has there been any bf3 footage released for consoles

wonderd how much im going to be dissappoined after seeeing what its going to be like on pc :(

You're acting like BF3 on consoles will look bad. It won't.

You're acting like BF3 on consoles will look bad. It won't.

MobilechicaneX

Compared to the PC version, it will.

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

kungfuchaos

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

It will probably look very similar to MoH lol. Which isn't that bad I guess. The lighting should be great, you will still have the same destructable enviroments.

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

Firebird-5

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

[QUOTE="Firebird-5"]

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

soulitane

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

yeah i know lol. consoles have had dedicated servers for most bf games iirc

[QUOTE="Firebird-5"]

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

soulitane

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

Without server browser, without filters, without ping meter, without player count setting lol. Only matchmakingIt will run on dedi's but wihout the countless of options wich come with it. lol

don't worry, it'll look great!

I doubt any console gamer should be worried as such, Dice does not really have a track record of making ugly games ;)

It will not look like the PC version, but I doubt the downgrade will be huge, since they aimed for smaller mp envioments for console instead of a downgrade in graphics.

If you study the trailers one of the thing that makes the game look so good is the lighting, it will still be there, and while anyone can understand a high end PC will have a better looking game it is not as if the consoles get a PS2 era looking game

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

kungfuchaos

:lol::lol:

Im pretty sure that 0% of console gamers will be able to max it out or play at decent framerates too. And those medium to high settings on PC will likely still look better than consoles.

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

kungfuchaos

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

Firebird-5

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

[QUOTE="Firebird-5"]

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

soulitane

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

[QUOTE="MobilechicaneX"]

You're acting like BF3 on consoles will look bad. It won't.

coreybg

Compared to the PC version, it will.

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

PurpleMan5000

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

PurpleMan5000

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

kungfuchaos

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

kungfuchaos

Because I did play the BC 2 demo in PS3 and it made my eyes bleed, whereas in PC the game still has one of the best visuals of the last years. And I'm playin BF 2 at 2560 x 1440, settings maxed with AF X16 and AA X4, at average 50 fps. I'm looking for a 28 nm new GPU for the BF3 release date to improve my current 5870 (which is still a beastly card at the moment).

Also remember that DICE will shoot themselves in the foot if they set the bar so high that only those with elite gaming rigs get the full experience. If DICE is smart they optimize the crud out of BF3 so that even those with mid range machines can still get mind blowing visuals but with maybe less particle effects and shadowing. To be honest, who in the world has time in a FPS to admire sparks flying, your refliction in a puddle, blood spray or how realistically your shadow is cast on a building???

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

Ondoval

Because I did play the BC 2 demo in PS3 and it made my eyes bleed, whereas in PC the game still has one of the best visuals of the last years. And I'm playin BF 2 at 2560 x 1440, settings maxed with AF X16 and AA X4, at average 50 fps. I'm looking for a 28 nm new GPU for the BF3 release date to improve my current 5870 (which is still a beastly card at the moment).

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

Ondoval

Because I did play the BC 2 demo in PS3 and it made my eyes bleed, whereas in PC the game still has one of the best visuals of the last years. And I'm playin BF 2 at 2560 x 1440, settings maxed with AF X16 and AA X4, at average 50 fps. I'm looking for a 28 nm new GPU for the BF3 release date to improve my current 5870 (which is still a beastly card at the moment).

Also remember that DICE will shoot themselves in the foot if they set the bar so high that only those with elite gaming rigs get the full experience. If DICE is smart they optimize the crud out of BF3 so that even those with mid range machines can still get mind blowing visuals but with maybe less particle effects and shadowing. To be honest, who in the world has time in a FPS to admire sparks flying, your refliction in a puddle, blood spray or how realistically your shadow is cast on a building???

kungfuchaos

It's not about sitting there and starign at the pretty lights/shadows.

Your brain is EXTREMELY good at taking in this information very quickly. So it immediately feels more realistic/imemrsive to you, it doesn't matter that you're not focusing on the graphics.

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

Also remember that DICE will shoot themselves in the foot if they set the bar so high that only those with elite gaming rigs get the full experience. If DICE is smart they optimize the crud out of BF3 so that even those with mid range machines can still get mind blowing visuals but with maybe less particle effects and shadowing. To be honest, who in the world has time in a FPS to admire sparks flying, your refliction in a puddle, blood spray or how realistically your shadow is cast on a building???

Kinthalis

It's not about sitting there and starign at the pretty lights/shadows.

Your brain is EXTREMELY good at taking in this information very quickly. So it immediately feels more realistic/imemrsive to you, it doesn't matter that you're not focusing on the graphics.

[QUOTE="Firebird-5"]

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

Sandvichman

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. First of all, I seriously doubt that more than maybe only 10% of you are going to get the oppurtunity to "max out" BF3 visually and still have descent frame rates. I promise you that the vast majority of PC gamers will be running BF3 on medium to high settings and of those I bet atleast 50% will be running it at 1366 x 768 or 1440 x 900. I will most likely get it on PC because I now prefer M/KB to controller. Secondly, have any of you played BFBC 2 on consoles. It is a very good looking game and now you all seem to think that even with updated graphics, Frostbite 2 and everything, somehow BF3 will look worse than BFBC 2 on consoles?? No and NO!!!! So keep your PC fanboyisms in check as the vast majority of you wont be playing the game at any better visuals than what consoles are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

Firebird-5

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

No, that's for E3.

[QUOTE="Totalgym9000"]PC gamers gloating that after 6 years they finally get a game that consoles wont be able to touch. Seriously PC gamers??? picking on 6 year old consoles..........mitu123

And it's sequel made it painfully obvious how dated consoles are ;)

Nope none has come out yet

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]

[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]

I simply dont understand why HARDCORE PC gamers have this idea in their heads that BF3 on consoles is going to look like complete trash. are at.

P.S.

Dont bring up...64 players, dedicated servers and mods, because nobody cares. Consoles get DLC and XBL is just fine!!

Sandvichman

Because I did play the BC 2 demo in PS3 and it made my eyes bleed, whereas in PC the game still has one of the best visuals of the last years. And I'm playin BF 2 at 2560 x 1440, settings maxed with AF X16 and AA X4, at average 50 fps. I'm looking for a 28 nm new GPU for the BF3 release date to improve my current 5870 (which is still a beastly card at the moment).

Is not a hyperbole at all. Playing it at four times 720p with four times the anisotropic and antialising filters and with things as SSAO which aren't even available in console make a huge difference in visuals (not to talk about playing at much higher framerrate and with 32 players supported instead of 24).

Is fun in consoles? Yes! Even 10+ years old games at 800 x 600 as Diablo II are still a lot of fun despite the outdated visuals, but don't try to say that playing it in PC doesn't make a difference. And about the 580, doesn't worry me a bit, as I said for the time of the BF3 release the new 28 nm GPUs from Nvidia and Ati will be more powerful and cheaper.

Sorry but the day we can't use BF3 as an example of how a game can be far better on a certain system is the day SW has jumped the shark with the "zomg stop being elitist!!11 :( " tripe.

The game is simply far superior on PC, stop with the excuses.

[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="Ondoval"]

Because I did play the BC 2 demo in PS3 and it made my eyes bleed, whereas in PC the game still has one of the best visuals of the last years. And I'm playin BF 2 at 2560 x 1440, settings maxed with AF X16 and AA X4, at average 50 fps. I'm looking for a 28 nm new GPU for the BF3 release date to improve my current 5870 (which is still a beastly card at the moment).

Ondoval

Is not a hyperbole at all. Playing it at four times 720p with four times the anisotropic and antialising filters and with things as SSAO which aren't even available in console make a huge difference in visuals (not to talk about playing at much higher framerrate and with 32 players supported instead of 24).

Is fun in consoles? Yes! Even 10+ years old games at 800 x 600 as Diablo II are still a lot of fun despite the outdated visuals, but don't try to say that playing it in PC doesn't make a difference. And about the 580, doesn't worry me a bit, as I said for the time of the BF3 release the new 28 nm GPUs from Nvidia and Ati will be more powerful and cheaper.

[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="Firebird-5"]

64 players dedicated servers MODS. consoles pay for mods and xbl is not fine

Heil68

Goodluck making tools for frostbite 2. If this is the case, why havent we seen awesome mods for bc2? :O

Dice need entite server farms just to do the destruction, you think a couple of modders can do better?

Typical PC gamer snobbery. Sigh.lhughey

why is any other faction allowed to make a thread boasting about their system or bagging on another system, which is what this entire Forum sub-section is about?

[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="Ondoval"]

Because I did play the BC 2 demo in PS3 and it made my eyes bleed, whereas in PC the game still has one of the best visuals of the last years. And I'm playin BF 2 at 2560 x 1440, settings maxed with AF X16 and AA X4, at average 50 fps. I'm looking for a 28 nm new GPU for the BF3 release date to improve my current 5870 (which is still a beastly card at the moment).

Ondoval

Is not a hyperbole at all. Playing it at four times 720p with four times the anisotropic and antialising filters and with things as SSAO which aren't even available in console make a huge difference in visuals (not to talk about playing at much higher framerrate and with 32 players supported instead of 24).

Is fun in consoles? Yes! Even 10+ years old games at 800 x 600 as Diablo II are still a lot of fun despite the outdated visuals, but don't try to say that playing it in PC doesn't make a difference. And about the 580, doesn't worry me a bit, as I said for the time of the BF3 release the new 28 nm GPUs from Nvidia and Ati will be more powerful and cheaper.

It will look inferior to the PC version, but probably look the best out of every multiplatform console game, so im sure console owners will be happy.