halo reach is one of the best looking game this gen (no 56K)

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="EVOLV3"]

It's so bland and uninteresting to look at.

Orchid87

The levels look bland. Characters look stupid. I guess they compensate each other.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXG4l0TE-yw&feature=grec_index and thats From the BETA just a repost for those who dont think reach looks good it looks excellent and again thats the BETA!

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

I agree. Even though the tech doesn't always hold up, the styling is outstanding.

@gpuking: That's a horrible comparison and those KZ3 shots look like feces.

worknow222

[QUOTE="worknow222"]

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

I agree. Even though the tech doesn't always hold up, the styling is outstanding.

@gpuking: That's a horrible comparison and those KZ3 shots look like feces.

windsquid9000

Says the guy with the Killzone 2 profile pic!! godzillavskong

Hello, Captain Obvious, we missed you!

Have finished Reaach and now looking at those pics... goodish graphics and thats it. The PS3 has much, much better looking exclusives (some of which are from last year at that) and lets not even compare it to the PC. Even Mass effect 2 and Gears 2 on 360 have better grahics imho.

I actually played Halo 3 just before Reach came out.Wen I got reach I didn't see huge improvement and Halo 3 is a bad looking game by todays standarts tbh.

So no, its not one of the best looking games this gen, not even close.However it is one of the OK looking games this gen.

[QUOTE="Rougehunter"]

In before crysis spam

GreenGoblin2099

Please don't.

TO CYRSIS FANBOYS: TC never said anything about graphics king, not even the best looking but one of the best looking games ON CONSOLES.

No more Crysis pics please :cry:

*posts 2011 Crysis ultra realism fantasia edition with rainbow leafs screenshots*

I agree. Even though the tech doesn't always hold up, the styling is outstanding.

@gpuking: That's a horrible comparison and those KZ3 shots look like feces.

windsquid9000

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

I agree. Even though the tech doesn't always hold up, the styling is outstanding.

@gpuking: That's a horrible comparison and those KZ3 shots look like feces.

gpuking

[QUOTE="gpuking"][QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

I agree. Even though the tech doesn't always hold up, the styling is outstanding.

@gpuking: That's a horrible comparison and those KZ3 shots look like feces.

soulitane

[QUOTE="gpuking"][QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

I agree. Even though the tech doesn't always hold up, the styling is outstanding.

@gpuking: That's a horrible comparison and those KZ3 shots look like feces.

soulitane

So the only thing that has been proven is that Reach looks bad even in bullshots.

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="worknow222"] you are aware GPUking is a BIG Sonyfanboy? and to those who think reach looks Bador not up their http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXG4l0TE-yw&feature=grec_indand thats From the BETA

worknow222

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="worknow222"] you are aware GPUking is a BIG Sonyfanboy? and to those who think reach looks Bador not up their http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXG4l0TE-yw&feature=grec_index and thats From the BETA

worknow222

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn2DklmJnqM

to 360 fanboys, that is from the BETA...

lol, this is also from the beta DF direct feed screen.

killzowned24

Reach looks decent in my eyes. Nothing spectacular, but nothing bad either.

Probably in the top 20.

[QUOTE="worknow222"]

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

I agree. Even though the tech doesn't always hold up, the styling is outstanding.

@gpuking: That's a horrible comparison and those KZ3 shots look like feces.

windsquid9000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jazNKi85jJg&feature=related watch it all in 720p(granted highly compressed), it's a gorgeous game.

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="windsquid9000"] Hot dang! :DxYamatox

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn2DklmJnqM

to 360 fanboys, that is from the BETA...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXG4l0TE-yw&feature=grec_index and thats From the BETA just a repost for those who dont think reach looks good it looks excellent and again thats the BETA!

worknow222

No offence, the graphics aren't bad, I just don't see what stands out about them. I mean, what do the visuals do that differenciate them from other games?

Though to be fair, I haven't been impressed by graphics as of late. I've seen gradual minor improvements; but nothing that has blown me away like in the old days.

Looks average , KZ2 blows it out of the water , so does U2 , GOW 3 , ME2 , GeOW 2 , MGS4 , AC II , AC:B.....

Naw, its not even that great looking. Its not ugly or anything though.

