@superclocked said:
Link? I haven't seen this video, nor have I heard about it..
Also, the XB1 version of BF4 has sharper textures, due to the superior upscale method, but distant objects are very blocky due to the lower resolution...
Come on dude both have the same scaler from GCN.
@superclocked said:
The XB1 uses a superior upscale method that makes textures appear sharper instead of blurring them. The trade off is that objects in the distance in BF4 look like crap on the XB1 version, due to the lower resolution..
For comparisons where the PS4 version is not upscaled, like Call of Duty, there will be no way for the XB1 version to look nearly as good. The PS4 version will not be blurred through upscaling, so textures will be sharper, details will be sharper, objects, especially ones the distance, will be less blocky, and you will also be able to see much further into the distance..
No upscale method will make 720p look anywhere near as good as native 1080p...
For the 10 time that is a lie,the xbox one version has sharpening filter on it,while missing Ambient Occlusion which will soften the image,and which the PS4 version did had,funny thing is that BF4 was running up to 14 FPS slower in some intense parts than the PS4,while lacking AO which hit performance,so once apply like it was say to BF4 on xbox one not only the image will look softer but the FPS performance will drop even more.
@_Matt_ said:
The jump in power needed to push those pixels must be huge, even if the end result is less so. We shall see soon enough, but I would take what Katateeechop says with a grain of salt, wouldn't be the first time he made something completely up...
It is huge which is why Cinemablend was calling out site like Anandtech and toms hardware,for making seen like the difference was nothing,this sites make a living by comparing every GPU out there,and they crown a graphics king basically by frame difference not resolution but frames.
This GPU did 14 FPS more than this other on the same quality in the same resolution and get crowned Graphics king of the GPU,in fact have you hear them talk some time about how this or that company will regain the crow.?
If by any change AMD make a GPU that was not only running BF4 at higher resolution than an Nvidia GPU but also at faster frames,it would be crowned as the King of the universe,because most difference you get on PC is just a few more frames at the same quality and resolution.
Imaging BF4 running at 4k on an AMD GPU while never going under 40 FPS,while Nvidia new GPU would run BF4 at 2K resolution and still have dips under 40 FPS while having jaggies problem..
Now to make it even worse that GPU from Nvidia is $100 more than the AMD one.
This on PC would cause such a backlash that Nvidia would simple loss its market.
Log in to comment