[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Hyrule-master"] Nothing is absolue but plenty can be predominant. I love the 360 as well but I am not gonna pretend thats its predominantly still big on shooters. If you were to say it is as balanced as the PS1 or the SNES was in its type of games that would be totally false. It seems every console this generation will be victim of that but its pretty clear that is how it is still on tthe 360.
Hyrule-master
I agree that the 360's bigger games are shooters, and I was not saying it is balanced or predominantly anything.
I was only stating that it has its share of non-shooter games, and that there are enough non-shooters at this stage to where you could form a sizable library consisting of only AA or higher rated games that are not shooters in the pure sense of the term (using Gamerankings, and I don't care to debate Gamerankings, just used it for simplicity).
Now, I am sorry I lost my temper, I did not mean to be rude. I can't sleep, and I am grumpy. I am usually much more pleasant. :D
Now, I am off to try sleeping again...Night!
EDITS: Spelling and grammar.
it would only be a sizeable library if you combined all the other geres to shooters. So Im still inclined to think its too much.
That's not true. :|
Allow me to demonstrate based on my current library of games for the 360. I have 16 games (not counting arcade games) for the system that are not shooters. I could list them for you but I don't really have the time. While FPSes are my favorite genre of games and I may personally buy a ton of them, there's a sizeable selection of games on the system that are not shooters and to say otherwise is just plain wrong.
Log in to comment