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]no, to even break the top 20 you have to be on PC0Hamburgher

Crysis

Crysis Warhead

Metro 2033

Arma 2 Operation Arrowhead

Arma 2

Cryostasis

Mafia 2

Half Life 2 Cinematic Mod

STALKER SoC Complete

STALKER CoP

STALKER Clear Sky

Starcraft 2

Battlefield Bad Company 2

CoD Black Ops (I think it looks amazing on PC. Massive difference but not nearly as massive as Metro 2033 360 vs PC)

DiRT 2

Arcania Gothic 4 (Mediocre game but still visually great)

GTA4

Oblivion (With mods it still looks great even today)

F1 2010

Just Cause 2

Mirrors Edge

Batman Arkham Asylum

Thats what...22-23 games that all look better than a console's best.

no sry not its not an ugly game but nowhere near among the best looking games this gen

Best graphics in a game ever in Quad HD!

Nah, I'm a huge Halo fan but even I know there are better looking games. Although I do find it visually appealing, it has a good mix of technical graphics along with a great art style.

[QUOTE="0Hamburgher"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]no, to even break the top 20 you have to be on PCChubbyGuy40

Crysis

Crysis Warhead

Metro 2033

Arma 2 Operation Arrowhead

Arma 2

Cryostasis

Mafia 2

Half Life 2 Cinematic Mod

STALKER SoC Complete

STALKER CoP

STALKER Clear Sky

Starcraft 2

Battlefield Bad Company 2

CoD Black Ops (I think it looks amazing on PC. Massive difference but not nearly as massive as Metro 2033 360 vs PC)

DiRT 2

Arcania Gothic 4 (Mediocre game but still visually great)

GTA4

Oblivion (With mods it still looks great even today)

F1 2010

Just Cause 2

Mirrors Edge

Batman Arkham Asylum

Thats what...22-23 games that all look better than a console's best.

Yay you gave some evidence. Although you must be joking with Mafia 2, Just caus 2, GTA 4, HL 2 cinematic mod, and Arkham Asylum. Back on topic Halo Reach is far from the best looking; I think it was a downgrade from Halo 3, actually.0Hamburgher

If I was joking I wouldn't have been posting them. Mafia 2 is a f'ing beauty maxed out and PhysX going. On my PC it runs like crap with PhysX on but damn it looks really good. Just Cause 2? Open world and really detailed. GTA4? Have you seen the pictures of mods for this game? Same with HL2 Cinematic, its a major overhaul that makes it look really good thanks to the insanely good textures and such. Arkham Asylum? Yeah I kinda put that down last minute but I'd take it over any console game. It looks that good on PC imo.

I think Reach was an upgrade from Halo 3 but Halo 3 was trash. I don't get how people called it good. Reach isn't bad but with such a low resolution and overall muddy appearance I refuse to call it good.

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="0Hamburgher"] Those 20 games are? It annoys me, PC fanboys never give any proof to back up their arguments.0Hamburgher

Crysis

Crysis Warhead

Metro 2033

Arma 2 Operation Arrowhead

Arma 2

Cryostasis

Mafia 2

Half Life 2 Cinematic Mod

STALKER SoC Complete

STALKER CoP

STALKER Clear Sky

Starcraft 2

Battlefield Bad Company 2

CoD Black Ops (I think it looks amazing on PC. Massive difference but not nearly as massive as Metro 2033 360 vs PC)

DiRT 2

Arcania Gothic 4 (Mediocre game but still visually great)

GTA4

Oblivion (With mods it still looks great even today)

F1 2010

Just Cause 2

Mirrors Edge

Batman Arkham Asylum

Thats what...22-23 games that all look better than a console's best.

^What, Halo Reach looks better than Halo 3.:?

^What, Halo Reach looks better than Halo 3.:?

mitu123

looks pretty bland to me....

^What, Halo Reach looks better than Halo 3.:?

mitu123

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

^What, Halo Reach looks better than Halo 3.:?

soulitane

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

^What, Halo Reach looks better than Halo 3.:?

mitu123

I thought it looked pretty good when i palyed it. but that was probaly due to how much better it looked compared to 3 and ODST, which didnt look great even when they came out.

Based on those pics, it looks about as good as MAG...hbk7137

MAG looked fine to me.

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="mitu123"] Other guy.mitu123