Homefront 7.0 at IGN

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"]The story of this game really interests me but the gameplay looks awful. It's like they've recreated COD on a new engine. I hated Dante's Inferno for doing it to GOW.BodyElite

Yea that's what I meant:D

Im just going to rent this

This game had the potential for a Half-Life 2 type campaign but the campaign is only 4-5 hours long. And it doesn't sound like the MP is unique enough to justify purchasing just for it. I was really hoping this game would be great. KC_Hokie

I'm getting this on OnLive, since it's a timed exclusive.

So like a 6.0 here confirmed. Called it.

[QUOTE="godsendBLISS"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

Then why gamedevelopers rip them to death? They seem to think that cod is the pinacle of shooters since they make their games more and more like them.

dakan45

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

COD s**** all over this game.

Lto_thaG

Boy oh boy. You think Call of Duty scores high because of the innovative features? You think it sells well because of how good each game actually is? Each game is the same thing. You are part of the problem, congratulations.

I'm getting this on OnLive, since it's a timed exclusive.

Ross_the_Boss6

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] And that's bad. You know your FPS is bad when CoD is better.CMPunk13

Boy oh boy. You think Call of Duty scores high because of the innovative features? You think it sells well because of how good each game actually is? Each game is the same thing. You are part of the problem, congratulations.

who would pay $60 (plus tax) for a game that has a 5 hour campaign ?

who would pay $60 (plus tax) for a game that has a 5 hour campaign ?

Zensword

Every shooter these days has a 5 hour campaign or less.

[QUOTE="Ross_the_Boss6"]

I'm getting this on OnLive, since it's a timed exclusive.

BodyElite

It was a joke anyways. I never planned on getting this.

[QUOTE="Zensword"]

who would pay $60 (plus tax) for a game that has a 5 hour campaign ?

rzepak

Every shooter these days has a 5 hour campaign or less.

medal of honor was NOT a cod rip off. the game didn't play like cod. just because they share similarities, such as they're both fps with a military theme, doesn't mean it ripped it off. this is so ridiculous. let's all pay homage to the great almighty cod, the greatest military shooter ever. whatever, give me a break. yes, moh needed work, but it was quite a refreshing experience compared to the same ol cod. cod is fun, i'll give u that, but when did all games become judged by it? the older cods had more soul, the new ones are created to appeal to the mass population. we know what happen when media is designed to to this. just look at music, movies, etc. anyway whatever, i'll buy homefront when it lowers in price, just as i bought cod, bad company, and moh. i'm just a lil' tired of the cod fanboys. but it's cool. enjoy.;)godsendBLISS

Are you kidding? :shock: OFCOURSE it was cod ripoff, ofcourse it played like cod. It was linear and super scripted just like cod and the multiplayer was more like cod than bc2. "share similarities" Are you serious? :lol: Its a carbon copy of cod.

"it was quite a refreshing experience compared to the same ol cod."

:shock: WHAAAAAAT? It was an even more linear and more scripted cod with crappy non existant story and even shorter with an ancient super generic mp and hit detection issues. Sorry to break it to you, but both moh and homefront copy moh. While both devs have made diffirent games in the past such as moh airborne and frontlines, they decided to change everything and do it the same way cod does. They are CLEARLY changing it because they want it to be more like cod so they get more sales.

"the older cods had more soul, the new ones " NO, just NO. The old cods did not even have a good campaign, look at cod2, no story, no memorable scenes, you just run around and shoot the same nazis again and again and again....and dont even get me started in the deathborring super generic mp that only get a gun and shoot each other and people sit at the spawn positions and frag you.

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

[QUOTE="Zensword"]

who would pay $60 (plus tax) for a game that has a 5 hour campaign ?

godsendBLISS

Every shooter these days has a 5 hour campaign or less.

I buy on PC so I never pay 60 dollars=) Edit: I also live in Poland where PC games are pretty cheap=p

who would pay $60 (plus tax) for a game that has a 5 hour campaign ?

Zensword

good score, i will rent it, blow through the campaign, send it back and goback to playing battlefield 43 the same as i have done with every other fps for the last 2 years.

[QUOTE="Zensword"]

who would pay $60 (plus tax) for a game that has a 5 hour campaign ?

Animal-Mother

[QUOTE="donalbane"]Remember the "Homefront will outsell Crysis 2!" thread? Yeah... not bloody likely.GeneralShowzer

wait what?

[QUOTE="godsendBLISS"]medal of honor was NOT a cod rip off. the game didn't play like cod. just because they share similarities, such as they're both fps with a military theme, doesn't mean it ripped it off. this is so ridiculous. let's all pay homage to the great almighty cod, the greatest military shooter ever. whatever, give me a break. yes, moh needed work, but it was quite a refreshing experience compared to the same ol cod. cod is fun, i'll give u that, but when did all games become judged by it? the older cods had more soul, the new ones are created to appeal to the mass population. we know what happen when media is designed to to this. just look at music, movies, etc. anyway whatever, i'll buy homefront when it lowers in price, just as i bought cod, bad company, and moh. i'm just a lil' tired of the cod fanboys. but it's cool. enjoy.;)dakan45

Are you kidding? :shock: OFCOURSE it was cod ripoff, ofcourse it played like cod. It was linear and super scripted just like cod and the multiplayer was more like cod than bc2. "share similarities" Are you serious? :lol: Its a carbon copy of cod.

"it was quite a refreshing experience compared to the same ol cod."

:shock: WHAAAAAAT? It was an even more linear and more scripted cod with crappy non existant story and even shorter with an ancient super generic mp and hit detection issues. Sorry to break it to you, but both moh and homefront copy moh. While both devs have made diffirent games in the past such as moh airborne and frontlines, they decided to change everything and do it the same way cod does. They are CLEARLY changing it because they want it to be more like cod so they get more sales.

"the older cods had more soul, the new ones " NO, just NO. The old cods did not even have a good campaign, look at cod2, no story, no memorable scenes, you just run around and shoot the same nazis again and again and again....and dont even get me started in the deathborring super generic mp that only get a gun and shoot each other and people sit at the spawn positions and frag you.

il get it when its in the bargain bin. no need to spend full price on a mediocre game when so many great games are coming out this year