halo reach is one of the best looking game this gen (no 56K)

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

^What, Halo Reach looks better than Halo 3.:?

walkingdream

[QUOTE="walkingdream"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

^What, Halo Reach looks better than Halo 3.:?

0Hamburgher

Those pics certainly are not helping your argument :P. It is pretty enough, but far form the best graphcis this gen. The water and ice look last gen in many ways and a lot of the textures are rather low and lack detail. It is a pretty game, but nothing amazing about it.

Based on those pics, it looks about as good as MAG...hbk7137

it's by console games not PC just to point that out

Wow, are people still trying to Hype this game as a Killzone 2 Graphical Killer???

remember when the Halo Reach reveal trailer came out and all Lems rushed to post that it has surpassed the PS3 graphics in every single way. LOL

poorfamz

looks like it has nice looking rocks here and there, but overall it gets trumped by other games graphically.

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]OmG, just no, no, no, no, no and no. This picture just makes me laugh, sorry, tc but your pics definitly don't show any proof of being best this gen. Maybe actually proves other wise.

Nisim19

[QUOTE="poorfamz"]

Wow, are people still trying to Hype this game as a Killzone 2 Graphical Killer???

remember when the Halo Reach reveal trailer came out and all Lems rushed to post that it has surpassed the PS3 graphics in every single way. LOL

psnisdoomedsoon

From the screenshots you put up, the textures look really bad compaired to other games.

Sure, I thought it went without saying... :P

why pepole say that halo reach graphics are bad?

its one of the best looking games on consoles.

Nisim19

Halo 3 & Reach screenshot mode renders bullshots at 8064x4480, dividing each one in 16 smaller parts, then resizing the initial image to 620p resolution.

This implies that the bullshots taken from this mode are supersampled images that has 0 relation with the quality that the game that 360 can run in real time. Halo 3 & Reach looks miles behind what those screend you posted.

[QUOTE="poorfamz"]

Wow, are people still trying to Hype this game as a Killzone 2 Graphical Killer???

remember when the Halo Reach reveal trailer came out and all Lems rushed to post that it has surpassed the PS3 graphics in every single way. LOL

psnisdoomedsoon

..

[QUOTE="amaneuvering"]

In terms of just the overall artistic look and feel I would absolutely agree with the OP.

Halo is a much better looking fps than most others this gen despite some of them being more "realistic" in some ways or more "technically impressive" in some way.

Basically I'd much rather look at Halo Reach than most of the other supposed "Grafix Kings" fps games out there.

skyform

Couldn't agree more.

The art style and design is what makes this game so atractive and nice looking. It may not be technical the best, far from that but i like what i see, all this beautiful mountains and big environments look so nice and round.

KZ3 is of course technical far superior but it's art is so boring, too industrial for my taste, i prefer more natural environments, like in Halo and btw i didn't even play Halo Reach because i don't own a Xbox 360 anymore, just PS3, but i wish i would play it after seeing this mountain pictures.

I was like wow, that looks so awesome, really, i simply love this open environments, they look beautiful, but i have also seen many terrible locations from Reach, but well it's almost the same with every game.

The art style and design is what makes this game so atractive and nice looking. It may not be technical the best, far from that but i like what i see, all this beautiful mountains and big environments look so nice and round.

KZ3 is of course technical far superior but it's art is so boring, too industrial for my taste, i prefer more natural environments, like in Halo and btw i didn't even play Halo Reach because i don't own a Xbox 360 anymore, just PS3, but i wish i would play it after seeing this mountain pictures.

I was like wow, that looks so awesome, really, i simply love this open environments, they look beautiful, but i have also seen many terrible locations from Reach, but well it's almost the same with every game.

skyform

My tastes arethe other way around. KZ2 sty1e is badass with the real feeling of war and chaos + outstanding attention of detail in every leven in the game + I love industrial stuff, hard no-nonsence sci-fi and the overal design of Helghast faction is on par with Combine from HL2 and Brotherhood of Nod from C&C in the terms of epicness. On the other hand Halo lacks any attention to detail - levels are just dull plains or some low-poly boxy military bases with copy-paste everywhere. Enemies look silly and are awfully animated, so I just can't take them seriously. Noble team are Super Sentai wannabees, atleast MC was a Doomguy ripoff, so he had like tenth of Doomguy's badassness. Art is the weakest part of Halo obviously.

[QUOTE="skyform"]

The art style and design is what makes this game so atractive and nice looking. It may not be technical the best, far from that but i like what i see, all this beautiful mountains and big environments look so nice and round.

KZ3 is of course technical far superior but it's art is so boring, too industrial for my taste, i prefer more natural environments, like in Halo and btw i didn't even play Halo Reach because i don't own a Xbox 360 anymore, just PS3, but i wish i would play it after seeing this mountain pictures.

I was like wow, that looks so awesome, really, i simply love this open environments, they look beautiful, but i have also seen many terrible locations from Reach, but well it's almost the same with every game.

Orchid87

My tastes are the other way around. KZ2 sty1e is badass with the real feeling of war and chaos + outstanding attention of detail in every leven in the game + I love industrial stuff, hard no-nonsence sci-fi and the overal design of Helghast faction is on par with Combine from HL2 and Brotherhood of Nod from C&C in the terms of epicness. On the other hand Halo lacks any attention to detail - levels are just dull plains or some low-poly boxy military bases with copy-paste everywhere. Enemies look silly and are awfully animated, so I just can't take them seriously. Noble team are Super Sentai wannabees, atleast MC was a Doomguy ripoff, so he had like tenth of Doomguy's badassness. Art is the weakest part of Halo obviously.

[QUOTE="Orchid87"]

[QUOTE="skyform"]

The art style and design is what makes this game so atractive and nice looking. It may not be technical the best, far from that but i like what i see, all this beautiful mountains and big environments look so nice and round.

KZ3 is of course technical far superior but it's art is so boring, too industrial for my taste, i prefer more natural environments, like in Halo and btw i didn't even play Halo Reach because i don't own a Xbox 360 anymore, just PS3, but i wish i would play it after seeing this mountain pictures.

I was like wow, that looks so awesome, really, i simply love this open environments, they look beautiful, but i have also seen many terrible locations from Reach, but well it's almost the same with every game.

Bread_or_Decide

My tastes are the other way around. KZ2 sty1e is badass with the real feeling of war and chaos + outstanding attention of detail in every leven in the game + I love industrial stuff, hard no-nonsence sci-fi and the overal design of Helghast faction is on par with Combine from HL2 and Brotherhood of Nod from C&C in the terms of epicness. On the other hand Halo lacks any attention to detail - levels are just dull plains or some low-poly boxy military bases with copy-paste everywhere. Enemies look silly and are awfully animated, so I just can't take them seriously. Noble team are Super Sentai wannabees, atleast MC was a Doomguy ripoff, so he had like tenth of Doomguy's badassness. Art is the weakest part of Halo obviously.