Halo Reach vs Black ops

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Elementguy13"]

thats cool. but as cool as this?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCoY9v38RXw

no.

millerlight89

Thats fantastic :o

Reach has many epic moments than BO can only dream about!

You do know how hard it is to actually shoot without auto aim on consoles? Try and shoot your teammates in halo. It's really hard to actually get more than a few shots on them.

I enjoyed both

Reach is easily the best in the series same with black ops

I preferred Black Ops over Reach.

I played Halo. Don't like it too much. Black Ops all the way :D Plus it has t3h zomb13z!scar-hawk

are you seriously saying that zombies is better than firefight?:lol:

[QUOTE="Elementguy13"]

[QUOTE="antifanboyftw"] you wouldn't say that if you did this

PAL360

thats cool. but as cool as this?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCoY9v38RXw

no.

Thats fantastic :o

Reach has many epic moments than BO can only dream about!

[QUOTE="scar-hawk"]I played Halo. Don't like it too much. Black Ops all the way :D Plus it has t3h zomb13z!gamedude234

are you seriously saying that zombies is better than firefight?:lol:

While black ops is a good game it is nothing compared to reach in my eyes. I can only play Black ops Mp for n hour at most but i can play reach mp 24/7

While I haven't played Reach it is probably the better game.

Black Ops isn't as well rounded, nor is it as feature packed; and it has its share of flaws.

Nonetheless both are series that really haven't done much at all as far as pushing outside their own boundaries over the years go.

a lot of games match that description these days, there is an aweful lot more copy/paste games this gen and a lot of 'remakes' as well.delta3074

World at War is better than Black ops and it's unoptimized and buggy piece of "you know what".

.

.

.