little over rated, and fulfilled itself as the only official X-Box game worth buying the console for (although it came out on PC! Bad move). It developed tactical shooting and developed a good fanbase for those interested in that kind of thing. It had satisfactory multiplayer content which was good solid fun but also applied the use of tactics like in the missions.
Then enter Halo 2. To increase Halo fanbase, they decided to dumb the game down for those who don't have the time for tactics and made the game just a full on shooter with limited tactics and cruddy weapons. Yes Halo 1s weapons were far superior.
And now Halo 3 which promises to be a rehash of Halo 2s style of gameplay to keep these gamers who don't like to think that much and just shoot (the types of gamers who thought Doom 3 and Prey were Gods Gift to Gaming) and still keep in pretty well the same style as Tribes only without the jetpacks. Plus the same repetitive nature of the game will drastically annoy fans of the original and soon enough people will just ignore Halo and remember it for what the series really is - A One Hit Wonder, much in the same vain as the Baha Men's "Who Let the Dogs Out" and the original Rocky film.
Resistance is the Halo killer for this generation of gaming. No doubt about it.
:'(
Tasman_basic
He's back and still clever.
lol nice thanks. :'(
[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(yo_foosure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version. opinion yet again :'( No, the PS2's graphics are slightly worse, that's not opinion. That's fact
[QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(coolviper2003sure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version. opinion yet again :'( No, the PS2's graphics are slightly worse, that's not opinion. That's fact Graphics doesn't equal gameplay and the strength of PS2s library owns XBOX library. You've been owned admit it! :'(
[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(yo_foosure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version. opinion yet again :'( No, the PS2's graphics are slightly worse, that's not opinion. That's fact Graphics doesn't equal gameplay and the strength of PS2s library owns XBOX library. You've been owned admit it! :'( No, but they'ere the SAME game! Meaning the Xbox version is the better version, even if it's only slightly. You've been owned so many times. How have I been owned? I've not felt once that you've owned me. Most of your statements are Fanboy garbage
[QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(coolviper2003sure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version. opinion yet again :'( No, the PS2's graphics are slightly worse, that's not opinion. That's fact Graphics doesn't equal gameplay and the strength of PS2s library owns XBOX library. You've been owned admit it! :'( No, but they'er the SAME game! Meaning the Xbox version is the better version, even if it's only slightly. You've been owned so many times. How have I been owned, I've not felt once that you've owned me. Most of your statements are Fanboy garbage I sugget that you and I quit arguing with that blind owned fanboy. I think my work here is done. Please enjoy the links Yo and hopefully you will come back with some proof for your statements the next time you make another garbage thread.
[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(Dr_DudeMansure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version. opinion yet again :'( No, the PS2's graphics are slightly worse, that's not opinion. That's fact Graphics doesn't equal gameplay and the strength of PS2s library owns XBOX library. You've been owned admit it! :'( No, but they'er the SAME game! Meaning the Xbox version is the better version, even if it's only slightly. You've been owned so many times. How have I been owned, I've not felt once that you've owned me. Most of your statements are Fanboy garbage I sugget that you and I quit arguing with that blind owned fanboy. I think my work here is done. Please enjoy the links Yo and hopefully you will come back with some proof for your statements the next time you make another garbage thread. Yeah, I agree, we should stop. Yo is such a blind fanboy it's almost sickening. Well Yo, I'm done arguing with you, you've obviously lost and just don't want to admit it, and that's fine. I'm sure this won't be the last time we have a debate.
Halo: Combat Evolved. Or rather - Combat DeEvolved. That should be the slogan that Microsoft should run with for the latest in its One Hit Wonder trilogy - Halo 3.Gears > Resistance. Resistance fails. Fanboys fail. PS3 fails. Sorry to say it, but your logic fails.
Now don't get me wrong. Halo was a good game, although a little over rated, and fulfilled itself as the only official X-Box game worth buying the console for (although it came out on PC! Bad move). It developed tactical shooting and developed a good fanbase for those interested in that kind of thing. It had satisfactory multiplayer content which was good solid fun but also applied the use of tactics like in the missions.
Then enter Halo 2. To increase Halo fanbase, they decided to dumb the game down for those who don't have the time for tactics and made the game just a full on shooter with limited tactics and cruddy weapons. Yes Halo 1s weapons were far superior.
And now Halo 3 which promises to be a rehash of Halo 2s style of gameplay to keep these gamers who don't like to think that much and just shoot (the types of gamers who thought Doom 3 and Prey were Gods Gift to Gaming) and still keep in pretty well the same style as Tribes only without the jetpacks. Plus the same repetitive nature of the game will drastically annoy fans of the original and soon enough people will just ignore Halo and remember it for what the series really is - A One Hit Wonder, much in the same vain as the Baha Men's "Who Let the Dogs Out" and the original Rocky film.
Resistance is the Halo killer for this generation of gaming. No doubt about it.
:'(
yo_foo
[QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Besides PS3 has higher standards for games anyway. Resistance got a 8.7 or whatever but would have easily got a 9.9 on the 360 because the standard for games on the 360 is lower than the standard of games for the PS3. How so? Because PS2 owned XBOX. And PS3 will own the 360 :'(coolviper2003sure thing :roll: just like Halo 2 would've probably received a 7 or so if it had been released on PS2. :'( HAHAHAHAHA...you must have been dropped on your head a few hundred times as a child huh? And I am sure you believe that the ps2 is more powerful then the xbox as well! it's the PS2s quality library that gave the PS2 its high standards not its power. That is why PS2 > XBOX and the the PS3 inherited those high standards which is why resistance scored lower. :'( haha oh yes who could forget all of PS2s "quality" FPSs... they dont make'em like killzone anymore Timesplitters and Timesplitters 2. And also lets look at PS2 games outside the FPS genre. MGS, FF, GTA etc. Owned! :'( Timesplitters 2 and 3 are also on the Xbox and Gamecube, they're also slightly better then the PS2 version. opinion yet again :'( No, the PS2's graphics are slightly worse, that's not opinion. That's fact Graphics doesn't equal gameplay and the strength of PS2s library owns XBOX library. You've been owned admit it! :'( No, but they'er the SAME game! Meaning the Xbox version is the better version, even if it's only slightly. You've been owned so many times. How have I been owned, I've not felt once that you've owned me. Most of your statements are Fanboy garbage I sugget that you and I quit arguing with that blind owned fanboy. I think my work here is done. Please enjoy the links Yo and hopefully you will come back with some proof for your statements the next time you make another garbage thread. Yeah, I agree, we should stop. Yo is such a blind fanboy it's almost sickening. Well Yo, I'm done arguing with you, you've obviously lost and just don't want to admit it, and that's fine. I'm sure this won't be the last time we have a debate. On that note I am off. Good night fellas.
[QUOTE="yo_foo"]Halo: Combat Evolved. Or rather - Combat DeEvolved. That should be the slogan that Microsoft should run with for the latest in its One Hit Wonder trilogy - Halo 3.Gears > Resistance. Resistance fails. Fanboys fail. PS3 fails. Sorry to say it, but your logic fails. nice. And I suppose you're a 360 fan...ah i see your banner! :'(
Now don't get me wrong. Halo was a good game, although a little over rated, and fulfilled itself as the only official X-Box game worth buying the console for (although it came out on PC! Bad move). It developed tactical shooting and developed a good fanbase for those interested in that kind of thing. It had satisfactory multiplayer content which was good solid fun but also applied the use of tactics like in the missions.
Then enter Halo 2. To increase Halo fanbase, they decided to dumb the game down for those who don't have the time for tactics and made the game just a full on shooter with limited tactics and cruddy weapons. Yes Halo 1s weapons were far superior.
And now Halo 3 which promises to be a rehash of Halo 2s style of gameplay to keep these gamers who don't like to think that much and just shoot (the types of gamers who thought Doom 3 and Prey were Gods Gift to Gaming) and still keep in pretty well the same style as Tribes only without the jetpacks. Plus the same repetitive nature of the game will drastically annoy fans of the original and soon enough people will just ignore Halo and remember it for what the series really is - A One Hit Wonder, much in the same vain as the Baha Men's "Who Let the Dogs Out" and the original Rocky film.
Resistance is the Halo killer for this generation of gaming. No doubt about it.
:'(
HyperMetaDragon
Halo: Combat Evolved. Or rather - Combat DeEvolved. That should be the slogan that Microsoft should run with for the latest in its One Hit Wonder trilogy - Halo 3.
Now don't get me wrong. Halo was a good game, although a little over rated, and fulfilled itself as the only official X-Box game worth buying the console for (although it came out on PC! Bad move). It developed tactical shooting and developed a good fanbase for those interested in that kind of thing. It had satisfactory multiplayer content which was good solid fun but also applied the use of tactics like in the missions.
Then enter Halo 2. To increase Halo fanbase, they decided to dumb the game down for those who don't have the time for tactics and made the game just a full on shooter with limited tactics and cruddy weapons. Yes Halo 1s weapons were far superior.
And now Halo 3 which promises to be a rehash of Halo 2s style of gameplay to keep these gamers who don't like to think that much and just shoot (the types of gamers who thought Doom 3 and Prey were Gods Gift to Gaming) and still keep in pretty well the same style as Tribes only without the jetpacks. Plus the same repetitive nature of the game will drastically annoy fans of the original and soon enough people will just ignore Halo and remember it for what the series really is - A One Hit Wonder, much in the same vain as the Baha Men's "Who Let the Dogs Out" and the original Rocky film.
Resistance is the Halo killer for this generation of gaming. No doubt about it.
:'(
yo_foo
truth and fact > your opinion
[QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]Halo: Combat Evolved. Or rather - Combat DeEvolved. That should be the slogan that Microsoft should run with for the latest in its One Hit Wonder trilogy - Halo 3.Gears > Resistance. Resistance fails. Fanboys fail. PS3 fails. Sorry to say it, but your logic fails. nice. And I suppose you're a 360 fan...ah i see your banner! :'( It's true though. Gears had better scores, sold 3+ million, received stupid amounts of awards/goty awards, etc... As far as Halo goes, they are going back to Halo 1's style. Regardless of opinion...the game is going to sell, and it will sell well. Halo series as a whole so far has sold 15-16 Million copies, anyone with a 2nd grade education would tell you the game is going to sell no matter what.
Now don't get me wrong. Halo was a good game, although a little over rated, and fulfilled itself as the only official X-Box game worth buying the console for (although it came out on PC! Bad move). It developed tactical shooting and developed a good fanbase for those interested in that kind of thing. It had satisfactory multiplayer content which was good solid fun but also applied the use of tactics like in the missions.
Then enter Halo 2. To increase Halo fanbase, they decided to dumb the game down for those who don't have the time for tactics and made the game just a full on shooter with limited tactics and cruddy weapons. Yes Halo 1s weapons were far superior.
And now Halo 3 which promises to be a rehash of Halo 2s style of gameplay to keep these gamers who don't like to think that much and just shoot (the types of gamers who thought Doom 3 and Prey were Gods Gift to Gaming) and still keep in pretty well the same style as Tribes only without the jetpacks. Plus the same repetitive nature of the game will drastically annoy fans of the original and soon enough people will just ignore Halo and remember it for what the series really is - A One Hit Wonder, much in the same vain as the Baha Men's "Who Let the Dogs Out" and the original Rocky film.
Resistance is the Halo killer for this generation of gaming. No doubt about it.
:'(
yo_foo
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment