This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="carlisledavid79"] PS3 2008 >> Xbox 360 2008world69star69Well I think 360 2008 >>>>>> ps3 2008 just because It wasn't full of crap exclusives like MGS4. COME ON? 99% of all players and all game reviewers disagree with you...did you even play mgs4? Do you even have a ps3? I am thinking no, with that wii avatar...My guess is you are a young kid who can't afford a ps3, and would rather bash it then accept it has better games out or coming out then either of your consoles...I own a wii too, but i realize that it's console lineup is trash and targeted for babies and casuals!
I'm not a fanboy or anything, but I like 360s exclusives better than PS3s. I don't know why, but no PS3 games appeal to me (LBP I guess).
I like Banjo, Gears, Halo, Vesperia, The Last Remnant and Fable II better than any of the PS3 games. That's just me though.
So to the thread question, I say no :)
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]No they havent.carlisledavid79PS3 2008 >> Xbox 360 2008 in your opinion. I myself would rather have Gears of War 2, Fable 2, Ninja Gaiden 2, Left for Dead, Lost Odyssey and a whole slew of better looking, better playing multiplatform titles then the PS3's offering this year. How's R2, LBP and MGS4 treating you for your big games this year?
Even though I think different (when it comes to this year's exclusives), you're one naysayer I can respect. (kudos)I'm not a fanboy or anything, but I like 360s exclusives better than PS3s. I don't know why, but no PS3 games appeal to me (LBP I guess).
I like Banjo, Gears, Halo, Vesperia, The Last Remnant and Fable II better than any of the PS3 games. That's just me though.So to the thread question, I say no :)
dylanmcc
[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]No they havent.NedemisPS3 2008 >> Xbox 360 2008 and a whole slew of better looking, better playing multiplatform titles then the PS3's offering this yearIf 3 multiplats this year (Fallout 3, Baja, and Need for Speed) counts as "a whole slew", then I'll agree. Otherwise, forget it.
[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="carlisledavid79"] PS3 2008 >> Xbox 360 2008nervmeisterand a whole slew of better looking, better playing multiplatform titles then the PS3's offering this yearIf 3 multiplats this year (Fallout 3, Baja, and Need for Speed) counts as "a whole slew", then I'll agree. Otherwise, forget it. nice job cutting out the first part just so your stupid comment could possibly hold some value. :roll:
[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="Nedemis"] and a whole slew of better looking, better playing multiplatform titles then the PS3's offering this yearNedemisIf 3 multiplats this year (Fallout 3, Baja, and Need for Speed) counts as "a whole slew", then I'll agree. Otherwise, forget it. nice job cutting out the first part just so your stupid comment could possibly hold some value. :roll:Actually, adding the first part strengthens my comment's value even more. So I cut you some slack really.
[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="nervmeister"]If 3 multiplats this year (Fallout 3, Baja, and Need for Speed) counts as "a whole slew", then I'll agree. Otherwise, forget it.nervmeisternice job cutting out the first part just so your stupid comment could possibly hold some value. :roll:Actually, adding the first part strengthens my comment's value even more. and just how is that in your messed up reality. The truth is that the 360's line up has been incredible for pretty much the whole year, where as the PS3 had two months which included ONLY 3 games even worth while. Please, explain how putting back in the first part of my post improves your comments strength and validity?
In sales, maybe not. But as far as quality goes, there is one title that comes in my mind.
MGS4 for me is the best game in the 7th Generation, so you'd guess that I would prefer it over games of any consoles. *sigh* if it could only be ported to the 360 I'd be a happy man.
where as the PS3 had two months which included ONLY 3 games even worth while.NedemisOkay then. Going by that logic, that means the 360 only had ONE game even worth while.
[QUOTE="bez2083"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"] Well I think 360 2008 >>>>>> ps3 2008 just because It wasn't full of crap exclusives like MGS4.Gh0st_Of_0nyxMGS4 was crap? Come on, now. Besides the cut scenes that stretched a bit long, what made it crap? This is to easy: The gameplay sucked Graphics were sub par , Story was just as ridiculous as the previous MGS's Ive played and like always the characters were a big joke and thats why I thought it was crap. The music was awsome tho
lrn2troll
This is to easy: The gameplay sucked Graphics were sub par , Story was just as ridiculous as the previous MGS's Ive played and like always the characters were a big joke and thats why I thought it was crap. The music was awsome tho[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="bez2083"] MGS4 was crap? Come on, now. Besides the cut scenes that stretched a bit long, what made it crap?WAIW
lrn2troll
My opinion of a game is trolling now :?Look at the reveiws, There are more Highly acclaimed games available on the 360 then the PS3 ImOldGregThat I will agree with since your refering to all years total plus not just exclusives.
Look at the reveiws, There are more Highly acclaimed games available on the 360 then the PS3, yes the PS3 has improved trumendously over last year but its still behind. ImOldGregYeah but the 360's losing steam. I personally think that a lot of 360 games were overrated at launch (see PD0). I also think that many of the 360's first year exclusives were only exclusive because the PS3 wasn't out It took them a while but PS3 games are starting to deliver. Meanwhile Microsoft are stuck because they've already already put out most of their good stuff so they could gain an early advantage over the PS3.
[QUOTE="WAIW"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"] This is to easy: The gameplay sucked Graphics were sub par , Story was just as ridiculous as the previous MGS's Ive played and like always the characters were a big joke and thats why I thought it was crap. The music was awsome thoGh0st_Of_0nyx
lrn2troll
My opinion of a game is trolling now :?When you say MGS4's grapics are subpar, you lose pretty much all credibility. Graphics isn't even an opinion; some games are just undeniably impressive.
Not by a long shot, it's still playing catch up with third party games, what with them always being suckier on the PS3.
From a owner of both, the quality of 360 exclusives far outshine the PS3, even now when a lot of exclusives lately on the 360 have been a bit buggy.
[QUOTE="ImOldGreg"]Look at the reveiws, There are more Highly acclaimed games available on the 360 then the PS3, yes the PS3 has improved trumendously over last year but its still behind. MarloStanfieldYeah but the 360's losing steam. I personally think that a lot of 360 games were overrated at launch (see PD0). I also think that many of the 360's first year exclusives were only exclusive because the PS3 wasn't out It took them a while but PS3 games are starting to deliver. Meanwhile Microsoft are stuck because they've already already put out most of their good stuff so they could gain an early advantage over the PS3.
Its games and hardware are selling better then ever before, its exclusives have been meet with critical acclaim, it has gained 2 of the PS3s major franchises in the space of a few months...I could go on.
Point is the Xbox isnt losing anything, the PS3 is simply becoming a more effective competitor. :)
Yeah and what console do you own? I am guessing it's not the ps3, and i am guessing you couldn't afford it. People like to hate things they can't have.I'm not a fanboy or anything, but I like 360s exclusives better than PS3s. I don't know why, but no PS3 games appeal to me (LBP I guess).
I like Banjo, Gears, Halo, Vesperia, The Last Remnant and Fable II better than any of the PS3 games. That's just me though.So to the thread question, I say no :)
dylanmcc
My opinion of a game is trolling now :?Gh0st_Of_0nyxActually it is. You do nothing but troll the PS3 in every thread, you criticise one of the highest rated games this year because "it's crap". You complain about its graphics despite the fact they are among the best of this generation.
[QUOTE="world69star69"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"] Well I think 360 2008 >>>>>> ps3 2008 just because It wasn't full of crap exclusives like MGS4.Gh0st_Of_0nyxCOME ON? 99% of all players and all game reviewers disagree with you...did you even play mgs4? Do you even have a ps3? I am thinking no, with that wii avatar...My guess is you are a young kid who can't afford a ps3, and would rather bash it then accept it has better games out or coming out then either of your consoles...I own a wii too, but i realize that it's console lineup is trash and targeted for babies and casuals!
They have set themselves apart. no 360 exclusives are different or ambitious if you will.
LBP is different with its community and overall artstyle and gameplay, its not something that everyone would enjoy but it works.
Resistance 2 changed its appeal completely from the first game, it became more mainstream but it worked out for the better. It has a massive scaled singleplayer with its bosses and does great job doing so. Its multiplayer and coop are great, the online is much different from the first, but it has a larger scale like the singleplayer. The coop is just great and very different from any coop out there.
MGS4 great singleplayer that is very story driven and is very different from all the other games in the seres(like every other mgs game from each other).
Downloadable games like Wipeout HD, socom, and even the smaller titles like the last guy, pixeljunk(eden, monsters, racer, etc) are all very distinct and are pushing digital distribution for the better. 360 has come good downloadable games like braid and geometry wars, but nothing that is pushing the envelope like socom or wipeout.
The problem with 360s exclusives is they arent expanding, they are sticking to close to the basics, as if to make sure they dont fail. Gears of war would of been so much better if they made more majoy changes, additions like hord mode and refined multiplayer are great but they need to take bigger steps like kojima did with every MGS game, add game changing features. Put out games that show ambition. Games like Resistance, mgs, or LBP completely new concepts to the gaming world, but they are a breath of fresh air from the games comming out these days. Those are the games 360 needs.
There are games already being shown next year for ps3 that are a breath of fresh air, killzone 2(graphics, gameplay, intense singleplayer and multiplayer), god of war(look at every other god of war), infamous(open world superhero game), also downloadable games are already slated like fat princess, another pixeljunk game, flower. Alot of variety that you cant deny looks great. Thats what the 360 needs to succeed
Well, its pretty much agreed that Resistance 2 is better Gears 2, Valkyria Chronicles is better than Fable II, and Motorstorm: Pacific Rift is better than Banjo Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts. Metal Gear Solid 4 and LittleBigPlanet still stand head and shoulders above anything the 360 has now.ThewbaccaThats not entirely true...infact according to Game ranking and metacritic... Gears of war 2>/=Metal gear solid 4>Resistance 2 Fable 2> Valkyria chronicles Motor storm> banjo...I wouldnt really count that as a victory though :P LBP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>life itself :D The Situation isnt nearly as lop sided as you think it is....
No they havent.Gh0st_Of_0nyxYou have a wii avatar and 360 sig. WHO IS going to believe your word? DENIAL!!!
I believe PS3 E's are outperforming 360 games. Yea, Gears 2 is out and lookin the best but come feb Killzone 2. And Mag with 256 online in a room pretty much shows these guys are pushing this system further. Resistance 2 with 60 online is a blast and with ZERO lag. Thats what I call outperforming.
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="WAIW"]My opinion of a game is trolling now :?
lrn2troll
WAIW
When you say MGS4's grapics are subpar, you lose pretty much all credibility. Graphics isn't even an opinion; some games are just undeniably impressive.
Umm no there not MGS4's graphics were on par with COD4's graphics IMO and that was a 07 game.You have a wii avatar and 360 sig. WHO IS going to believe your word? DENIAL!!![QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]No they havent.caseypayne69
I believe PS3 E's are outperforming 360 games. Yea, Gears 2 is out and lookin the best but come feb Killzone 2. And Mag with 256 online in a room pretty much shows these guys are pushing this system further. Resistance 2 with 60 online is a blast and with ZERO lag. Thats what I call outperforming.
I dont want anyone to belive my word Im just voicing my opinion :? So how am I in denial for voicing my opinion :roll:[QUOTE="WAIW"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"] My opinion of a game is trolling now :?Gh0st_Of_0nyx
When you say MGS4's grapics are subpar, you lose pretty much all credibility. Graphics isn't even an opinion; some games are just undeniably impressive.
Umm no there not MGS4's graphics were on par with COD4's graphics IMO and that was a 07 game.Not only does MGS4 look better than COD4... A lot of amazing looking games are from pre-08 (Uncharted, Gears 1, Heavenly Sword, etc.). I really hope you are trolling :|
[QUOTE="caseypayne69"]You have a wii avatar and 360 sig. WHO IS going to believe your word? DENIAL!!![QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]No they havent.Gh0st_Of_0nyx
I believe PS3 E's are outperforming 360 games. Yea, Gears 2 is out and lookin the best but come feb Killzone 2. And Mag with 256 online in a room pretty much shows these guys are pushing this system further. Resistance 2 with 60 online is a blast and with ZERO lag. Thats what I call outperforming.
I dont want anyone to belive my word Im just voicing my opinion :? So how am I in denial for voicing my opinion :roll: Since you dont own ( and probably never used ) a ps3 how can you voice a valid opinion about something you never used?Umm no there not MGS4's graphics were on par with COD4's graphics IMO and that was a 07 game.Gh0st_Of_0nyxIt was a fantastic looking 07 game. But MGS has better graphics. The little details in the environments are mindblowing if you're unable to offer any sensible or relevant discussion then there is no point of you coming into this thread and crapping it up
[QUOTE="Dreamable"]PS3 exclusives have been outperforming 360 exclusives since 2007 when Uncharted: Drake's Fortune came out ;)Nedemis:lol: no....:| agree. I hate that fricking game
Its games and hardware are selling better then ever before, its exclusives have been meet with critical acclaim, it has gained 2 of the PS3s major franchises in the space of a few months...I could go on.
Point is the Xbox isnt losing anything, the PS3 is simply becoming a more effective competitor. :)
ImOldGreg
I'm not really talking about exclusives i's losing, we both know that's happened a lot and it is completely understandable. I'm talking about exclusives period.
The PS3 is doing more than becoming an effective competitor, it is coming out with exclusives that deliver on the promise of this gen and push the boundries of what is possible with current gen consoles.
That doesn't necessarily mean the games will be good (see killzone) and it doesn't necesarily mean it's a smart financial move (see killzone) but it is resulting in higher rated exclusives than the 360 is getting and fantastic games all round
[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="Nedemis"]where as the PS3 had two months which included ONLY 3 games even worth while.NedemisOkay then. Going by that logic, that means the 360 only had ONE game even worth while. yet again you dodge a question that everyone knows you can't even give an answer to simply because you're blind devotion to one company prevents you from knowing the facts. Yet again, you take out one snipit of my post and answer solely on a part of a sentence therefore giving yourself the assurance that you've responded in a intellectual manner when all you've really done is proven just how idiotic your thoughts truly are. Just once, keep my post intact and do your best to give a well thought out, non fanboyish response. My money would be that you can't even do that once.Well, since a Sony fanboy is, in your definition, anyone who disagrees with you, I guess there's no way around it then. So accuse me of fanboyism all you want.
[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="nervmeister"]Okay then. Going by that logic, that means the 360 only had ONE game even worth while.nervmeisteryet again you dodge a question that everyone knows you can't even give an answer to simply because you're blind devotion to one company prevents you from knowing the facts. Yet again, you take out one snipit of my post and answer solely on a part of a sentence therefore giving yourself the assurance that you've responded in a intellectual manner when all you've really done is proven just how idiotic your thoughts truly are. Just once, keep my post intact and do your best to give a well thought out, non fanboyish response. My money would be that you can't even do that once.Well, since a Sony fanboy is, in your definition, anyone who disagrees with you, I guess there's no way around it then. So accuse me of fanboyism all you want. so yet once again you simply refuse to give a legitimate answer to a simple set of questions? You seriously have NO IDEA what it is you try to talk about, do you?
[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="Nedemis"] yet again you dodge a question that everyone knows you can't even give an answer to simply because you're blind devotion to one company prevents you from knowing the facts. Yet again, you take out one snipit of my post and answer solely on a part of a sentence therefore giving yourself the assurance that you've responded in a intellectual manner when all you've really done is proven just how idiotic your thoughts truly are. Just once, keep my post intact and do your best to give a well thought out, non fanboyish response. My money would be that you can't even do that once.NedemisWell, since a Sony fanboy is, in your definition, anyone who disagrees with you, I guess there's no way around it then. So accuse me of fanboyism all you want. so yet once again you simply refuse to give a legitimate answer to a simple set of questions? You seriously have NO IDEA what it is you try to talk about, do you?I know what I'm talking about just fine, especially since I don't need to throw childish insults at whom I'm responding to.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment